Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of the president as the chief executive
Role of chief executive president
Roles and responsibilities of an executive officer
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of the president as the chief executive
Symphanie Vessells Professor Cummins Phi 330: Business Ethics- Mon/Wed December 5, 2014 Response paper 3: Executive Compensation “The Pay Problem” A Chief executive officer (CEO) is typically responsible for leading and executing a company’s long-term strategic plan. The job description of a CEO requires meeting the needs of the company, employees, customers, investors, as well as the law. A CEO is also responsible for making decisions for a company on a day to day basis; however does every CEO deserve such a high salary? In this response paper, I will discuss the reasons why I agree that there is a pay problem within a company in regards to a CEO. A high percentage of top executives are overpaid rather than underpaid. The reason why …show more content…
”The results of a company are more often produced by a group of executives or even by an entire organization’s effort, and only rarely by a single individual" was stated in the article "The Pay Problem" I agree with this 100 percent. Why companies don’t share their earned profit more within a company, like with the employees who worked just as hard to bring in the money? Or how about with the investors who took a chance with the company weather the outcome was good or bad, or even a manager of a …show more content…
In some cases, CEO’s are running failed organizations, and getting paid as if their companies are successful. If CEO’S are not creating new jobs and expanding their companies, then why are they receiving a lot of incentive? Because resources are so scarce, shouldn't companies become more aware and careful about the way they distribute the money. The more CEOs get paid, the worse their company does over the next few years. If a company is in a current downfall, how can they afford to continue to give CEO bonuses/ incentive? Where is this money being generated from? Why do the boards of directors wish to keep someone who is not creating profit, why should he be allowed to receive any bonuses? Lots of companies fail because of the CEO wasteful spending. Once one person does it everyone in the company will think it is okay to spend any way they want. I believe it is important to base a CEO salary on the company performance. Some companies may have great short term performances and failed long term. Before CEO receives bonus/extra pay, companies should ask themselves what exactly our CEO has accomplished this year. What goals were met? What areas did the company make the most profit? What areas still need
The CEO needs to create a corporate culture. His culture will determine what people should be doing and what should do not be trying. He can decide who will stay, who will leave, and how the job will get done. Culture starts with the boss. He can decide how he wants people to act and start modeling the behavior publicly. STOPPED HERE…!!!:)
“Equity considerations play a major role not only in the evolution of distributive systems but all in the emergence of supporting ideologies and the processes through which distributive systems are challenged and replaced” (Cook,K.S., & Parcel, T.L. 1997, p.2). Therefore, when the employees are rewarded for their work they will most likely work harder to restore the balance of equity. Whereas if an employee is under rewarded the employee will most likely do the opposite and not work as hard. The ongoing issue at Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant was that the employees were being under- rewarded and not appreciated by upper management, which lead to low productivity that severely impacted the companies
...ith strong share price and some of them will get the organisation with the worst conditions of company performance. This is when the corporate governance bringing the right direction for organisation making best practice in deciding executive remuneration to sufficiently attract and motivate, eventhough to reach the satisfactory result there is a long way to go, involves time and efforts. The executives' remuneration at WH Smith especially for CEO is considered appropriate because it does not rely on agency theory alone but also considered the guidelines of the UK Corporate Government Code (2010) which is to attract, retain and motivate directors. To support this argument, “high pay itself is not evidence of inefficient contracts but may simply reflect the market for CEOs and the pay necessary to attract, retain, and motivate talented individuals.” (Conyon, M. 2006)
In 2003 the average pay for CEOs at 200 of the largest U.S. companies was $11.3 million--but there are a good number whose compensation packages approach the $100 million mark. Faced with these figures, Americans from all walks of life--who revile CEOs as greedy fat cats--are overcome with bewilderment and indignation. Astonished to learn that what an average worker earns in a year, some CEOs earn in less than a week--people ask themselves: "How can the work of a corporate paper-pusher be worth so many millions of dollars?"
The question is why. The reason is simple. It’s greed. The more a CEO makes the more they want to make. The economy is no longer about providing a good or service for the population at large, but about amassing as much wealth as possible, and you’re stupid if you think you have the same opportunities to obtain wealth as those Wal-mart and Target CEOs. The truth is the deck is stacked against you, and it keeps getting worse as the world moves along its orbit. The economy has become based largely on the trading and selling of commodities, and the worker has become a cheap disposable commodity, to be used up by megalomaniacs who sit atop cash mountains, casting down crumbs as they see fit.
The company Steel Co, which has been established for around 30 years, has been in a steady decline during the current recession and although a Divisional Director has been employed by the owner the fortunes of the company have not improved. The staff is unhappy, unproductive and unimpressed by the Human Resource system that currently exists in the company. The pay structure that currently exists within the organisation has been much debated among employees who feel it is unsatisfactory. The Business Adviser will research Performance and Reward management tools in order to help the company develop a more suitable Performance and Reward system to use. A variety of sources will be used in order to evaluate the system and tools against other organisational frameworks. The pay structure within the company will also be looked at in order to identify any possible changes that could be made.
This paper will discuss the reasons why CEOs are not being overpaid. It will apply the utilitarian ethical principle to many a few aspects to CEO compensation and whether or not it is justifiable for such pay. The paper will look at whether or not their performance is justifiable for the pay because they play such a big role in the livelihood of the company along with the principle agency theory and how it is being addressed for the benefit of the shareholders and others involved with the company, the supply and demand of the CEOs, and the paper will describe the comparison of other professions to help link the idea of CEOs being fairly compensated.
Steve's salary while being the CEO of apple was $1 a year. Did you know that? He tried to show and teach his employees that money has no value. Although, he did own the majority of the shares in Apple, and that makes up for his $1 a year salary by A LOT. -- That is besides the point.
In conclusion we need to make people's salaries more fair. This paper should make you more aware of these things. Be sure to thank those people who do so much. Although athletes are still amazing put them into context. Do something to help this cause.
The Pro-Forma Financial Statements, as can be seen in Appendix F, show the results of the alternative strategy for IBM as compared to the company remaining on their current course of business. One of the important moves for IBM under the new strategy is to bring new leadership into the company. Their current CEO, Rometty, has a hefty salary, and also stock options that are potentially worth more than her salary according to Melin (2017). Stock options is a common way companies can add compensation, without adding to the bottom line because of the way they are valued. While this method is within acceptable standards according to GAAP, Rometty’s issuance of options, and the way the board compensation committee used a variety of methods for their valuation has raised many eyebrows, especially after years of poor performance by the company (Melin, 2017). In the alternative strategy for IBM, Rometty would be relieved of her post as CEO at IBM. What can be viewed through the Pro-Forma Financials after taking this action in 2017, is that IBM will experience savings in their Selling and Administrative Expense as her successor would not come in at the excessive salary that she was collecting. According to Merlin (2017), Rometty’s
However, the rebuttal to this argument is this: companies are making the biggest gains. Employees’ perks are small (when compared to company gains) and self-serving. To add on to this fact, employees also have the self-orientated mindset. Almost all employees would rather himself have a pay increase as opposed to his fellow co-worker. The company has a more holistic mentality.
Professor Zaimah Khan Viviana Chowdhury Composition III February 25, 2015 There has always been controversy whether professionals or people in career fields are getting paid what it is deserved or not. Specially there is a big controversy about artist and athletes high salaries; some people think that artist and professional athletes get paid fairly and others agree that they should not be paid such high salaries. Most of the people take into account the impact of the jobs, mainly in a social way, to determine if the salary is fair; individuals may compare the work of doctors, teachers, and social workers with artists and athletes, but people do not realize every job is important and has a different role in society. The persons who are in disagreement with the high salaries of artists and athletes do not see the big picture behind those thousands of dollars.
Management spends a huge amount of time to design incentive systems and schemes to motivate their workers and to ensure they work in their best possible manner. Motivating workers by giving them decent pay helps in winning employees heart to make the work done efficiently, significantly and effectively. The most effective way to motivate people to work productively is through individual incentive compensation (Pfeffer, 1998). An attraction of getting more is a powerful incentive to people for high performance. While most people agree that money plays a major role in motivating people, in organizations there is a widespread belief that money may also have some undesirable effects on morale.
Remuneration management is defined as the sum received for an employment or service delivered, this includes the money received on a monthly basis as well as benefits given as rewards (investopedia,para.1 ). Individualism need to be taken into account when implementing these remuneration structures or reward schemes, equal pay plays a role in balancing earnings among the diverse workforce (Shen, Chanda, D’Neetto and Monga,2009,p.241). The Woolworth’s Holdings uphold remuneration policies which have the purpose of making sure to attract and hold on to the best talent, that they are congruent with the strategies of the company and are the determinants of performance during the short and long phases. The policy considers the board members and the employees. This policy manages employees of the company by giving...
Most will agree that knowledge is the ‘key’ resource in this post-industrial economy. The challenge for many companies is developing an organization that creates and cultivates knowledge and learning. Pay plays a significant role in shaping workplace behavior. Most of the traditional pay systems reward the job the individual performs rather than the skills he/she brings to the job. The system is not being able to reward the things the company needs and this presents a barrier. The trend has moved away from pay for the value of the job, service and seniority. It is being replaced with paying for skills, knowledge, competency, performance and productivity, all which can be delivered through different invitations, from changes to base pay to introducing gainsharing.