Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects on mental illness in school effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects on mental illness in school effects
“A wise person should have money in their head, but not their heart.” These words by Jonathan Swift sum up just why being too quick to give our direct rewards for grades harms youth and their mentality, despite any short-term benefits. If parents and schools want motivated, positive students who succeed later in life, paying for grades is out of the question. The practice encourages students to have a poor mindset for education. Its benefits are limited to short-term study and memorization. And lastly, paying students could have severe effects on their intrinsic motivation, which is crucial for their future. With a negative impact on learning, mixed-at-best benefits, and a dangerous loss in self-motivation likely, paying for good grades is a short-term solution that sours in the long run.
First of all, students should not be paid for good grades as it often leads to a damaging school mindset, As a result of money being given out, schools are seen
…show more content…
This is supported with a test by a Cornell labor economist (C. Kirabo Jackson) that shows a “30% [increase] in SAT and ACT scores and an 8% rise in college-bound students when schools paid students.” However, this can easily be challenged as even if students study more for some tests, colleges take far more into account, and future courses essential to gain valuable life skills will not necessarily have direct cash rewards. The mindset of students becomes, however, “Why should I take classes for no cash in return?” leading to less knowledge gained and less interest in imperative courses. This is evident from studies by Edward Deci and others (as previously seen) that show how “[a child’s internal motivation to learn] is soon eclipsed by the promise of external rewards, and a child’s natural enthusiasm for learning may be dampened.” In brief, paying for good grades does nothing for the
The author argues that by focusing on the economic benefit, educators risk distracting students from the importance of the academic process itself. However, students of different socioeconomic backgrounds have different motivational factors. A study conducted by Stanford University in 2015 researched this particular topic. Five hundred-seventy students from different universities, ethnicities, and financial backgrounds were asked what motivates them to do well in school? Based on their results, low-income students were highly motivated by the
However, such accusations such as laziness and entitlement, although common, have been prevalent amongst those of college age as proven in “A’s for Everyone.” Shepard had investigated the cause behind this and had put the blame on grade inflation in the years prior to entering college, the pressure to get superb grades due to high tuition costs, and most importantly the belief that “effort” constitutes a grade bonus. However, if one has entered the school system in America, one could see the relative ease in which one could improve their grades through inordinate amounts of extra credit. Multiple students have heard and even seen fellow students ask their parents to even come in for meetings of which equate to blaming their child’s poor grades on the teacher and harassing said teacher to allow their child, soon to be a hardworking, productive citizen of society, to get the “grade they
Simply speaking, students who place a high degree of emphasis on obtaining the uppermost marks on college grades, despite the opportunity cost in sacrificing a real education, often go without learning. Edmundson observes this phenomenon, as he details the consumeristic approach in evaluating the economic and personal value of an institution. The greater the value proposition of a university, the greater the reward in the eyes of the student. All this to hurry the offset of the economic weight of their education. Should students be allowed to attend college tuition-free, or greatly reduced, many students, myself included, would feel a lightened sense of hurry and rush to graduate, thereby allowing them to spend one
“Beginning in 2007, his [Roland Fryer Jr.] project paid out $6.3 million to students in 261 urban schools...from low-income families” (Sandel 52). As a result, paying students for good grades has an impact on many people, not only students but teachers as well. Students should be paid for good grades because they will be able to save the money they earn for the future, it will motivate them to do well in school, and it will increase their scores on AP exams. With the money that students earn for their good grades, they can save it for their future. According to student Brett Upperman, “‘Kids need money so we can save it for college.
With the cost of education rising and no stop in sight, many students are beginning to question the worthiness of a college education. It is commonly known that individuals who go to school will make more money over their life time compared to someone who does not. This is a great motivator for many wanting to go. An article written by The Economist
Does Grade Inflation Matter to the Modern Day Student? Does grade inflation really matter? Jordan Ellenberg is the author of the article that is under question regarding why grade inflation does not matter. There are two different viewpoints to this argument, one corresponding to the answer of yes it does matter, or no; grade inflation does not matter and the world of education and the students are making a big deal about absolutely nothing at all. Grade inflation can matter internally due to the fact that it can be difficult to motivate students to excel, at the higher end of the GPA standings, students are lumped together as all being smart and above average at that high a level.
In the opinionated article “Flunking 3rd-Graders Can Do More Harm Than Good,” David Callaway persuades school members that flunking students is a poor decision because of the impacts it has on the schools. Flunking students requires excessive costs. Inciting why flunking students is detrimental to the schools, Callaway states, “Forcing a student to repeat a grade costs an average of $10,000 per student per year.” If schools are having to sacrifice extra funds to hold back students, they are taking money that can be used to assist other struggling students. If the money is taken away from the struggling students, then the amount of students failing will increase. Then the amount of students that need to be flunked also grows which in the end, inclines the total amount of funds spent on students repeating grades and leaves little to no funds for other
That is a good argument but having to repay for a class is just going to motivate them to be successful more because no one is going to want to repay for a class a third or even in some cases a fourth time. What I said early still implies, students need to know there is consequences and having to pay for school gives them that and motivates them to
A diverse array of arguments concerning the costly price of college and its equivalence to the ultimate result of attending persists along a vastly debatable spectrum of economic and social influences. Those seeking a better standard of living by the means of higher education often find themselves in conditions that are more adverse than their lifestyle prior to attending college. Efforts to dwindle the expenditure of college education have the potential to produce a heightened reality of the world, with intellectual knowledge as a pivotal key. The expensive cost and limitability of a college education has potential to invoke incentive to work harder in one’s studies; however, the cost can crush individuals enrolled, obtaining a college degree does not ensure employment, and an excessive number of individuals are hesitant to attend college in the first place due to the prevalent debt tied to its completion.
middle of paper ... ... If students got paid for having good grades, then they would be less likely to commit crimes such as murder, assault and auto theft. The economy of the U.S.A. gains by paying students to get through high school and go beyond. There are many estimates out there evaluating just the cost benefit that can be gained from having students graduate high school, and it seems that as a country we can save anywhere from two to seven thousand dollars for each student who completes high school.
When we are in high school all we hear is that we need to make good grades so that we can get into a good college. Nowadays people with a higher education are making the same or even sometimes less amount of money than those with nothing higher than a high school education. The ones who did not go to college end up not having to pay and type of debt but the people that do go to college have to pay back the debts with the money that make that is the same as those who don't go to college. “Post secondary education should help students to discover what they love to do, get better at it, and develop the ability to continue learning so they become agents of change.” (source B)
In order to succeed in today’s society, a college education is a necessity. Despite this, a large amount of high school graduates are not given the opportunity to attend college due to the extremely high cost of college tuition. Also, many students who are able to afford going to college have to change their major from one they love to a major that will lead to a career where they are able to afford paying off their debt. By 2020, the United States economy will experience a shortfall of 5 million college-educated workers due to these high tuition prices (Bergeron and Martin, 2015). This is where the idea of tuition-free colleges will help.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
Teachers and school reputations will remain high. Teachers and schools want to give a good impression and in order to do that they need to produce something that all students want, a good grade. Some say grade inflation helps show students they are smart and capable of working hard and receiving good grades. This motivates them to work harder to keep those high grades. Grade inflation also gives students the opportunity to apply them selves to the next level University.
Although a college education is costly, many people go to foresee a wealthier future. College, in time, pays for itself through advantages with a degree. David Leonhardt has researched that, “the pay gap between college graduates and everyone else reached a record high last year.” In today’s society, it is expected of students to earn a college degree even though colleges aren’t making enough graduates.