Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of price discrimination
Price discrimination consumer view
Price discrimination consumer view
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantages of price discrimination
INTRODUCTION:
Price discrimination means charging a different pricing of same product, good and services by the same provider in different markets. It is a pricing strategy by which a producer charges its good and services at different pricing levels. Firms are selling their same goods at a market price in competitive market. So for price discrimination firm must have some market power.
The first lesson is that price discrimination is a ration strategy for maximizing profit that is a monopolist can increase their profit by charging different pricing for different customers a monopolist can charge s a price to each customer according to their willingness to pay. Second lesson is that price discrimination has an ability to separate their customers
When price discrimination is efficient then output can be expanded even output remains constant price discrimination can reduce efficiency by misallocating outputs among customers. keeping the difference pricing groups are separate, making price difficult, or restricting price information, boundary set up by the marketers to keep segment separate. so Price discrimination is very common in services where resale is not possible in services an example is student discounts at museums and restaurants. In this theory students for their condition as students will may get lower price than other groups of customers for a product or service and later will not become resellers since what they get received, may only be used and consumed by them. intellectual properties which are enforced by law and technology is another example of price discrimination.
Price discrimination also be seen in the requirements that goods or services can be identical is relaxed. For example, so-called premium products which have a price differential that is not explained by the cost of production. economists have argued this is a form of price discrimination exercised by providing a means for consumers to reveal their willingness to
It is the situation when supplier sell the same product at different prices depends on the quantity purchased, not only it is inefficient but also anti competitive because the smaller companies may not receive the same prices as the bigger companies. It is also called quantity discount, it reduces consumer surplus and more common than 1st degree.
3RD DEGREE PRICE DISCRIMINATION:
Third type of price discrimination is a commonest type means charging a price to different groups of consumers. The goods or services must not be transferable in this, the market is inefficient because of the dead weight loss in other words separation of market reduces dead weight loss and the separation of market enables the firm to increases profits.
For examples: there are two segments of market students and alumni. These two groups have different elasticities of demand if the price increases the students are less likely to purchase a product then alumni so the firm charges different prices to each group or the company maximize their profits on each groups
The first, second and third degree of price discrimination of taxonomy is due to modern
Price discrimination can be defines as when a firm offers an “individual good at different prices to different consumers” The Library of Economics and Liberty elaborates on its pricing strategy, stating Comcast offers different pricing depending on what features the consumer desires. For instance, the cable company will charge a higher price to a person who uses several services as part of their cable package. Conversely, the firm charges a very low price to someone who would “otherwise not be interested” , providing basic services at a minimum price. It takes advantage of the regulation imposed on the cable industry by offering the required basic package at seemingly attractive prices. Using this pricing system allows for it to attract different consumers whose maximum price they are willing to pay differs. Recently, Comcast attempted a new billing strategy by introducing a data usage cap. It essentially expanded on the company’s existing price discrimination method by charging customers according to how much data they used each month. Comcast also utilizes penetration pricing, where it offers its product at low prices to attract new consumers, later raising the prices once the customer is subscribed for a certain amount of time. Generally it claims the original prices were promotional only, lasting only a small amount of
Apart from Antitrust laws, there are several other laws that promote fair business practices. The Robinson-Patman Act prohibits price discrimination. This act ...
A couple of Squares has a limited capacity for which to produce their products and smaller companies tend to have larger fixed costs than bigger companies. Therefore, A Couple of Squares must maximize profits in order to ensure that they will stay in business. A profit-oriented pricing objective is also useful because of A Couple of Squares’ increased sales goals. A Couple of Squares increased their sales goals due to recent financial troubles. Maximizing profits is the easiest way to meet these sales goals due to the fact that A Couple of Squares has limited production capacity. The last key consideration favors a profit-oriented pricing objective because A Couple of Squares offers a specialty product. A specialty product often has limited competition, therefore can be priced on customer value. Pricing at customer value will maximize profits as well as customer satisfaction. A Couple of Squares’ lack of production capacity, increased sales goals, and specialty product favor a profit-oriented pricing
...e. A price gouger needs to charge more in order to avail the product or service. In the case of Raleigh, the roads to the town were not accessible due to fallen trees and rocks. An entrepreneur would need to cut the trees and remove the rocks in order to take the product there. People who do that need compensation for all the trouble they take to bring products to the market. The youths who brought ice to Raleigh town had to cut down trees in order to access town. Instead of selling ice as the “right price” of less than 2 dollars, the youths charged more than 8 dollars. The price provided just there right compensation for all their efforts. Banning price gouging led to serious suffering of the people because the little food left went bad causing even more losses. For a few dollars for the price of ice, Raleigh residents could have saved millions worth of food.
Price Elasticity is the measure in responsiveness of consumers to changes in the price of a product or service. The evaluation and consideration of this measure is a useful tool in firms making decisions about pricing and production, and in governments making decisions about revenue and regulation. “Price Elasticity is impacted by measurable factors that allow managers to understand demand and pricing for their product or service; including the availability of substitutes, the consumer budgets for the product or service, and the time period for demand adjustments.” The proper consideration of Price Elasticity allows managers to set pricing such that the effect on Total Revenue is predictable and adjustments to production are timely. The concept of Price Elasticity is employed in the management of commercial firms and government.
Price discrimination is a significant and influential practice on the market in the modern economic world. It aids in a firm's profit maximization scheme, it allows certain consumers with more scarce resources the opportunity to purchase goods or services that would otherwise be usable, and it aids firms in balancing what is and what is not sold. Price discrimination is an effective means by which a firm can sell a higher quantity of goods, make a higher profit margin on the goods it sells, and builds a broader consumer base due to differing price elasticity of demand for given goods and services. Price discrimination ultimately equalizes price and value for both the consumer and the firm, creating a more ideal situation for both entities in terms of preference and opportunity cost.
“Price discrimination is the practice of setting a different price for the same product in different segments to the market.” (Pricing Strategies, 2017) In new markets we have entered, that the competition has not entered, we will extensive rebates so we can make a name for ourselves in the new markets. This way, when the competition decides to enter we will already be there with a strong brand name. In established markets we will adjust pricing to closer match the competition. The performance of the computers and the additional sales and service staff will keep them coming back for
Swarovski has been in the industry area since 1895 and it is one of the biggest companies in the world that creates and sells crystal, Swarovski [2010]. Our company operates in an oligopoly structure due to the following factors which are; many buyers seek to buy luxury products from companies like Swarovski as there are no buyer entry barriers. This is shown to our findings as from 1980 up to 2005 the population was increasing rapidly and from the average we get that when population increases by 1% the quantity demand of the company increases by 2.79% and gives us satisfying results. On the other hand there are some seller entry barriers and this leads into having a few sellers. The seller entry barriers may provide that the already existing companies protect their profits and revenues well and prevent other competitors to entry. The company offers consumption goods that in a certain way satisfy the luxury needs of a consumer and this has been achieved through the specific details on the crystals. Overall this brought the market power to our company that more or less it also helps Swarovski of not being too much competed by other companies. Let us assume that as an oligopolistic company we have the opportunity to use price discrimination in order to increase our profits, would this work for our company? In general our company has to use market segmentation before charging in different prices and identify the needs of the customers that are homogenous and the profilers that are based on different industries, geographic locations, nationalities, ages and incomes. This would help selling in the right prices to the right groups and avoiding any misunderstandings on the way we choose our prices. Price discrimination would also work...
Oligopolies have considerable control over the price market, however, when changing prices, output, or advertising each must consider the response of its rival. Just as a monopoly has entry barriers, these same barriers apply to the oligopoly as well. One significant difference in an oligopoly versus a monopoly is that the oligopoly is a common practice in the market system, whereas a monopoly is prevented through federal
Predatory pricing “is alleged to occur when a firm sets a price for its product that is below some measure of cost and forfeits revenues in the short run to put competitors out of business” (Sheffet p.163-164). The reason firms take the short term loss is because they hope to drive out competitors and raise prices to monopolistic levels. By doing this, they covered their short term loss to make even greater profits in the long term than they would have by not using predatory tactics (Sheffert). Predatory pricing became illegal under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. It has remained one of the more difficult allegations for prosecutors to prove, due to the complexity of determining the company’s actual intent and whether or not it the strategy is competitive pricing. According to Areeda and Turner, there are three ways to determine if a firm is implementing predatory pricing. First, a price above marginal cost is presumed lawful; second, a price below marginal cost is considered unlawful, except when there is strong demand; and third, average variable cost is considered a good proxy for marginal cost. This is a reason predatory pricing is still important today. The courts must decide whether or not companies are engaging in competitive prices for the good of the consumers or are using predatory tactics for the good of their own company. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the current legislation regarding predatory pricing, determining when there is predation in an industry and the cause and effect relationship it has on an industry.
The competition and consumer act aims to discourage price discrimination in the business environment if the discrimination could substantially reduce competition. An example of price discrimination would be Apple with the distribution of IPhone 5c around the world, the prices vary from $500-$1,500(local currency). The IPhone 5c is less-profitable for Apple but still the price range has a big gap e.g., in Singapore the iPhone costs $948, but in the UK it costs $529 . There are three types of price discrimination (first degree, second degree and third degree) and they all discriminate differently. The price discrimination in business will increase revenue, they will attract more consumers and will enable companies to stay in business. The consequences for price discrimination is that the manufacture/business will get sued by consumers for price discrimination especially when paying higher prices, decline in consumer surplus, there may be administrative costs of separating the markets etc. However, Price discrimination has a lot of impacts on consumers and business owner 's around the world but most importantly it affects people that have been discriminated over the price for the same
As an example CVS and Walgreens are similar companies that produce the same type of goods with the same types of prices. So both competitors try to beat one another by using a the format of a price war that can allow them to lowering there price’s to gain a profit over there competitors by using the average eye of a consumer to buy their company product over there competitor price. However, the problem about this tactic price
The second market structure is a monopolistic competition. The conditions of this market are similar as for perfect competition except the product is not homogenous it is differentiated; thus having control over its price. (Nellis and Parker, 1997). There are many firms and freedom of entry into the industry, firms are price makers and are faced with a downward sloping demand curve as well as profit maximizers. Examples include; restaurant businesses, hotels and pubs, specialist retailing (builders) and consumer services (Sloman, 2013).
Price is the values entirety that consumers trade for the advantages of having or utilizing the product or services. Different places and cultural have different spending culture. Therefore the price has to be relevant according to the product offer because it can reflect the image of a
An oligopolistic market has a small number of sellers dominating market share and therefore barriers to entry are high. These sellers are highly competitive and do not act independently of each other. Access to information is limited so sellers can only speculate of their competitor’s actions. Sellers will take advantage of competitor’s price changes in order to increase market share.