More handpicked essays just for you.
Chapter4 Analysis Of Financial Statements
Chapter4 Analysis Of Financial Statements
Analyzing and interpreting financial statements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Capital structure is the composition of the company 's capital value and the proportion of the relationship which can reflect the company 's structural stratification and core competitiveness of the company 's business performance also has unpredictable impact on market value, shareholder wealth and even sustainable development capacity . Through the analysis of the equity ratio, the debt ratio, the long-term debt ratio, the return on assets and the Modigliani and Miller theory, Sainsbury 's capital structure is stable. Sainsbury sets out a detailed and complete financial statement every 52 weeks until 12 March 2016. First of all, the shareholders 'equity ratio is the ratio of shareholders ' equity to total assets, reflecting the owner of …show more content…
The financial report shows that sainsbury 's equity ratio fell from 38.48% in 2016 to 35.38% in 2014, while tesco was 19.65% in 2016. The data show that Sainsbury is well-run and all aspects of operation are stable. When shareholders run the company, more resources can be used to get a better return. Earnings per share can be directly seen in the financial report, which is an important measure of equity. It can predict the future of the company 's profitability. Sainsbury 's unit profit margin for the past three years averaged 0.3% and the trend is reduced, even negative in 2015. This means that the company is losing money in 2015 and this trend is similar to tesco. Although the downward trend represents a drop in the company 's profitability, Sainsbury 's stock market is optimistic, as the 2014 and 2016 figures indicate that Sainsbury 's shares are blue-chip stocks. The ratio of shareholders ' equity to asset - liability ratio is equal to 1. These two ratios reflect the long-term financial situation. The larger the ratio of shareholders ' equity, the smaller the ratio of assets to liabilities . The smaller the financial risk, the stronger the ability …show more content…
The rate of return on assets measures the use of corporate creditors and owners of total profits. The higher the index, the better use of corporate assets, indicating that enterprises succeed in income and savings .The use of funds achieved good results. As Sainsbury, its ROA in 2014 was 4.33%, down by 1.56% in 2016 slightly, but overall remained stable, which shows the capital flow quick speed , the small amount of funds occupied, the volume of business. Due to its stability, the risk of operation is low and the level is good. The return on equity shows the return on the capital provided by the shareholders after payment to other capital providers. The return on equity from 2014 to 2016 was 11.25%, 2.84% and 7.8%, respectively, meaning a moderate return to shareholders. These two returns are better than tesco, revealing the superiority of Sainsbury 's capital
This requirement makes it important to look through a majority of the return ratios, which include return on sales, return on assets, and return on equity. Additionally, investors are also interested in the ratios related to the company’s earnings, such as earnings per share (EPS) and PE ratio. Looking at return on sales, we can see that Wendy’s has a 7.27% return on sales and Bob Evans has a 1.23%, which demonstrates Wendy’s has a higher profit margin. Moreover, Wendys’ return on assets is 2.85% and Bob Evans is 1.58%. Also, Wendy’s and Bob Evan 's have return on equity ratios of 6.66% and 4.30%, respectively. All of these return ratios show that Wendy’s has a better handle on turning working capital into revenue. On the other hand, although Wendy’s return ratios are higher than Bob Evans, Bob Evans has a better performance on earnings per share and PE ratio. This is due to Bob Evans having less common stock share outstanding, which makes their earnings per share and PE ratio higher than Wendy’s. Due to the EPS being higher for Bob Evans, we would recommend that investors look towards Bob
Return on sales is decreasing and is below the industry average, but the goods news is that sales and profits have been increasing each year. However, costs of goods are increasing and more inventory is left over each year causing the return on sales to decrease. For 1995, it was 1.7% which is less than the average of 2.44% but is a lot higher than the bottom 25% of companies as seen in exhibit 3, which actually have negative sales return of 0.7%. Return on equity is increasing each year and at a higher rate than industry average. In 1995, it was 20.7%, greater than the average of 18.25% and close to the highest companies in exhibit 3, of 22.1% showing that the return in investment in the company is increasing, which is good for the owner.
The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) ratio is a profitability ratio that measures how well profits are being generated based on capital employed. RadioShack’s ROCE dropped down to -34% in 2013 in comparison to 10% in 2012. For every dollar of capital employed, RadioShack is losing $0.34. The dramatic dip stems from 2012’s positive earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) of 155.1 million dollars to 2013’s EBIT of -344 million dollars. Capital employed is determined by subtracting current liabilities from total assets. In 2013, capital employed decreased by 79 million dollars. ROCE is used to view the long-term profitability of firms. A more in-depth trend analysis done over several years would need to be done to determine the
Finding the perfect capital structure in terms of risk and reward can ensure a company meets shareholder expectations and protects a firm in times of recession. Capital structure refers to how a business puts its money to “work”. The two forms of capital structure are equity capital and debt capital. Both have their benefits and limitations. Striking that perfect balance between the two can mean the difference between thriving versus trying to survive.
The return on total assets (ROA) is an overall measure of profitability which measures the total effectiveness of management in generating profits with its available assets. This ratio indicates the amount of net income generated by each dollar invested in assets. The higher the firm's return on total assets, the better. Harley Davidson's return on total assets was 14.04% for 2001, 14.27% for 2000. These percentages are high and show an upward trend, this shows strong performance in this area for the past two years.
Description: Return on Equity (ROE) indicates what each owner’s dollar is producing in terms of net income that is the rate of return on stockholder dollars. ROE is a common metric for assessing the value of a firm and most investors look to ROE first when deciding where to allocate their capital. As such, it is also an important measure for a CEO to monitor.
The capital structure decisions for Target Inc. are significant since the profitability of the firm is specifically influenced by this decision. Profit maximization is part of the wealth creation process and wealth maximization can be a lengthy process for financial managers. Profits affect the value of the firm and it is expressed in the value of stock. Cost of capital is how investors evaluate weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Capital structure ratios help investors gauge the level of risk that a company is taking on through financing. While Target
The objective of this report is to give an overall view on research and analysis to regards of two companies, Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc and Tesco Plc that I have chosen for. In this report, I will be comparing two companies’ financial analysis based on their comprehensive income and balance sheet for one year; and also will be comparing their generating cash ability, cash management and financial adaptability based on statement of cash flows for the past two year and also determine whether the two companies have the ability to repay their debts to their creditors, generating into cash and going concern which related to finance.
The Dupont analysis includes the asset turnover ratio, the profit margin percantage, return on shareholder’s equity percentage, return on assets, and the equity multiplier (Spiceland, Sepe, and Nelson 258-264). The asset turnover ratio is the amount of revenue received for every one dollar of assets, it reveals how efficiently the company is distributing assets. Apple’s asset turnover ratio is 60.43 which means for every one dollar Apple has in assets, they receive approximately sixty cents (Apple Inc). Microsoft’s asset turnover ratio is 13.17 so for every dollar they only receive about thirteen cents (Microsoft Inc). Apple is doing significantly better in this category. The profit margin is just how much of a company’s sales they keep as a profit. Apple’s profit margin is 21.67% while Microsoft has a 28% profit margin so Microsoft is accumulating more profit off each sale but their sales are lower. The return on shar...
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.
The ratio of 1.7 for the last two years indicates consistency, although a lower number is preferred. As a company produces high value product, this could be a satisfactory ratio. By comparing it to 2011 when a ratio was 2.9, in the last two years a ratio improved
The return on Investment (ROI) is important because it describes the rate of return the company was able to...
Introduction The purpose of this report is to undertake financial analysis of the position of the three major supermarket chains (Tesco plc, Morrison plc and Sainsbury plc) in the UK, using the financial tools such as Horizontal and Vertical Analysis and Ratio Analysis. The calculations done are considering the figures from the income statement and balance sheet of these three companies for the last 2 years (2008 & 2007). Doing these calculations is an effort to find out the current position and if any forecast on their performance. Tesco Plc *Interpreting the Horizontal and Vertical *Analysis The balance sheet’s horizontal analysis reveals the first worrying statistics about the company- the fact that stock level has increased by 25.84% in the year, even though net assets have increased by only 12.59%. The vertical analysis of the balance sheet again highlights the increase in amount of stock held by the company at the end of 2008 and increase in current assets. Interpreting the Ratio Analysis By looking at the ROCE* ratio it is clear that the business has not generated any higher return in the period 2007-2008. Though there is a marginal decrease in the returns (0.14% from 0.16%), however when compared with returns of other competitors Tesco plc has performed much better. Drop in asset utilisation ratio in the year 2008 indicates that the company did not use its assets efficiently to generate sales. As a result profit margin dropped down to 5.91% in 2008 from 6.21% in the year 2007. The Acid test ratio also doesn’t meet the ‘ideal’ ratio of 1:1. In other words Tesco had only 38p of quickly realisable assets to meet each £1 of current liabilities. Stock turn shows the effect of increased stock at the end of 2008 as it s...
The rapid development of media and technology in the world market today has helped companies to sell their products and get in touch with their customers more easily (Rayburn, 2012). However the success of a company depends on many factors, not that only whether it has brilliant advertisement or marketing campaigns. The main aim of a company is to create shareholder’s value which according to Bender and Ward (2008), companies have to manage both well in a trading environment and financial environment in order to do that. Hence, the financial strategy can be seen as one of the most important factors in contributing to the business’s success especially to a large company such as Unilever as it is all about strategic decisions related to raising and manage the funds in the most appropriate manner.
The capital structure of a firm is the way in which it decides to finance its operations from various funds, comprising debt, such as bonds and outstanding loans, and equity, including stock and retained earnings. In the long term, firms seek to find the optimal debt-equity ratio. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of different capital structure mixes, and consider whether this has any relevance to firm value in theory and in reality.