Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nagative Effects Of Curfew
Nagative Effects Of Curfew
Curfew laws for teenagers all over the united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nagative Effects Of Curfew
Introduction
In 2003 the Labor Premier of Western Australia Geoff Gallop, introduced legislation that enforced a after-dark curfew on all civilians under the age of eighteen, unless they were accompanied by a legal guardian. The curfew was restricted to the city’s entertainment precinct know as Northbridge. This report will be looking into both the positives and negatives of the curfew and if there is a community need to extend the curfew to other areas of the city and surrounding areas.
The Legislation
26 June 2003, Labor Premier Geoff Gallop announced the introduction of The Young People in Northbridge Policy. It was designed to address the growing problem of youth that were unsupervised in Perth’s largest entertaining precinct, Northbridge. A curfew was put in place which stated any child under the age of twelve wasn’t allowed in the Northbridge area after dark and those who are between the ages of thirteen and fifteen are not allowed to be in the area after 10.00pm local time unless accompanied by a legal guardian who was sober at the time of supervision. There were four phases that were outlined in the policy in regards to the legal frame work that included; Street Patrols, Finding Safe Places and Safe People, The Operational Debrief and Follow-Up and Case Management. With the legal position of the policy outlined in Section 41 of the Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA), police and members of organisations such as; The Department of Child Protection (DCP) and the Juvenile Aid Group (JAG), were authorised to direct youths back to their homes if they were not supervised (Carpenter, 2006). If youths were found to be considered ‘vulnerable’ they were then taken to JAG for risk evaluation to see whether or not they wer...
... middle of paper ...
...In conclusion while there is negative attributes towards the Northbridge curfew, the curfew demonstrates how there was a need for action against juvenile violence and crime. Although the policy needs to be tweaked so that juvenile rights are taken more into consideration the curfew is put in place to make the community feel more comfortable and safe in its night time environment. With all the evidence provided into the Northbridge curfew it is prone that a city wide curfew is introduced to help the youth of Western Australia by limiting violent actions and violence against the youth. As stated by the Western Australian Government’s Office of Crime Prevention, “Our children and young people are the future of our State. They require nurturing, support and protection to ensure that they achieve personal success and make a valuable contribution to society” (OCP, 2009).
As shown above, curfew laws can play a very critical role in a teenager’s life. It can assist with keeping the city safer, help them get enough sleep, and help them build their personal skill under a well-structured system routine. A lot of people might find curfew laws for teenagers unconstitutional and contradict the first amendment, so they decide not to abide with it. But by doing so, they are placing more a bigger experience to teenagers who are still working on developing their skills to take on new challenges. After all, Teenagers are the future of our society if we don’t teach, coach, direct, and offer guidance their future will be unstable and unproductive and that will affect the entire nation.
In February 2002, the House of Commons passed the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA). The Act came into effect in April 2003, replacing the Young Offenders Act (Mapleleaf). The new legislation attempts to balance the legalistic framework of the Young Offenders Act and the social needs approach underlying the Juvenile Delinquents Act. This goal is apparent in the Declaration of Principle stating th...
The Youth Criminal Justice Act, often called by the name of YCJA, is specifically made for youths ages varying from 12 to 17 that disobey the law. In April 1, 2003, the YCJA replaced the previous justice act called Young Offenders Act due to several negative concerns. “These concerns included the overuse of the courts and incarceration in less serious cases, disparity and unfairness in sentencing, a lack of effective reintegration of young people released from custody, and the need to better take into account the interests of victims.” The main purpose of the YCJA aims to have a fairer and more equitable system. Although the YCJA is an effective law within the justice system, a main aspect/characteristic that needs to remain, is keeping the
The causes and consequences of youth unemployment in Australia has been of particular concern within both government and private sectors for many years. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 10.9% of the total 15-24 age population was unemployed in September, 1995. This figure climbed to 15.3% in September, 2003. This evidence gives cause to the growing concern surrounding the increase in youth unemployment. For sizeable numbers of youth, its not going to get any easier to find work as they move into their twenties or complete education. Opinions such as those found in the Smith Family Youth Unemployment Report (2003) hypothesise that juvenile crime is directly connected to the high rates of youth unemployment in Australia. In this essay, I would firstly like to ask exactly what is known about both the rates of juvenile crime and youth unemployment in Australia, and is there a direct link between the two? The suggested connection between a soaring crime rate and youth unemployment influences the way in which our society is governed and developed, making it imperative that we endeavor to try and understand and/or eliminate some of these suggestions. I will begin my essay by defining what I mean by youth unemployment and juvenile crime, and explore the possible challenges upon measuring both of these things. Comparing statistics gathered from both the ABS and other government recognized reports on unemployment, and information from the Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC), I will attempt to weigh up the claim that the crime rate has risen in unison with the unemployment rate. I will also assess claims made by Weatherburn (2001) that youth unemployment causes crime, sifting through the truths and fallacies.
Lesile, Katie. "Teen Curfews: Protect Teens, Curb Crime, or Just Peace of Mind?" Atlanta News, Sports, Atlanta Weather, Business News. N.p., 13 June 2011. Web. 22 May 2014. .
Today, teen curfews are commonplace and supported by voters. Bainbridge observes that according to Jet Magazine’s survey taken in 2011, 75% of the voters were in support of curfew laws (13). Parents arrange for young children to go to bed at an earlier time than teenagers (Psychologytoday.com). Teens receive the privilege to stay up later but this can mean that they will be out on the streets later at night. McKinny indicates that curfews are in place to protect the youth from crimes that may harm them or take the children’s lives (Time.com).
They open up the doors to a new discussion that explores the idea of not punishments for crimes they commit, but preventing them before they take place. Staying after school, involved in productive activities seems to help students stay out of trouble. Curfews are imposed in some states, preventing juveniles from being out past a certain time until a time early the next day. These curfews are said to be in place in order to prevent crimes, but there are no statistics to back this up, as there are for the crime rate dropping with kids staying after school. Regardless, these are matters of precaution taken in order to attempt to prevent crimes from happening at the times in which they’d be anticipated to. If things are in place in order to prevent juveniles from committing crimes, the crime rate will drop, and many people will be saved from entering a world unknown to the world that is prison. Stopping juveniles from committing crimes would maybe them cause adults to not commit crimes as well, since in essence, these juveniles will indeed one day be adults. By implementing laws, states and law makers understand that there will always be people that don’t follow them. By stating programs, allowing juveniles a place to reconcile with small mistakes they make, or creating a safe-place where they can seek help from
Youth and juvenile crime is a common and serious issue in current society, and people, especially parents and educators, are pretty worried about the trend of this problem. According to Bala and Roberts, around 17% of criminals were youths, compared to 8% of Canadian population ranging between 12 to 18 years of age between 2003 and 2004 (2006, p37). As a big federal country, Canada has taken a series of actions since 1908. So far, there are three justice acts in the history of Canadian juvenile justice system, the 1908 Juvenile Delinquents Act, the 1982 Young Offenders Act, and the 2003 Youth Criminal Justice Act. In Canada, the judicial system and the principle of these laws have been debated for a long time. This paper will discuss how these three laws were defined and why one was replaced by another.
...e curfew law allows for authorities to target them based solely on their age and maybe even certain racial groups. In a positive light the curfew law is seen to reduce crime, but at the same time was allowing our law enforcement agencies to be prejudice amongst this group of our society.
The presupposition that curfews do not keep teens out of trouble is a categorical truth. Many people believe that curfews will not keep teenagers out of trouble. Although some advocates of the opposition would argue that curfews do keep them out of trouble, these critics are too dogmatic in their provincial ideology. Most teens when forced to follow rules will try to find ways around them. This in effect will cause more problems. Throughout history and current times plenty of evidence of this notion is available. “There 's only one problem with youth curfews: They don 't work. And we shouldn 't kid ourselves that they do.” (Curfews)
Throughout the United States a question regarding teenagers is “Should there be a legal curfew for minors”. Some parents agree that there should be, while others think otherwise. The whole issue behind teen curfew came about when 80 percent of juvenile crimes began happening between 9a.m – 10p.m. Nothing seemed to reduce the crimes so the only solutions the law enforcement officials could come up with was a curfew. Little did they know it would cause more problems than the actual issue itself.
A curfew is a time of day or night, usually around 8 or 9 o’clock,
Curfews can keep a family together. Curfews give teens a reasonable time to return home to their parents. Teens can stay out of trouble if they are in the house with family. “Can anyone argue that in a city like Chicago, where children are killing each other every day and where children are outside till 4 and 5 O'clock in the morning, a curfew would not help? It cannot be the only solution to the problem, but it can be part...
Curfew has been a controversial topic so far since it takes place in many countries around the world. In some countries, there are several strict laws released to force children to stay at home during a limit time frame. In the United States, curfew laws “are local ordinances that prohibit people of a certain age (usually under 18) from being in public or in a business establishment during certain hours (such as between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.)” (Juvenile Curfew Laws – The Basics). Although most teenagers will argue that curfew put them in many problems and steal their freedom rights, it is still an effective way to keep teens safe. Let children being out of home at
Stokes, D. 2004. Submission to the Youth Justice Agency. [Online] Available from: www.youthreach.ie [Accessed 7th May 2012]