There is no universal theory of the debt-equity choice, and no reason to expect one. In this essay I will critically assess the Pecking Order Theory of capital structure with reference and comparison of publicly listed companies. The pecking order theory says that the firm will borrow, rather than issuing equity, when internal cash flow is not sufficient to fund capital expenditures. This theory explains why firms prefer internal rather than external financing which is due to adverse selection, asymmetry of information, and agency costs (Frank & Goyal, 2003). The trade-off theory comes from the pecking order theory it is an unintentional outcome of companies following the pecking-order theory. This explains that firms strive to achieve an optimal capital structure by using a mixture debt and equity known to act as an advantage leverage. Modigliani and Miller (1958) showed that the decisions firms make when choosing between debt and equity financing has no material effects on the value of the firm or on the cost or availability of capital. They assumed perfect and frictionless capital markets, in which financial innovation would quickly extinguish any deviation from their predicted equilibrium. The pecking order theory suggests that firms have a particular preference order for capitalised to finance their businesses. Stewart Myers put forward the idea of pecking order theory in 1984 in which mangers will prefer to use retained earnings first and will issue new equity only as a last resort (Book Reference). Companies prioritize their sources of financing according to the principle of least effort, preferring to raise equity as a financing means of last resort. Wang & Lin (2010) how internal funds are used before debt and once thi... ... middle of paper ... ... Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment", The American Economic Review, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 261-297. Moore, R.R. 1993, "Asymmetric Information, Repeated Lending, and Capital Structure", Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 393-409. Myers, S.C. 2001, "Capital Structure", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 81-102. MYERS, S.C. and MAJLUF, N.S., 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), pp. 187-221. Nicholls-Nixon, CL 2005, 'Rapid growth and high performance: The entrepreneur's "impossible dream?"', Academy Of Management Executive, 19, 1, pp. 77-89, Health Business Elite. Wang, K.A. & Lin, C.A. 2010, "PECKING-ORDER THEORY REVISITED: THE ROLE OF AGENCY COST", Manchester School, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 395.
Capital structure is the composition of the company 's capital value and the proportion of the relationship which can reflect the company 's structural stratification and core competitiveness of the company 's business performance also has unpredictable impact on market value, shareholder wealth and even sustainable development capacity . Through the analysis of the equity ratio, the debt ratio, the long-term debt ratio, the return on assets and the Modigliani and Miller theory, Sainsbury 's capital structure is stable.
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
Gershon, H., & Pattakos, A., (2004). Creating market opportunities: Innovation is key. Journal of Healthcare Management, 49(1), 9-11.
Bodie, Zvi, Alex Kane, and Alan J. Marcus. Essentials of Investments. Ninth ed. N.p.: McGraw, 2013.
Pike, Richard, and Bill Neale. Corporate Finance and Investment: Decisions and Strategies. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2009.
Modigliani & Miller applied their theories with two modules, one which doesn’t include the taxes and this is their first finding, and another one with taxes to make it more realistic. The First Proposition without taxes: In this part Modigliani & Miller stated that the firm’s value is not affected by the structure of the capital between Equity and Debt, They proved this by having an example of two firms that have got the same conditions in everything, same cash flow, same operational risks and same opportunity costs. One of the firm’s capital structure is all equity and the other firm’s capital structure is a mixture between equity and debt, since the form of financing (debt or equity) can neither change the firm’s net operating income nor its operating risk, the values of levered and unlevered firms will be the same. They have concluded that the value of the levered firm = the value of the unlevered firm, only if they have the same conditions, same risk levels, cash and opportunity cost.
Having a low P/E ratio with respect to the rest of the market, and the replacement cost of the firm being greater than its book value (argument 3), there is a good chance that the current stock price and the proposed offering price are too low. Although long-term debt is a better financing choice, a few of the drawbacks are pointed out. Debt holders claim profit before equity. holders, so the chances that profits may be lower than expected. increases risk to equity, may reduce or impede stock value. However, the snares are still a bit snare.
Watson, D. & Head, A. (2010) Corporate Finance: Principles & Practise. 5th edn. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
William Sharpe, Gordon J. Alexander, Jeffrey W Bailey. Investments. Prentice Hall; 6 edition, October 20, 1998
...ence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards’, Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, vol.1, no.1, p1-28.
In our business world, ‘Capital is the lifeblood of every business venture’ (Smith, 2012). Capital can build up company, purchases non – current assets for instance machinery or plant and paid off daily expenses for examples wages, lighting, power etc. Every company needs to have someone to manage the finance by thinking different types finance which are internal short term, internal long term, external short term and external long term financial resources. These are the main four ways which can raise the capital but those sources may relate to different repayment rate and length and the amount will be received. When the owner and manager thinking to apply internal or external financial resources they need to consider Purpose, Amount, Repayment, Interest and Security which is name as PARIS. Purpose is identifying what type of finance are suitable to required, amount is how much should be borrow, repayment is how much and when should the business pay the finance back. Interest is how much is the finance cost and security is the business need put down the business assets or personal household as a deposit before receive any finance. These are the main concepts owner and manager need to remember before apply any type of finance. (Cox and Fardon, 2009) Director and manager need to think effectively for rising capital in an effective way which includes lower repayment and the control of the company. (Gillespie, 2001)
Brealey, Richard A., Marcus, Alan J., Myers, Stewart C. 1999, Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 2nd edn, Craig S. Beytien, USA.
Gregor Meerganz von Medeazza, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 41, No. 11, Money, Banking and Finance (Mar. 18-24, 2006), pp. 949-952
The capital structure of a firm is the way in which it decides to finance its operations from various funds, comprising debt, such as bonds and outstanding loans, and equity, including stock and retained earnings. In the long term, firms seek to find the optimal debt-equity ratio. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of different capital structure mixes, and consider whether this has any relevance to firm value in theory and in reality.
Block, S. B., & Hirt, G. A. (2005). Foundations of financial management. (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.