The forty-nine year old Black lesbian feminist socialist, Audre Lorde claims a significant statement in her speech which is “The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house”. The master according to Lorde, is primarily a group called the hegemony which consists of people with power and knowledge production. The master tends to be white, a male, rich and the dominant majority. The master’s tools are to divide and conquer and no one can really use these tools because the tools is the master. The tools of the masters contain groups that are exclusive for certain members and even though they are fighting for the same cause, the master dismisses certain people. For example, when it comes to women rights movement, women sometimes dismissed females who are black or lesbian. The house of the master is the parameter that only change can occur within the master’s space or boundary. Although the master and the …show more content…
groups that are not the master’s main concern are both fighting and protesting against the same topics and problems, the master ignores these minority groups. In the reading by Kimberle Crenshaw she discusses the topic about intersectionality and in one of her examples it can apply to Lorde’s statement about the master, its tools and house.
Crenshaw addresses the issue about Black women challenging the hiring practices of automaker General Motors. The master in this case would be white women because the women who were hired were white women and only for front office jobs. Even though automaker general motors is a place that is intended for men to work at, women were able to obtain a job however these job positions were only available for white women. To dismantle the master, the tools, and the house it would signify that there is injustice happening within the groups who have the same ideology or beliefs. The master’s tools can never dismantle the house if the master does not start to acknowledge intersectionality. An example, when it comes to women’s rights movement the master needs to take notice that some of these women are not just white but also African American, bisexual, and etc. whom are also
fighting. Lorde’s quote is so powerful and important because it entails how even the people who are in your side will still not acknowledge you because of the hierarchy and groups they have created. Unfortunately, to destroy the master’s tools it can be impossible because the master will just attack by using the same tools. The master’s house is essential only for people who they want to recognize and help out even when there are o
Many may think this is an obvious observation to be made, yet the interpretation of titles often goes unnoticed or is simply overlooked. Hall gives a statement which gives the reader an understandable interpretation of the title when she states, “The activists of Elizabethton belonged to a vulnerable tradition of disorderly women, women who, in times of political upheaval, embody tensions that are half-conscious or only dimly understood” (Hall). This statement alone sheds light onto exactly how many different components the common marginalization of women in society takes place in. Women, not only in this time period, but also currently are often either overlooked or simply claimed to being not understood when seen attempting to create names for themselves. This may be why feminism often has a negative connotation connected to it. Feminism is ultimately the advocacy for equality of both genders in society, and this is exactly what was represented all throughout Jacquelyn Hall’s article. This was done so when Hall mentioned the common instances where female militancy had often gone “unseen” due to the fact that it was a contradiction of conventional wisdom and had simply fractured America’s image of what an ideal woman should represent. This image is often categorized as slightly submissive towards men, while behaving in a meek, controlled manner in all situations, no matter the
“Black Awakening in Capitalist America”, Robert Allen’s critical analysis of the structure of the U.S.’s capitalist system, and his views of the manner in which it exploits and feeds on the cultures, societies, and economies of less influential peoples to satiate its ever growing series of needs and base desires. From a rhetorical analysis perspective, Allen describes and supports the evidence he sees for the theory of neocolonialism, and what he sees as the black people’s place within an imperial society where the power of white influence reigns supreme. Placing the gains and losses of the black people under his magnifying glass, Allen describes how he sees the ongoing condition of black people as an inevitable occurrence in the spinning cogs of the capitalist machine.
... to the strikers’ demands or burden their husbands’ salaries, ‘some of the first ladies of this city have announced themselves as ready to carry their accomplishments into the kitchen.’” These black women were standing up to those who had oppressed them, and, for a change, making their employers lives more difficult.
As such, Lorde forwards her compelling argument of the merit of communication of anger in the combating racism by constituting a unified audience of educated white and colored women through the appeal to broad and transcendent motifs, explicitly anger and historical context, as well as a pervasive female victimhood narrative to establish multiple tracks of affinity within her audience as to pursue an ultimate common interest in the crusade against racial bigotry.
In this paper, I plan to explore and gain some insight on Audre Lorde’s personal background and what motivated her to compose a number of empowering and highly respected literary works such as “Poetry is Not a Luxury”. In “Poetry is Not a Luxury”, Lorde not only gives voice to people especially women who are underrepresented, but also strongly encourages one to step out of their comfort zone and utilize writing or poetry to express and free oneself of repressed emotions. I am greatly interested in broadening my knowledge and understanding of the themes that are most prominent in Lorde’s works such as feminism, sexism and racism. It is my hope that after knowing more about her that I would also be inspired to translate my thoughts and feelings
Hughes urges his fellow workers (white workers) to stop working separate and form a “team” to demolish the idea of the rich getting richer, and get the working class stronger, without being segregated by color and/or race. “Let us new lessons learn, All workers, New life-ways make, one union form.”
As presented in the article, "The Master 's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master 's House" by Audre Lorde, white women are discriminating against poor and coloured women and lesbians in the feminist movement through patriarchal ways. She further argues that if every woman would contribute and combine their differences, progress as well as change could be achieved against the oppression caused by men (Lorde, 1983). Additionally, the article, “A Black Feminist Statement” written by the Combahee River Collective, which was also a black feminist group that began in 1974, describes as well as examines the problems such as prejudices, racism, sexism, class oppression and homophobia that African-American women have faced throughout their lives. They also discuss the obstacles, in which they struggled and fought to overcome in order to eradicate as well as change all systems of oppressions against black women. (Combahee River Collective,
Jones gives us nothing that is revolutionary here. Instead, he lays the groundwork for this piece with the gloomy initial images of "(d)ull unwashed windows of eyes"(1). These eyes are no doubt those of the speaker, and they have been dulled and dirtied by his existence as a black man in the post-segregation 1960s. The "industry" he mentions in lines 2 and 3 is both the industry of the American machine that exploits the underprivileged, and the industry he "practice(s). " The speaker is a self-professed "slick / colored boy, 12 miles from his / home" who practices "no industry" (35).
Bell hooks said feminism should be thought of as the “struggle to end sexist oppression,” instead of the movement to make women equals of men, as the rhetoric of the latter definition implies that it is always men who are oppressing women (26). For example, John Stuart Mill wrote that historically, the “subject-class” of women (166) were dominated by men, and power was “common to the whole male sex” (165). He only focused on the domination of women by men, and ignored how non-white and poor men have faced discrimination that rich white men did not have to endure, and therefore the former feels “powerless and ineffectual in relation to ruling male groups” (hooks 18). Mill also neglected to mention that black women are often victims of domination
Sandoval theory is influential within second wave feminism. The reasoning behind this article is to provide a framework for theorizing about oppositional activity and consciousness in the United States in the post-modern world (Sandoval, 1991). Primarily, interested in race, class, and culture third world feminist expand on the male/female division. Sandoval credits Louis Althusser for the use of his theory of ideology. Much of her article incorporates influential authors that we have previous discussed in our discussion including Sojourner Truth, bell hooks, and Barbara Christian. She first introduces the concept of hegemonic feminism by discussing the different periods in history: 1. Liberal: women are “as fully human as men” 2. Marxist: “women are different from men” 3. Cultural/radical: “women are superior” (Sandoval, 2001). She later argues that oppositional consciousness is topographical rather than typological. According to Sandoval, there are four cateofries that fit well into the hegemonic frame: equal rights, revolutionary, supremacist, separatist. Yet they add, differential to act as “the mechanism that permits the driver to select, engage, and disengage gears in a system for the transmission of power (Sandoval,
Most hegemonic societies are structured on the assumption that public can be classified as innately superior or inferior to each other. Differences were thus based upon biological functions, the colour of one’s skin, one’s geographical origins and even one’s professions and ways of livelihood. Such notions were challenged in the seventeenth and the eighteenth centuries when feudal traditions in the West began to be replaced with more liberal philosophy of rationalism. The spirit of liberal feminism may be traced back to the great social and political upheaval of the French Revolution. It may be identified in Mary Astell’s (1700) angry defense of women’s equality. “If absolute sovereignty be not necessary in a state how comes it to be in a family? … If all men are born free, how is it that all women born slaves?” Many liberal feminists explain women's exclusion or inequality with reference to contemporary notions of female inferiority. They argue that women are interiorised and rendered incapable of reason because of the upbringing and education of both men and ...
The paper is on " The Approaching Obsolescence of Housework: A working-class perspective. From the piece "Women, Race, and Class" written by Angela Y Davis, housework plays a central role in this Angela Y. Davis essay. She explores the idea of capitalist critique and feminism, and she argues that housework is annoying as much as it is disempowering women in the society and women need to be released and discharged from these duties (Angela, 2011). Liberation from this chores and responsibilities can only happen if it is socialized. Black women face a double burden of doing domestic and out of household labor, unlike white women. Angela argues that the stereotype of weaknesses that is substantially associated with women does not apply to black women as they work hard to support both their communities and families. She associates weakness to white women who worked at homes only and never labored for their communities. As a fact some of this house works done by black women was
Ben Mezrich is the author of Bringing Down the House. He starts the story with a startling anecdote about Kevin Lewis, a student from MIT, playing blackjack in Las Vegas. Lewis is a member of a card counting team based on the campus of MIT. After winning $30,000, he has to leave the casino suddenly for fear of getting caught counting cards. Transitioning back to present day, Mezrich participates in the scheme, and is helping transport the capital needed to play blackjack at such high stakes. Lewis and Mezrich met at a party, and Lewis shared his story with Mezrich so his double life of making millions of dollars could become public.
Among the many subjects covered in this book are the three classes of oppression: gender, race and class in addition to the ways in which they intersect. As well as the importance of the movement being all-inclusive, advocating the idea that feminism is in fact for everybody. The author also touches upon education, parenting and violence. She begins her book with her key argument, stating that feminist theory and the movement are mainly led by high class white women who disregarded the circumstances of underprivileged non-white women.
In just a few decades The Women’s Liberation Movement has changed typical gender roles that once were never challenged or questioned. As women, those of us who identified as feminist have rebelled against the status quo and redefined what it means to be a strong and powerful woman. But at...