Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of technology in the workplace
Impact of technology in the workplace
Impact of technology in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of technology in the workplace
When most people here the phrase “the world is flat” they think that it’s an illogical statement. Thomas Friedmann a famous New York Times columnist wrote his international best-selling book “The World is Flat” which analyzes globalization in the 21st century. The phrase The World is Flat is a metaphor for viewing the world as a flat playing field where competitors from all over the world have an equal opportunity. In 2007 Friedmann gave a keynote address at MIT’s in which he gives an in depth analysis of his book and addresses the topic of globalization in our world today. He divides globalization into three eras.
1. Globalization 1.0 he says started in 1492 and continued up until the early 1800s. He described this era as people only
…show more content…
How well people “horizontalize” or collaborate on this platform will produce the most important productivity gains and the most competitive advantage. He says that people have to learn to adjust from interacting vertically to interacting horizontally. A real world example he uses for this is his experience with Southwest Airlines. He explains how people by downloading their boarding passes online are interacting with Southwest horizontally and are able to capture 60 minutes of productivity by now not having to wait to board or go through the hassles of checking in. He says that the people who do it best are going to capture enormous productivity.
Another thing that I really agreed with was his ideas about Liberal arts schools. Friedmann says that Liberal Arts schools are so vital because they promotes imaginative thinking. He then says Innovation comes from having 2 or more specialties applying the framework of one to the framework of the other. He uses examples of Steve Jobs who took a calligraphy class in college which led to the innovate typeface on the apple
…show more content…
As part of her move her and her sister decided they where going to open a clothing store in Johannesburg. My mom’s plan was to buy women’s clothing from the US and ship it to South Africa. I was originally surprised at how easy it was for her to order the clothing, have it put on a container and shipped to her store in Johannesburg. She also has the ability to operate the store whenever she comes back to New York to visit me. This also connected to how in class we spoke about Containerization and how it shifted globalization around the world. When my mom was shipping her products she was torn between whether it would be easier to fly the products or have them shipped on a boat. Ultimatley the cost of shipping by air was too much, and the cost of using the container was reasonably
Lisa Lowe’s introduction on the word “globalization” was interesting as it reminded me of the readings and lectures regarding colonization of the United States. Globalization is described conditions that increased economic, social, and political interdependence among people. The article allows for comparisons to be made with eighteenth century America. For example, the arrival of English colonists led to a change in the North American landscape. This could also be described as an invasion of native land as colonists felt the land belonged to them. Similarly, Globalization also mentions American invasion in the context of the conflicts against Afghanistan and Iraq. In addition, both seventeenth and twentieth century America appear to some effect
As Americans we have to start to comprehend that the world around us is changing technologically, politically, and economically. In “The Last Superpower” an excerpt from the book The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria published in 2008. Zakaria emphasizes on these changes. Thomas Friedman the author of “The World is Flat” a piece from the book The World is Flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century published in 2005 also emphasizes on the same changes currently happening in the world. Zakaria and Friedman define these changes as globalization. The obvious common ground shared by both authors is their representation of globalization and the effects that it has and will continue to have on modern life. In contrast to sharing the same main topic both authors take a drastically different approach on how the relay their information to the audience. The differences displayed are mainly due to their personal and educational backgrounds, definitions of globalization as well as the individual writing styles of each author.
As Thomas Friedman explains in his book “The World is Flat”, globalization started “when Columbus set sail, opening trade between the Old World and the New World.” Afterwards, “multinational companies went global for markets and labor,” and around the year 2000, individuals were the ones who got into the global world. Today, individuals and small groups easily enter the global market, collaborate, and compete - a process described by Friedman as “the flattening of the world.”
Thomas Friedman contends that globalization 1.0 shrunk the world from large to medium and countries and governments were the main protagonists. The governments of countries would finance explorers like Christopher Columbus to discover new parts of the world to enhance trade and commerce. The governments financed the explorers through the exports of manufactured goods and by taxing nobles and their manors. Globalization 1.0 lasted from 1492 until the early 1800’s. This era was the beginning of a global arbitrage. Countries were the dynamic change agents during this phase of globalization. For example, Spain explored South America, Britain colonized India, and Portugal colonized East Asia. The data that was gathered by business managers during this period included maps, trade routes, the languages of the indigenous people, and new kinds of trade goods that could be procured from the new world such as gold, silver, corn, and potatoes.
Friedman, Thomas L. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. New York:
Children are the Future. There’s times where you just sometimes lose motivation for learning, am I right? We don’t realize how much our globalized world is changing and how this might affect us. According to, The World Is Flat by Thomas L. Friedman, our world has changed and it’s becoming flat. We are all competing for jobs and those jobs that were able to get without further education are now being sent to other countries.
The three Globalizations contrast in many ways. Globalization 1.0, lasting from 1492 to about 1800, was about countries and muscles. Its force driving the process of global flattening was the amount of "muscle" your country had. The key agent of change in Globalization 2.0, which lasted from 1800 to 2000, was the power of multinational companies, which went global for markets and labor. Globalization 3.0, beginning in 2000 flattened the playing field even more. The dynamic force was the power by which individuals could collaborate and compete globally. They could do so digitally with the convergence of the personal computer with fiber-optic cable. Globalization 3.0 differs from the previous two not only in how the world is flattening, but also in the types of people involved. In Globalization 1.0 and 2.0 it was mostly American and European businesses who...
The world is ever changing and has been that way even before humans dominated Earth. However, what we are interested in for this topic is in the last few decades where globalization has had an impact in the early 21st century, making the world "flat". The phrase that the world has become flat is a metaphor for viewing the world level in terms of commerce and competition, meaning a level playing field where everyone has an equal opportunity. However, opinions are divided on how much globalization has actually impacted the world as a whole. Critics argue that Friedman’s term "flat" is grossly exaggerated as his view is from an American perspective. This paper investigates major arguments for both sides.
Constant change and a flat, global competitive market landscape were described by Thomas Friedman, author of The World is Flat, as triple convergence and was a result of the ten flatteners. Friedman also stated that in “Globalization 1.0, countries had to think globally. In Globalization 2.0, companies had to think globally to thrive, or at least survive. In Globalization 3.0, individuals have to think globally to thrive, or at least survive.” (Friedman, 2007) The concept of needing individuals to think globally and thrive in the market led Friedman to travel and report on various educational cultures across the world. Friedman was determined to find “the right stuff” to make the youth in future generations competitive globally.
Sea freight is more efficient and less damaging to the environment for moving a heavy load, based on emissions per ton of weight, than air freight. Expensive and relatively light items may justify using air freight to transport them, especially when the delivery time is short and distances traveled are large. Reducing the lead time, which is 4 to 8 weeks for sea freight, reduces inventory costs in a supply chain. It also shortens the time needed to introduce a new or upgraded product. As an example, in the case of a quality problem in a new product, an organization has limited choices such as recall, rework, sell at a discount, or scrap the existing inventory, all of which represent financial losses to the organization. Using air freight and
Higher education is becoming more important than ever as we shift into what Thomas Friedman calls a flattening world. Friedman, the author of The World is Flat is obviously not speaking geographically so what does he mean by a flattening world? He is rather speaking of a new era of globalization which allows us as individuals to compete globally thanks to new technology. The author warns America, “Because it is flattening and shrinking the world, Globalization 3.0 is going to be more and more driven not only by individuals but also by a much more diverse-non-Western, nonwhite- group of individuals” (11). Basically America is now being pressured by a quiet crisis which is allowing other countries to compete a lot closer with us. Yet, if
First of all, Friedman talks about the different levels of globalization. There are 3 different time periods in which the society has differed and changed, bringing us to where we are today. Globalization 1.0, which took place from 1492 to 1800, was the first step to making the world flatter. The coming to America, and the industrial drive that came along with this is what most characterized globalization 1.0. The industry drive was about things such as manpower and horsepower, and how well we could utilize these in the world market. This caused the world to “shrink” a little bit, and become flatter. With the discovery of a new world, it broadened the area in which business was conducted, but the commonality of rule and trade caused the distance to be spanned more frequently. I think Friedman’s notions regarding globalization 1.0 is very accurate. The world in our terms began in 1492 with the discovery of North America. Once the area began to be inhabited and settled, there was much more worldwide interaction. Communications and trade between the American colonies and England increased, and this began a more stable business of worldwide association. I believe that Friedman’s theory is true, because the discovery of a land across the ocean for th...
...o we can achieve our dreams in life: “we are now living in a world where time and space don’t matter anymore” just like J.Mittleman said. Globalization as we just learned is relative, whether it’s an opportunity or an exploitation depends on where you sit and how you look at the world. Kent, J., Kinetz, E. & Whehrfritz, G. Newsweek. Bottom of the barrel. - The dark side of globalization (2008/March24). David, P. Falling of The Edge, Travels through the Dark Heart of Globalization..Nov 2008. (p62)
...in the new “flat world” individuals need to figure out how to become “untouchable.” He explains that “untouchables are people whose jobs cannot be outsourced, digitized, or automated” (184). He explains that in a “flat world” there is no longer a job based solely on geographic, but rather in most cases an available job “will go to the best, smartest, most productive or cheapest worker-wherever he or she resides” (183). He goes on to show that companies and individuals have to look at the global picture today in order to succeed (183).
"Globalization is a process of world shrinkage, of distances getting shorter, things moving closer. It pertains to t...