Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of media in today's society
Influence of media in today's society
The influences of media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influence of media in today's society
Modern media is based on the idea of having information at ones fingertips. With advances in technology and the growth of the internet, people from all around the world can find information in an instant and use it in their day to day lives. With Facebook, twitter, Instagram connecting people all across the globe instantly, why shouldn’t Wikipedia which grants its user immediate information to be used as a source in academics? One reason why Wikipedia should be considered as a reliable reference is the amount of information available to its users and the variety of subjects covered. Another reason why Wikipedia can be used as a valid solid references from academic journals and educational websites, which can be used to help further study. …show more content…
Wikipedia articles cover a huge amount of subjects, from cooking to the making of the Atomic Bomb Wikipedia probably has an article about it. Wikipedia has a grand total of 35,000,000 articles in hundreds of different languages (Polk, Johnston and Evers). As Technology advances so does the need to share information. “All kinds of social interaction which the internet would have been out of the question are now feasible, and today there are dozens of ways people can participate in reporting new, Questioning, Debating and creating cultural products” (Ayers, Matthews and Yates). As the age of information becomes more technically advanced, Wikipedia provides instant information its users, and thus connects them with the rest of the world. Many Wikipedia “doubters” believe that Wikipedia is very inaccurate and doesn’t provide reliable information, however a study in by Nature the international weakly journal of science in 2005 proved that Wikipedia was as accurate as The Encyclopedia Britannica (Sunburn). Clearly, with so much information available on one easy to access site Wikipedia should be as a reference for university
...second using the search engine, people lose their motivation to read and the attention to think about the answer. (Crovitz 353) In Plato’s Phaedrus, Greek philosopher Socrates claims that people who get information without proper instruction as ignorant since they only conceit of the answer instead of the wisdom to find out and understand the answer. (Carr 341) With such access to information, we do spread information and expand human knowledge in a rapid rate. However, we lose our creativity, intelligence and the spirit of inquiry.
Like Gladwell, Nicholas Carr believes the internet has negative effects. In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Carr attempts to show as the internet becomes our primary source of information, it diminishes the ability to read books and extensive research. Carr goes on to give a very well researched account of how text on the internet is designed make browsing fast and profitable. He describes how the design for skimming affects our thinking skills and attention spans. He wraps up his argument by describing what we are losing in the shift toward using the internet as our main information source. Carr suggests the learning process that occurs in extensive research and through reading is lost. While the learning process can be beneficial to scholars and intellectuals, not everyone has the capability to follow through with it. The internet offers an education that anyone can have access to and understand. Also if Carr believes the learning process is better, this option is always available for people who want to learn according to this scholarly principal. However, for the rest of the population the quick and easy access has allowed the average population to become more educated, and to expose themselves to aspects of academia that previously is reserved for
As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader-produced encyclopedia. While plenty of professors have complained about the lack of accuracy or completeness of entries, and some have discouraged or tried to bar students from using it.
...ie, 31 (1) 27-49.Fallis, D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662–1674. doi:10.1002/asi.20870
Steven Pinker states that “search engines lower our intelligence, encouraging us to skim on the surface of knowledge …” (1). Many students are not reading their assigned books anymore. Sparknotes and other web sites such as Shmoop have provided students with resources which are not useful. Students’ skim through these sites to read books. Most of the websites gives students’ plot summaries which are from another person’s take on that book .This damages the student 's’ chances of actually reading and understanding a book and having their own opinion .The
The reason why Wikipedia is so unreliable there are several dimensions of information quality: accuracy, completeness, currency, comprehensibility, and so on (cf. Fox, Levitin & Redman, 1994). The information suggested that the Wikipedia fails on several of these dimensions. However, people that acquire knowledge from Wikipedia are not as comprehensible and complete as we might expect an encyclopedia to be. There are three reasons to think that significant amount of information on Wikipedia might be inaccurate, first, anyone can contribute to Wikipedia, and many of these contributors will not have much expertise in what they write about.
Now that we are living in an ever changing world, technology is viewed as the most resourceful tool in keeping up with the pace. Without the use of technology, communication would be limited to using mail for delivery and encyclopedias for research. Although technology has improved the way we communicate and find information for research, the information is not always valid. Unfortunately, for those of us who use the internet for shopping, research, or reading articles of personal interest the information is not treated the same as a your magazine or book. While such literature is reviewed by an editorial staff, internet literature or information can be published by anyone. In order to reap the full benefit of having the use of technology for any purpose, there are five basic criteria’s one must keep in mind as an evaluating tool for deciding whether or not the particular website is a reliable source for information.
In the first paragraph, Jaron appeals to the pathos of the reader; he assumes that the reader is of the generation that has grown up in the digital age, thus they would agree that the most important aspect of the internet is the people who contribute to it. However, there is no reason to ever assume that. Some people may actually believe that user contribution detracts from what makes the internet a viable source of information. For example, if the internet were controlled by academia, it would most likely be a peer reviewed source of information. However, as it is, anyone can contribute information to the internet, which makes the internet not a reliable source for knowledge. We can see this in academia, which typically does not support the use of Wikipedia as an academic source, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that relies entirely on user contribution.
The objective of this essay is to compare Internet research with other sources of information which include books, word of mouth and primary research. This paper will also look at ways of ascertaining the validity of research information for academic work.
The Internet has created a generation of the most efficient multi-taskers ever born. Many people will have at least four tabs open as a time (Google, Facebook, Youtube, Pandora, Wikipedia, Gmail, etc.). People are constantly jumping from one web page to the next, clicking on links and opening new tabs and browsers. The method through which knowledge is gained has transitioned from deep reading to fast skimming. Every time a web page is opened the viewer is bombarded with information, almost every page has advertisements or links to additional information lining its sides. The Internet has made mountains of information available to almost anyone. It is fast and easy to find information and facts. Essentially the Internet has become the fast food of knowledge. It is convenient but it skips the element of effort.
One of the benefits of effortlessly obtaining information is the convenience and timeliness it takes to collect it through the various mass media channels. For the most part, advanced technology has caused information to be available instantaneously right at our fingertips by way of a tablet or smartphone regardless of where we are at the moment. Another advantage is that people can communicate, share, research, shop, and be entertained via the Internet providing easy access to information. The disadvantages to obtaining information with ease are that while searching for information on the Internet, it is a possibility that the site you select can put a virus on your device. And also, facing the fact that everyone nowadays can post information, it is possible that the effortlessly attained information found can be deceitful.
Wikipedia’s main goal is assisting individuals with a general perception of any topic. The majority of Wikipedia's critics cite sourcing as its number one problem. Wikipedia is a starting point, it was never intended to be an ending point. Wikipedia is great for getting a general understanding of a topic before diving into the research
With the advancement of technology and the exponential increase of Internet use, professionals-academic and business-are relying on electronic resources for information, research, and data. The Internet gives an individual access to a sea of information, data, and knowledge; plus, this vast amount of information is available in a matter of seconds, rather than hours or days. The ease of access, availability, up-to-the-second timeliness, and vastness of online resources is causing many professionals, however, to forgo the use of print sources. Online resources are useful to conduct scholarly research and 'may be convenient, but they have shortcomings that make print sources necessary for submitting high-quality assignments' (Dilevko & Gottieb, 2002, ¶ 1).
The volume of the information that you will find on the internet is outstanding. For every topic that pops in your mind, then you will sure be able to find it on the internet, because there is always someone that has written about it. The internet can offer you a series of different perspectives on a single topic. As a matter of fact, you can even connect to an online encyclopedia. A lot of them offer you a subscription service that helps you search through the full text of the encyclopedia.
First off, wikis could provide many uses for the educational environment. Not only is it easy to access and doesn't require fancy hardware or programs, it also encourages participation to take place. Wiki pages can be edited by either students or professors with each page relating to a topic or subtopic to the class unit; these pages can either be a collaborative or individual effort depending on the professor's choice. Each page can consist of an image or video gallery to support the text or have links provided for students to learn more information. Also, there could be forums to discuss the information further with fellow peers. David L. Neumann conducted a research project to analyze the effects of using wikis against individual (traditional) lectures. At the end of the researc...