Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is wikipedia a reputable source
Is wikipedia a reputable source
Is wikipedia a reputable source
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is wikipedia a reputable source
The reason why Wikipedia is so unreliable there are several dimensions of information quality: accuracy, completeness, currency, comprehensibility, and so on (cf. Fox, Levitin & Redman, 1994). The information suggested that the Wikipedia fails on several of these dimensions. However, people that acquire knowledge from Wikipedia are not as comprehensible and complete as we might expect an encyclopedia to be. There are three reasons to think that significant amount of information on Wikipedia might be inaccurate, first, anyone can contribute to Wikipedia, and many of these contributors will not have much expertise in what they write about. People also can contribute anonymously, some who claim to have expertise or credentials do not (cf. Read, …show more content…
However, consider that there is a tight focus on a horse race during Canadian election campaign; an important question is to ask whether pollsters and journalists interpret the horse race accurately. A person depends on pollsters and journalists to interpret the horse race, and their interpretation will be accurate only if the interpretation by pollsters and journalists is itself accurate (Pétry, F., & Bastien, F. (2013). Larson (2003) directly assessed the accuracy of TV journalists’ interpretations during the horse race and the 2000 US presidential campaign found almost half of these interpretations were inaccurate. One of the main mistakes was journalists’ declaring one candidate “ahead” when his advantage was within the margin of error. The paper examines two testable hypotheses that make distinct but compatible predictions of when inaccuracies occur and when they do not (Pétry, F., & Bastien, F. (2013). Between the relationships of the media and the polling, industries create the motive for some pollsters to be a variance with best practices in poll quality control. As Rosenstiel (2005) argues, recent changes in the use of the polls by the media increasingly unreliable polling practices, with more outlets competing for fewer resources growing reliance on daily tracking polls, to name a few. Similar changes have provoked in the polling industry. In addition, media organization will be judged on the accuracy and reliability of its journalism which must be well sourced, supported by strong evidence, examined and tested, clear and unambiguous. The form of basic news, not a rumor, and speculation the facts must be verified
398).It is also stated that news divisions reduced their costs, and raised the entertainment factor of the broadcasts put on air. (p. 400). Secondly, the media determines its sources for stories by putting the best journalists on the case and assign them to areas where news worthy stories just emanates. (p.400). Third, the media decides how to present the news by taking the most controversial or relevant events and compressing them into 30 second sound-bites. (p.402). finally, the authors also explain how the media affects the general public. The authors’ state “The effect of one news story on public opinion may be trivial but the cumulative effect of dozens of news stories may be important. This shows a direct correlation between public opinions and what the media may find “relevant”. (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p.
Media concentration allows news reporters to fall victim to source bias, commercial impulse, and pack journalism. Together, all three of the aforementioned factors become known as horse race journalism, a cause for great concern in campaign media. In complying with horse race journalism, media outlets exclude third party candidates, reinforce the idea that politics is merely a game, and dismiss issues that directly affect voters and their day to day lives. Through horse race journalism, the media is mobilized in impeding an active form of the democratic debate in American politics. Even across the wide range of human values and beliefs, it is easy to see that campaign media coverage must be changed, if not for us, then for our children. It is imperative that we discern the flaws of the media and follow our civic duty to demand better media
As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader-produced encyclopedia. While plenty of professors have complained about the lack of accuracy or completeness of entries, and some have discouraged or tried to bar students from using it.
Objectivity has nearly become nonexistent, and "For years, Americans' political press has been stuck in a fact-free model of neutrality, often covering even the most obvious lies as 'one side' of a dispute," (Introduction). The publishment of these lies and giving them the title of an argument is feigning neutrality, which fools the public into believing all the media is producing. Equal coverage has also been a major issue in media bias. For example, in this past presidential election, “the mainstream media labels a Republican candidate with a slew of phobics to paint him as an awful person, while they seem to put the Democratic candidate on a pedestal or report less harshly” (Ostmann). Determining equal coverage between the two political parties is a touchy subject, but it is apparent that Trump received the brunt of the attacks on his past then his opponent did. Even if it had been the other way around, the media should be held responsible for their devious actions. For the media, it is all about the story, which they will spend hours and hours fine tuning until they are able to fill their likes, views, and subscriptions
...ie, 31 (1) 27-49.Fallis, D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662–1674. doi:10.1002/asi.20870
Coverage of events by the mainstream media is politically biased, due to the numerous instances when news networks support one party (either Liberal Democratic or Conservative Republican) and slant the issue in that party’s favor. For example, NBC News reported that the Affordable Care Act was “cheerleading” and viewed the law in a positive manner (Lawrence). As NBC is a major supporter of the Democratic Party, its views are obviously slanted towards liberal and supportive opinions of Obama and his policies. Moreover, this positive perspective of the law only attracts Democrats, and it masks the other perspective involving the detriments of that law, showing presence of propaganda, instilling liberal viewpoints in its unsuspecting audience. In contrast t...
The record distrust in the media, based on a survey conducted Sept. 6-9, 2012, also means that negativity toward the media is at an all-time high when election happens. This reflects the continuation of a pattern in which negativity increases every election year compared with the year prior. The current gap between negative
The news media rejects the fact that they are biased. They claim that they are the “middle of the road,” and are neutral on the stories that they cover. Publishers also claim that they are the watchdog for the political system, and they make sure that the system is free of any corruption, or wrongdoing. Th...
...nce that media holds on Canadian elections. This is far from the ideal scenario and against the proposed measures of the CRTC, but until there is a shift in media regulation, news networks will continue to uphold the power of pre-election favourites. While, in the end, the pre-election favourite will not always win, if they continue to gain additional stimulus as the result of Canadian media then it will ultimately begin to render the policy-heavy period prior to elections useless. In that realization the Canadian media is essentially restricting the entirety of the democratic process. Whether or not they know it or seek to acknowledge it, Canadian media outlets hold far too much influence in the Canadian electoral system as it stands today. Without changes to the status quo, who is to say how exactly the media will disrupt the democratic process in the near future.
There are those that will take issue with this condemnation of the news media’s actions covering politics, and argue that while they certainly play a role in the debate, it is the electorate that chooses to watch and believe the images that are illustrated by the media. One might cite that the politicians and party platforms have not changed over the past few decades so it is up to the voter to come to that conclusion for themselves and might cite Abramowitz: “The large increase in partisan polarization on relative thermometer ratings of the presidential candidates between 1984 and 2012 is especially impressive given that the choices presented to the voters by the two major parties appeared to be no more polarized in 2012 than in 1984. It would be difficult to find evidence that Barack Obama was a more liberal Democratic candidate than Walter Mondale, who had a consistently liberal voting record during his years in the U.S. Senate, or that Mitt Romney was a more conservative Republican candidate than Ronald Reagan, who was widely regarded as
Immanuel Kant was a moral philosopher. His theory, better known as deontological theory, holds that intent, reason, rationality, and good will are motivating factors in the ethical decision making process. The purpose of this paper is to describe and explain major elements of his theory, its essential points, how it is used in the decision making process, and how it intersects with the teams values.
The way the media frame issues has a subtle yet significant effect on the general public. Studies have shown that frames can help determine which procedures we find medically necessary (Edwards, Elwyn, Covey, Matthews, & Pill, 2001), can influence our ability to recall critical details of a news story (Valkenburg, 2000), and can even subtly influence elections (Shah, Domke, & Wackman, 1996). Given the impact frames can have on the general public, it is important to have a clear way to conceptualize and measure their effects.
However, candidates can try to use them to deprave rivals' positions. Voters need to understand differences between push polls and ordinary polls to defend their right for verifiable information. It is difficult for some people to recognize illegal actions, because researches also use negative information in normal inquiries. The main characteristic of push polls is speed. Callers have goal to cover thousands of voters and do not spend much time on one person.
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...
As Americans we take pride in our liberating government. But, it is essential to ask how much we, the general public, know about our democracy. Because of the representative structure of our government, it is in our best interest to remain as knowledgeable as possible about political affairs so that we can play an active role in our democracy by voting for candidates and issues. The media, which includes print, television, and the internet, is our primary link to political events and issues. (For the purposes of this essay only print and television will be considered.) Therefore, in order to assess the success of our democracy it is necessary to assess the soundness of our media. We are lucky enough to have a media, in theory, free from government influences because of our rights to freedom of press and freedom of speech, but we are still subject to the media’s interpretation and presentation of politics, as is the danger when depending on any source for information. So, we must address how the media informs us; how successful it is at doing so; and how we should respond to it.