Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of leadership
Importance of leadership in the society
Leadership and team effectiveness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of leadership
According to Manion (2014), a leader is a person who is able to positively influence a group of people and develop their ability to accomplish a goal (Manion, 2014). According to this definition of leadership, it suggests that every individual has a likely chance to become a leader. Every time one voices an opinion or an idea, they influence others in some form of way, therefore, they function as a role of a leader. Lewin, Lippitt and White (1939) suggest that there are three types of leaders: authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire (Lewin, Lippitt, & White, 1939). Authoritarian, or autocratic leadership, is a leader that dictates all the decisions within a group of individuals (Lewin et al., 1939). On the other hand, the Laissez-faire leader allows the group members complete freedom without the leader’s participation in any of the decisions (Lewin et al., 1939). The type of leader I aspire to be is the …show more content…
I gave encouraging comments to my colleague by saying “you are very organized when we do projects together. It keeps us on track.” I would try to appreciate the contributions that others have done and gave positive feedback. In my next year, I will continue to improve aspects in encouraging the heart. According to Kouzes and Posner (1996), the heart of leadership is caring, and it is important to build relationships with those I work with (Posner & Kouzes, 1996). When we recognize and recognize others for their contribution, it imparts with them a sense of courage, inspiration and also brings to their awareness of value within the organization (Posner & Kouzes, 1996). I personally agree with this perspective of leadership, and I will continue to strive to encourage those around me as this plays a big role in capacity building. An important part of leadership is to be able to inspire and empower others to be the best version of their own
Introduction According to the Oxford Dictionary, a leader is defined as “the person who leads or commands a group, organization, or country” (Oxford Dictionaries, 2013). Though there is a definition for what a leader is, people still have different ideas about what a leader should be and how he or she should act. There has never been a concrete idea of what a leader is; the only thing we know is that this person is the one in charge of the unit. We look at characteristics of those people we see as leaders and use those attributes to compare other people to see if they are able to be as good as, or even better than, those aforementioned leaders. We have to keep in mind that in different situations, leaders must do different tasks which indicates the need for different qualities.
) Conflict is an opposite action toward a different idea, perception, or feeling of people or groups. (b)Transactional analysis has three ego states which are parent, child, adult that affect our behavior or the way we transact through communication. Critical parent is controlled by the conversation using advising responses that are judgmental, opinionated, demanding disapproving, or disciplining telling others what to do, and sympathetic parent is protecting, permitting, consoling, and caring to be supportive. The natural child response that shows
Leadership is an important element in the functioning of group interactions toward an organized goal. Leadership has been defined in many different ways by sociologists and social psychologists alike, numbering too many to discuss here. The most common element found in these definitions is "that leadership involves a process of influence between a leader and followers to attain group, organizational, or societal goals" (Hollander, 1985). In small group interactions, leadership is usually an assigned status, with the "followers" designating, both consciously and subconsciously, someone as a leader. This is a person who, according to the group members, is believed to have those characteristics which are most suited to accomplish the task and objectives of the group (Bales and Slater, 1955). Much of the available early research that I was able to attain focused on leadership and the concept of leadership in terms of political situations. When viewed from a political standpoint, the study of leadership pertains to the analysis of relationships between those who possess power and those who don't possess power (power will be discussed in det...
A characteristic of a person who tends to help facilitate people to achieve a certain task describes leadership. By motivating and directing individuals, a leader tends to have a major effect on a group of individuals. Leaders can be harsh and commanding, but they can also be accepting and encouraging. However, both styles of leadership have a major affect on the group of individuals and the nations they rule, either positive or negative. For instance, an authoritarian leadership style is when one person rules an entire nation alone and decides what is good or bad for the country without any input from other executives.
Encourage the Heart – leaders appreciate the contributions that individuals make and allow them to participate in the rewards of their efforts, therefore, leaders celebrate achievements.
In the past people believed that leaders are born not made. Now the definition of leadership has been changed because now we believe that leaders can be made through education. Leadership plays important part in every field and organization to achieve higher goal. According to Kelly, “leadership is a process of influence in which the leader influences others toward goal achievement” (Kelly & Crawford, 2013, p. 168). Nowadays there are many leadership theories and have different perspective and suggestion. I have chosen two theories to discuss in this paper that is Autocratic leadership theory the Transformational leadership theory. Both theories are total contradictory with each other because both have a different perspective.
Autocratic leaders uses an authoritarian manner and dictates what is going on without consulting athletes. It is characterised by absolute individual control over group members and very little input from them in the decision making process. If the autocratic leader is the most knowledgeable person in the group it usually leads to fast, effective decisions being made. This type of leadership best suits athletes who are in need of support and answers. This is because this leadership style prevents a person from doing their own thing and they are solely guided by what the leader does. It best suits those who highly value extrinsic motivation because with the leader having all decision making power the athlete is motivated not by themselves but
Particularly, two members within my group began to emerge as leaders due to their knowledge, skills, as well as experience working with our chosen population. Although I always view them as ‘experts’ in this topic, our group became less focused on our goals and more concerned about the ‘power struggle’ between our two leaders, before we could reach any consensus. Essentially, our group had two authoritarians butting heads and trying to take lead throughout the beginning of the group process. Thus, the other members or ‘followers’ contribution, like mine, seem to not matter unless they adhered to either leaders’ opinions without question. According to Stringer (2014), “Leadership… Is defined according to its function of facilitating organizational and operational processes, rather than defining and controlling them” (p. 31). The researcher further states that active participation is the key to encourage and motivate group members to invest their time and energy to shape the quality of the group's production. Therefore, our group needed to find ways for all members to have a chance to participate fully and apply their individual strengths, in order to enhance our group’s
A leader is described as a person who guides others and has authority and influence over others. They work to influence others into meeting certain goals. There is no right or wrong definition of a leader and there is no recipe that ensures effective leadership. Successful leaders have a good balance of vision, influence, and power. Leaders gain their authority from their ability to influence others to get the work done; because of this, anyone has the potential to be a leader. (Finkelman. 2012, p15)
I was involved in a situation where leadership was ineffective by my director of obstetrics. The topic involved our hiring policy. We had multiple candidates for a nursing position. Due to staffing shortages, this position need filled as soon as possible. My role was assistant nurse manager on night shift. It was myself, the other night shift assistant manager, and our director present for the interview. We had a candidate apply that had a few years of post partum experience, and I worked with her in the past at another facility, though did not recommend her. I kept my opinion quiet, because I always want to be fair. The interview started and was not going well. The candidate did not answer questions well, nor did she look at us in the eyes. She was dressed sloppy and did not possess any professionalism. Towards the end of the interview, the director started to ask when she could start, the compensation, and continued to give her a tour of the unit. The other assistant manager and I could not believe what we were seeing. The director hired her on the spot. This leadership was ineffective in a variety of different ways.
I did my job well and received good appreciations from many company officials for my work. Even though I acted as a good coordinator, I felt there was something missing with my style of leading and found it to be motivation. I believe that when we focus solely on one-on-one relationships, we neglect a fundamental aspect of effective leadership: harnessing the collective power of the team to improve the individual performance.1 As a part of my Personal Leadership Development Plan(PLDP) writings, I would like to mention my favorite quotes about importance of
I like the fact that the teacher pointed out that leadership can be found everywhere. Leaders don't necessarily exist only in a company where there are a lot of people following you. “Everyone has the potential and possibility to be a leader”. They could be the best at inspiring others, or best at solving problems or dealing with criticism. By and large we all have the necessities to lead and I find, during the group discussions, that the difference and uniqueness of us that give us our own perspective to view and do things. Leadership is also about understanding and combining many different talents and to make them work together to create the best result. There are many kinds of leaders out there, and so many leadership styles. Yet I think we shouldn’t categorised ourselves into one or identify our superiors into one. Why? Because I think it is crucial to be flexible and adapt to which way to lead according to the situations For example, the Democratic style maybe the most popular and most effective, yet it is proved to be counter-productive in urgent occasions requiring instant and firm decisions from one person only, and that is the
). Burke et al (2006) suggested that transactional leadership, based on contingent rewards, can have a positive effect on followers' satisfaction and performance. However, a transactional leader focuses on management tasks, and will not identify shared values of a team. By contrast, transformational leaders inspire others with their vision and work together with their team to identify common values (Marquis and Huston 2009). The transactional approach is task-orientated and can be effective when meeting deadlines, or in emergencies such as when dealing with a cardiac arrest. This approach can lead to non-holistic patient care, because nurses focus on the task they need to complete, rather than the patient as a whole (Bach and Ellis 2011).
Manning and Curtis (2015) simply describe leadership as “social influence” (p. 2). Leadership is not tied to a specific position description or title, but closely connected to the influence an individual has on an organization, movement, or initiative. All leaders require followers. If there are no followers, there are no leaders (Manning and Curtis, 2015). “The effective leader today must be a director and motivator, implementer and innovator, mentor and team builder, expert and moral force, organizer and developer of people” (Manning and Curtis, 2015, p. 61). There are many different styles of leadership, including servant, participative, transformational, and directive to name just a few (Manning and Curtis, 2015). Many leaders employ the tactics of coaching, mentoring, managing, and supervising in their various roles.
Autocratic leaders also known as authoritarian leaders are leaders that have absolute authority over subordinates, are in control of the situation they are in, dictate and enforce orders, rarely consult with or ask opinions of others, are highly task driven, and the emotional needs of people are a low priority. The advantage of an Autocratic leader is they typically achieve results quickly; they would make a great leader during the time of crisis or when a project