Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Education censorship
When controversial topics are mentioned, literature is probably not the first, or most pressing, one that comes to mind. But books can and have been highly controversial ground for schools, libraries, and governments around the world and throughout history. Literature successfully pushes boundaries and comfort levels and has done so since the beginning of printed texts. Lots of sources agree that, “Books that span all eras and topics and are aimed at the young and the old are frequently objected to and challenged by many” (Olson 1). Because of this, on all levels, books are banned yearly because of content and language. However, in a highly technological and digital world, book banning is not an effective way to safeguard the minds of the young. …show more content…
Rowling. Schools and parents tended to disapprove of these books because of the obvious topic of magic that the books discusses. Even with a hundred years or more in between them, both The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and the Harry Potter series are each contested for different reasons. Huckleberry Finn for language and the historical terms used and Harry Potter for witchcraft. This is a broad span of topics to cover, from racism to wizardry, and yet there are still two sides to the argument that people continue to make both for and against these books. When books like this are discussed and debated, it is easy to see reasonable arguments on both sides of the aisle. There are some who are strongly opposed to young people reading racist words. Parents and teachers make a good case about this aspect. The young, impressionable minds of children read literature and absorb the ideas therein and then regurgitate them. Therefore there is some content that is unsuitable for younger minds. But that is why education and conversation are an essential part of reading any book, no matter the topic. If children are introduced to racist language or slang, it should also be important to introduce them to a responsible use of that knowledge. It is also easily understandable how and why witchcraft might make some uncomfortable. However, literature can only shape our minds but it cannot force us to mimic it or act upon the ideas it illustrates. If anything, books that have objectionable material might need an age restriction, but ideas can never be permanently censored. A book might be discontinued from print, but the topic or idea in it will continue to exist in the mind, on the Internet, and in other books. Instead of censoring things governments, schools, and parents should think about considering the material and opening a dialogue about why it is no longer acceptable or why
In the article How Banning Books Marginalizes Children, the author, Paul Ringel, states that approximately fifty-two percent of the books banned in the last ten years illustrate “diverse content”, such as race, religion, gender identity, etc. Ringel believes that attitudes about which books are “appropriate” for kids to read have too often suppressed stories about different cultures and life experiences. He basis his argument around the pretext that when libraries stop the banning it will allow kids to learn how to navigate imaginary worlds filled with differences and apply those lessons to their own lives.
The practice of the censorship of books in schools has been prevalent due to the explicit content of them. Parents have been complaining to schools about books that count as required reading because they disapprove with the points made in the book. If a book consists of offensive or sexually explicit material, then parents would challenge the schools about them in order to prevent their children from reading them. Censorship in general has been an intensely debated issue because it is considered an infringement to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution while others argue it is used to conceal inappropriate things (Aliprandini and Sprague). The banning of books in school curriculum has also been debated since parents see certain books as inappropriate while others argue that banning them hinders student learning. Against the censorship of books in schools, Fenice Boyd and Nancy Bailey, authors of Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, believe that banning books creates a barrier between students and intellectual development (Boyd and Bailey, 655). Banning books from schools and removing them from the curriculum prevents students from exploring different ideas and developing creativity and critical thinking skills.
Countries worldwide actively call for the banning of books that are found to be politically inconvenient, religiously awkward, or embarrassing in one form or another. But for writers like Russia's Vasily Grossman, a book's ban means far more than just a dip in sales. In 1961, he pleaded with the Soviet censors, "I am physically free, but the book to which I have dedicated my life is in jail." (Merkelson). A book represents an idea, thus limiting access to a book is banning the representation of an idea. The banning of books in American schools should not be allowed, because banning books will prevent students from learning the reason for the controversy and alternate viewpoints they can come to on their own.
“It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer. The children are the real losers because they are the ones that are not able to read the classic works of literature which are the backbone of classroom discussions all across the United States.
We live in an overprotective society, where people try to control other people’s lives from things that they find explicit. Many parents believe that by sheltering their kids from offensive things it will keep them safe. But, trying to live life as if there is always sunshine and no rain turns out to be a big disappointment. The banning of books has a negative effect on children and adults alike, as it can shelter children from real life situations, and revokes the rights of the people. Although people believe in banning books that contain vulgar language and profanity to help their children, it can actually hurt the child and can be considered unconstitutional.
Why are books challenged and further on banned? To challenge a book is an attempt to remove the material from schools and/or libraries, and to ban a book is to successfully remove the material from these places. Books are usually challenged to protect children from the censors of these books. This book was banned for all the wrong reasons. This paper will focus on racism, sexism, homosexuality, and violence since these were reasons the book got banned which on the contrary should have given it much more motive to let high school students read and learn from it.
This book has been banned from school libraries all over the country because of the main character's teenage angst, which many feel is too graphic for teenagers, and its profanity. Profanity, whether it be frequent or a rare occurrence, is a characteristic of many literary classics, as is the use of racial epithets.In the book Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain (ranking number 2 on the list), an epithet is use many times over to describe the people of color in the book. Now since the book was published in 1885 and such language was common at the time, I do not belie...
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
Walt Whitman once said, “The dirtiest book of all is the expurgated book.” Between the years 2000 and 2009 a total of 3200 books were challenged in school libraries in an attempt to expurgate, or censor, the content in books provided to students. Today the trend of censorship continues as popular novels such as The Hunger Games, The Fault in Our Stars, and Captain Underpants are censored from schools across the nation (Challenges by Reason).Censorship in regards to literature refers to the examination and suppressing of a book because of objectionable material. The process of censorship in school libraries often begins with an outspoken parent, teacher, student, or administrator and ends in the banning or abridgement of a novel deemed inadmissible. Censorship is protecting many students from controversial, immoral, and potentially unsuitable content; however, this is not always the case. Students, parents, teachers, and administrators with different backgrounds, beliefs, and morals are not creating a library pleasing to everyone because of the variety of opinion. Censorship in school is not justifiable, because it restricts discussion and knowledge of new, controversial, and necessary ideas, allows a handful of people to make decisions for a larger group based on opinion, and undermines democratic ideals.
This burden often falls on teachers. The purpose of this research paper is to discuss censorship in schools and to argue that the censorship of books in the high school English curriculum is limiting and takes away literature that is meaningful to students. How a Book is Censored Brinkley describes a few actions that can lead to the censoring of a book in a school or school system: An expression of concern is simply a question about the material with overtones of disapproval; an oral complaint is an oral challenge to the contents of a work; a written complaint is a formal written challenge to the school about the contents of a work; and a public attack is a public statement challenging the contents of a work that is made outside of the school, usually to the media to gain support for further action (1999). Brinkley also points out an important difference between selection and censorship: Selection is the act of carefully choosing works for an English course that will be age-appropriate, meaningful, and fulfill objectives, while censorship is the act of excluding works that some con... ...
Books are meant to make the reader see an idea from a different perspective. When said perspective isn’t agreeable to certain parties, should that be cause to ban the books altogether? There is such a thing as freedom of speech, and based on these thoughts books do not deserve to be banned. In many schools, in many countries, the lists of banned books expand. Many complain of the missing classics on the shelves, claiming them to be “seditious” (a word used in an essay to describe twenty-three new additions to the military’s blacklist in Korea), when in fact most of these books are bestsellers.
“I believe that books challenge and interrogate. They give us windows into the lives of others and give us mirrors so that we can better see ourselves. Ultimately if you have a worldview that can be undone by a novel, let me submit that the problem is not with the novel.” This quote was said by John Greene, and everything he said is completely true. By banning books, schools are teaching young children that there is no diversity in the world and that the world they know is the world everyone knows. When schools promote these small worldviews, that is when prejudice and discrimination grow and fester. The children begin to think that since a book is banned it must be wrong, but in reality, it’s not wrong, it’s just different. Like John Greene said, if someone has a worldview that is so small that they feel the need to ban a book because something in the book is different than the life they’ve experienced, then the problem is most definitely not with the book, it is with the person. Schools should not ban books because it plants the seed of discrimination in children and halts the progression of society.
“Censorship is the child of fear and the father of ignorance”. – Laurie Henderson. By banning books, it can deprive children the information or the mental nourishment they will need for life. Personally, it’s not the best objective for children to be brought up and not know the capabilities of the real world. Due to that, when a child grows up and goes out into the world they wouldn’t be as efficient on how to handle themselves on their own, due to the “protected state of mind” that they were taught.
In 2013, Lane Technical High School students flooded the school grounds chanting things like “No more banned books!” and “Let us read!” under the freezing rain. Their principal was told by his supervisor to remove all copies of Persepolis (by: Marjane Satrapi), a graphic novel depicting one woman’s childhood during the Islāmic revolution in Iran, from all classrooms and the school’s library. The resulting protest against the book’s removal has earned the students the Illinois Library Association’s 2013 Intellectual Freedom Award. Despite the student’s effort against banning the book however, The Chicago Public School district claimed to have the right to ban Persepolis from their library considering the fact that the book contains questionable language and depicts scenes of torture...but are they really “protecting” children from the evils of the world?
Many books are written by different writers and are fast selling, but not all these are suitable for the United States of America society because of different reasons. Books are known to be categorized into different sections based on what the books are trying to interpret. Books that are banned do not necessarily reflect on the people generally. Books that are banned are decided by the United States of America society if it will be accepted. Some people in the society argue that some books are not to be banned because they have positive impacts on the United States of America society while some says that such books should be banned.