Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of leadership to a society
Importance of leadership to a society
Why leadership is important
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of leadership to a society
The role of the President as Chief Executive is a complex matter because it covers a wide area of responsibility and involves many government agencies and offices, that the President is responsible for overseeing. The history of Chief Executive starts in the constitution with Article II section I “Executive Power shall be vested in the President of the United States of America” this did not create the role although it was a front runner to it. Executive Power is understood to mean “seeing that laws are executed” this would be a hard task for one person to accomplish in a newly formed government let alone in today’s political world (Kalllenbach) . To briefly explain this requires and understanding of what it is, what it does and how it works. This in turn leads to an understanding of why it was instituted and why it is necessary. It also gives insight into how it has expanded over time and how it has enhanced Presidential power.
Although the constitution laid the framework for the Executive Office it was not formalized until Franklin Roosevelt became President and “authorized the Executive Reorganization Act of 1939” that allowed the President to staff the office with aids (Erwin). The Executive Branch has changed from its early years; probably more than the Founding Fathers could have imagined. In the beginning it consisted of three department; Foreign Affairs, Treasury and War. Today the Executive branch includes the Vice President, the Cabinet, personal aids and other offices that are not as noticeable such as the White House Military Office. The purpose of this Executive Branch is to help the President to govern efficiently. The Executive office employs over 1,800 people today. It is worth examining those that make ...
... middle of paper ...
...e or department to deal with possible issue. As a result the President must delegate responsibility and some of those delegations are responsible for the expansion of the role of the Vice Presidency and the White House Staff. This also has expanded Presidential Power because it has increase Presidential responsibility. The citizens look to the President not the congress as more and more power goes to the Executive Branch of the Government.
Works Cited
Erwin, C. Hargrove. The Power of the Modern Presidency. Vol. First Edition. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1974.
George C. Edwards III, Wayne Stephen J. Presidential Leadership Politics and Policy Making. Boston: Cengage Wadsworth, 2010.
Kalllenbach, Joseph E. The American Chief Executive. New Yourk, and London: Harper& Row, 1966.
Unknown. The Power of the Presidency. Washington DC: CQ Press, 2008.
The President of the United States is instrumental in the running of the country. He serves as the chief executive, chief diplomat, commander in chief, chief legislator, chief of state, judicial powers, and head of party. Article II of the Constitution states that the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. He also is tasked with the authority to appoint fifteen leaders of the executive departments which will be a part of the President’s cabinet. He or she is also responsible for speaking with the leaders the CIA and other agencies that are not part of his cabinet because these agencies play a key role in the protection of the US. The President also appoints the heads of more than 50 independent
Skowornek writes, “these presidents each set out to retrieve from a far distant, even mythic, past fundamental values that they claim had been lost in the indulgences of the received order, In this way, the order-shattering and order-affirming impulses of the presidency in politics became mutually reinforcing.” (Skowornek, 37, book). These presidents are in the best position not because they are exceptional at their job but because the time they came into office offered them the elasticity and authority to make new orders and be welcomed by the public because he is taking the country out of its troubles and challenges.
Sidney M. Milkis, Michael Nelson. The American Presidency Origins & Development, 1776-2011. Washington DC: CQ Press, 2008.
One of the biggest examples used in the article for expansion of presidential power is George W. Bush. After 9/11 occurred, the overwhelming emergency brought Bush to do what ever he could to secure the country and make the American
... This precedent allows future presidents to take actions strictly forbidden by the executive branch in times of national emergency without congressional approval. The most important expansion of the power of the presidency happened during the Jackson administration. When Jackson used the veto power of the president to influence legislation as a matter of policy and not constitutionality, he arguably altered the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches.
This position requires the management of the Country by implementing the laws, nominations of officials, grant pardons, serve as Commander-in-Chief of the military, veto lows passed by Congress, and negotiate treaties. The President is also responsible proposing yearly budgets and helping boost economic development. The many divided tasks between Congress and the Presidency has made it
Presidential Influence in Congress." American Journal of Political Science 29.2 (1985): 183-96. JSTOR. Web. 19 May 2014.
Political scientists have continually searched for methods that explain presidential power and success derived from using that power effectively. Five different approaches have been argued including the legal approach, presidential roles approach, Neustadtian approach, institutional approach, and presidential decision-making approach. The legal approach says that all power is derived from a legal authority (U.S. Constitution). The presidential roles approach contends that a president’s success is derived from balancing their role as head of state and head of government. The Neustadtian approach contends that “presidential power is the power to persuade“ (Neustadt, p. 11). The institutional approach contends that political climate and institutional relations are what determines presidential power. The last approach, decision-making, provides a more psychological outlook that delves into background, management styles, and psychological dispositions to determine where a president’s idea of power comes from. From all of these, it is essential to study one at a time in order to analyze the major components of each approach for major strengths and weaknesses.
The modern presidency reached its initial fulfillment during the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. Under the stimulus of the New Deal, World War II, and the entrepreneurial leadership of Franklin Roosevelt, there was a huge expans...
Schwarz, Frederic D. "The Demagogue’s Downfall." American Heritage Nov.-Dec. 2004: volume 55, issue 6. Web.
Richard E. Neustadt, the author of Presidential Power, addresses the politics of leadership and how the citizens of the United States rate the performance of the president's term. We measure his leadership by saying that he is either "weak or "strong" and Neustadt argues that we have the right to do so, because his office has become the focal point of politics and policy in our political system.
Thomas, Scott. The Pursuit of the White House. New York: Greenwood Press, 1987. 46-52. Print.
Lowi, Theodore J. (1985). The personal President: Power invested promise unfulfilled. Ithaca, New York: Cornell
Understanding and evaluating presidents’ performance often poses challenges for political experts. The nation votes one president at the time and each presidency faces different tests. The environments surrounding a presidency have a tremendous impact on the success and failure of that presidency. In addition, the president exercises his power through a check and balance system embody in the Constitution. As stated in (Collier 1959), the Constitution created a government of “separated institutions sharing power.” As a result, a president works with others institutions of the government to shape the nation’s agenda. Thus, determining a presidential performance becomes difficult, especially when it comes to comparing the performance among presidencies.
Schmidt, Shelley, and Bardes. American Politics and Government Today. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999, pgs. 325-327.