“Beginning in 2007, his [Roland Fryer Jr.] project paid out $6.3 million to students in 261 urban schools...from low-income families” (Sandel 52). As a result, paying students for good grades has an impact on many people, not only students but teachers as well. Students should be paid for good grades because they will be able to save the money they earn for the future, it will motivate them to do well in school, and it will increase their scores on AP exams. With the money that students earn for their good grades, they can save it for their future. According to student Brett Upperman, “‘Kids need money so we can save it for college. And I want to buy a house someday…’”(“Cashing In” 2). Whether a student wants to attend a community college, …show more content…
According to student reporter Joseph Maneen, “Studies have shown that rewards can motivate students to attend school and that the more kids are in school, the more they learn” (“Cash Courses” 1). Teachers cover topics more in-depth than a school textbook does, so for a student to understand what the teachers are teaching they must be present in the classroom. Some may say that being rewarded with money doesn’t help improve our success in subjects we don’t like, but student Katelyn Vlastaris says, “‘If you reward us with money, it may motivate us to do great in subjects we don’t like, and then we’ll start doing well by ourselves’” (“Cashing In”). Once a student gets involved in a subject they are unsure about, they start to learn about it and understand it better, and the students will continue to grow in that subject area. According to the author of “Cash Courses”, “The monetary rewards motivate many kids, especially those from underprivileged families, to come to class when they would otherwise stay home” (“Cash Courses” 1). Students who come from families who do not have a lot of money, will want to attend school to earn extra money to use for themselves to buy basic necessities. Rewards motivate students to attend school; therefore, they obtain more knowledge given by the teacher …show more content…
Michael J. Sandel, the author of What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, says, “...the Advanced Placement incentive programs in Texas and elsewhere have had a positive effect...many [students] are passing the standardized exams that qualify them for college credit” (Sandel 54). This benefit of earning college credit in high school saves the students from taking these college level courses in college when they could be focusing on more in-depth classes. According to expert Jay Mathews, “Every English, Math or Science AP test...with a passing grade from independent College Board readers meant a $100 check for the student and another for the teacher. Checks totaling $90,800 went to the students and $145,370 to the teachers” (Mathews 1). This monetary reward is quite the motivation for students to study and work hard on their AP exams. Expert Rebecca Ruiz said, “Today Mr. Nystrom teaches AP statistics to eight times as many students as he used to, and this year 70 percent of them scored high enough to qualify for college credit, compared with 50 percent before” (Ruiz 1). This increase in AP test scores shows that the rewards offered are in fact motivating these students to work harder preparing for these exams. Any programs that offer rewards to students for excelling on their AP exams will see an increase in the scores on the
In the essay AP courses-Mounting Burden, Declining Benefit, the author Nathan Yan expresses his concern about the impact of AP classes have on students. He states that most of students who takes AP courses have an infatuation of passing the AP tests. Yan explains that with this kind of obsession, students are giving up their education, desire to learn and their understanding of the subject for a 3, 4, or 5 test score on the AP test. The writer was wondering that by giving up all these important characteristics of taking a class, a passing score on the AP test really mean anything much, let alone exemplify the readiness for college by AP students. Furthermore, he argues that by creating and teaching AP courses, teachers and administrators are
Which is said by Stanford Dornbush, director of the Stanford Center for Youth Development, “Students who receive money for grades will in the long run have lower academic performances.” If students receive money for grades they will not succeed in the long run because they are only motivated because of money. The effect of this is teaching kids to only accomplish stuff for money, which can cause them to become greedy. Obviously, students will not succeed in the long run academically if they are galvanized by
Many high school students have a job that they go to after school which takes up their time that they could be using for homework and studying. If we were to pay these students for their good grades then they would no longer have the need for a job and could get even better grades and would even be able to take harder classes because of the extra time they would have to study and for homework. With the extra time that students would receive they could progress their education even
In many ways this is true because without them getting anything in return, there is nothing that provides the person into doing it. Money stimulates children to work hard in school because they will want to do the best they can so they get the best result possible, and at the end, get rewarded not just with the money, but with a better possibility of doing well in the future. About 75% of students don't like trying hard in school because they feel like they aren't getting anywhere and that it is just a waste if their time. The money will encourage kids to work hard, and they will then realize that school is not as bad as they think. Lastly, kids will learn that work actually pays off. They will realize that when you work hard and put effort, you will always get something good back in return. This will get them ready for the future because they will know from experience that you do get rewarded for your effort. As you can see, people usually work harder when their is something in return, and the money will encourage students to commit to their
The general argument by author Arianna Prothero in her work, “Paying Kids to do Well in School?”, is that school authorities are trying to use incentives to help kids perform better on tests. More specifically, Arianna argues that educators have long used rewards to prod children into doing what they want. The rewards sometimes consist of items such as gift cards, scholarship money, and in some cases cold hard cash. Technically, anything that motivates a student to do something is an incentive. Therefore, an incentive could be as simple as putting a sticker on a test or even as extreme as rewarding perfect attendance with a brand new car, like Raytown did last year.
Getting an A in a difficult class should and is a better amount of fulfillment than getting a hundred dollars or whatever the case may be. Research found on students “show that they all perform better and work harder when the task is interesting, fun to do, and relevant to their lives” (Flannery). Well, that seems quite rational! Also, money in a poor household could cause HUGE conflicts. Parents “rip teachers” when their kid gets a C according to Mary Ellen Flannery’s “Cash For Grades?”
“ Why can’t I get paid for good grades? ” I asked. “ Because you should be able to do well on your own.” My mom says. Parents should not pay students for good grades because they only want the money and not good grades to help pass to the next grade. Students would lose the love of learning in school. Students would forget what they learned in class. School becomes more of a business transaction then a place to grow up. Paying students for good grades is a bad idea because student lose the love of learning, they don’t remember what they have learned, and school becomes more of a business transaction the a place to grow and belong to.
Psychologists Bob Brooks and Sam Goldstein explain that research by Edward Deci and others shows that most children, by nature are motivated to learn. “External motivators may be effective and well intended.” says Goldstein, ”but they clearly work against the continued development of a child’s intrinsic motivation.. It doesn’t really teach kids the reward of learning for learning’s sake.” In other words. Kids start to lose interest in the material they are studying.
Students should not receive cash for grades because students would work for the money and not for their own good, teachers would feel pressure as well as students, and there are better things the money can be spent on. To start off, paying students would prevent them from having any motivation. The kids might earn grades for the wrong reasons, for the money and not for the satisfaction of a job well done. Not for their own benefit, and would they really do as well in school if they weren't receiving cash?
One of the main reasons to paying students is that it might help the people that are having trouble stay in school. In the article “should you bribe your kids to get good grades”. In paragraph 13 it said that “it could be a way to get them a jump-start to get them to try a little bit harder”. Someday i do not want to come to school but if i knew i was going to get paid for grades i would be up here all day. Some schools or parents don't think kid or students should get paid. They think they should be able to do it without getting paid. But i still believe that whatever u have to do to keep your kids in school is a good idea. Paying student helps them stay in school.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
Children these days are always asking, “Mom, do I have to go to school today?” Students think school is dull, difficult and frustrating. But if they are paid to receive good grades? Some say the money motivates the students. On the other hand, certain parents and schools say it pressures them.
Kids who are being motivated by getting paid or reward is lazy because kids are only doing good to get something. Money should be used to reward your kid for getting good grades because it's their job to go to school and do go for himself not for that reward. Kids should be motivated by seeing that if they but in that good work and getting good grades there is a reward after all but it may not be money or something like that it is graduating either 8th and going into high school or graduating highschool and going to college for a good job that is what kids should be motivated by.This article I read Why parent should never give kids money for good grades at school say It’s not what ultimately motivates me though and I don’t want it to be what motivates my kids. They need to be motivated to learn for the learning itself and striving hard based on desires that are deeper than
“A wise person should have money in their head, but not their heart.” These words by Jonathan Swift sum up just why being too quick to give our direct rewards for grades harms youth and their mentality, despite any short-term benefits. If parents and schools want motivated, positive students who succeed later in life, paying for grades is out of the question. The practice encourages students to have a poor mindset for education. Its benefits are limited to short-term study and memorization.
In today’s society, every child in the United States has to attend school from preschool to the end of high school. A total of 13 years, or till s/he reaches 18 years old and decides to drop out. School exist to help students realize their full potential, to equip students with the skills they will need to achieve success and contribute to society, or to foster the development of independence, critical thinking, and strong ethical values. We would expect every student to be excited about going to school every day and doing their best, but there are others who are not as excited.. There are many students in the United States that take advantage of the free public education system that is offered, and become successful from the education they’ve received. But not all students take advantage of the education system and don’t do the work that they are supposed to, and do bad in standardized test. In the article by Jennifer Medina named “Next Question: can students be paid to excel?” it states that “School districts nationwide have seized on the idea that a key to improving schools is to pay for performances, whether through bonuses for teachers and principals, or rewards like cash prizes for students.” Many people believe that this will help improve students’ performance while the time the cash reward program is offered. But many other people including me, believe that this is not a good idea for the students overall. Los Angeles middle schools should not offer cash rewards to students to improve their academic motivation and performance because they will be thinking about the money rather than their own motivation to become educated and successful in life.