Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is curfew keeping teens put of trouble introduction
Negative effects of curfews
Are Curfews Effective When Keeping Teens Out of Trouble
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is curfew keeping teens put of trouble introduction
What did he do your honor? I know he was out with his friends late at night, but he would never commit a crime like this. This is how many American parents explain their children to the judge. When a mother can’t face the fact that her child committed a conspicuous crime, she will start to express her personal emotions. In the judicial system emotions get you nowhere, if your son/daughter were where they were supposed to be they wouldn’t have encountered this situation. This is the problem that no curfew conflicts on the public society. I believe if you are a minor you should have curfew due to all of the obstacles man faces every day, don’t matter how hard you try you cannot leap over every obstacle without encountering it.
I really don’t understand why all states don’t put a curfew in affect throughout all communities, let me explain why. First off, curfew keeps children safe, parents can’t be everywhere at one time. In addition, slowly but surely curfew teaches children time management and responsibility. Last but not least, curfew will indirectly raise student’s grades in school. There has been numerous studies done on how grades are affect by curfew. In closing, I strongly support the purpose of a curfew.
For starters, curfew keeps children safer than usual. When you have children just roaming the streets, something bad is bound to happen. It’s always that one experimental friend that says “hey guys, let’s go try this”. Well this one statement can lead to a heap of trouble. According to a recent study done, there has been a 97 percent drop of juvenile delinquents (Seith 1). What this means is with curfew incorporated within the community the rate of children going to juvenile centers has significantly decreased.
Not a...
... middle of paper ...
...ws/article-2150187/Under-18s-commit-quarter-crimes-Young-offenders-responsible-million-crimes-just-year.html>.
Lesile, Katie. "Teen Curfews: Protect Teens, Curb Crime, or Just Peace of Mind?" Atlanta News, Sports, Atlanta Weather, Business News. N.p., 13 June 2011. Web. 22 May 2014. .
McCann, Kathleen. "AASM News Archive." AASM. N.p., 14 May 2008. Web. 27 May 2014. .
Park, Alice. "Larks and Owls: How Sleep Habits Affect Grades." Time. Time Inc., 10 June 2009. Web. 25 May 2014. .
Seith, Robert. "Curfews Can Reduce Crime." Curfews Can Reduce Crime. N.p., 12 Apr. 2001. Web. 26 May 2014. .
As shown above, curfew laws can play a very critical role in a teenager’s life. It can assist with keeping the city safer, help them get enough sleep, and help them build their personal skill under a well-structured system routine. A lot of people might find curfew laws for teenagers unconstitutional and contradict the first amendment, so they decide not to abide with it. But by doing so, they are placing more a bigger experience to teenagers who are still working on developing their skills to take on new challenges. After all, Teenagers are the future of our society if we don’t teach, coach, direct, and offer guidance their future will be unstable and unproductive and that will affect the entire nation.
Today law enforcement is criminalizing innocent activity because of curfews placed in their region. Like in Shaina’s case, she had a destination in mind. Many young teens out past 10p.m. are only trying to get home or have a place of interest in mind. There shouldn’t be an automatic negative assumption of a teen that is out past 10pm. Teenagers should not have labels placed upon them when they have not caused any trouble. Curfew laws create these labels on young teens and put down the ones who are innocent. Curfew laws discriminate against young teens who have done nothing wrong and serve no threat to the community.
They open up the doors to a new discussion that explores the idea of not punishments for crimes they commit, but preventing them before they take place. Staying after school, involved in productive activities seems to help students stay out of trouble. Curfews are imposed in some states, preventing juveniles from being out past a certain time until a time early the next day. These curfews are said to be in place in order to prevent crimes, but there are no statistics to back this up, as there are for the crime rate dropping with kids staying after school. Regardless, these are matters of precaution taken in order to attempt to prevent crimes from happening at the times in which they’d be anticipated to. If things are in place in order to prevent juveniles from committing crimes, the crime rate will drop, and many people will be saved from entering a world unknown to the world that is prison. Stopping juveniles from committing crimes would maybe them cause adults to not commit crimes as well, since in essence, these juveniles will indeed one day be adults. By implementing laws, states and law makers understand that there will always be people that don’t follow them. By stating programs, allowing juveniles a place to reconcile with small mistakes they make, or creating a safe-place where they can seek help from
Curfews don't keep teens out of trouble at night. Making more trouble by forcing them to stay in the house. They'll sneak out the house any time at night to go to a party, or have fun. Sneaking out the house past their curfew; with their parents thinking their child's in bed. When the parent finally notices that the child is missing they will have no idea where their child's at.
In regards to recommending if the policy should be extended to areas outside of Northbridge, I believe that unless there is a significant amount of research placed on the specific areas which are believed to need a curfew, then yes, it should be extended. Despite this though, from the research above, showing that there was a drop in the amount of people apprehended, it was set out on a specific racial group, from low socio-economic areas, and not areas in which middle class people reside, as it is usually believed that people from low socio-economic background are more commonly at a higher risk of crime than that of middle class.
Curfews have been around in the United States since the late 1800s. Over time curfews have changed; the original curfews were in medieval Europe. A curfew was “the ringing of a bell indicat[ing] that fires were to be extinguished for the evening” (Fried 128). When curfews were adopted in the U.S., city officials and citizens believed that imposing a curfew helps to reduce crime rate and victimization of teens. First curfew was imposed in Omaha, Nebraska in 1880. According to the article, “Youth curfews popular with American cities but effectiveness and legality are questioned” President Harrison believed that curfews were very important in protecting children from “‘vices of the street’” (Favro). Later, curfews were adopted in many of the major U.S. cities that had populat...
According to a 1997 survey conducted by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, “[A curfew] provides officers an opportunity to intervene with potential issues before problems develop. Periodic sweeps remind the public about the law officer. Curfew enforcement has, in large part, become a part of routine enforcement” (US Conference of Mayors). Most adolescents do not see a logical point in having a curfew, but they don’t always realize that parents and other adults only want what is best for them. Curfews allow for parents to keep an eye on their children, keeping them safe and away from harmful situations. It is important to inform others, adults and teenagers alike, of the advantages of a curfew, in order to allow everyone to take better care of themselves
The government is taking the role of a parent by limiting the amount of time youths can spend in public. A city in Valle Platte, Louisiana has a curfew and it was noticed that the use of a curfew could not even be for the benefit of the public, instead, for revenue as each violator will be cited and forced to pay a fine (Berg). This shows that the citizens are not in the government's highest interest. It is actually the money that the whole system could be based off of. The government expects all youth to act as the perfect poster child. Placing restrictions upon all children is unfair to those that sometimes just have the urge to get out and be in the open. The government acts like the fairy godmother in Cinderella, it limits the time frame for when youth are expected to be home or face the consequences. These consequences are not fair as it is oppressing children from their natural rights. “The idea of a youth curfew is premised on the denial of rights and, in particular, the denial of freedom of movement” (White). Denying the right to travel is against each citizen's constitutional rights as an American citizen. If the United States government would like to rule as an autocracy then placing a curfew limiting the freedom of citizens is a huge step towards this system. The children are not the real problem, the government enforcing the curfew
However, many cities and states in the US currently enforce curfew laws that deny young teens under the age of 18 their right to be in public places or to drive after certain hours. These laws are punishing minors for exercising their constitutional rights in the same way that adults do without such punishment; they are mostly causing no harm, and do not deserve to be discriminated against by the government in the way they are.
"Handling Curfews." BYU David O. McKay School of Education. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014.
Laws like these divert attention from the real causes of crime” (474). Author himself writes, “They put law-abiding teensgers unde house arrest every nights of the week. But it’s not because they have done anything wrong. It is because of the crimes committed by others” (475). Author’s states “Curfew laws usurp the right of parents to raise their children as they think best. It become a crime for parents to allow their teenagers to go to the theater or a jazz club. This law injects the government where it doesn't belong” (475). about curfews. Basically she is saying their children as they think best. It become a crime for parents to allow their teenagers to go to the theater or a jazz club law injects the government where it doesn't
In today’s society, some parents create curfews for their children while others allow their children to create their own curfews. Numerous people argue that setting curfews for teenagers help them refrain from taking part in mischief and help them to develop into superior adults. The remaining group of people state that curfews would make teenagers rebel. Teenage curfews produce many different positive and negative views in parents and teenagers. Different opinions on curfews are expressed through parents, teenagers, and mayors; and there are numerous reasons for people not supporting curfews.
...In conclusion while there is negative attributes towards the Northbridge curfew, the curfew demonstrates how there was a need for action against juvenile violence and crime. Although the policy needs to be tweaked so that juvenile rights are taken more into consideration the curfew is put in place to make the community feel more comfortable and safe in its night time environment. With all the evidence provided into the Northbridge curfew it is prone that a city wide curfew is introduced to help the youth of Western Australia by limiting violent actions and violence against the youth. As stated by the Western Australian Government’s Office of Crime Prevention, “Our children and young people are the future of our State. They require nurturing, support and protection to ensure that they achieve personal success and make a valuable contribution to society” (OCP, 2009).
Many people assume curfews will stop children and teens from acting out, however I think that is only part of the fix from the “bigger issues” that are happening. Teenagers do not just rebel for no reason, and putting a time limit on when you can go outside isn't going to be much of a fix to any of the problems either. I agree that curfews help keep our city and environment safer than if there was none at all, however there is more that people can do to help fix the issue of rebellious
According to McClain, Kansas City police and officials implemented a curfew for minors. This curfew restricts teenagers the rights that they’re are able to take part in. The curfew refuses teens the right to dine, watch movies, talk with friend, or walk around the plaza after 9 p.m. The curfew was implemented due to a shooting that occurred involving a number of teenagers. This article informs the reader that not only are teens having the freedoms that other people are able to enjoy taken away, but they are also being discriminated against because of their age. These restrictions are not only discriminative, but they’re unconstitutional. The 14th amendment to the constitution has a clause, called the Equal Protection Clause. The Equal Protection Clause states, “The constitutional guarantee that no person or class of persons shall be denied the same protection of the laws that is enjoyed by other persons or other classes in like circumstances in their lives, liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness” (thefreedictionary.com). The Equal Protection Clause also prevents a class of people from feeling inferior. This clause could easily be extended to teens as well because they are viewed as intellectually inferior by majority class. Adolescents are thought to be incapable of making an appropriate solution to a situation. This misconception has been formed due to parents and elderly people forcing children to follow strict rules and do as the parent or elderly person says; this prevents the child from creating their own solution to problems and causes the child to lack problem solving skill. The lack of problems solving skill could affect them more substantially in life, due to them no longer being minors and having their punishment more severe. Teens are widely regarded as trouble-makers, but they only cause trouble in their pursuit to experience life. Not only do curfews force children to