Why kids should get paid for good grades
Would you pay your child for getting good grades?, or would you like to get paid for your good grades? Parents have payed their children for their proficiency several times, and people are starting to realize what a magnificent idea this is. People believe that this can make kids try harder and it can help them gain more knowledge. Others think this could be an unsuitable theory because it makes kids only want to learn for the money. In my opinion, paying kids for good grades is an excellent suggestion.
People may say it is a bad idea to pay children for good grades . In some ways, this could be true like…. Kids will never just want to learn to be successful, their main focus will be to do the best they can and get rewarded. Another reason why some people disagree is because they
…show more content…
In many ways this is true because without them getting anything in return, there is nothing that provides the person into doing it. Money stimulates children to work hard in school because they will want to do the best they can so they get the best result possible, and at the end, get rewarded not just with the money, but with a better possibility of doing well in the future. About 75% of students don't like trying hard in school because they feel like they aren't getting anywhere and that it is just a waste if their time. The money will encourage kids to work hard, and they will then realize that school is not as bad as they think. Lastly, kids will learn that work actually pays off. They will realize that when you work hard and put effort, you will always get something good back in return. This will get them ready for the future because they will know from experience that you do get rewarded for your effort. As you can see, people usually work harder when their is something in return, and the money will encourage students to commit to their
In “Grades and Money,” Steven Vogel makes it clear that he is disappointed and frustrated with what grades have become. He believes that grades have become commoditized and that students’ grades suffer because of their relation with money. Vogel also believes that students no longer take any risk with their education. I agree with Vogel that grades are being equated to money by students, that students’ work suffers because of grades, and that students no longer take risks in their educational process.
Students brought up in a system of incentives get accustomed working for grades. So yes. It works for many students to motivate work. But if "working" means learning, these external incentives teach the students the wrong thing to aim at, the wrong reason for doing it, and often the wrong way to do it. If we are hoping our students will be life-long learners, why would they continue learn in the grade-less post-graduation world? (Schwartz, 2011)
1.“If, for example, students were not ultimately rewarded for spending their early adulthoods pursuing undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, or if the hardest-working and most productive workers were paid the same as the median worker, then citizens would have little incentive to develop expertise, to exert effort, or to excel in their work.”
“Beginning in 2007, his [Roland Fryer Jr.] project paid out $6.3 million to students in 261 urban schools...from low-income families” (Sandel 52). As a result, paying students for good grades has an impact on many people, not only students but teachers as well. Students should be paid for good grades because they will be able to save the money they earn for the future, it will motivate them to do well in school, and it will increase their scores on AP exams. With the money that students earn for their good grades, they can save it for their future. According to student Brett Upperman, “‘Kids need money so we can save it for college.
There has always been a lot of debate on whether or not college athletes should get paid. With as much money as college sports makes from these student athletes, should these student athletes be getting paid? There are many different stances on why I feel like these student athletes should be getting paid. I will talk about some of the reasons on why they should get paid. Being a student athlete is a very stressful thing in life at that age as they are attending school full time and working extremely hard at being the best athlete they can on the field.
For years college athletes have been working their whole life to play in College. Day in and day out, working their hardest, pouring their heart and soul into their sport. Over decades athletes have been able to showcase their talent to get to College. When a college school recruits you, your job is to bring in money for the University. A real athlete plays the game for their desire and passion for the sport. Recently, athletes have been questioning whether or not they should be paid for their hard work and dedication to the sport. In this essay, I will explain the effects of paying athletes.
say that money is the only reason for an education, but it seems to be the force that drives
Education is certainly the most valuable investment that a person can dedicate his/her efforts to. Parents certainly has been trying to enforce such a belief by managing the time spent on
There are more than 420 thousand student athletes in the NCAA. They all play a lot of different sports football,basketball,soccer. The athletes play a lot of different sports and some of them go to the professional and some do not . The average Football Bowl Subdivision Player is paid 137,357 per year, and the men's basketball player gets paid 289,031per year. The players earns just $23,204 in scholarship money to go to there college that is not enough to pay for all there needs. That will barely pay for books and food and everything they need to keep their hygiene good . Then they will have to save all there money all year long they get there next check for the year. That's why I think “All student athlete that plays college sports should
College students deserve to be making money for playing sports. However, people think that they already get rewarded with education, but that is not enough. They deserve to be rewarded, because these students put a lot of their time and hard work into these sports. The schools and sports organizations should not be making a profit, while getting their services free of charge.
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today, the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored with school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
When children reach a certain age, they like to have their own spending money. While they sometimes receive money for birthdays and other holidays, some parents pay their children for doing work around the home. While this benefits the child in an effort to have their own money, there are many pros and cons of giving kids an allowance for chores.
Although that is true for some, it is not true for all. Some would say that money is not everything, as long as they are happy. While that is true and happiness should hold a great power over people’s lives, for most, college will bring people happiness. There is a great percentage that individuals that attend college will still benefit the same if not more than those that do not attend college. As earlier implied, college is not for everyone and Isabel Sawhill and Stephanie Owen display that well in their essay, “Should Everyone Go to College?.” Owen and Sawhill say that people are actually doing some individuals a disservice by telling them everyone needs to go to college (Page 209, Para 1). In “Should Everyone Go to College?” they say this because they think it is necessary that people think about their likely education path and career path before investing so much money and time into secondary education (Page 212, Para 1). This is true, people should not invest a lot of their self before they have thought about where they want this to lead them. Even though everyone does not have to go to college to benefit in academic, financial, and social ways, for most, it certainly will not do anything but make them grow as a person and become more
The opposing opinion believes that grades serve as a way to “determine which students should be promoted to the next level.” They are a form of motivation that help students create a desire to learn in the subject they love and to do more than just memorize the material. Lowman says that “some students strive for high grades as rewards” while “others are motivated more by a a fear of failure.” Something else that plays into this is that if letter grades are not used in elementary school but are used in all the upper levels