Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis on robespierre and terror
Short note of role of robespierre
Essays on robespierre
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis on robespierre and terror
Maximilien Robespierre declared at the trial of King Louis XVI. “The King must die so that the nation can live.” Robespierre advocated the kings demise and with it the ways of the Ancien Régime. However, in an ironic twist of fate his words also foreshadowed his own rise and fall as the leader of the French Revolution. Known as “The Incorruptible”, or alternately “Dictateur Sanguinaire” Robespierre is a monumental figure of the French Revolution, but which was he? Was he the incorruptible revolutionist fighting to overthrow the Ancien Regime or a raging radical that implemented his own absolute tendencies under the cover of the revolution? When dissecting the dichotomy of Robespierre’s life and actions during the French Revolution and comparing it to the seven main characteristics of Absolutism it can be seen that Robespierre held many absolutist tendencies.
The early life of Maximilien François Marie Isidore Robespierre gives insight into the man at the center of the French revolution. Robespierre’s birth was just as controversial as his death due to the fact he was born out of wedlock on Born on 6 May 1758. The eldest of four children his mother died when he was six years of age and his father, an established lawyer, subsequently left. Robespierre continued to reside in Arras under the care of his maternal grandfather. He taught himself to read, and do to his astounding intellect was recommended by the local bishop for a full scholarship to Lycée Louis-le-Grande. His academic conduct was so exemplary that the seventeen year old Robespierre was chosen to give a welcoming speech to King Louis XVI. This is a curious fact as Robespierre would later in life speak in favor of executing the same King. His education was completed ...
... middle of paper ...
...
Bibliography
Carr, John Laurence. Robespierre: The Force of Circumstance. St. Martin’s Press, n.d.
Doyle, William, and Colin Haydon, eds. Robespierre. Cambridge ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Gough, Hugh. The Terror in the French Revolution. St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
Jordan, David P. Revolutionary Career of Maximilien Robespierre. Simon and Schuster, 2013.
McPhee, Peter. Robespierre: A Revolutionary Life. Yale University Press, 2012.
Robespierre, Maximilien, and A. (Auguste) Vermorel. Œuvres de Robespierre. Paris, F. Cournol, 1866. http://archive.org/details/uvresderobespie00robegoog.
Scott, Otto J. Robespierre: The Voice of Virtue. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2011.
Scurr, Ruth. Fatal Purity: Robespierre and the French Revolution. Macmillan, 2007.
“The National Archive of the UK HO 42/31/16,” June 6, 1794. The National Archives, Kew.
Liberty, equality, and freedom are all essential parts to avoiding anarchy and maintaining tranquility even through the most treacherous of times. The Reign of Terror is well known as the eighteen month long French Revolution (1793-1794). In this period of time, a chief executive, Maximilien Robespierre, and a new French government executed gigantic numbers of people they thought to be enemies of the revolution, inside and outside of the country. The question is: were these acts of the new French government justified? Not only are the acts that occurred in the Reign of Terror not justified, they were barbaric and inhumane.
Meanwhile, the Saint Domingue mulattoes sought spots in the National Assembly, the French legislative body at the time. When they were rejected, they revolted, with Vincent Ogé at the helm. However, Ogé’s time would not last, and he was later defeated and executed. With Ogé’s death, a void in leadership was left. Then, sighting the void, L’Ouverture joined the revolution as a doctor and small time commander. Soon, L’Ouverture gained a reputation for his orderly rule and for his training of soldiers in both guerrilla tactics and European shoulder-to-shoulder combat. What resulted from L’Ouverture’s involvement was a chain of events that would make a great impact upon the French Revolution...
1793, the first year of the Reign of Terror, Robespierre grasped on to his new power and as the revolution spun out of control the Jacobins Club established a new way to “fight enemies” by constructing a Committee of Public Safety and a Tribunal Court. (Doc A) This new government was working swell; it contained counterrevolutionaries in the Vendée Region, and it smothered and ferreted the internal threats. (Docs A, C, G) The counterrevolutionaries adopted a name that meant trouble – the rabble.
These leaders taught the French people more about what type of government would be the best option for them. One of the most radical, and extreme leaders was Maximilien Robespierre. The duration of his dictatorship was known as "Reign of Terror." He demanded a republic and soon after his demands the monarchy was overthrown. He also felt that a constitutional government would have to wait until all the enemies of the revolution had been eliminated.
When the radicals tried Louis XVI for treason and demanded that he be executed, we peasants were relieved. We now gained more rights and felt freer. The Jacobins were now gaining more power. We didn’t like this at all. We were horrified by the beheading of the king. We knew that the beheadings could become a routine within our country.
The French Revolution started in 1787 because the country was going through financial difficulties and there was unrest between the classes of citizens in the country. The differences between the lower class citizens and higher classes, being nobles and the monarchy were great. The citizens had heard of the revolution that went on in the colonies and they also wanted freedom and independence. The real start of the French Revolution was on July 14, 1789, with the storming of the Bastille. Between 1789 1793, a constitution was written, feudalism was abolished, war had broken out, and King Louis XVI was put to death. In late 1793 and early 1794, Maximilien Robespierre became the head of the Committee of Public Safety in France. This was the new governing body in France; it could be compared to the executive branch of a government. Robespierre was a great leader, he ins...
New York: Barnes & Noble, 1969. Print. The. Kreis, Steven. A. A. "Lecture 12: The French Revolution - Moderate Stage, 1789-1792.
“History is a set of lies agreed upon” Napoleon Bonaparte said during the French Revolution. Analysing the accuracy of the portrayal of the French Revolution seems almost ironic, because one person’s account may not match another’s. However, what Charles Dickens wrote in A Tale of Two Cities seems to leave out a lot of the more important factors which would have influenced the thoughts and actions of the people involved in the French Revolution. One of these things was that there is no mentioning of any of the influential figures, namely Robespierre, who was an important leader in the Revolution. Another missing point is that many of the actual events in this time period were not displayed. Finally, the actually reason for the uprisings in
As a time of new ideas and human reasoning in the Enlightenment seemed to be coming to an end, it only lead to individuals developing larger, more enforced (persistent?) demands for the rights of man and equality from the philosophes—hence resulting in the French Revolution. Through incidents like the storming of the Bastille in July of 1787 to an audience’s rage on a group of actors who were against depicting Charles IX badly in a play, the French Revolution was starting to show its roots of reform on both the expression of freedom and liberty. However, as more and more people fought for the rights of man, the question on how much freedom should be allowed arose as a serious concern, along with how to go about fighting for it. In this time period, the Enlightenment’s ideologies were shining on the undermined patriotism and nationalism of the country, bringing out the desire of an equal and free nation among all (revolutionaries) in France, based on the ideas of natural rights.
In answer to the changes sought out by the rebelling French communities, Edmund Burke’s release of the “Reflections on the Revolution in France” in 1790 depicted the man’s careful denunciation of the destructive nature of the people. Concurrently, Thomas Paine published a direct response in the form of two volumes dubbed “The Rights of Man” between 1791 and 1792. But apparently, Paine was ready to support that risk. In conclusion, Thomas Paine’s views are more convincing than those of Edmund Burke, just because of their motives behind the same.
Liberté, égalité, fraternité, this was the motto of the French Revolution. It was coined by Pierre Leroux in 1838. The years 1779-1789 saw everything from the first constitution of France being drawn up, to the “Reign of Terror” in which the symbolic guillotine proved to be both the judge and the executioner. The Revolution initially started in an attempt to make the king answer to the people, in an attempt to overthrow the absolutist role and in an attempt to gain equality in all areas including taxation. The financial crisis was a burden to heavy to bear for the Third Estate. The people grew hungry which swiftly turned to rage. The lack of results led to the end of the monarchy and the execution of both King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette. However, despite the bloodshed, the ideals that the French were fighting for were alive in their hearts. Liberty is the freedom to think or act without being constrained by necessity or force. In France, people were seeking liberty from the tyrannical rule of the monarch in which the Queen was using taxes to endow herself in riches. The second ideal, equality, consists of rights, treatment, quantity, or value equal to all others in a specific group. This meant getting rid of the hierarchical system and ensuring that nor the Church or nobles were exempt from taxation. The last ideal, brotherhood, means a group of people with feelings of friendship and mutual support between them. The French lacked this during the Revolution. Civil disobedience was present and very few showed camaraderie towards one another. Ten years of hardship, striving towards one common goal, sacrificing thousands of lives the French achieved what they set out to do. With great willpower and with the help of a benefac...
Laura Mason and Tracey Rizzo (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999), 268-9. 62. Lebrun, “Republican Ode to the French People on the Supreme Being,” in the French Revolution; a Document Collection, ed. Laura Mason and Tracey Rizzo (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999), 248-252.
“The King must die so that the country can live”. With this strong sentence the French revolutionary Maximilien Robespierre expressed his opinion about this absurdity that we use to call monarchy. The monarchy is an historical tyranny that should be abolished now, and replaced by the true government of the people, the republic.
One of the few features that remain constant throughout the revolution is that it was a reactionary force. The actions of the revolutionaries, although guided by ideals and morals of building a better France, were propelled mostly by mixture of fear and rage at certain groups with a perceived advantage over the masses. The events of the French Revolution are tightly interconnected to each other, the actions of a previous government causes the next one to compensate in the opposite direction. This tendency to react to the present, both when groups fought to obtain power and when they attempted to keep it, lacked the foresight necessary to form any lasting stability in the French nation. This view of the nature of the French Revolution also sheds some light on why it isn’t possible to form a cohesive description of the French Revolution as a whole. Instead, it is necessary to break down the Revolution into time periods and see the overarching theme within each one. The constitutional monarchy at the beginning of the French Revolution is an entirely different entity than that of the Directory during the Revolution’s slow decline, let alone the quasi police state that existed during the Terror. Some revolutionaries, such as
This lack of leadership leads to the ability of Maximilien Robespierre to rise into a position of power. To gain respect and support, Robespierre used the current poverty conditions of the common people as a platform to claim he was a true representative of the people and call for change. He quickly became nicknamed The Incorruptible as he promoted a Master Order which calls for a new order of society. In the beginning, he believed in a doctrine that was drawn from The Age of Enlightenment such as equality for all men, liberty, fraternity, universal suffrage, an end to slavery, and opposition to the death penalty. To achieve the aforementioned would require that everything within the French society must be recreated, the political system, an end to the Catholic Church and Christianity, an end to the nobility class, and a change in human nature itself. It seems that Robespierre not only begins ignoring all the horrific