Theory Of Human Motivation Essay

520 Words2 Pages

According to the article entitled,” A Theory of Human Motivation” by A.H. Maslow, Maslow stated that human motivation is defined in several ways. Some of the ways that human motivation is define is : The integrated wholeness of the organism must be one of the foundation stories of motivation theory. The hungry drive was refused as the main focus point. A theory should be center itself base on goals The cultural paths have the same goal. Any motivate behavior such as preparatory or consummatory should be understood on all levels Human needs arrange themselves in hierarchies of prepotency . Classifications of motivations must base on goals insnftead of instigating drives or motivate behavior. Motivation theory is not synonymous with behavior …show more content…

Physiological theory is divided into two categories. Homeostasis refers to the body ‘s automatic system to maintain normal state. In order for the body to maintain normal state, it has to have water content, sugar level, salt content, protein, fat content, calcium content, and constant temperature of the blood. Another part of the physiological needs is the appetite which relates to the need of the body. When the body lacks certain chemical , then the body will have certain appetite for that need. All physiological needs are not homeostasis . The other needs are desire , sleep, and maternal need in animals. Physiological needs is considered to isolated because they are localizable and somatically (Shafritz&Hyde, 2012, p.114). Safety needs is another physiological needs. Most theorists observed this need by observing infants. The main reason why the infants are observe is that theorists are able to see the infants reaction to threat and danger. Infants are not taught to obtain safety until later in life. As an adult they will do anything necessary to obtain safety. In various studies , it was discovered that infants are able to react to danger in many ways such as body language, undisrupted rhythms, or routine pattern of child( Shafritz & Hyde, 2012,

Open Document