Cash For Grades Is Useless
All across the country, there is a “cash for grades” program going around, in an attempt to try to boost student achievement. The majority of these programs are taking place in high schools and are essentially paying scholars “for doing what we want students to do: achieve good grades, get high test scores, attend classes, stay out of fights, and the like (Peterson). “Bribing” adolescents to achieve a better reputation for one’s school (test scores) is not as straightforward as it sounds. The “desire to learn” is still a dilemma among students and getting one’s wallet fatter will not solve this complication. Students should not be paid for earning quality grades because getting an education is not a job, rewards should only be followed by true achievements, and these programs do not encourage students to challenge themselves.
To a great degree, students should not be paid for earning quality grades because getting a FREE education is not a job! Most parents’ argument most likely sound like this: “My kid’s job is school. So why shouldn’t I pay her for good grades? After all, I get paid for the work I do.” As this brainless statement may seem true, do adults get paid to sit on their butts all day? The answer to that question is no. Saying this unreasonable argument is the equivalent to saying
…show more content…
Getting an A in a difficult class should and is a better amount of fulfillment than getting a hundred dollars or whatever the case may be. Research found on students “show that they all perform better and work harder when the task is interesting, fun to do, and relevant to their lives” (Flannery). Well, that seems quite rational! Also, money in a poor household could cause HUGE conflicts. Parents “rip teachers” when their kid gets a C according to Mary Ellen Flannery’s “Cash For Grades?” Thus, “the bigger the reward, the bigger the damage done”
In “Grades and Money,” Steven Vogel makes it clear that he is disappointed and frustrated with what grades have become. He believes that grades have become commoditized and that students’ grades suffer because of their relation with money. Vogel also believes that students no longer take any risk with their education. I agree with Vogel that grades are being equated to money by students, that students’ work suffers because of grades, and that students no longer take risks in their educational process.
The practice of offering incentives for charitable acts is very common because it is an effective way to get people to donate time and/or money. Although I grant that the idea that incentives are morally wrong because people are acting out of self interest rather than out of wanting to do the right thing, I still maintain my view that self interest is a natural part of being a human and it is inevitable that we will take into consideration how things will benefit ourselves as well as others. The exchange of donations for grades or any other kind of reward is what I may argue ethically and morally correct because humans are not only motivated to do good, but we are also acting in good faith by taking the incentives because normally they are minimal in comparison to the donation they are making so the result is still greatly an act of kindness.
According to student reporter Joseph Maneen, “Studies have shown that rewards can motivate students to attend school and that the more kids are in school, the more they learn” (“Cash Courses” 1). Teachers cover topics more in-depth than a school textbook does, so for a student to understand what the teachers are teaching they must be present in the classroom. Some may say that being rewarded with money doesn’t help improve our success in subjects we don’t like, but student Katelyn Vlastaris says, “‘If you reward us with money, it may motivate us to do great in subjects we don’t like, and then we’ll start doing well by ourselves’” (“Cashing In”). Once a student gets involved in a subject they are unsure about, they start to learn about it and understand it better, and the students will continue to grow in that subject area.
Which is said by Stanford Dornbush, director of the Stanford Center for Youth Development, “Students who receive money for grades will in the long run have lower academic performances.” If students receive money for grades they will not succeed in the long run because they are only motivated because of money. The effect of this is teaching kids to only accomplish stuff for money, which can cause them to become greedy. Obviously, students will not succeed in the long run academically if they are galvanized by
Some parents reward their child for the outstanding grades on their report card; nowadays schools have programs which reward the students instead of the parents. The Cash for Grades Program is a program which rewards cash incentives to all hard-working students in the school system. This program is “jointly funded by public money and private donations” (“Cash for Grades”). People from the community or successful companies financially support this program because they understand the role of education in a child’s life, even if it will cost them to donate money for the children. “At each evaluation, they can earn $50 for every A they receive, $35 for each B and $20 for every C” (“Cash for Grades”). The goal of the program is to reach out and help children from all social classes, either by cash or motivation. Many programs like the Cash for Grades Program such as Gr...
Many high school students have a job that they go to after school which takes up their time that they could be using for homework and studying. If we were to pay these students for their good grades then they would no longer have the need for a job and could get even better grades and would even be able to take harder classes because of the extra time they would have to study and for homework. With the extra time that students would receive they could progress their education even
When students arrive at university, professors expect them to understand the material to an exceptional standard. The problem is that grade inflation is occurring more regularly in secondary schools and universities across the country and when these students’ marks are sent to universities or colleges, the student may be given multiple scholarships for something that he/she should not have earned. Grade inflation is conceived between both students and teachers, meaning that the students are given higher grades when they have inadequate learning, reading, and verbal skills, while the teachers do not have to grade as many papers as they should in the real curriculum. There have been multiple examinations that have confirmed that grade inflation is very real and still occurs today. Students seem to think that they do not need to put forth much effort in school to do well and grade inflation encourages this thought.
By paying them, they would learn many valuable lessons that will help them in the future. Students should be paid for good grades because it encourages them to work harder, it helps the economy and last but not least, it will allows students to gain more responsibility and would increase their self-esteem. Some responsibilities would include taking care of their own belongings and learning to spend money when it is only needed. Obviously, being paid for good grades will give a brighter future to students and they will always be confident in themselves at whatever they
College students deserve to be making money for playing sports. However, people think that they already get rewarded with education, but that is not enough. They deserve to be rewarded, because these students put a lot of their time and hard work into these sports. The schools and sports organizations should not be making a profit, while getting their services free of charge.
Why should you pay students to study? One of the reasons is the achievement gap. The achievement gap is the difference in academic performance between specific groups of students. The difference can be shown through test scores, grades, and dropout rates just to name a few. In the article, “Achievement Gap” by Susan Ansell, the National Center for Education Statistics’ special analyses in 2009 and 2011 stated that “black and Hispanic students trailed their white peers by an average of more than 20 test-score points on the NAEP math and reading assessments at 4th and 8th grades, a difference of about two grade levels” (pg.2).
After four long, strenuous years of hours upon hours of homework, late night studying, and emotional breakdowns, it all leads up to one thing: college. High schoolers spend their teen years working towards “perfect” GPA and build up their extracurriculars to create an impeccable application. So why, after devoting all those months of hard work, would students have to put even more into the journey to college? Have they not proven enough?
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately every one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored by school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life. Although learning has its own rewards, some students respond better to money. This essay explains how students will be paid and the reasons that they should receive money for getting good grades. Some reasons that students should be paid are: if students received rewards for having good grades fewer students would drop out, graduates would be better educated, people would seek higher education, less crime would be committed, less people would rely on the government and graduates would be more qualified for better jobs.
In recent years, much more attention has been paid to the college education. An Increasing number of people hold the opinion that college should give practical training that is beneficial for students ‘career instead of providing “generalist” education, such as science, literature, history, philosophy, art. From my point of view, broad range of knowledge courses is necessary and no one can deny the benefit of those courses.
“Go to school and get good grades, so you can get into good colleges. Also make sure you are studying hard for standardized tests, all meanwhile being actively involved in your school and community, so you can get scholarships to pay for college”. This phrase may be one you have heard more than once in your life—which if not for you, then for many others, put a sense of determination to get good grades, and do well in school. It all seems like a straight path to success, until you are at the crossroads that is college. Suddenly, you are bombarded with the problem of paying for college.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the