Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Describe some of the differences between equity financing and debt financing
Debt and equity differences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
4. Sensitivity analysis
4.1. Areas that required a sensitivity analysis
According to exhibit and appendix 1 a sensitivity analysis is required for price and cost of raw materials. Besides, price impacts variables such as quantity of units to be sold and technical support.
Price is highly sensitive, since chemical industry (Wonderpump´s customers) needs to be high cost effective to compete. Besides, average price of pumps sold by AGT in 2012 was 5.000, while Wonderpump´s price is 140% higher. Furthermore, Bestpumps the main competitor launched new pumps between 6.000 and 7.000 that are also life extended. All those reasons show a high likelihood that price should be reduce in years 1 and 2.
On the other hand if prices are not reduced for
…show more content…
According to those facts there are four scenarios to consider (Table 9).
Table 9 Scenarios sensitivity analysis
4.2. Investment assessment and sensitivity analysis
After calculating cash flows and investment appraisals, the variable that has a mayor impact in Wonderpump is the increase of raw material´s costs, since if it does not change, Wonderpump is a profitable project event if sales (price or quantities) reduce or remain stables (Table 10).
Table 10 Investment assessment and sensitivity analysis
Considering this scenarios, it is important to identify strategies that can be adopted to reduce the impact of changes in raw material costs and discuss them with investment committee.
5. Reassess of the discount rate
Although Bestpump´s business risk is closely to Wonderpump project, since AGT does not have debt and Bestpump does, to apply Bestpump´s discount rate in Wonderpump project, it is necessary to find Bestpump´s ungeared beta and then AGT´s cost of equity. Calculations are as
…show more content…
6. Capital structure and the discount rate
6.1. Features of debt and equity financing
Financing through equity or debt has advantages and disadvantages as follows:
Equity is more flexible for the company, since in a situation of lack of liquidity shareholders return could be delay or stopped, while debt interest always have to be paid (Atrill and McLaney, 2015).
Debt is faster to obtain than a securities issue (Atrill and McLaney, 2015).
Related to control, a debt does not provide lenders control over company´s operations and management decisions, except some previous agreements with lenders about limiting future borrowings, sale of assets and pay of dividends. On the other hand a security provides control to the shareholder. A disadvantage of financing new projects through equity is that every issue of shares dilutes shareholders control (Brealey et al, 2014).
Considering cost debt has a benefit, since it can be used to reduce company´s tax, while issuing securities imply a cost and return on equity has a tax for each stakeholder (Atrill and McLaney,
These ratios can be used to determine the most desirable company to grant a loan to between Wendy’s and Bob Evans. Wendy’s has a debt to assets ratio of 34.93% while Bob Evans is 43.68%. When it comes to debt to asset ratios, the company with the lower percentage has the lowest risk. Therefore, Wendy’s is more desirable than Bob Evans. In the area of debt to equity ratios, Wendy’s comes in at 84.31% while Bob Evans comes in at 118.71%. Like debt to assets, a low debt to equity ratio indicates less risk in a company. Again, Wendy’s is the less risky company. Finally, Wendy’s has a times interest earned ratio of 4.86 while Bob Evans owns a 3.78. Unlike the previous two ratios, times interest earned ratio is measured on a scale of 1 to 5. The closer the ratio is to 5, the less risky a company is. From the view of a banker, any ratio over 2.5 is an acceptable risk. Both companies are an acceptable risk, however, Wendy’s is once again more desirable. Based on these findings, Wendy’s is the better choice for banks to loan money to because of the lower level of
average price. In long term this will not be the case since the operating costs will
Firstly, in assessing ourselves, we determined that our BATNA associated with $37 million. I comprised the cost of building a new plant ($25 million), loss of profits in 12 months ($12 million) and the cost of 90 day option to buy land ($0.5 million). A non-refundable expense of $10 million on buying the option for the land is considered the sunk cost. The maximum amount of money that our group could spend on this buying intention is $40 million. We decided that our target point would be $16 m...
Finding the perfect capital structure in terms of risk and reward can ensure a company meets shareholder expectations and protects a firm in times of recession. Capital structure refers to how a business puts its money to “work”. The two forms of capital structure are equity capital and debt capital. Both have their benefits and limitations. Striking that perfect balance between the two can mean the difference between thriving versus trying to survive.
In order to find out what are some of the key drivers’ of the analysis I will further run different sensitivity analysis. I think some of the key drivers of our assumptions could be sales growth, production costs as a percentage of sales, inventories as a percentage of cost of goods sold etc.
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
... on equity. Clearly all these variables play an important part on the WACC of a project and should be thoroughly examined.
The issues of two impacts are in two ways. The first one, more efficient plants are likely to cannibalize sales from the Rotterdam plant. The second one, the forecasted rate of return for customers needs to account for a ramp up period before it is possible to reach the 7% additional revenue of the project. Furthermore, the two impacts should be calculated in the project's cash flows for the final evaluation purposes.
There is no universal theory of the debt-equity choice, and no reason to expect one. In this essay I will critically assess the Pecking Order Theory of capital structure with reference and comparison of publicly listed companies. The pecking order theory says that the firm will borrow, rather than issuing equity, when internal cash flow is not sufficient to fund capital expenditures. This theory explains why firms prefer internal rather than external financing which is due to adverse selection, asymmetry of information, and agency costs (Frank & Goyal, 2003). The trade-off theory comes from the pecking order theory it is an unintentional outcome of companies following the pecking-order theory. This explains that firms strive to achieve an optimal capital structure by using a mixture debt and equity known to act as an advantage leverage. Modigliani and Miller (1958) showed that the decisions firms make when choosing between debt and equity financing has no material effects on the value of the firm or on the cost or availability of capital. They assumed perfect and frictionless capital markets, in which financial innovation would quickly extinguish any deviation from their predicted equilibrium.
Should Lille Tissages, S.A. lower the price to FF15.00/m? (Assume no intermediate prices are being considered.)
DMC's potential loss of significant market share in the near and long term, of oil well pumping motors if DMC doesn't respond quickly and effectively to the expected change in motor specs for the industry.
During the last few years, Harry Davis Industries has been too constrained by the high cost of capital to make many capital investments. Recently, though, capital costs have been declining, and the company has decided to look seriously at a major expansion program that had been proposed by the marketing department. Assume that you are an assistant to Leigh Jones, the financial vice president. Your first task is to estimate Harry Davis’s cost of capital. Jones has provided you with the following data, which she believes may be relevant to your task.
Having a low P/E ratio with respect to the rest of the market, and the replacement cost of the firm being greater than its book value (argument 3), there is a good chance that the current stock price and the proposed offering price are too low. Although long-term debt is a better financing choice, a few of the drawbacks are pointed out. Debt holders claim profit before equity. holders, so the chances that profits may be lower than expected. increases risk to equity, may reduce or impede stock value. However, the snares are still a bit snare.
Thesis: Businesses deem financing necessary when they are just beginning, expanding, or recovering; Debt financing and equity financing have many advantages and disadvantages but also change the entire accounting method that is to be considered while running the business. Debt financing has both advantages and disadvantages. Debt financing is a business’ way to start up, expand, or recover by borrowing money from a person or company. The money borrowed has to be paid back along with the interest that was accrued during the length of time the loan was carried out. This option is great for company’s that do not want investors.
The capital structure of a firm is the way in which it decides to finance its operations from various funds, comprising debt, such as bonds and outstanding loans, and equity, including stock and retained earnings. In the long term, firms seek to find the optimal debt-equity ratio. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of different capital structure mixes, and consider whether this has any relevance to firm value in theory and in reality.