Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debate against Wikipedia as a reliable source
Debate against Wikipedia as a reliable source
Wikipedia an unreliable entity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debate against Wikipedia as a reliable source
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia with information created and maintained by volunteers around the world. Errors in the articles are inevitable due to the reliance on volunteers. This has lead to a stigma around the use of Wikipedia for academic purposes. Middlebury College’s history department went as far as to deny students from using Wikipedia as a source for exams and papers (Cohen, 2007). Even with the controversy surrounding Wikipedia’s credibility, it has been able to various roles in universities today. For Middlebury College, the history department's decision to restrict the use of Wikipedia citations was moral and justifiable. Too many Wikipedia articles had been providing non-factual information to students, affecting their …show more content…
Harvard College advises against using Wikipedia for anything other than reference materials for this very reason (Harvard College, 2017). Many have made the case that Wikipedia is within the same accuracy range as Encyclopedia Britannica (Terdiman, 2005). This is not a valid argument for this case since the school stated that students should not be citing any encyclopedias whatsoever (Cohen, 2007). Wikipedia’s role as a source has historically been and should continue to be a tool that contains a vast collection of easily accessible information. This information tends to be only used as a last resort when conducting research. However, there is nothing wrong with using the references provided in a Wikipedia article to find the scholarly data to support a college assignment. This use is suitable for any discipline as it allows the user access to a collection of reliable sources based on one related …show more content…
Students are able to gain a better understanding of writing content for an encyclopedia while Wikipedia’s credibility is being improved. As stated in the New York Times article by Noam Cohen, students found that the experience had taught them discipline in writing the articles. This was due to the need to get in contact and interview experts to improve their work on a particular article. Although there has been a lot of controversy over the credibility of information from Wikipedia, society can still benefit from its existence. Wikipedia has the potential to become more reputable through the use of college assignments aimed at creating and editing content on the site. This enhanced reliability would benefit society with a vast collection of highly accurate
As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader-produced encyclopedia. While plenty of professors have complained about the lack of accuracy or completeness of entries, and some have discouraged or tried to bar students from using it.
...ie, 31 (1) 27-49.Fallis, D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662–1674. doi:10.1002/asi.20870
Some of the differences between popular and scholarly sources using in research like for instance scholarly sources will not usually have things like pictures or any illustrations but does sometimes contain things like graphs. Popular sources will contain some pictures and illustrations unlike scholarly sources.
Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluatingstudent-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal for Educational Technology, 39(6), 987-995.
Steven Pinker states that “search engines lower our intelligence, encouraging us to skim on the surface of knowledge …” (1). Many students are not reading their assigned books anymore. Sparknotes and other web sites such as Shmoop have provided students with resources which are not useful. Students’ skim through these sites to read books. Most of the websites gives students’ plot summaries which are from another person’s take on that book .This damages the student 's’ chances of actually reading and understanding a book and having their own opinion .The
Despite our English teachers’ best efforts each and every one of us at some point in our writing careers have stumbled upon a source of information from the infamous website Wikipedia. In this article the writer discusses both the pros and the cons of the controversial online encyclopedia in an attempt to allow us to come up with our own conclusions about it’s credibility as a source. Wikipedia provides a vast array of articles, over 31 million, on numerous topics. Some of the benefits of Wikipedia include its user friendly site. With its easy to maneuver layout and useful sub-links to help direct you, it’s easy to see why some favor this popular search. This setup allows for you to find new possible connections between subjects while also brainstorm different unique ideas to link with your paper.
...larify the structure and destination in which I was headed. By revising my essays I was able to make the content and message seem more important and made the final drafts seem a slight degree better than the originals, but the finals were better nonetheless. The instructor did a very good job in guiding me and helping find my way into writing by focusing on some of the problems I was facing and clarified them so that I would better understand them. The instructor helped me expand on my grammatical by helping me discover what it was that I lacked while constructing basic sentence structure; the usage of commas and semi-colons, quotations, and how to sight titles of books and articles within an essay. This English 101 course I have attended has helped me develop better writing skills as well as helped me create more profound essays and a very satisfying research paper.
It provides a real opportunity for genuine communication. It also helps building students’ comprehension on a text. In the daily life, we can tell people about a news article we have read, so this is a classroom activity that is fairly authentic.
In the first paragraph, Jaron appeals to the pathos of the reader; he assumes that the reader is of the generation that has grown up in the digital age, thus they would agree that the most important aspect of the internet is the people who contribute to it. However, there is no reason to ever assume that. Some people may actually believe that user contribution detracts from what makes the internet a viable source of information. For example, if the internet were controlled by academia, it would most likely be a peer reviewed source of information. However, as it is, anyone can contribute information to the internet, which makes the internet not a reliable source for knowledge. We can see this in academia, which typically does not support the use of Wikipedia as an academic source, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that relies entirely on user contribution.
Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. By August 8, 2001, Wikipedia had over 8,000 articles.[30] On September 25, 2001, Wikipedia had over 13,000 articles.[31] And by the end of 2001 it had grown to approximately 20,000 articles and 18 language editions. It had reached 26 language editions by late 2002, 46 by the end of 2003, and 161 by the final days of 2004.[32] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing even the 1408 Yongle Encyclopedia, which
With the internet being part of our everyday life information can be accessed from almost any corner of the world. Whether it’s used for playing games, communicating with friends, or even just streaming movies, the internet is intertwined with essentially everyone on the planet in some sort of fashion. With the abundance of articles and information that is easily attainable in today’s society problems occur when the information is incorrect or not justified. Wikipedia is taking the majority of the heat and is frequently called an unreliable source. Because of the easy read and quick basic overview, Wikipedia is a go to source for students as well as teachers and is a helpful tool to get minimal information. However Wikipedia should not be used as research tool on academic papers because of its lacking credentials.
New books and research studies are posted on the Internet daily for the world to read. In the past, if you were from a poor school or a sheltered community that banded books from school libraries, you may not be able to read some important information. Making the student that had the opportunity to read and learn this new information better educated than a person who did not have the same books on their school library shelves. The author of the article The internet as a classroom explains this fact when she says, "We have arrived at a new moment in history: a moment in which such terms as class, race, gender, sexuality, nationality and ideology are no longer useful" (Hendricks). This statement applies to education because information can be found on any subject on the web.
Firstly, most people today get all their information from the internet instead of books . While the internet is great there are some problem with getting information online. One of those things is sources anyone can create a website with information. The problem is that anyone can write information on the subject and the information could be wrong. Today everyone has the option to
With the advancement of technology and the exponential increase of Internet use, professionals-academic and business-are relying on electronic resources for information, research, and data. The Internet gives an individual access to a sea of information, data, and knowledge; plus, this vast amount of information is available in a matter of seconds, rather than hours or days. The ease of access, availability, up-to-the-second timeliness, and vastness of online resources is causing many professionals, however, to forgo the use of print sources. Online resources are useful to conduct scholarly research and 'may be convenient, but they have shortcomings that make print sources necessary for submitting high-quality assignments' (Dilevko & Gottieb, 2002, ¶ 1).
As an illustration, Ella Tannous’ case in the article “Medical malpractices: more than meet the public eye” was my most useful source since out of it, I built my ideas and found a good bibliography from the ProQuest, AUB Library. In fact, I tried to improve my writing style to provide the highest quality in order to serve a purpose. I fully content knowing that setting short term goals will produce long term effects. For example, Wiki on the Moodle was a low cost solution for a successful e-learning. By reading various articles, I figured out a new enrichment in the vocabulary and a deeper understanding for the connotations of the various topics we covered such as attitudes towards gossip, bullying, and communication in the workplace. All in all, it was an achievement sublime, a learning experience, one day a