Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare equity financing to debt financing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare equity financing to debt financing
When it comes to such things as expansion, research and development, or simply building a new manufacturing facility, organizations raise capital in a variety of ways, each with its own unique advantages and disadvantages. In this composition, an attempt will be made to compare and contrast the debt and equity markets, as well as state what type of investor might invest in each market.
In the business world, companies finance their operations, both short-term and long-term, in the following three ways: debt financing, equity financing, or profit accumulation. Simply said, profits are generated by a company from within, but debt and equity are external, and both are controlled by managerial decree. When it comes to comparisons, debt and equity financing also provide the required amounts of business capital and both involve investors, but here, the similarities generally end. Going forward, the differences between debt and equity funding will be discussed.
When attempting to raise capital, debt financing is where an organization obtains a loan or issues bonds to private or corporate investors. The fundamentals of debt financing are similar to household debt, familiar to just about everyone. For example, companies can arrange long-term financing to acquire equipment, plant facilities, or other long-term assets. This would be like a family taking out a loan to purchase a home or auto. A company can also use a form of revolving credit to pay for its short-term financial needs, such as inventory or payroll expense. A bond issue functions like a loan between investor and corporation. Investors give the corporation a designated sum of money in exchange for interest payments, usually on a semiannual basis. When the maturi...
... middle of paper ...
...want to make large sums of money because of those risks, and want to own a piece of the pie, or company. Investors who choose company bonds, desire a steady, low risk income, are satisfied with making less because of the minimal risk, and are not concerned with owning a part of the company. Choosing between debt and equity financing depends a lot on the company’s age and financial condition. Normally, start-up organizations with no history or positive cash flow choose equity financing. Companies that have been in business for a while, have a proven track record, good credit, and a positive cash flow, can go with debt financing and take advantage of the tax deductible interest expense. On the other hand, those same companies can choose equity financing, or a mixed version thereof. It all depends on corporate management, and the direction they want to take the company.
Berk, J., & DeMarzo, P. (2011). Corporate finance: The core, second edition. (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
We defined several criteria to determine our choice – return, risks and other quantitative and qualitative factors. Targeting a debt ratio of 40% will maximize the firm’s value. A higher earning’s per share and dividends per share will lead to a higher stock price in the future. Due to leveraging, return on equity is higher because debt is the major source of financing capital expenditures. To maintain the 40% debt ratio, no equity issues will be declared until 1985. DuPont will be financing the needed funds by debt. For 1986 onwards, minimum equity funds will be issued. It will be timed to take advantage of favorable market condition. The rest of the financing required will be acquired by issuing debt.
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
There is no universal theory of the debt-equity choice, and no reason to expect one. In this essay I will critically assess the Pecking Order Theory of capital structure with reference and comparison of publicly listed companies. The pecking order theory says that the firm will borrow, rather than issuing equity, when internal cash flow is not sufficient to fund capital expenditures. This theory explains why firms prefer internal rather than external financing which is due to adverse selection, asymmetry of information, and agency costs (Frank & Goyal, 2003). The trade-off theory comes from the pecking order theory it is an unintentional outcome of companies following the pecking-order theory. This explains that firms strive to achieve an optimal capital structure by using a mixture debt and equity known to act as an advantage leverage. Modigliani and Miller (1958) showed that the decisions firms make when choosing between debt and equity financing has no material effects on the value of the firm or on the cost or availability of capital. They assumed perfect and frictionless capital markets, in which financial innovation would quickly extinguish any deviation from their predicted equilibrium.
Organizations that decide to issue bonds generally go through a series of steps. Discuss the six steps.
Assessing the capital structure of any firm is important for investors attempting to determine if...
In “Bank Debt” alternative, a sum of $3.5 million will be injected to the company through bank loans. However, the company will have to pay an additional amount of $33,750 in interest and a principal payment of $300,000 to the bank annually over the course of 7 years. Net income will come to $489,187.50 and EPS will be 0.49.
Modigliania, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review.
Evaluating a company’s financial condition can be done by looking at its profitability or its ability to satisfy long-term commitments. These measures can be viewed through an analysis of a company’s financial statements, including the balance sheet and income statement. This paper will look at the status of Scholastic Company’s (Scholastic) ability to satisfy its long-term commitments and at the profitability of Daktronics, Inc. (Daktronics). This paper will include various financial ratio calculations and an analysis of the notable trends. It will also discuss the profitability and long-term borrowing positions of the firms discussed.
There is a range of criteria relevant for a decision of financing a new venture. To construct my list for the evaluation of a new company as an opportunity I have selected to refer to t...
Adelman, P. J., & Marks, A. M. (2010). Entrepreneurial finance. (5 ed.). Bedford, Texas: Prentice Hall.
Research on the Sources of Finance for a Business Firms sometimes need to raise finance for Working Capital and Capital Expenditure. Explain what each is and give examples. · Working Capital (or Revenue Expenditure) The working capital is made up of the current assets net of the current liabilities. It is vital to a business to have sufficient working capital to meet all its requirements. Many businesses have gone under, not because they were unprofitable, but because they suffered from shortages of working capital.
The decisions around capital structure lie with the managerial members of the firm, however, it is the debt holders and shareholders who are more prone to bear risk. The normal business risk is always present, but when there is a higher level of debt the equity holders also bear an additional financial risk as there are additional charges relating to the financing. There is also a risk that if future liquidation or bankruptcy was to occur, the creditor hierarchy would favour debt holders first.
Many organizations have maximized the use of cash on hand by effective cash management techniques and the use of short-term financing. This paper will discuss various cash management techniques and short-term financing methods used by organizations.
Studying Banking and Finance at University of St.Gallen will help me further increase my proficiency in corporate finance and financial markets. The in-depth research of specific topics, as well as a comprehensive curriculum, is a possibility for me to focus on my topic of interest – the mechanisms and institutions involved in providing venture capital and identifying angel investors as means to encourage innovation.... ... middle of paper ... ...