Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How important are leadership styles
Comparisons of autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire leadership styles
Comparing 6 Types of Leadership Styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How important are leadership styles
What is the leadership style? The meaning of the leadership and style may differ from a person, situation, and the other. The word 'leadership' has been use in various aspects of human endeavour such as social works, politics, academics, businesses and other. Furthermore, previous views about the leadership can show it as personal ability. (Messick and Kramer, 2004) A leader is a person who inspires, motivates and leads people to complete the organizational goals. Leadership style play a very important role, leadership style also emphasizes the need for a manager to find his leadership style and improve his leadership style. Will has worked in the hotel for the past 12 years and has the best service record in the department. So that, Mr. …show more content…
(Anderson 1959) The person who is using the democratic style, the person will motivate his team cooperation, can effectively and actively encourage his group members. This is on account of the person who uses the democratic style of the leadership style will decided with the team members and participate in the consultations are not unilateral democracy leader and dictator. In the study, we have found that this leadership style is one of the most effective and creates higher productivity, better contributions from group members and increased group morale. Democratic leaders can lead to better ideas and more solutions, creative problem they face, and because team members are encouraged to share their ideas, opinions, ideas, skills, problem, they need to share other things (Kendra Cherry, …show more content…
So that, a laissez-faire leaders does not lead the employee, but leaves the group entirely to itself such a leader allows maximum freedom to subordinates. The person who uses the free rein leader of the leadership style are given a freehand to the employee, so that, employee can deciding their own policies and methods. In sum, laissez-faire leadership style considered better than the authoritarian style. However, it is not as effective as the democratic style of the leadership style. Laissez-faire leaders allow the employee have a complete freedom, it will make the employee to make the decisions concerning the completion of their work. It let the employee have a high degree of autonomy and self-rule, while at the same time it can offering guidance and support when requested. The laissez-faire leader using guided freedom provides the followers with all materials necessary to accomplish their goals, but does not directly participate in decision making unless the followers request their
Before you can summarize the concepts related to leadership theory, you have to define what leadership is. Leadership is a process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task or goals. The fundamental concept of leadership is indirection. In any organization, the leader indirectly impacts the performance of the organization through the performance of individual team members. To make that impact, the leader takes on the role of the coach, and the inspiratory. As the coach, the leader improves the performer's skills. As the inspiratory, the leader inspires the passion required for optimal performance. A good leader can make decisions with a clear mind and will listen to theirs but can run through every consequence and possibility in their head. They take every angle and come out with the best answer for the majority of the people or situations it effects. And will not let their emotions be shut off but will have feeling where it is needed.
(a) Autocratic, Democratic, Laissez-Faire are the three basic leadership styles. A leader who has Autocratic leadership style is primary concern is only job related and low consideration about the employee. They say to employees what to do and closely watch over performance and give little or no support for them to work out. Democratic leadership style is a high consideration about employee and low concern about job. Tell employees to do their way and oversee the performance at major stages and develop a supportive relationship with the employee. Laissez-Faire leadership style is low consideration about employee and job task. They provide little or no direction and support to perform. (b) My plan of action is getting an associate with the employee and support them what they really want better job performance as much as I can. I encourage to motivate them to work hard and help to build up their self-confidence with accomplishment.
The leader trusts his personnel and leaves it free to work by his own program. He supports his team and he is ready to help them at any time. The staff is satisfied because he has the control of the work and the productivity in most cases is high. The style requires from anyone, deep knowledge of the sector.
This style has been defined as ( Abdicates responsibilities avoid making decisions)(Robbins 2001). That would mean leaders are not involved in taking decisions at all and they are available only to provide their employees with materials and answering questions, the subordinates have complete freedom to take decisions and set objectives (Chaudhry and Husnain 2012). In other words, this theory lacks any kind on powerful leadership. Hence, there would be lack of motivation, low levels of performance, and poor work practices(Packard 2009). However, if the employees are already motivated and have full understanding and high level of knowledge regarding the mission at hand, Lassies- Faire model might works fine (Gustainis and Roosevelt 2004) .
Lewin, Leppit, and White were cautious in the conclusions the drew from this study. They noted that autocratic leadership does get results and is preferred over democratic leadership. However they observed that autocratic leadership can create tension, apathy, frustration, and dependence by the group on the leader. Further, the researchers found that some of the differences in the behaviors of the children were associated with the presence or absence of the leader. Specifically, constructive effort declined in the autocratically controlled children groups. Finally, they observed very little value in laissez-faire control ---an essentially “no-leader” approach to leadership.
Edwin T. Cornelius III defined leadership style as the broad, characteristic way in which a leader interacts with others across in various situations and occasions. (Cornelius, 2006) However, many researchers would agree that leadership style is merely traits and they can change within an organization or between different situations. Annick M. Brennen in an article stated: A study of leadership styles therefore deals mainly with the manner in which the leader carries out his/her leadership functions or roles–the use of authority and power and the approach to the decision-maki...
It is the nature, vision, and upbringing of the leader which helps them to determine which leadership theory fits them the most. A leader is the one who helps others to accomplish the goals. If there is any kind of intervention in the leadership style then most probably it would fail as the employee would be no more interested to work under the leader. A leader is someone who inspires others, helps them to view a goal and motivates them to achieve the goal. In a workplace, leaders come and go but the important thing is that leader who inspires others will leave a mark for the lifetime. Being a leader is not a difficult job, but leadership faces a jeopardy situation when a leader is incapable to answering the why and how questions. So, one should be very careful while acting as a
Continuously, there is the affiliative style which means that a leader creates a positive harmony for his employees (Six leadership styles: selecting the right leader, 2016). In other words, that leader put people first and tasks second. The Democratic leader focuses on the decision making, also, the employees in this organisation have the skills, knowledge require. Therefore, the leader trust them in their
STYLES OF LEADERSHIP An autocratic leadership style is one where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. Therefore the group becomes dependent on him or her. The result of this style is the members of the group are often dissatisfied with the leader. This results in little cohesion, the need for high levels of supervision, and poor levels of motivation amongst employees. A democratic leadership style encourages participation in decision making.
What Leadership Means Leadership is 'the behaviour of an individual when he is directing the activities of a group towards a shared goal'. (Hemphill and Coons, 1957, p.7) A leader is interpreted as someone who sets direction in an effort and influences people to follow that direction. How they set that direction and influence people depends on a variety of factors. To really comprehend the 'territory' of leadership, one should briefly scan some of the major theories, notice various styles of leadership and review some of the suggested traits and characteristics that leaders should have. There are many leadership theories.
Consultive likely to result in employees becoming angry. Democratic it is categorized by a discussion with the employees and their involvement in the making of plans and policies. They encourage participation in decision-making. Free-rein avoids influence and responsibility. The non-interest type of leader passes on the responsibility for decision-making to their employees and takes a minimum of initiative in an organization. The leader gives no direction and allows the group to establish its goals and work out its problems.
A laissez-faire leader needs immediate supervision of representatives and neglects to give general criticism to those under his watch. Exceedingly experienced and prepared workers requiring little supervision fall under the free enterprise leadership
Laissez faire leadership differs quite a bit from the traditional leadership styles. As mentioned above, the style requires quite a bit less leadership than many other styles, as the leader’s role is rather diminished. Nonetheless, the hands-off approach doesn’t mean that the framework is non-existent or irrelevant. In fact, for laissez faire to work properly and effectively, emphasis must be place on creating the right conditions for employees to flourish.
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.
According to Shockley and Zalabak (2009) "Leadership is a process of guiding individuals, groups, and entire organization in establishing goals and sustaining action to support goals.Leadership is like mapping out where you need to go to win". A Leader is a person who has a strong personality and who has an ability to manage people and work. He is also the person who is able to direct people .Usually a leaders has a lot of attributes that