Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The theory guiding laissez faire leadership
Comparison between leadership theories
Comparison between leadership theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The theory guiding laissez faire leadership
What Authoritarian Leadership Is
This is a traditional leadership, firm and very strict. These kind of
leaders expect to be listened to, obeyed quickly and exactly. They
will not put up with argument or questions asked. They are believers
in force, and they asked to be treated with a lot of respect.
Laissez-faire Leadership
This is the complete opposite to Authoritarian Leadership. Laissez-
faire is French for ' let them do what they want'. It cant be a
leadership if you have no control over anybody, but very occasionally
they put their foot down.
Democratic Leadership
=====================
Democratic Leadership is the third kind or style of leadership. This
is seen as a moderate type of leadership, between two extremes. This
is said to have the best of both worlds. To round it off, it means
that everyone has a part to play in the decision making-process.
Army- Authoritarian Leadership is displayed here. The Drill sergeant
would shout at the soldiers who wouldn't be marching correctly. He
does this to give them discipline, and make them understand that they
don't expect anything less than they want. So the next time they do
it, they will get it right.
Police- Democratic Leadership is displayed here. If one of the lower
officers couldn't get enough evidence to convict a suspect, then the
higher rank officer maybe unhappy but will not discipline the officer
for his actions. He will explain to him what he could do, and so he
can go out and get it right.
NOT MEETING TARGETS
This could be related to all Public Services.
For Example the fire service: they aren't responding to 999 calls fast
enough…the reason for this is that there is poor motivation in the
ranks.
Douglas McGregor's theory of motivation includes, Theory X and Y. The
first of these management styles is assumption of the mediocrity of
the masses.
THEORY X
1. Workers must be supervised, or quality and quantity of output
some thing wrong he will be punished and for a good deed there is a
will recover his bond with God. He will grieve. He will repent. He will walk away a
when he knows that what he has done is wrong, he continues to do it
Loweistein, K. (1953). The Role Of Ideologies in Political Change. New York: International Social Science Bulletin.
will be difficult to act innocent and to deal with his guilt. When he later
In a seminal work, Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, and Sanford (1950) coined the term authoritarian personality and stated that it was characterised by strong adherence to externally imposed conventional norms, as well as submission or obedience to the authorities that promote those norms. According to Adorno and colleagues, these behaviours are attempts to deal with various personal insecurities. Specifically, authoritar- ian individuals displace their own anxieties onto weak minority groups in their culture (e.g., ethnic and/or religious minorities) or onto people who deviate from social norms (e.g., homosexuals). Displacement is often accompanied by associated beliefs that are highly evaluative and rigid. Other characteristics of the authoritarian personality include a cynical view of mankind, cognitive and emotional inflexibility. A belief in the need for power and toughness, the tendency to act harshly towards nonconformists, opposition to subjective or imaginative tendencies, and an exaggerated concern with promiscuity. Adler (1965) re-examined the personality char- acteristics described by Adorno and colleagues and noted that the central trait of the authoritarian personality is the ‘‘will to power over others’’, which results in aggressive overcompensation for feelings of inferiority and insignificance. Contemporary research continues to rely on many of the conceptualisations and measures originated by Adorno and colleagues (Martin, 2001; Stone, Lederer, & Christie, 1993).
of choices in the story. He has all consequences to all the choices made in the story.
to him. At the same time, he must figure out who is more at fault, his mother or
he thinks is right. He does not fear his actions nor does he regret them.
Many leadership researchers and scholars have stated that leaders do not exist without followers. Leadership has been described as the process of influencing, in which a person can enlist the support of others to accomplish a task or goal (Nye, 2010 and Oc & Bashshur, 2013). A leader is one whom others agree to follow, but a follower must be willing to be led. In developing leaderships styles and theories, the traits and behavior of the leaders were considered by Bass (2008). Bass described these styles as transactional and transformational leadership (2008). For the purposes of this short essay, I will discuss two leadership styles, the types of followers, and the autocratic style being used by this organization’s new VP.
According to Manion (2014), a leader is a person who is able to positively influence a group of people and develop their ability to accomplish a goal (Manion, 2014). According to this definition of leadership, it suggests that every individual has a likely chance to become a leader. Every time one voices an opinion or an idea, they influence others in some form of way, therefore, they function as a role of a leader. Lewin, Lippitt and White (1939) suggest that there are three types of leaders: authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire (Lewin, Lippitt, & White, 1939). Authoritarian, or autocratic leadership, is a leader that dictates all the decisions within a group of individuals (Lewin et al., 1939). On the other hand, the Laissez-faire leader allows the group members complete freedom without the leader’s participation in any of the decisions (Lewin et al., 1939). The type of leader I aspire to be is the
Reyes, Antonio Jose T. A53 11538406 Sir. Anthony Borja AUTHORITARIAN AND DEMOCRACY How does one rule a country? Politics has been the basis of power for more than a thousand years now. Traces of political movements have been discovered in different parts of the world; from the birth place of civilization found in the Middle East; the Mesopotamian, from the Western region of the world; England and even South America, and from the Dynasties of China and lands of Japan, politics was already in play during these times.