Why Monarchy should be abolished?

583 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The case against monarchy

WHY MONARCHY SHOULD BE ABOLISHED

“The King must die so that the country can live”. With this strong sentence the French revolutionary Maximilien Robespierre expressed his opinion about this absurdity that we use to call monarchy. The monarchy is an historical tyranny that should be abolished now, and replaced by the true government of the people, the republic.
Why you, citizen, can’t live in the same palaces than the king? Why you, worker with full rights “in theory”, should pay the dinners and the capricious live of the monarchs you haven’t chose? Why a human being, only for being born somewhere, has the right to be head of a state and not you? We’re supposed to have the same rights, aren’t we?
And the final question that we should make us is: Should we accept this grievance against our dignity and intelligence? The answer is: no.

Many people say the monarchs don’t have a relevant function so it doesn’t really matter to maintain them: False, monarchs don’t have a relevant function so it doesn’t make sense to maintain them.

Some people say the monarchy is the same that the presi...

Show More
Related

  • Life of Maxamillian Robespierre

    987 Words  | 2 Pages

    Maximilien Robespierre declared at the trial of King Louis XVI. “The King must die so that the nation can live.” Robespierre advocated the kings demise and with it the ways of the Ancien Régime. However, in an ironic twist of fate his words also foreshadowed his own rise and fall as the leader of the French Revolution. Known as “The Incorruptible”, or alternately “Dictateur Sanguinaire” Robespierre is a monumental figure of the French Revolution, but which was he? Was he the incorruptible revolutionist fighting to overthrow the Ancien Regime or a raging radical that implemented his own absolute tendencies under the cover of the revolution? When dissecting the dichotomy of Robespierre’s life and actions during the French Revolution and comparing it to the seven main characteristics of Absolutism it can be seen that Robespierre held many absolutist tendencies.

    Read More

  • Letter From Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    1086 Words  | 3 Pages

    First, King implies that the purpose of the government is to protect and defend its citizens. For example, he refutes the clergymen’s praise for the police force. To emphasize their brutality, he uses parallel structure: “I doubt that you would so quickly commend the policemen if you were to observe their ugly and inhumane treatment... if you were to see them slap and kick… if you were to observe them… refuse to give us food because we wanted to sing our grace together” (King 750). Additionally, King says that the government must not only

    Read More

  • Boussuet And John Locke: A Comparative Analysis

    345 Words  | 1 Pages

    Boussuet says, “Without the absolute authority the king could neither do good nor repress evil. It is necessary that his power be such that no one can hope to escape him, and finally, the only protection of individuals against the public authority should be their innocence” (400). He also focuses

    Read More

  • Lord of the Flies Final Essay

    1319 Words  | 3 Pages

    Absolutist kings rule with terror. Fear sweeps over their territories, which causes their subjects to be obedient and docile. Citizens have to be disciplined to protect the nation. They are suppressed from rebellions and protests because of the consequences that might bestow upon them. Simply put is that they are not allowed to speak against the king. Consequently, they do not have much opinion in the government. The ruler’s decision is solely based on his discretion and none of his subjects’. A major rebellion has to break out in order for the king to realize a fault in his order. As exemplified in the French Revolution, the

    Read More

  • The Key Elements Of The French Revolution

    1594 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before the Revolution, France experienced a period of time called the Enlightenment. Traditional concepts, such as religion and style of government, were debated upon by scholars, philosopher, and ordinary people. One of the most famous writers of the Enlightenment was philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. He introduced the concept that the people should be in charge instead of an individual ruler. This idea became known as the general will. In his “Ths Social Contract” Rousseau states, “Each of us puts his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will, and, in our corporate capacity, we receive each member as an indivisible part of the whole” (Rousseau). Throughout the future French Revolution, Rousseau’s writings became a cornerstone to the French people. His ideas gave the French people a definition on why the position of the King should be abolished. What was even better, Rousseau even described why the people be placed in charge. At the time of the Revolution an enormous amount of France’s power was allocated to the King and very little was left for the people. In order to achieve more power for themselves, the citizens of France lobbied against a monarchy and instead for Rousseau’s philosophy that the collective whole should rule. Under the ideas of Rousseau, all French citizens would receive power because the collective whole was the governing power. However, obtaining such intentions required that the people abuse the traditional powers of France as Furet

    Read More

  • The Declaration of Independence of the United States of America

    1463 Words  | 3 Pages

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

    Read More

  • Absolute Monarchism

    706 Words  | 2 Pages

    The prevailing government of Europe from 1900-century back was absolute monarchism, this form of government worked very well considering the belief of all people in god and the teaching. Monarchist use this belief to justify this rule in. if they could make the people believe that they were ordained position by god then they had no worries because the people belief in god was so prevailing that it was not mentionable in private to go against it. Napoleon and Louis XIV were the ideal rules to use this type of ruling. Napoleon and Louis XIV were the same type of rulers by using the divine right monarchy to control the people of their country, which was France. Napoleon and Louis way of ruling and other similarity were so alike that they could have traded their period when they sat at the throne and the people would have not noticed

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of European Absolutism

    484 Words  | 1 Pages

    The European monarchs during that time period lacked any kind of selflessness. They want to keep themselves safe and protected. They will act deceitful and will always be eager to avoid danger (Machiavelli). They will be a person’s best friend when they need to, but when they are put in danger, they forget everything about the friendship. The selfish way of ruling makes it a tyranny. People's opinions about how the government should run are uncared for which gives the monarchs a chance to rule in a cruel way, in a tyranny. The monarchs were doing what they felt was right for their kingdom, but they should not have the right to decide what the members of the government do

    Read More

  • Maximilien Robespierre, Leader of the French Revolution

    1448 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Europe cannot conceive of life without Kings and nobles; and we cannot conceive of it with them. Europe is lavishing her blood to preserve her chains, whereas we are lavishing ours to destroy them”(Maximilien Robespierre). For centuries upon centuries, the monarchal system had dominated European life. The very nature of this method of rule incited rebellious feelings, as a definite imbalance of power was present. Understandably, people under this system had risen against authority. The glorious nation of France was no exception. The eighteenth century brought about a great deal of economic and social turmoil. By the end of this one hundred year period, rebellion had been talked about by many citizens for quite some time. However, no definitive action was taken until one man stepped to the forefront; Maximilien Robespierre. Born in Arras, France about thirty years prior to the French Revolution, Robespierre was an immensely intelligent man as is seen from his ability to read and write fluently from the age of eight (the Force of 10). Robespierre rose from fairly humble origins to become a provincial lawyer, advancing further to become a representative in the Estates General, and eventually ascending to the leader of the French Revolution itself. For its sake he sent thousands to the guillotine, overthrew a monarchy, declared a new national religion, and invigorated the will of a nation. “No individual of the French Revolutionary era, with the exception of Napolean Bonaparte, has excited more passion in his time than the…dedicated provincial lawyer, Maximilien Robespierre”(Maximilien 1). During this era, Robespierre led France’s world inspiring cry for the liberation of mankind and petrified the world with its relentle...

    Read More

  • Plato's Criticism of Democracy

    900 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...nstead the state consists of rulers who behave like subjects and subjects who behave like rulers. The people begin to desire a strong leader, who will make the difficult decisions for them and bear the consequences: the Democracy has become a Tyranny.

    Read More

  • Justification of French Revolution

    1757 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...wn the monarchy because “World History,” states that, “Louis was well-intentioned and sincerely wanted to improve the lives of the common people.” (Beck Roger, Black Linda, Krieger, Larry, Naylor Phillip, Shabaka Dahia, 653) However, King Louis XVI lacked the conviction and initiative to carry out any of his plans to truly improve the lives of the French citizens. Proof of this was that the French citizens were desperate enough to riot the streets of France and storm the prison of Bastille. After all that has been said, it is clear that the citizens were indeed justified to overthrow the monarch.

    Read More

  • What Is The Differences Between Edmund Burke And Thomas Paine

    963 Words  | 2 Pages

    “When a man seriously reflects on the idolatrous homage which is paid to the persons of the Kings, he need not wonder, that the Almighty, ever jealous of his honor, should disapprove of a form of government which so impiously invades the prerogative of heaven (Paine

    Read More

  • Should the British Monarchy be Abolished?

    842 Words  | 2 Pages

    The monarchy symbolizes unity and traditions, which is unique and treasured to the nation. The monarch universally known as head of the Commonwealth, she is voluntarily recognised as the Head of State to 54 independent countries (The British Monarchy, 2013) The Queen to modern Britain, is an icon, who cannot simply be swapped for an elected politician. The British monarchy has played huge importance in British history, which is integral to our national identity. The Queen reined for 61 years and she provides an existing connection between the past, present and future. This is exactly what a politician could not offer to the public; for instance, Tony Blair, prior to 1997 was unknown on a state level, as he had done nothing significant for the British public. The monarchy’s traditions are famous not only in the United Kingdom but throughout the world. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is the ruler of sixteen other countries including Britain. Whilst the queen receives many privileges as head of state, it does come at a personal cost. Her privacy is limited as she is consistently scrutinized from t...

    Read More

  • The Theme of Usurpation in The Tempest by William Shakespeare

    1651 Words  | 4 Pages

    If there were no king the country would be in chaos for there would be

    Read More

  • Kings, Queens, Princes and Princesses – Coronation Rituals

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...expected to abide by all of the rules and regulations when being inaugurated to the throne. Even if the monarchs of Europe no longer exert actual control of their respective countries, the people respect, adore and look up to their Kings, Queens, Princes, and Princesses.

    Read More

More about Why Monarchy should be abolished?

Open Document