Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Donald trumps authoritarian leadership style
Challenges Of Authoritarian Leadership Style
Autocratic leadership pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Donald trumps authoritarian leadership style
When you think of authoritarian leadership you generally think of corrupt militant leaders. However, there is more to this leadership style than meets the eye. While most of today’s successful authoritarian leaders aren’t purely authoritarian, they have many similar qualities. Some of the qualities are attractive, while others are very unappealing. In pure authoritarian leadership, one person makes all of the decisions. Everything that goes through the organization goes through the person at the top of the chain. This can be beneficial because there is a definite chain of command and each member knows directly who to report to. The leader is then able to make sure that the organization is consistently producing the desired outcomes. Also, …show more content…
For instance, replacing a leader in an autocratic environment can be quite difficult. After an authoritarian leader dies, is removed, or steps down, people can become confused due to a lack of direction. This lack of direction can drastically, and negatively, affect productivity until a new leader is found. Additionally, this leadership style can be ineffective because one person can become overwhelmed when they have to make each and every decision. They must take the time to gather information on their own and must try to brainstorm creative solutions to make sure that they are making the correct decision. This is especially difficult because In many cases it is beneficial to share the decision-making process with different people who offer diverse opinions and solutions to ensure that the best decision is …show more content…
Group projects are much more enjoyable when tasks are evenly distributed to each group member. I have learned that if you are willing to let go of some of the control, group members are typically very willing to make a positive contribution to the project. This is especially true when you are allowed to pick the members of the group. As long as everyone is striving to do their best, there is almost always a positive outcome. Nevertheless, these groups generally still have one or two people who always step up to take charge and make sure that everyone is on the same page. I am generally one of these people and so I suppose in some regards I will always be a little bit
Normally in a group, the work will be divided into the number of members in the group and may be arranged to each of the members to receive the part where they are more confident and have more knowledge of it. In addition, if a member is confused with their work, he can receive assistance from his teammates rather than just being alone and figure it himself independently. However, I believe sometimes been in a group can have its cons. A common pitfall associated with working as a group is disagreement about the way something is being done, a particular issue, or an opinion. Sometimes one member might have his own beliefs and want to perform a task in their way and conflict can arise from this. Once conflict arises, the members can discuss their own opinions and might arrive to a solution, but this can cause a member to not show their full potential because something was not done the way they wanted. I believe this is very common but if you are open minded, it can be overcome for the sake of the team to be
An authoritarian society is one in which those with power “ [favor and enforce] strict obedience to authority…at the expense of personal freedom” (Abate). Authoritarian societies have strict rules and severe consequences if those rules are broken. However, unlike an authoritative society, an authoritarian society imposes rules without rationale or providing reasons for why these rules are being implemented, “‘we have rules in this house. Your father will not be disobeyed’” (Sater 43). [I’m going to try to find more information on this.]
The extreme leadership style of the Authoritarian can have a negative effect on team members. A characteristic of this leader is one who makes all the decisions and passes the directives to subordinates who are expected to carry these out under very close supervision. Because open communication is vital to any project, these perceptions can hurt team performance.
For example, authoritarian leadership style is very successful in emergency situations where there isn’t any time for suggestions from other staff members. Based on my observation at South Beach Psychiatric Center, the nurse leader displayed characteristics of an authoritarian leader. The nurse leader mentioned the disorganization in the department prior to her arrival and since her arrival there has been progress and productivity. Productivity is usually high during authoritarian leadership and staff members are usually motivated by coercion (Marquis & Huston, 2015, p.40). This is seen with the sick leave mentioned earlier because nurses are now aware that they are not able to just call out for no apparent reason and if they do it on a constant basis, then there will be repercussions.
The leaders take full authority and assume full responsibility. Autocratic leadership typically is negative, based on threats and punishment, but it can appear to be positive, as demonstrated by the benevolent autocrat who chooses to give some rewards to employees. Consultative leaders approach one or more employees and ask them for inputs prior to making a decision. These leaders may then choose to use or ignore the information and advice received, however.
In autocratic leadership style, the leaders take direction ship and make decision in own. They do not transfer any domination to the others.
Authoritarian power is when someone expects people to follow the rules with no questions asked. The people under that authority aren’t given a choice to vote, or add in their opinion. They are just expected to go along with all of the set laws. This power is evident all throughout Lord of the Flies.
The Authoritarian Spector is a compelling book by the social psychologist Bob Altemeyer, that discusses the different aspects of the authoritarian personality, all based on both his research and the research of others. Altemeyer makes the claim that different behaviors, “trusting Nixon during Watergate, hating homosexuals, opposing abortion” (Altemeyer 45) are all linked through authoritarianism, all the while reminding the reader that there are exceptions to these behaviors. The authoritarian personality falls along a spectrum rather than a cut and paste personality. The author of this book does not delve deeply into why these behaviors are linked to the authoritarianism, unless the reason is itself because they are authoritarian. He does; however, provide an extensive number of personality traits that one can identify, and possess a correlation, strong or otherwise, with the authoritarian personality.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
Within the paper, both authors discuss how a leader or team can balance the need for open discussion early in the decision-making process with the need for unity at the end. By using an Inquiry style decision-making process, teams can openly express their own interest and ideas. The teams stay away from trying to persuade others to take any one individuals point of view, but to decide on what is the overall best course of action. This process allows the team to express their ideas without the bickering and fighting that comes with an Advocacy style process. The team stays unified and satisfied that their opinions were heard and put into consideration.
Perhaps he has something extra that has propelled him above everybody else. Everything that he touches seems to turn to gold. Donald Trump’s leadership style has made him rich, powerful, famous and known throughout the world. This paper will examine some of these leadership styles. Leadership traits “Leadership research has not revealed a single trait that is possessed by all successful leaders, but a number of characteristics have been identified that are common to many of them”(Timpe, p.30, 1987).
Autocratic leaders have been described as controlling, power-orientated and closed-minded (Bass 2008). They stress obedience, loyalty and strict adherence to the rules (Bass 2008). Autocratic leaders may be disliked by their team, but this may evolve into appreciation and fondness once the positive results of their leadership become evident (Bass 2008). Although staffmay dislike autocratic leaders, they often work well under them (Bass 2008). Schoel et al (2011) found that well-liked leaders might be perceived as ineffective while disliked leaders might be perceived as
As John Maner stated, “Neither strategy is necessarily better than the other.” Through experience, I have confirmed this claim when referring to dealing with children as a counselor. Authoritarian style leadership is good when trying to get campers to listen and behave. Though, too much of the authoritarian style, and the children resent you. If campers were to resent me, I would not be able to effectively do my job: make the week as fun as possible for the kids.
An autocratic style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian leadership style of managing. Autocratic leaders are those who believe in individual control over all and every decision. Autocratic leaders also do not believe in any inputs from group members. Leaders that practice autocratic style of leadership normally make business choices based on their own agendas and judgments and never accept recommendations from their subordinates.
In a sense the authoritarian state is, it could go into either of directions. They do not necessarily always stay authoritarian as they control the economies and as the economies grow more and more they could lean towards more democratic idea, because when people are getting more educated and work harder and get more economic means, they are going to demand more of a government. By the same idea, they could go to the other direction and become more totalitarian. Because as a authoritarians get more in charge and as they do more thing, it is very realistic that they are going to want to control some more of the decisions beyond the economic ones. “I will take of politics, you just work for the various businesses”, so when you thi9nk about totalitarian state, they want control – “You either with them, or against them”.