Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive impact of reward system
Effects of getting good grades
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive impact of reward system
For over 50,000 years school has been in existence. In many of those years, students haven’t been paid any cash for their good work. I think this should change. students will be more excited to learn, they will get into a better college, and students aren’t allowed to have jobs. These are reasons why I think that students should get paid for getting good grades.
My first reason why I think that students should get paid for good grades is because they will be more excited to learn. A known fact about children is that they will work harder at a task if a reward is involved. You know how when you were a kid and something you didn’t want to do came up? Then you ended up doing it because a couple of dollars were put up on the table? This is usually the case when it comes to kids. When a reward is given they tend to want to succeed at the task even more, and usually they will succeed. From Time Magazine, a student named Ethan was a “TV addict.” But, when his mother asked him if he went a full month without watching television, then he would be rewarded $200. None of his friends thought he could do it, but he did.
…show more content…
This is true for two reasons. One, because their grades will increase. Two, because they will have more money saved up for college if their grades stay up. One of the main things that colleges look for is that you have a strong increasing trend on your grades. The higher your grades in your most challenging classes, the better your chances of getting into a better college. When students focus on achieving something, they will have a better chance at succeeding at it. If a reward is given, then they will definitely want to try harder than if there was none. The average amount for an instate college last year was $8,893.
Michael J. Sandel, the author of What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, says, “...the Advanced Placement incentive programs in Texas and elsewhere have had a positive effect... many [students] are passing the standardized exams that qualify them for college credit” (Sandel 54). This benefit of earning college credit in high school saves the students from taking these college level courses in college when they could be focusing on more in-depth classes. According to expert Jay Mathews, “Every English, Math or Science AP test...with a passing grade from independent College Board readers meant a $100 check for the student and another for the teacher. Checks totaling $90,800 went to the students and $145,370 to the teachers” (Mathews 1).
To begin, with, school should not pay students for good grades because they are constrained to earn good grades. Evidence from the NEA article claims, “Many teachers also say paying students for grades leads to practical problems in their classroom, including pressure to inflate grades.” This leads to kids trying to get good grades, which can cause stress because if they have one dreadful grade, they will worry a lot about not getting as much money. The effect of this is students will be distressed about grades that they won’t have any fun and won’t rest their brains. Clearly, students are pressured to earn good grades if they are getting
Can you imagine having a job for nine months out of the year that makes you work from 8:15 AM until 3:30 PM on every weekday and not getting paid for all of your hard, tedious work? To most of you that sounds ridiculous. That’s because it is. Students have to go through this painful process from September to May and usually don’t have anything to show for it. They dedicate their whole lives to getting all A’s on their report card and when they finally do all they usually get is a pat on the back. Thus, students should get paid for having good grades because it takes lots of hard work to get those grades, it would cause more students to strive for good grades, and it would eliminate the need for a job, which would allow for more studying time.
Some people believe merit pay creates competition and favoritism. They seem to think school systems will pay some teachers more than others and create a “battle” for money. In Merit Pay: Good for Teachers? By Gary Drevitch, one interviewee states, “I know it’s worked in some places, but I shudder at the idea of teachers being in competition with each other.” None of these problems will occur if school districts implement a successful, unbiased system. Another issue society presents when it comes to merit pay comprises of differentiating a “good” teacher from a “bad” teacher. School districts can easily evaluate a teacher’s ability to educate students by the work teachers put into helping students. Student’s reactions to a teacher’s class can also help evaluate teachers. More often than not, students will love a class where the teacher clearly demonstrates lessons, explain procedures, and adds elements of fun. On the other hand, students typically dislike classes where the teacher only comes in for a paycheck. This attitude is displayed by their lackadaisical teaching style. Other people argue that money should not be the reason why people go into teaching. Richard Barbieri, author of Merit Pay? argues that money is not an external motivator, but the substance of a teacher’s motivation. Financial incentives will cause employees to work harder
Arianna Prothero wrote the article “Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work?” Her general argument in her work is about students getting “rewards” for achieving good grades. Parents reward their kids with things such as gift cards, scholarship money, cash, and sometimes even gifts like a new bike to motivate their students to go to school and perform better on tests. I think with all of her research and facts that she is against it parents paying their children for good grades.
First off, students should be paid for having good grades because it encourages them to work harder. They would learn that goals can be achieved with hard work, and hard work has rewards in the end. Many studies have proven that people work harder when they are getting something out of it. For instance, if students were to receive the new iphone 6 plus when they receive an A on their next test, they would try harder and
College students deserve to be making money for playing sports. However, people think that they already get rewarded with education, but that is not enough. They deserve to be rewarded, because these students put a lot of their time and hard work into these sports. The schools and sports organizations should not be making a profit, while getting their services free of charge.
I believe that teachers should be graded by their students. I think that this is a good idea because teachers are graded, yes that is true, but they aren't graded by the ones who are being taught, and the ones that know how the teacher teaches and what the teacher teaches. A lot of the people who don’t like this idea are the teachers themselves, but the only reason that they deny it should happen is because they are afraid. Yes afraid of what they will be judged on. Afraid that the student that they gave the most detentions too will expel them from their job. Afraid that the things that they graded harshly will grade them harshly. People think that if this idea comes to reality then the teacher will give a poor student a good grade just so
After four long, strenuous years of hours upon hours of homework, late night studying, and emotional breakdowns, it all leads up to one thing: college. High schoolers spend their teen years working towards “perfect” GPA and build up their extracurriculars to create an impeccable application. So why, after devoting all those months of hard work, would students have to put even more into the journey to college? Have they not proven enough?
Teachers are often shamed if they give a student low grade that they believe they don't deserve. Although, if they constantly granted them the score they felt they earned, would they really be benefiting and learning from their mistakes? I believe that if students were praised only when they have accomplished something they have succeeded in, they will then learn from that and try to become better, rather than thinking they've succeeded in that subject and not doing anything to fix the mistakes made.
Should Teachers get paid based off of students test scores? According to Derrick Meador, a school administrator who has been in the education field for 16 years, “performance based pay creates competition amongst teachers.” Now maybe a few classes are high performing and those teachers who teach those classes are making more money because of their students scores. Even though it may benefit some teachers, it may negatively affect other teachers to the point that some may quit their jobs. That would leave less teachers to educate students and prepare them for later on.
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today, the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored with school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
...howed that a reward system would and did motivate people to do better in a specific activity. Throughout the study, the researcher explained how a reward or punishment system can help motivate someone to do better in a specific activity and the researcher found that a reward system can be more effective than a punishment or just a neutral state of mind.
When it comes to performance-related pay or in other words, merit pay, I believe that most people are familiar with this concept. This method of payment means that with more labor, better performance, and results, people can get a higher salary in return. It is very common in many industries, such as in sales or on production lines. However, whether it should be applied to the teaching profession is always a controversial issue. Some people think that it would be unfair for teachers, but others think that this can help increase competition, thereby improving the quality of teaching. These two completely opposite views both seem sensible. However, in my opinion, merit pay for teachers is necessary because it can improve teachers’ motivation,