Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Function and features of tricksters stories
Characters in trickster narratives
Characteristics of trickster narratives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Function and features of tricksters stories
What is a trickster? A trickster typically breaks the creeds of the divine or nature, most of the time this is doomed maliciously, but sometimes with positive results. More frequently than not, the rule-breaking will capture the pattern of tricks, or thievery. Tricksters are generally cunning, foolish, or perhaps both. They are usually very funny even when they are scared. In diverse cultures the trickster and humanizing hero are often merged in one. Tricksters are particular to their own cultures. However, tricksters are naturally bound by undeniable attributes no matter what their religion is or what culture they have come from. It is thought that all of us have some type of trickster within us, whether it may be conscious or subconscious. One of today’s best known tricksters is perhaps the infamous Wile E. Coyote. Even though Wile E. Coyote is a trickster whose tricks never seem to work, he is considered to be a modern-day fictional trickster because he is always plotting and cheating to catch the road runner, two of the most common attributes of a trickster. However, there are many other common elements to a trickster.
Some of the most common elements and fundamentals of a trickster are that they tend to be creators, opportunist, mischief-makers, adventurers, manipulators, lazy, and often play the victim role (Leonard S, 2004). The most unsurpassed way to perceive a trickster is by his personality. A trickster is regularly respected and loved for his credibility and perfection, mostly exemplified as thievish, bitter, and incestuous. A trickster is usually a male but not always. Most times a trickster will take animal form. They display greed, drunkenness, lust, and gluttony. A trickster is often called a divi...
... middle of paper ...
...very similar to wile E. Coyote.
In conclusion, a trickster typically breaks the creeds of the divine or nature, most of the time this is doomed maliciously, but sometimes with positive results. Tricksters are particular to their own cultures. However, tricksters are naturally bound by undeniable attributes no matter what their religion is or what culture they have come from. There are trickster in every culture, form, and sex from around the world. Although, Wile E. Coyote is a trickster whose tricks never seem to work, he is a modern day trickster for two main reasons, first because he is always trying to manipulate the road runner into catching him, but mostly because he is continuously plotting and cheating for his benefit. Have you ever wondered what would become of Wile E. Coyote if he ever caught the road runner? Would he still be a trickster?
Hence, the image of the trickster Coyote is the focal point in these two cultures, because of his/her never-ending desire to start the next story for the creation of the world and have everything right. Native American culture has a lot of dialogic perspectives in it; in the form of stories and conversations in which all humans and non-humans communicate (Irwin,2000, p39) and writers often highlight the importance of the oral cultural inheritance both as the notion of their being and as method for their writing. Coyote in traditional oral culture reminds us the semiotic component of sufferings of
The show Supernatural revolves around the lives of two brothers Sam and Dean. Sam and Dean are hunters of all things mythical, evil, or supernatural. When the pair first meet the Trickster in the show, he is disguised as a janitor at a university (Shiban, John). Unbeknown to the brothers, he is wreaking havoc on the school and the town through a series of dangerous jokes and tricks. The trickster in Supernatural is eventually identified as a demi-God, Loki who is very similar to the Norse god Loki in the Prose Edda. They share the power to conjure images and imaginary events up, just for the fun of it. The trickster is able to rebuke Sam
For many centuries, the art of deception has been a powerful tool for achieving goals, and it has spawned the ancient debate of the ends justifying the means. In the tragedy Philoctetes by Sophocles and in Hesiod's Theogony, there are many instances of deception, particularly on the part of men in the texts. For each of them, the deceit is justified as a means of building and maintaining a reputation or obtaining power. Ultimately, however, the use of deception results in putting the men in positions of further vulnerability.
Tricksters are very important to many stories. They are the energy of mischief in the three tales we read, which are: How Stories Came to Earth, Coyote Steals Fire, and Master Cat. The tricksters add a desire to change to the story. Some of the elements in these trickster tales are anthropomorphism, cleverness, and the use of brain over brawn. These elements are often in stories, you just may not recognize them immediately when you read.
Often, the trickster finds his antics to come back and hurt him, due to greedy, conceited, or boastful behavior. These tales are told in a humorous manner, meant to entertain the reader, but are specifically designed to teach a lesson about human behavior or morals. One trickster tale, “The Coyote and the Buffalo,” is the quintessential trickster story, and uses a coyote as a main character, very popular for early Native American literature. It tells of a coyote that has gotten himself into trouble with Buffalo Bull, his enemy, and has made a deal to give the Buffalo new horns. To express his gratitude, Buffalo Bull gives Coyote a young cow on the condition that he does not kill it, but only cuts off the fat. Soon Coyote gets greedy, and kills the cow for the better meat. However, he is quickly outsmarted by a woman who offered to cook the bones. She ends up stealing them, and the coyote is left with nothing. He pleads to the buffalo for another, but the buffalo will not give it to him, “and that is why there are no buffalo along the Swah-netk’-qhu.”(Allen et. al. 52) The moral of this story is that having too much greed can leave you hungry, instead of full of the riches of life you can gain by listening and following the
Only Coyote and Anansi had consequences for their actions. Coyote didn't receive another cow and had to go home without one (Coyote and the Buffalo). Anansi is still being chased by death (Anansi and Brother Death), but Brer Rabbit escaped from Sis Cow with her milk (Brer Rabbit and Sis Cow). Also only some of the stories include the trickster roles of numbskull and cultural hero. Coyote is a numbskull when he kicks the skull and spits on it and a cultural hero when he smokes his pipe and calls out to the gods (Coyote and the Buffalo). Anansi is a cultural hero when he gives away his daughter to the old man for a wife (Anansi and Brother Death). These tales have differences in their endings and in trickster
Kind and selfish, deep and shallow, male and female, and foolish and wise aren’t always words that are associated with each other, quite the opposite in fact. However, when it comes to the trickster tales of Native Americans, each word is associated with the other and describes more or less the same person or animal. To Native American people a trickster affects the world for an infinite number of reasons, including instruction and enjoyment. A trickster, like the name implies, is a cunning deception. A trickster can be a hero. However, at the same time he could introduce death. How is that heroic? Why would a group of people want to remember a person that brings punishments such as death? The function the trickster tales have/ had on Native American communities is still powerful today quite possibly because of their context, the lessons they reap, and the concerns they address. As the tales are told, the stories unravel showing the importance of a trickster and the eye-opening experiences they bring.
For instance, when “[Candide] tried to leap into the sea after him [James the Anabaptist]; Pangloss the philosopher stopped him by proving to him that the Lisbon harbor was formed expressly for the Anabaptist to drown in” (10). When James the Anabaptist falls into the ocean Candide tries to save him, but is stopped by Dr. Pangloss. Even though Candide knows that the morally correct thing to do is to at least try to help the Anabaptist, but he doesn’t because he followed what someone else told him to do. His gullibility is further shown when the Dutch Captain is able to steal thirty thousand piasters and two sheep from Candide (40). As a result of his urgency to reunite with Cunegonde, Candide is willing to give any amount of money to be taken to Venice and thus resulting in the Dutch Captain taking advantage of him. Consequently, allowing Candide to learn that he must be aware of others and be mindful of the decisions he
At the start of the play, a tinker called Sly has a trick played upon
...portant since you do not have a strong bond with that person. Hamlet uses the advantages he has to create a mad persona of himself, which is believable, to gain his revenge on.
Witchcraft is said to be the most widespread cultural phenomenon in existence today and throughout history. Even those who shun the ideas of witchcraft cannot discount the similarities in stories from all corners of the globe. Witchcraft and its ideas have spread across racial, religious, and language barriers from Asia to Africa to America. Primitive people from different areas in the world have shockingly similar accounts of witchcraft occurrences. In most cases the strange parallels cannot be explained and one is only left to assume that the tales hold some truth. Anthropologists say that many common elements about witchcraft are shared by different cultures in the world. Among these common elements are the physical characteristics and the activities of supposed witches. I will go on to highlight some of the witch characteristic parallels found in printed accounts from different parts of the world and their comparisons to some famous fairytales.
Tricksters are both and neither argents of chaos or justice, right and wrong, yin and yang. The Joker within the Dark Knight exemplifies all aspects of what a traditional trickster is. The Joker is very anomalous to what most people would think a veteran of the armed forces is. The cookie cutter definition of what a veteran in the US is would be someone that stands up for social morals and defends the rights of the people whom he shares his country with. The Joker is very much the opposite of this and tells everyone that he is just that. He stands up for the people and organizations that do not support social norms. Throughout the movie the Joker is constantly playing tricks on people and deceiving everyone around him, it is comedic in how much deception he employs throughout his time in the story/movie. Although the movie is supposed give audiences the feeling that this could be real the Joker takes on many different disguises throughout the movie. From masked clown, to police officer, to female nurse demonstrating that no costume is too ridiculous for him. In his exchange with Harvey Dent/Two-Face the Joker tells us himself that he invents situations, albeit on a whim, showing that he is exemplifying the 4th trait of a traditional trickster. The Joker doesn’t hold anything sacred but he does show that he is a messenger of chaos. We know that mythologies have different gods that embody the qualities of chaos or directly represent chaos as their power to manipulate. It is not that much of a stretch to think that the Joker is merely acting as an agent of these gods making him a messenger of something they would hold holy and sacred to themselves. Lastly the Joker is very much a jack-of-all-trades as he has the skills to use many different weapons and explosives and even understands the inner-workings of criminal
When Hamlet is with a trustworthy friend, he is rational and symptom-free; as soon as those persons appear, however, whom he wants to convince that he is mad, he changes his behavior so as to implant different explanations in their minds for his noticeable irrational behavior. With Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, he makes believe that the reason for it is frustrated ambition; with the Queen and King, that it is their marriage that has upset him; and with Polonius and Ophelia, that it is frustrated love that has driven him mad. These rapid and clumsy changes from rational speech with those he trusts to irrational conversation with those whom he wishes to impress are strong evidence of fraud.
Upon reading Shakespeare's l604 tragedy, Othello, the Moor of Venice and Jonson's l606 comedy, Volpone, or The Foxe, a reader will notice both similarities and differences. In both plays, we meet characters of "rare ingenious knavery." Indeed, Iago, Volpone, and Mosca are uncommonly similar in nature. An elaborate "con game" is practiced in each play through intriguing dramatic inventiveness. However, the focus of Shakespeare's tragedy is upon a noble and heroic figure; the focus of Jonson's comedy is upon a monster of depravity, a genius in crime.
had ever encountered in his world. In the middle the trickster, Mr. Richie, in his red