Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Competition between Apple and Samsung
Corporate culture Apple
Competition between Apple and Samsung
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Competition between Apple and Samsung
Steve Jobs was a visionary leader. Although, he was described as abrasive, he was inspiring. He set clear achievable goals. His abrasive management style did cost him to be kicked out of Apple by the very person he hired to be CEO, but his unwavering determination further took shape as, PIXAR and NEXT and boomeranged him back as the CEO of Apple (McInerney, 2011). The company’s core value reflects what he valued most -“People with passion can change the world”. True to this value he chose people on his team based on their passion as opposed to their qualifications (Evan Carmichael, 2015). Apple under his leadership was run like a startup. There were no committees for each department but instead just one leader per function for e.g. iphone, …show more content…
Although most ideas originated from him and he did not exactly employ a democratic (almost autocratic with a little participative) style of leadership or share responsibilities with strategic jobs, he motivated and inspired his people. He hired people that were self-driven and did not need to be managed; they shared Apple’s vision and passion (Segall and Simple, 2016; Carmichael, 2015). Under his leadership things that were deemed impossible came to fruition because his team was inspired by his vision, knowledge and determination. His success lay in the fact that he stated his vision in small achievable goals for his revolutionary gadgets e.g. Ipods (Simon & Schuster Books, 2012). Ipod was described as “1000 songs in your pocket” (History.com, 2016). He also described computers as “a bicycle for your mind”(Popova, 2011). He was also known to reiterate goals to keep his team focused and encourage them to achieve Apple’s visionary success one step at a time. Additionally he also spoke in high stakes. He described his competitors- Samsung, Microsoft or Big Blue as mortal enemies and described Apples fight against them as a war for …show more content…
Sheryl Sandberg, COO of Facebook, the second largest tech company after Apple would be the focus of this discussion. I was listening to her speech at the Pentagon on how women need to step up to leadership roles and embrace them as a reality by not backing off and attributing their roles as mothers and wives as the reason for foregoing these roles (Leadership in action, 2015). Sandberg’s leadership style could be defined as participative or adaptive. She is a team player and was behind the creation of her “Lean in” Movement and also her book with the same title. He overall goals with this was to encourage women to lean in and achieve their professional goals. She focuses on important issues like equal pay and work life balance for women. She can be described as compassionate person and has always been part of non-profit organizations to remain in public service. Her role in facebook is also part of this service because she understands the power of technology and its ability to reach the masses. Additionally, She is ambitious and has always kept her focus on goals and was never intimidated by her male colleagues. She did receive a lot of criticism, which is part of anybody’s quest to question social norms, and long held sexist beliefs (Namin-Hedayati, 2014).
Steve Jobs and Fr. Jose Arizmendiarrieta were the founders and leaders of two different but highly successful and profitable organisations, Apple and Mondragon. The two companies are from different parts of the world, in different industries, and can only be compared by their organisational and financial success. Fr. Jose and Steve were the architects of this success, leading and inspiring confidence and support among the people who were needed to achieve their vision and organisations goals (DuBrin, 2013). This essay will compare and contrast the leadership of Steve Jobs with that of Fr. Jose Maria Arizmendiarrieta based on Andrew J. DuBrin’s leadership theory.
Sandberg, S. (2013, August 11). Leadership roles in workplace: Are women not “ambitious enough”. Retrieved from http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-08-11/news/41295742_1_job-authority-men-sheryl-sandberg.
A boy, adopted by middle class parents, who dropped out of college after six months, decided to begin his own business, and he stated his business on 1 April; April Fool’s Day (Dernback, n.d.). Society would presume that a company with such a colorful beginning would most likely not survive its infancy stage, but that is not the case for this story. In 1976, this company began with three men and one thousand dollars, but it started a movement that would revolutionize the world, Apple Computer was born. By the time Steve Jobs was twenty-five years of age, he was worth over a hundred million dollars (Dernback, n.d.). Jobs not only had an idea, he had a plan that would lead to the success of Apple. Jobs understood that “Marketing is much more
In 1984 Jobs would introduce the Macintosh at the company 's annual shareholders meeting. They launched the Macintosh and for the first few months it was successful. A year later sales was dropping and Jobs was in denial and would continue to behave as if he had saved Apple. Steve Jobs and John Sculley was not talking to one another.
In the American society, we constantly hear people make sure they say that a chief executive officer, a racecar driver, or an astronaut is female when they are so because that is not deemed as stereotypically standard. Sheryl Sandberg is the, dare I say it, female chief operating officer of Facebook while Mark Zuckerberg is the chief executive officer. Notice that the word “female” sounds much more natural in front of an executive position, but you would typically not add male in front of an executive position because it is just implied. The fact that most of America and the world makes this distinction shows that there are too few women leaders. In Sheryl Sandberg’s book “Lean In,” she explains why that is and what can be done to change that by discussing women, work, and the will to lead.
Steve Jobs was a college dropouts with no big plans. No one would have guessed that him and two of his friends working in a garage would be the beginning of a revolution in the world of technology. The free enterprise system made it possible for Steve Jobs to revolutionize the world with Apple products.
Lean In: Women, Work and The Will To Lead, by Sheryl Sandberg, addresses how women can achieve professional achievement and overcome the lack of leadership progress that has been absent over the past few years. Sandberg uses personal experience, research and humor to examine the choices that working women make everyday. She argues that women can achieve professional goals while still being happy within their personal lives. She argues this by going into detail about what risks to take, how to pursue certain professional goals and how to overcome struggles such as balancing a family and a career. All through Lean In, Sandberg uses the fourth dimension of interpersonal effects through a Narrative to show her indicated stance on gender construction, she includes examples of marked forms as well as cultural gender expectations within communication.
Steve Jobs was the utmost CEO of all time. In the speech it states, “……… he’s been called a visionary, a creative genius, a rebel, a non-conformist, an original, the greatest CEO ever, the best innovator of all time.” In the article it states, “He was intensely focused when committed, confident enough to take risky leaps, and charismatic enough to enlist legions of employees and customers in the restless pursuit of his aspirations.” Both texts describe the traits of Steve Jobs which made him the greatest CEO of our age. Steve Jobs was an original genius he had a significant and unique imagination. It’s one thing to envision your own company broadening, but it’s another thing to envision that your company’s services and products will change people lives for the better, the way we communicate and work. Jobs built his company thinking that Apple’s products and services would change the
It was Steve Jobs who made Apple leave the garage and make leaps and bounds in the world of technology. Steve Wozniak made the first prototype, but it was Jobs who “saw the potential” in his computer and persuaded Wozniak to sell it (Peterson 106). Even though that first computer saw very little success, Jobs knew that Apple had potential and so released the Apple II. From the beginning Jobs knew what the consumers wanted, and where computers were going to take the world; he had a vision of the opportunities in technology and saw that Apple needed to move in a different direction. In 1984, one year before he left, Jobs finished the Macintosh computer system. He was pushed from his original computer design project, “the Lisa”, and then raced to release the Mac first, but the Lisa was released to the public first. Although the Lisa came out first, the Mac “[became] synonymous with Apple, mark[ing] a…revolution in…personal computing,” (Peterson 106).
Steve Jobs one of the founding fathers of Apple Inc used strategic planning to his advantage by making Apple’s mission a simple one- bringing easy to use computers to the general market, revolutionizing the computer market. In 2007, after thirty years, the organization changed its name from Apple Computer to Apple Inc., this was a significant move because the organization became more independent, and it was no longer known as a vendor to Macintosh personal computer line (Yoffie & Slind, 2008). This strategic move paid off; a year and half later, Apple Inc.’s third quarter net profit of $1.07 billion on a $7.46 billion in revenue (Yoffie & Slind, 2008). SWOT Analysis of Apple, Inc. Strengths (Competitive Advantage)
Elliot, Jay (2012). Leading Apple with Steve Jobs: Management Lessons From a Controversial Genius. Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com
We think Steve Jobs was a successful leader because he was imaginative, passionate about his job, he had the ability to push employees to create new things, had confidence, and believed in collaboration. Under Steve Jobs' leadership Apple was an innovative company and under Tim Cook's leadership Apple is now being seen as more of charitable, socially and ethically responsible company. While [he’s heard the repeated refrains that “Apple can’t innovate under Tim,” that the company needed a low-cost iPhone to thwart the progress of Google’s Android, that Cook never could replicate the Jobs magic—and therefore that Apple never again would be “insanely great.” ] (Lashinsky, 2015), he hasn’t changed his methods since Jobs’ passing and continues to lead in a way that he believes will raise Apple’s value in the eyes of society.
Steve Jobs (CEO and chairman of Apple Inc.) was an American entrepreneur and inventor. He was born in February 24, 1955 and founded Apple Inc. with his high school buddy Steve Wozniak in 1976. But later in 1976, when Apple was about to bankrupt he returned to it as advisor and Interim CEO. He made Apple profitable from near bankruptcy by 1998 (Walter Isaacson, 2013). From (1996-2011), he proved himself as one of the best engineering leaders of the world and made Apple the most innovative company of the world.
Although Steve and Bill are competitors, there are similarities between Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Both of them are the most successful CEO’s in the world. Though they were college dropouts, but they still achieved a lot of success in their own way. Steve was a very innovative man. As the English proverb goes by “ Have no fear of perfection - you will never reach it.” by Salvador Dali. No matter how many times he failed, he could develop things from his own idea and turn them into a successful product. In 1979 Apple’s first product was introduced, people like it very much because of its simplicity and innovative ideas. Later on in year 1980, the company showed a tremendous performance, where its share rose by 32% (Messa, 1998). Similarly, Bill Gates was also like that, but just that Steve was in a company which makes hardware prod...
...change the world. His invention literally changed the way of life. Secondly, Steve Jobs was consistent and responsible. Steve jobs was always passionate about creating the most innovative and the best product for people. These decisions often put his company and his career in danger but he did not want to change his mind. He was responsible about his decision and always delivers his promises. Lastly and the most importantly, Steve Jobs never give up from challenges. He knew that he is able to accomplish as long as he does not give up. He encountered many different problems and obstacles. He did not give up. Not only he did not give up but he remained himself. He truly believed that his decision and passion is not wrong. Even the death was not enough to stop Steve Jobs passion. Without his courage and stubbornness, we would not be able to enjoy iPhone or iPad today.