Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organizational analysis
Organizational analysis
Organizational analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Steve Jobs and Fr. Jose Arizmendiarrieta were the founders and leaders of two different but highly successful and profitable organisations, Apple and Mondragon. The two companies are from different parts of the world, in different industries, and can only be compared by their organisational and financial success. Fr. Jose and Steve were the architects of this success, leading and inspiring confidence and support among the people who were needed to achieve their vision and organisations goals (DuBrin, 2013). This essay will compare and contrast the leadership of Steve Jobs with that of Fr. Jose Maria Arizmendiarrieta based on Andrew J. DuBrin’s leadership theory.
Brief Background
Fr Jose Maria Arizmendiarrieta, a Catholic Priest, founded the Mondragon Corporation, a cooperative in the Basque region of Spain in 1956. The region suffered greatly during the Spanish Civil War (Thomson, 2010) and Fr Jose felt it his calling to help his regions people recover, allowing them to continue to support themselves. Fr Jose’s motive was to promote individuals’ moral character as well as social justice through the creation of a new kind of work place, one that encouraged hard work, cooperation, shared rewards, and individual responsibility. At the same time, he sought to generate employment and income in a region that had been impoverished by war, dictatorship and neglect (Lafuente, 2012). The initial cooperative was successful and from that much other cooperative business emerged in industries including banking, manufacturing, distribution and education. The Mondragon Corporation multiplied until it became the biggest employer in the region (Witzel, 2003). The Mondragon Corporation now consists of over 82,000 people in an integrated group of so...
... middle of paper ...
...ties and differences of the leadership of Steve Jobs and Fr. Jose Arizmendiarrieta that the leadership required for organisations to succeed is unique to the goals and definition of success portrayed by the leader. Their leadership styles were reflected in the organisations development and it can be seen why leadership in organisations is of such importance. What is also clear is that there is no right or wrong way to lead – Fr Jose achieved a sustainable profitable cooperative, Jobs archived a highly profitable company. The leadership practice used needs to fit the organisations vision, the needs of the stakeholders, and be ingrained into followers. The followers need to buy in to the leader’s vision and goals and play their part in implementing the steps required for success. The leader is ultimately responsible for guiding the followers along the path to success.
There have been countless books, lectures, and and trainings, and retreats constructed around the idea of cultivating leadership in an individual. However, cultivating individuals’ ability to follow great leadership has received far less attention. Who are these people leading if each person within an organization is being trained to be a leader? The word follower has negative connotations, evoking the images of a weak, uncreative, milquetoast personality. However, Jimmy Collins, in his book, “Creative Followership: In the Shadow of Greatness”, suggests that the ability to be led brings as much creativity, consciousness, and indeed leadership to an organization or team as the leader himself. Great followership is a reflection of great leadership. In this, the follower is just as important as the leader in the relationship. Many great leaders have asserted that a leader with even a modicum of understanding of what drives their subordinates can take their organization to previously undreamt-of heights in creativity and productivity. Collins does not disabuse us of this notion, he does however add that the follower is indispensable agent in this interplay between leader and follower.
The most valuable commodity of any great organization is the quality of good people. Almost everyone has good intentions but leaders acknowledge what needs to be done and has the ability to inspire others to respond. Nonetheless the author conveys the differences between leadership of past generation versus this generation. As society loses confidence in leadership techniques of the past, it begins to look for management wit...
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Leadership can be defined as the method in which one influences a group of individuals for a common goal. There have many great leaders in the world but these leaders are not born leaders. One must have willpower and the desire to become an effective leader. These leaders become dependent upon based upon their abilities and their success. A leader is looked upon for guidance and the inspiration to know what the right thing to do is. The theoretical foundations of the research of leadership are firmly supported. To better understand the foundations and understand the focus of leadership, it is essential to have knowledge of the history of leadership, the meaning and concept of leadership, types of leaders and leadership styles, and issues in leadership such as issues with culture and gender. According to Antonakis (2004), “leadership researchers have struggled for most of the last century to put together an integrated, theoretically cohesive view of the nature of leadership, invariably leading to disappointment in those who studied it” (p.4). An overview of the history of leadership is necessary to understand the concept of leadership because it also provides a framework for other areas of leadership. In any conventional group, individuals fill different role and one of those roles must the leader which is essential for the group to achieve it purposes.
...F. and Whyte, K.K., Making Mondragon: The Growth and Dynamics of the Worker Cooperative Complex (Ithica: ILR Press, 1988).
With that interview, I have learnt a lot of leadership styles and motivational theories, which I studied in my University lectures from Mr. John. This paper is the reflection of what I learnt from him.
One might say that leadership within an organization is essential for growth and success. Organizations often teach their employees different ways on how to be an effective leader. One thing to note is that leadership is not something one is born with, rather it is something individuals aspire to be. By being a leader one has the ability to influence an organization and/or employee(s), as well as having the power to inspire others. In Chapter 11, Jex and Britt (2014) discussed different theories, traits, and approaches associated to leadership. Through reading this chapter, one can see just how complex leadership is. In this paper I will discuss what leadership is, why leadership and the first follower is important, as well as which general
According to our leader’s legacy book written by Kouzes and Posner, leadership is the influence and impact of an individual. More precisely, “Leadership is a relationship between those who aspire to lead and those who choose to follow” ( Kouzes, 2006. p 52). Also, a good leader is one that can turn every person that they may lead into a teacher. Therefore, the legacy will continue and an impact is made. Having such effect on someone life is due to the enthusiasm, organization, discipline and passion that the leader may have for his/her work. These traits are also the determining factor if a person “stay, perform at their best, wow customers, or be motivated to share the organization’s vision and values” (Kouzes, 2006. p
“Leadership is an influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their mutual purposes” (Rost, 1931). But in today’s time, the styles of leadership are changed every time a new technology is invented or discovered so there is lack of persistency. The only thing which manages to stay constant is the principles of carrying out business activities. There are philosophies and ideologies on leadership which can be used in any time period as they are mostly a reflection of the principles of leadership. Theorists and authors like Hobbes (1679), Lewin (1947) and Aristotle (384–322 B.C.), in their time have produced enough material which can be put into use by modern day leaders and managers. Philosophers like Aristotle, who was known to be one of the most business-oriented and practical philosopher of his time, his work is still used by businesses today because of their relevance as he is interested in defining principles in terms of the ethics of leadership (Santa Clara University). In the essay I have tried to show how leadership has adapted to the changes around them and compared to the past and what circumstances caused need to change it. As a layman, anyone would think that the principles centuries ago will be very different to what we follow now but after studying on Hobbes, Lewin and Aristotle it has made a big impact on my way of thinking because the work produced by them still has more relevance compared to some of the work produced now. I have tried to explain the evolvement of leadership through three aspects which are psychology, sociology and philosophy.
In chapter eleven case study, we were asked, What special qualities of Steve Jobs seem to have contributed to his leadership success as Apple’s CEO? We think Steve Jobs was a successful leader because he was imaginative; passionate about his job, he had the ability to push employees to create new things, had confidence, and believed
Warren Bennis was a scholar, author, educator and organizational consultant. He is viewed as the pioneer in the field of leadership studies. He delineated leadership as the capacity to translate vision to reality. He clearly differentiated it from management. According to him, leaders do the right thing, unlike managers who are more focused on doing the right things. Leaders are visionaries who are capable of aligning the energies and efforts of others behind their vision. Leaders communicate their vision and goals to others so effectively that those goals became theirs too. He claimed that leaders were not people who were in charge for the control and ‘personal exhilaration’ associated with it. On the other hand, leaders were people who have profound impact on other people’s lives, sometimes for ever. Bennis claimed that effective leadership had several purposes and goals, the consequence of leaders on their followers make it necessary that they are understood clearly.
Good leadership is essential to an organisations that shape the way we live, work and play. Leadership transforms potential into reality. Leadership is present in the systems theory without leadership inputs won’t be efficiently transformed into outputs of high standards leadership has direct influence on the productivity, working environment establishment of vision mission goals and objective through these statements being realised success will be achieved. It is the social skill of leadership which accomplishes organisational goals by utilising the potential of the employees
For this assignment, I chose a very famous and well known entrepreneur. He, however, had already inspires a few famous people and have single handily help change the landscape of technology for people around the world. No, I'm not talking about the other billionaire Bill Gates (good guess though), but of course I'm referring to the one and only Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Computers. He, Steve Jobs is one of the biggest icons in the world of technology in the world co-founder of one of the most important and exciting companies in the world.
Background of Mondragon cooperatives began the reason to restore and develop local people and company activities on the Basque region in Spain found by catholic priest José María Arizmendiarrieta after Spain civil war. His students and he thought that cooperative solve stagnate in the local economy to step up social revolution in Basque region. Mondragon cooperatives was established by his students and him that he was activity to found training and learning school for jobless and young people in local economy. They have developed cooperative corporations to merge bankruptcy of neighboring companies and to found suited needs of social problems in local economy in the head of Basque area in Spain. When the market in Spain could join from company in other countries, Mondragon cooperative decided to adapt a flow of the time between locally and globally. Mondragon corporations come to develop over the world that extends various enterprises of distribution, industry, finance, and training or education in each country.
Leadership, without doubt, is a significantly important function of management. It helps to aggrandize efficiency and to fulfil an organization’s goals. Leadership is the ability of a manager to induce the subordinates to work with confidence, determination, courage and zeal. It is also defined as ability to influence a group towards the realization of a goal. Leaders should have the capability of developing future visions, and to drive the organizational members to want to attain the visions. This paper states my points in which I duly believe, justifies the importance of an outstanding leader in any organization.