Online resources have become extremely remarkable for college students because they can easily have access to these sources without difficulty. However, some of these websites and resources can be inappropriate, for academic studies require reliable resources in order to get reasonable and accurate data. One of these inappropriate websites is Wikipedia because people cannot trust information, essays, and articles that were written by unknown authors. For academic writing, students must have accurate information about authors and their studies in order to use those articles. They cannot provide an acceptable academic paper if they use non-academic recourses such as Wikipedia and other blogs on the Internet. Even though some think that college students can use Wikipedia as an accurate resource, I believe that they should use other websites and resources that are more accurate and trustworthy than …show more content…
Wikipedia. One of the most important reasons why college students should not use Wikipedia in their academic writings is that Wikipedia lacks the creditable information about authors and editors. On this website, there is a considerable number of articles and essays that do not have authors’ information. Moreover, many editors can contribute to these articles and make changes in the original texts. According to Coomer, “… articles can be written by anyone, not necessarily a world expert.” Coomer assumes that Wikipedia editors have the authority to rearrange articles and texts based on their perspectives and knowledge. Under these circumstances, college students can observe that there is a lack of accuracy in these articles that written by unknown authors or unreliable editors. However, students can use other peer reviewed articles that have credible sources from other websites such as Google Scholar, which can be more dependable than Wikipedia. These examples show that students should avoid using Wikipedia in their academic scopes. Another primary reason why students should avoid Wikipedia is that the information in this website is not trustworthy and accurate.
Even though some information from Wikipedia looks reasonable and accurate at the first glance, most of these details are not creditable and lack proofs and citations, too. Students must be careful about what they read in these articles because they may have wrong ideas due to an absence of credibility. According to “Wikipedia: Not a Credible Source, but a Jumping Off Point for Research,” information that is available on Wikipedia is not a creditable source. This has explained whether people can use Wikipedia for creditable information or not, and it deduced that it is difficult to cite from this website due to several reasons that make the information questionable. Although writers may have knowledge about what they write about these topics, there is a risk of unclear explanations of data and the use of their own perspectives as non-scientific proofs. Overall, students cannot guarantee the creditability of the information in this
website. Additionally, Wikipedia’s articles are written in various languages, but these articles may contain mistakes due to errors in translations. For example, in some languages there are various words that have different meanings, so Wikipedia translation can be misleading if it gives wrong synonyms. Moreover, people who know more than one language have found a considerable number of mistakes in Wikipedia articles’ that were translated to different languages. Gaillard, Boualem, and Collin conducted a research regarding query translation using Wikipedia, and they stated that translation can be a challenging task when they want to choose the most accurate translation for substitute texts due to a lack of information. Obviously, if scientific texts have a few mistakes in words or concepts, their entire meanings will change, and this issue can impose misleading beliefs upon an idea or research that is found on Wikipedia. College students must be precise when they read translated texts from Wikipedia because it can influence their knowledge and affect their studying as well. Even though Wikipedia has a considerable number of disadvantages, some believe that students can use resources on Wikipedia that available at the reference page, and this sources can be accurate information to start a new article. Yes, it is true that college students and other people can easily have access to other resources and peer reviewed articles via Wikipedia resources, which can be easy. However, this is not an effective way of learning and finding reliable resources; it also could be misleading and lead to other conflicts between the creditable and unreliable sources. Garrison states that, “Students were negatively influenced overall about the use of Wikipedia for assignments, but significant differences were found in the influencers and types of students.” A significant number of college students avoid using Wikipedia for their assignments because it can be vague and confusing simultaneously. On the other hand, those students can only use Wikipedia for having general and background information about the topics that they are looking for. These arguments show that Wikipedia is not an appropriate choice for college students, for students must find accurate information from creditable resources. In conclusion, a considerable number of people think that Wikipedia is not an appropriate resource for academic writing. There are several reasons make this website non creditable including wrong information, lack of authors’ information, editors can have access to contribute to articles, and error in translation. College students should avoid using these kinds of websites, for it can affect their studying. There are various websites that can be used as creditable resources instead of Wikipedia, which can be harmful.
Sean Kamperman the author of “The Wikipedia Game: Boring, Pointless, or Neither” believes that wikipedia can be helpful with educational learning purposes. Wikipedia is known for plagiarism and fake information. People make Wikipedia have a bad reputation in schools especially in english classes. Wikipedia can be a source of entertainment and self improvement for some people. Some people might just research stuff on Wikipedia to find interesting articles. In “Wikihunt” many Wikipedia users have “discovered” a game of their own, this involves creativity so it brings out the creative qualities of people. Wikipedia is a educational game and it's also free it's convenient for people. The game “Wikihunt” involves two people in separate computers
As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader-produced encyclopedia. While plenty of professors have complained about the lack of accuracy or completeness of entries, and some have discouraged or tried to bar students from using it.
...ie, 31 (1) 27-49.Fallis, D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662–1674. doi:10.1002/asi.20870
The purpose of the assignment is to compare and contrast the source of research material available to a learner. We were first assigned to find a source from the Internet, and the second assignment was to find another source from the periodicals in the USCA library. This comparison will help each individual to determine the type of reading that benefits him or her the most. From these two sources, I learned a great deal of information about the different influences and ways that people learn. I recognize and agree that people can learn in different ways. I believe that as a person growing up in a technologically advanced world, that the current generation is more comfortable using information available from the Internet.
Steven Pinker states that “search engines lower our intelligence, encouraging us to skim on the surface of knowledge …” (1). Many students are not reading their assigned books anymore. Sparknotes and other web sites such as Shmoop have provided students with resources which are not useful. Students’ skim through these sites to read books. Most of the websites gives students’ plot summaries which are from another person’s take on that book .This damages the student 's’ chances of actually reading and understanding a book and having their own opinion .The more we run to search engines for answers the less we shall learn . Technology has taken the place of many students’ brains which causes them to think they are dumb. This leads to the need of searching for answers online at all
Fact checking is an essential part of journalism. A fact checker authenticates information found in media reports and published materials. Specific skills are needed to become a fact checker such as research and analytic skills, attention to detail, and decent reading comprehension. Being accurate and meticulous is also critical for fact checking. Study.com notes that writing skills, communication skills, and interviewing skills are also imperative.
The reason why Wikipedia is so unreliable there are several dimensions of information quality: accuracy, completeness, currency, comprehensibility, and so on (cf. Fox, Levitin & Redman, 1994). The information suggested that the Wikipedia fails on several of these dimensions. However, people that acquire knowledge from Wikipedia are not as comprehensible and complete as we might expect an encyclopedia to be. There are three reasons to think that significant amount of information on Wikipedia might be inaccurate, first, anyone can contribute to Wikipedia, and many of these contributors will not have much expertise in what they write about.
Learning this made me realize how hard of workings people in this occupation are. From my works cited page, I learned that the websites most be italicized and to always add the dates. Finally, I learned that whenever someone is working on a paper, procrastination is never a good thing
Modern media is based on the idea of having information at ones fingertips. With advances in technology and the growth of the internet, people from all around the world can find information in an instant and use it in their day to day lives. With Facebook, twitter, Instagram connecting people all across the globe instantly, why shouldn’t Wikipedia which grants its user immediate information to be used as a source in academics? One reason why Wikipedia should be considered as a reliable reference is the amount of information available to its users and the variety of subjects covered. Another reason why Wikipedia can be used as a valid solid references from academic journals and educational websites, which can be used to help further study.
Everyone in modern society can search sources for anything at anytime and anywhere easily through internet or other channel. There are millions of sources on the internet and they are different from one to others, the problem is how to figure out which of them is credible, figure out which of them can be used as a reverence, we also need to know what kind of sources should be credible. How can we judge whether a source credible or not, there are some tips given below: 1. If the information can be edited by anyone at anytime, you should pay attention to its credibility, because it can be some mistakes or totally misleading. 2.
Now that we are living in an ever changing world, technology is viewed as the most resourceful tool in keeping up with the pace. Without the use of technology, communication would be limited to using mail for delivery and encyclopedias for research. Although technology has improved the way we communicate and find information for research, the information is not always valid. Unfortunately, for those of us who use the internet for shopping, research, or reading articles of personal interest the information is not treated the same as a your magazine or book. While such literature is reviewed by an editorial staff, internet literature or information can be published by anyone. In order to reap the full benefit of having the use of technology for any purpose, there are five basic criteria’s one must keep in mind as an evaluating tool for deciding whether or not the particular website is a reliable source for information.
As one of the first places people turn to for information, Wikipedia is lacking articles about topics ranging from indigenous peoples to black history. Volunteer editors, primarily males in high-income countries with access to high speed Internet connections, create pages about people and events that are familiar to them, leaving gaps in coverage. To fill in the gaps, the Wikipedia foundation sponsors edit-a-thons; this past October was the Indigenous Peoples' Day edit-a-thon. During the San Diego, California event, volunteers from the United States, Canada and Mexico created pages about notable Native Americans, tribes and Indigenous historical figures to expand Wikipedia's coverage of disenfranchised peoples.
As I read through the different web sites and links provided by my searches, I carefully analyzed each one. I compared my research to Rothenberg’s article. I disagree when he says that the Web is an easy way to write a paper, that information on the Internet is out of date, and that Web research leads to a student using less thought and logic. I have come to realize the wonderful contribution the web has made to students’ research papers.
According to Swain (20100, academic user community (students and academic staff) is encouraged 'to trust in electronic resources with a presumption that, the wealth of information available in electronic formats can utterly accomplish their scholarly needs as a better substitute to traditional print services. Moreover students can have direct access to electronic information with consistency and guaranty of equity access. Besides, students can get certain advantages in accessing electronic information like, quick browsing, compound access, retrieval speed, sharing, print and downloading, comprehensive information coverage, and more so"
Using technology within a curriculum, gives students, many choices that they need to decide on like how to generate, obtain, manipulate, and to also display information. Writing this research paper is an excellent example of how all these criteria are met. One must generate information from external sources, manipulate the data with multiple supporting examples, and put everything together into a well suited essay. Students learn a lot by processing the information independently with their own mindset creativity and thinking out of the box. As always, there are some students that decide to make the wrong choices that set the student off track. Many of these distractions come from various social media websites like Facebook, Twitter, and other