Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of reward and punishment
Impact of reward and punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of reward and punishment
Definition of compliance gaining:
Compliance gaining is a term used in the social sciences, specifically in sociology and communication studies, to identify the act of intentionally trying to alter behavior. The term refers to how people try to get other people to do things, or comply. In short, the term compliance gaining strategies are used to define the tactics we use to persuade others to think or act in a desired way.
I. TYPES OF COMPLIANCE GAINING STRATEGIES:
Reward and Punishment: So, in case you do not like to lets say suck up to people, then Face Maintenance is not for you. Or if you tried it but it didn’t work, then another choice could be Reward and Punishment. For example, this movie clip from “Gone in 60 Seconds” shows how a car smuggler convinced a big brother to steal 50 cars for him and one week!
Show the clip
The type of strategy the car smuggler used was punishment, he literally said steal these cars for me and I won’t kill your brother. If the big brother didn’t take the request of stealing those 50 cars then he would be punished with the loss of his little brother. You see he had to do it.
It’s the strategy of punishing people to make them do what you want them to do can work with anyone. As long as you have something to point against them so they’ll have to do it. Although you’ll get what you want, punishment is not always a good idea. People don’t like to be punished.
People like to be rewarded. Wouldn’t you rather be rewarded for doing something, than be punished for not doing anything? Just like Elliot, in the movie “Bedazzled,” where the devil, tries to convince Elliot to sign an away his soul for 7 wishes.
Show the clip
The devil strategies were to make him believe that h...
... middle of paper ...
...appeal works in a more intimate relationship. But Face maintenance works by appealing to the ego. And Reward and Punishment we conform since there’s a clear advantage for doing so. However Reciprocity obligates you to return the favors.
Indirect Appeal you assume or infer the real intentions, and regarding assume remember what our teacher advised us. Finally, the appeal that gets the most of what you want. Direct Appeal is the straightest way to ask and communicate in an interpersonal relationship.
Grasp the secret on how to get what you want! Compliance – Gaining Strategies are tactics intended to influence others to do what the user of these strategies wants them to do.
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/family-affair/200809/rewards-are-better-punishment-here-s-why)
Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R. (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior.
The most basic concept in social psychology is conformity. Conformity is the idea that behaviour or a belief is changed in order to follow, or conform, to what is considered the “norm.” One of the oldest experiments to support this notion was conducted in 1935 by Muzafer Sherif (Song, Ma, Wu, Li, 2012 p. 1366). There are two different types of
Conditioning the citizens to like what they have and reject what they do not have is an authoritative government's ideal way of maximizing efficiency. The citizens will consume what they are told to, there will be no brawls or disagreements and the state will retain high profits from the earnings. People can be conditioned chemically and physically prior to birth and psychologically afterwards.
Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (1999). Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
...at person’s belief but is carried out to achieve rewards or to avoid punishment (Winner 2011:287). Conformity is behaviour that blends with the behaviour of the majority of the group needed to function effectively in a large group (Winner 2011:290). Conditioning the members of a cult is an effective way to change attitudes of the members to ones that are approved by the cult’s social standards and ideas.
..., P., & Plax, T. G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Communication Education, 38, 214–229. Retrieved from
B. & Goldstein, N. J., 2004) while one might privately disagree on it (Myers, 2012). Conformity refers to “the act of changing one’s behavior to match the responses of others” (Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J., 2004, p. 606), as a result of group pressure either in a real or imagined situation (Myers, 2012).
Elliot Aronson (2012) provides a definition of conformity, two social psychological processes that underlie a conformity and cited examples of reasons why people conform in the book, The Social Animal. Aronson (2012) defines a conformity as “a change in a person’s behavior or opinion as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people” (p.19). In accordance with Aronson’s (2012) definition of conformity, people do conform owing to the social influence, which are two main social psychological processes: belonging and getting information.
Violations of expectations in turn may confuse their receivers, shifting more attention to the violator and the significance of the violation itself. Someone who can assume that they are well regarded by their listeners is safer engaging in violations and more probable to profit from doing so than someone who is poorly regarded. When the act of violation is one that is likely to be unclear in its meaning or to convey numerous interpretations that are not consistently positive or negative, then the reward valence of the communicator can be particularly important in moderating clarifications, assessments, and consequences. Violations have comparatively consensual meanings and valences related to them, so that engaging in them produces similar effects for positive and negative communication.
One psychological process underlying majority influence is through direct public compliance. The dual-process dependency model which was postulated by Deutsch and Gerard, (1955 in Hogg and Vaughan 2007) proposes two important motives for conformity: normative social influence and informational social influence. Normative social influence refers to the need to be accepted and approved by society. This involves individuals to modify their behaviours and to adopt new/current ones that are associated with the particular social group so that they are not rejected (in Hogg & Vaughan 2007). An example of this situation can be reflected in Asch’s (1956 in Baron et al. 2008) study of conformity in which participants conformed to the majority group but at the same time maintained their own private opinions and disagreed. This process is known as compliance (in Bailey, J.et al. 2008).
Conformity, obedience and the power of situation are a few of the many reasons why nice people get corrupted. Society influences us to define what is right and what is wrong. Society also defines what is correct behavior. There is an ethical implication on how we should act in a workplace. On one hand, they must be respectful of authority. On the other hand there must be a point in which the demands of such authority must be opposed and resisted.
Conformity is the process of understanding to majority influence and is defined by David Myers (1991) as a change in behavior or belief a result of real or imagined group pressure
Festinger, Leon. Carlsmith, James M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 58, 203-210.
The book, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert B. Cialdini illustrates the implementation of reciprocation, commitment and consistency, social proof, liking, authority, and scarcity. The book identifies these six principles as weapons of influence in aiding with persuasion. The following explains and applies each principle.
Conformity is defined as the compliance with social standards and laws in a particular culture, environment, society and time. If this occurs the individual changes their attitudes, beliefs or actions to align more holistically with those in the surrounding groups and environment, as a result of real or perceived group pressure. This is ultimately a direct result of the power which a group has over the individual. There are two types of conformity, normative conformity, and informational conformity. Normative conformity is motivated by the desire to be liked and accepted in society. This is most widely known as peer pressure. For example, a student begins smoking because their peers are smoking,
The concept of compliancy closely resembles the concept of conformity in the sense that individuals’ behaviors are adapted though the norms of their surrounding group. However, in comparison to obedience, compliancy is less as intense as obedience in which commands are given to an individual to perform behaviors and conform to beliefs by an authority figure. Compliance is more of