Does Paying Kids To Do Well In School Actually Work Summary

616 Words2 Pages

Arianna Prothero wrote the article “Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work?” Her general argument in her work is about students getting “rewards” for achieving good grades. Parents reward their kids with things such as gift cards, scholarship money, cash, and sometimes even gifts like a new bike to motivate their students to go to school and perform better on tests. I think with all of her research and facts that she is against it parents paying their children for good grades.
More specifically, Prothero argues that students should not have to be bribed in order to improve their grades on quizzes and tests. Parents believe that paying or gifting their kids for good grades, will help them be successful in their child’s life. They think of it as an incentive to gift their students to study for good grades. In better details, parents should not have to reward their kids with prizes in order for them to achieve their grades. The students should be able to achieve good grades without getting a reward or prize in return. Some people may look at it as lazy. Parents should also help …show more content…

“Students don’t necessarily know how to improve their test scores, so even if they’re motivated to try harder, that doesn’t mean they can actually do better.” One of the parents should help them study everytime they have an upcoming quiz or test. I would understand if the student is younger and they get a sticker or something but getting a child a new bike is a little overboard. Kids should be motivated for good grades without getting any kind of reward or gift in return. Rewarding students for good grades will teach them to only work for the gift. That gives them the idea to only study when they are getting a gift. In other words, it teaches them to be lazy. They only want to work when they get some kind of gift or reward in

Open Document