Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Seperation of powers the same thing as federalism
Reflection on federalism
Reflection on federalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Seperation of powers the same thing as federalism
For five years after Revolutionary war each state basically governed themselves. Although there was national government in place, it held little power over the states. It soon became apparent that the Articles of Confederation needed to be readdressed to combat the increasing problems that were brewing in the country. The first attempt to redress was dismissed by many of the states. Nevertheless, a second attempt produced results with twelve of the states sending delegates to redress the Articles of Confederation. Several delegates submitted plans for consideration that would strengthen the national government two such plans were the Virginia and the New Jersey Plan. Despite much of Virginia’s plan being accepted, if a compromise had not been reached the New Jerseys plan would have been more workable because it offered: equal representation of the states, provided operational means to congress, and was not a radical departure from the Articles of the Confederation. To begin with the unequal representation of the states in the Virginia Plan was of great concern and controversy while the New Jersey Plan retained equal representation of the states. Virginia proposed a bicameral legislature that included elections by the people and appointments by those elected. This system used both wealth and population as a determining factor in regards to the number of seats in both houses. New Jersey on the other hand proposed single house legislature that allow each state a single vote. Votes based on population would put small states at a disadvantage. The states that were more populated would be in control of the legislative branches, leaving small states without a voice. Concerns about who was to be counted in the population also ... ... middle of paper ... ...lan workable would take agreement from the states and revenue. To get agreement from the states they would need assurance that they would have an equal voice and not be subjected to monarchy rule. In spite of the fact that most of the Virginia plan was accepted the New Jersey plan would have been more workable if a compromise had not been reached. The New Jersey Plan ensured equal representation of the states, along with way to finance the proposed government and security against monarchy rule. Furthermore it amended the Articles of Confederation rather than writing a new constitution. Considering all this coupled with the states fears of a centralized government makes the New Jersey plan more workable than the Virginia plan. Works Cited Sidney M. Milkis, Michael Nelson. The American Presidency Origins & Development, 1776-2011. Washington DC: CQ Press, 2008.
Synopsis: The purpose of the Albany Plan of Union was to create a centralized government for the colonies. The Plan also promoted for the colonies to unite as one due to the French and Indian war. The new government would be controlled by a President-General which was chosen and supported by the king. Also, the representatives of the colonies would have to choose a Grand Council in order to assist the appointed President-General. In the Grand council, each colony would have a number of representatives based on the population of the colony. The government would have the power to commerce activities, national defense, also a defense and negotiate relations with the Natives. Also, the Grand Council member would change every three years and that they will meet once a year or occasionally if needed. The Albany plan was approved on July 10, 1754, by the Albany Congress. Copies of the Albany plan sent to the colonies and the British
At the time, larger states like Virginia were creating an unfair amount of power for themselves that the small states didn’t have. In the new government, Congress was created to make laws, and was made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives would give states a number of Representatives they could have based on their population. This would give fair power deserved to the larger states. The Senate however would be two and only two Senators for each state, no matter how large or small, bringing some equality to Congress.
At the convention, the founders were debating about how many representatives in the Congress should each state allowed to have. For example, James Madison, who came from Virginia, one of the larger states, suggested that representation should be proportional to the state’s population (Hart et al. 109-110). Coming from a state with larger population had influenced Madison’s proposal, for he reasoned that since Virginia has a large population of people, so more representatives are needed to represent more people. However, the states with a smaller population disagreed with this proposal and came up with a proposal that would counter Madison’s proposal. Paterson, who came from New Jersey, one of those states with smaller population, proposed a plan in which equal number of people should be elected from each state for representation in the Congress (Hart et al. 109-110). It was evident to see how coming from a smaller state had affected Paterson’s proposal, for he feared
Under the Articles of Confederation each state had its own sovereignty. And the central government was to provide thing such as national security, treaties, courts, and currency. However the government could not tax. If the states didn't pay their bills to the government there was nothing the government could do about it. This is just one of many reasons why the Articles didn't work. In 1786 Virginia tried to get the Articles modified by holding a meeting known as the Annapolis Conference. This meeting failed because only five states sent delegates. A few months later another meeting was held in Philadelphia.
The New Jersey Plan was proposed during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, where the delegates from each state were creating their new government. One of the plans that were proposed at the Conventional Convention was the Virginia Plan. This plan was written by James Madison who grew up on a wealthy plantation in Virginia. The plan said that the government should be split into three branches to keep equal power throughout the government. Though it did say seem flawless, there was one factor that displeased the smaller state. It said that the government should use the proportional representation, which is when voting would be based off of how many delegates there were. This was a problem for smaller states because then those states would not have as much of the vote as the larger states.
The U.S. was never a stranger to political controversies. An early example is the Virginia Plan, which, for example, angered the less populous states. Thus, fears of equal representation were prevalent during the writing
As I stated earlier each state wanted to be represented according to different factors. The states with bigger populations wanted representation to be based solely off of population. The states with smaller populations wanted there to be a fixed number of representatives per state, regardless of size or population. The Connecticut Compromise resolved this issue by forming the two houses that we have today.
After the American Revolution, each of the original 13 colonies operated under its own rules of government. Most states were against any form of centralized rule from the government. They feared that what happened in England would happen again. They decided to write the Articles of Confederation, which was ratified in 1781. It was not effective and it led to many problems.
During the 1700’s, one of the most discussed topics, was the kind of government that should be incorporated into each state. Several men with skeptical beliefs and contradicting ideas, led to many (indirect) disputes about which route should be taken. Virginia and Pennsylvania’s constitutions were a hot topic during the era, they stimulated an intriguing matter amongst many politicians. From Thomas Paine to Carter Braxton’s writings, each individual had an important role arguing and making claims toward the type of government they found to be the most effective. Virginia’s constitution was considered to be a mixed government, while Pennsylvania’s constitution was a simple government. Each structure had men who praised it and men who critiqued it. Through their writings we find many pros and cons for each style of governing, as well as the different theories each individual had when it came to structuring a state’s constitution. We also gain an insight of what possible concerns came about during the time and what solutions they offered, if any were offered at all.
The Great Compromise, was one of the most well know compromise made at the Constitutional Convention. When deciding how states should be represented in the new Constitution two plans were presented, The Virginia Plan and The New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan proposed a
The first proposals to this new plan were the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan called for a separation of powers among the government’s three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. Some states proposed this idea and came up with the New Jersey Plan, which called for all of the states to have equal representation from Congress. In order to move forward from the deadlock of the two proposals, the Connecticut Compromise was enacted. This decided that legislature would be bicameral, which meant that there would be two houses: one would have equal representation and one would be based on state population. This unified the states under a federal system. To this day, there are three types of Fe...
Another similarity was that both acts were not passed into law because of the lack of public support. The Articles and the Plan also caused colonial governments to worry about losing power, land, and commerce. The Albany Plan interpreted the Bill of Rights, specifically the Fourteenth Amendment. Although it was never passed, the Albany Plan was the first plan whose purpose was to unite all the colonies under one centralized
New Jersey’s plan was nicknamed the Paterson Plan. Paterson was the first committee of representation at the convention. He arrived at the convention on May 25 and left on August 6. His role was very important at the convention as the primary author of the New Jersey Plan. Paterson left the convention after the big issue of representation within the senate was resolved. After he left the convention, he only came back to sign the constitution on September 17. Paterson’s main argument was that other delegates had gone too far with their authority. It was once said that, “Mr. Paterson is one of those kind of men whose powers break in upon you, and create wonder and astonishment” (William Pierce). After the new government was established, he served in the U.S. Senate for New Jersey and also served in the Associate Justice in the Supreme
The development of the U.S. Constitution was a series of many trials and errors. There were many problems starting from the Articles of Confederation and even the battle to ratify the constitution. Not everyone wanted the same thing for the new government, however they all agreed that they didn’t want the same type of government that they had unde English rule.
27 Nov. 2011. Genovese, Michael A. Encyclopedia of the American Presidency. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003 New York: Facts on File, 2010. Print.