Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of organizational structure on organization
What are the implications of employee engagement for management
What are the implications of employee engagement for management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of organizational structure on organization
An organization’s structure is crucial in deciding how tasks are managed or organized by employees and led by the top management. An organization’s structure provides a chance of untangling how the firm’s business is performing internally to ensure timely production of goods and services. When designing an organization’s structure, it is important to build it upon the vision and mission of the firm’s core objectives (Puffer, 2004). This kind of a structure will allow the set goals and initiatives to be met by the project scope. Thus, an organizational structure denotes how powers and responsibilities are allocated within the company, and work processes are carried out by members of the organization. The theme of this paper is to discuss the effects of Organizational structures on employees, Behavioral implications of different organizational designs and finally considering if there is a better structure in terms of its effects on its employees.
Effects of organizational structure on its members
Many employees desire to work in an environment that has respect and trust, where they are
…show more content…
Quicken Loans utilizes a flat organizational structure. It does not allow the management to have all the powers. The organizational design at Quicken Loans permits networking in departments, which encourages employees to organize and cooperate. According to King and Simon (2015), for the organization to be successful, employees must be trained to enhance their skills. Managers and team leaders should be skilled at finding workers with varied capabilities to work. In such firm design, it is pertinent for the director to have both technical and interpersonal competency. Employees might need different forms of stimulus as rank and status occupy the
Organizations are initially structured around tasks, and as the organization continues to grow, the structure within the organization takes on many characteristics. Not all structures are advantageous, especially if they are lacking in some areas. There is a relationship between structure and size of the organization that affect the centralization of the organization. At the highest levels, the personality of the chief executive may amend the organizations' structure. The structure within an organization helps define the roles and responsibilities among the members from each department and work group. The four general types of organization structure are functional, divisional, matrix, and project based. “Organizational structure is the skeleton of an organization” (Feigenbaum, 2013) and how these individuals relate to each another. Structure is a statement of the current affairs, not the ideas, intentions or improvement within an organization. When business leaders develop their initial plans for an organization, he or she looks at how to design a company and takes inventory of all the tasks, functions and goals of the business. The leader then develops groupings and ordering of job positions, departments, and human resources to effectively and efficiently perform these tasks. Technology, size, environment, strategy and goals affect an organizational structure and effects, whether they are categorized as mechanistic or organic.
With all discrimination aside, what’s important is to show some honest respect, ethics, value, and loyalty to every employee.
The variation in the public health leadership and organizational structures are that the local government has vertical linkages with various businesses and households. It has upward vertical linkages with the state and other federal agencies in order to coordinate its operations smoothly. Public health leadership and organizational structures are performed at many levels from local to national. The organizations and agencies devoted to public health at these different levels share many of the same functions including disease surveillance, policy development, and provision of access to health care. In terms of public health, no level of government has complete authority and autonomy (Turnock, p.195). Optimal outcomes result from a symbiotic relationship and a complementary effort on all levels.
According to Schmitt, Quicken Loans drives success by developing excellence in its work place with organizational behavior practices such as strong individual rewards and/or development, teamwork, individual and collective creative decision-making, and visionary leadership. Key values and goals are presented by Quicken Loans as ISMs promoting principles for employees and leadership to live by in the workplace. Collectively, the ISMs represent key goals and values as teamwork, respect/value, and integrity. The Founder, Dan Gilbert, and the Chief Executive Officer, Bill Emerson, of Quicken Loans actively participate in new employee orientation by spending a full day explaining and promoting the company’s values and goals, i.e. ISMs (Quicken 2016). The company promotes teamwork in the view of a united group, working together to develop innovations and accomplish tasks quickly and completely, while compiling ideas in order to obtain the best solution regardless of position in the company. According to Quicken Loans respect/value of fellow coworkers, consumers, time, and money exist by employing a “we” attitude not an “us” and “them” approach. In essence, the corporation believes by exhibiting excellence and passion, in addition to becoming an expert in the specified job role, employees will create the wealth or income
An organization’s structure can affect its efficiency and productivity. The two main management theories are the Classic Theory and Theory X. Classical theory is defined as a management theory of a large organization in which management is led by intuition to motivate and control employees (Hamilton, 2008 p. 41). The Classic Theory can be divided into two large subgroups, scientific managers and bureaucratic theorists. Scientific manager’s focus is on reducing production costs while bureaucratic theorists focus is on administrative efficiency (Hamilton, 2008 p. 43). Although Theory X is not a large subgroup of the Classical Theory, it is under the classical theory and its crucial point is that workers are assumed lazy; therefore managers punish them to motivate them. Managers of Theory X believe that the average person; will avoid work because they do not like work, will not strive to achieve objectives, will avoid responsibilit...
In order for one to evaluate and identify with the diverse business structures, he/she must be aware of the meaning and standards that makes that structure. Various businesses functions in different ways as the world is full of technology and new structures, company cultures and new ways in which companies are run. In order to fully grasp the concepts of Organizational structure and culture in the movies, I will use the Movie Up in the Air and The Devil Wear Prada movies to analyze a business scenario from them.
The Different Ways Organizations Can Be Structured and Operated There are four major ways a company - organization can be structured and operate. P.C.G (o) Ltd I would dare say that is structured and operates with the functional structure. In order to make it clear and understandable I am analyzing here below the four ways that organizations can structure and operate. We will observe that all four structures have there advantages and disadvantages. In order also to assist you understand better the differences of the four ways that organizations can be structured see in Page 4 & 5 Figures 1,2,3 which are the layout of the organization charts for each structure: 1.
Organizational structure can be defined as the “formal arrangement of jobs within an organization” (Robbins & Coulter, 2009, p. 185). Having a defined and unified structure helps employees work more efficiently. Jacques Kemp, former CEO of ING Insurance Asia/Pacific, realized this need early on in his role. The company had been performing well and recently acquired another insurance company to become “one of the largest life insurance companies in Asia-Pacific” (Schotter, 2006, p. 4). However, Kemp’s proactive personality led him to seek out ways to achieve more efficient coordination between the regional office and business units (Robbins & Coulter, 2009). Kemp noticed that “most business unit managers did not even know the current corporate standards” and he began searching for a way to manage the managers (Schotter, 2006, p. 5). ING Insurance Asia/Pacific’s organizational structure was mechanistic and fairly well structured, but for a company that had recently been involved in a major acquisition and was divided across 12 geographically dispersed markets there was a great need to tweak this structure to unify the company (Schotter, 2006). If I had been in Kemp’s position as CEO, I would have made modifications to the organizational chain of command, formalized business processes, and used technology to stimulate collaboration amongst the region to help this company overcome organizational design challenges.
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.
The fundamental role in management is attaining predetermined objectives through cooperation of staff and other parties. Organizations therefore attain their goals by utilizing the competence of their employees and this mostly applies to the executive members who are mandated with the responsibility of overseeing the development of the company’s priorities. However, there are instances when the employees at any level in the organization may experience problems due to distortions, which may cause errors and in the process compromise the goals and priorities of an organization.
Organizational structure is the way that an organization arranges people and jobs so that work can be performed and goals can be achieved. Good organizational design helps communications, productivity, and innovation. Many organization structures have been created based on organizational strategy, size, technology, and environment. Robbins and Judge (2011, p. 504) listed three common structures: simple, bureaucracy, and matrix. In this post the author will describe the matrix structure, and discuss its advantages and disadvantages.
An organisation has to assure the reliability and the efficiency of its employees, enhancing their abilities and specifying their responsibilities in order to touch its vision, to build a sustainable environment and to make profit. An effective framework could be beneficial for an organisation abolishing the communication’s barriers, building a proper business environment, ameliorating the performance and the productivity, inspiring the staff and finally provoking the emerge of innovative ideas (Faith Technologies, 2011). In reality, there are different structures which could be effective related with the organisations targets. Thus, Samsung Electronics and Apple Inc. have adopted different structures.
When we consider all the facts we can conclude that, this theory is developed by a facing many difficulties. It has many merits as well as limitations.Feactures consisting of formal organization have autonomy, it consider organization structure as important than the human element, closed system structure, efficiency of employee a considerable factor, authority is centralized, no existing conflicts, economical rewards always motivating the employees. For any organization growth is important. We can effectively use this for that purpose.
Organizations are established in specific ways to obtain different objectives, and the structure of an organization can help or restrain its advance toward accomplishing these goals. Organizations of different sized and types can achieve higher sales and other profit adequately by identifying their requirements with the structure they use to operate.
Organizational structure within an organization is a critical component of the day to day operations of a business. An organization benefits from organizational structure as a result of all it encompasses. It is used to define how tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated. Six elements should be addressed during the design of the organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, spans of control, centralization and decentralization. These components are a direct reflection of the organization’s culture, power and politics.