Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Capital structure case studies
Capital structure case studies
How to evaluate capital structure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Capital structure case studies
Home Depot & Capital Structure Finding the perfect capital structure in terms of risk and reward can ensure a company meets shareholder expectations and protects a firm in times of recession. Capital structure refers to how a business puts its money to “work”. The two forms of capital structure are equity capital and debt capital. Both have their benefits and limitations. Striking that perfect balance between the two can mean the difference between thriving versus trying to survive. Equity capital represents money put up and owned by shareholders. This money can be used to fund projects and other opportunities under the auspice of creating greater value. This type of capital is typically the most expensive. In order to attract investors, the firms expected returns must consummate with the associated risk ("Financial leverage and,"). To illustrate this, consider a speculative oil drilling operation, this type of operation would require higher promised returns than say a Wal-Mart in order to attract investors. The two primary forms of equity capital are 1) money invested into the business for an ownership stake (i.e. stock) and 2) retained earnings from past profits used to fund future growth through acquisitions, expansions and product development. Debt capital refers to money borrowed. Examples of this include bonds and short-term commercial paper. Bonds are more widely used because it provides a company with years to come up with the principal while paying interest only. Bonds are rated (i.e. AAA, AA, BB, etc.), these ratings correspond to the risk of default. The higher the rating, the lower likelihood of default and therefore a lower interest rate accepted by the lender. Short-term commercial paper is typically... ... middle of paper ... ...t the overall WACC. It will change the risk premium expected by equity holders. Less debt equates to a lower risk premium versus greater debt. References Berk, J., & DeMarzo, P. (2011). Corporate finance: The core, second edition. (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall. Financial leverage and capital structure policy - capital structure Investopedia, Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/walkthrough/corporate-finance/5/capital-structure/capital-structure.aspx Morningstar. (2014, March 10). Retrieved from http://quicktake.morningstar.com/StockNet/bonds.aspx?Symbol=HD&Country=usa Yahoo finance. (2014, March 10). Retrieved from http://finance.yahoo.com/q;_ylt=AhzwS2Csrl01Nl5OggYZa2eiuYdG;_ylu=X3oDMTBxdGVyNzJxBHNlYwNVSCAzIERlc2t0b3AgU2VhcmNoIDEx;_ylg=X3oDMTBybHFhOHFvBGxhbmcDZW4tVVMEcHQDMgR0ZXN0AzUxMjAxNQ--;_ylv=3?uhb=&fr=uh3_finance_vert_gs&type=2button&s=HD
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
The capital structure decisions for Target Inc. are significant since the profitability of the firm is specifically influenced by this decision. Profit maximization is part of the wealth creation process and wealth maximization can be a lengthy process for financial managers. Profits affect the value of the firm and it is expressed in the value of stock. Cost of capital is how investors evaluate weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Capital structure ratios help investors gauge the level of risk that a company is taking on through financing. While Target
Does the capital structure of a firm really matter? If so, how and why does it matter? Practitioners and scholars of corporate finance have debated these questions for several years and have found it difficult to come up with definitive answers. The classical work of Modigliani and Miller (1958) provided the impetus for what is now, orthodox corporate finance theory on the optimal capital structure of firms. They postulated that, in a perfect or frictionless capital market, the choice between debt and equity financing has no material effect on the value of the firm. Stern and Chew (2003) noted that following the Modigliani-Miller propositions, academic researchers in the 1960s and 1970s turned their attention to market imperfections that might make firm value depend on capital structure. They further noted that the main suspects were a tax code that encourages debt by making interest payments but not dividends tax-deductible and expected costs of financial distress that rise with increasing amount of debt. Towards the end of the 1970s, they noted, there was also discussion of signalling effects, such as the tendency for stock prices to fall significantly on the announcement of new equity issues and to rise on the news of stock buyouts. These effects seemed to confirm the existence of large information cost that could influence financing choices in the predictable ways.Myers (1984), however, noted that there is a conflict which has existed among the different theories and referred to is as the “capital structure puzzle.” Barclay and Smith (2005) noted that it has been the difficulty of coming up with conclusive tests of the competing theories. Firstly, they noted that model on capital structure typically are less precise than...
As higher investors generally expect higher returns for a more leveraged firm (Arnold 2013 p 697) there would appear to be very little scope for the RM to increase its debt capital unless it can convince investors profits are likely to profit significantly. Unfortunately the annual report does not suggest such growth is likely short term, due to increased parcel competition and falling letter sales (RM 2015).
Analyzing the pros and cons of structuring the additional capital funding as a debt rather than equity.
Financial decision of a business organization becomes one of the important decisions that normally will represent by capital structure. Musiega, et al. (2013) claimed that choosing an appropriate capital structure will benefit the firm as it help a firm to adapt with various challenging and competitive business world thereby become more profitability. According to Zeitun and Tian (2007), managers who are able to identify the optimal capital structure will help the companies to increase the firm revenue or profitability and reduce the firm’s cost of finance. Nutshell, capital structure of a firm can influence a firm profitability; a firm health determined by a firm capital structure.
In finance, capital structure refers to the way a corporation finances its assets through some combination of equity, debt, or hybrid securities. A firm's capital structure is then the composition or 'structure' of its liabilities. For example, a firm that sells $20bn dollars in equity and $80bn in debt is said to be 20% equity financed and 80% debt financed. The firm's ratio of debt to total financing, 80% in this example, is referred to as the firm's leverage.
This week the class read about capital structure. Capital planning is the procedure used to figure out if a company’s log-term investments merit seeking after. A major consideration in capital budgeting decision is the risk. The company needs to differentiate the assumed return from the venture with the uncertainty connected with it. The bigger the risk attempted, the increased return, the smaller the risk, and the smaller the return. At the point when the company, settles on capital budgeting choice, they wish at a minimum to recuperate enough to pay the expansion expanded by the venture. The article I came across with is a great example of capital structure, “How Will The Virgin America Deal Alter Alaska Air’s Capital Structure?”
The sources of this capital may either be internal (contribution from shareholders in the form of equity; ploughed back revenue et cetera); or they could external (borrowing from banks; private equity firms; development finance institutions; capital markets et cetera).
Brealey, Richard A., Marcus, Alan J., Myers, Stewart C. 1999, Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 2nd edn, Craig S. Beytien, USA.
The capital structure of a firm is the way in which it decides to finance its operations from various funds, comprising debt, such as bonds and outstanding loans, and equity, including stock and retained earnings. In the long term, firms seek to find the optimal debt-equity ratio. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of different capital structure mixes, and consider whether this has any relevance to firm value in theory and in reality.
The old saying, “It takes money to make money” hold true for individuals as well as corporations. There are times when companies foresee how certain investment projects necessitate the need to raise capital either through corporate loans or the sale of company stocks or bonds in order to position for future supply and demand. If the company is considered to have good value, then there are plenty of investors willing to provide funds for those investment projects, but not without costs to the company known as capital costs or cost of capital. These costs associated with the use of outside funds have financial implications regarding company profits needed to meet investors and owners return expectations while maintaining good value. Before a company can make a financial decision to increase outside funds, they must first calculate the costs that will be incurred by the company to acquire those funds. If a company decides to sell common stock to raise capital, the costs to the company ...
(Accountingexplained, n.d.) WACC is the overall cost of capital in order to raise capital from the company’s perspective, which
Company reaches it success by applying strategies that underline its unique core competencies or that build on its dominant logic. The firm’s financial decision about how to mix the debt and equity represents the main issue that face the financial managers of the company. The financial researchers Modigliani and Miller were the first theorists who posed the question of the relevance of the capital structure for a company. After them, the researchers in both strategic management and finance started to examine the question of the relationship between firm strategy and its capital