Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of ageism in the workplace
Predatory company practices
Ageism in the workplace myths and facts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary of ageism in the workplace
Writers John Stossel and Frank Mastropolo, both working as a correspondent and journalist in ABC News, open their article highlighting the accomplishments of Bruce Marrow, a radio personality legend who “has been on the air for decades,” “Introduced the Beatles at the New York Shea’s Stadium,” and “was credited with helping push oldies station WCBS-FM to number one” (Stossel). However, the writers ended the paragraph talking about how legend Bruce Marrow, despite his endeavors, had been abruptly fired without any warning three years ago. They then continue to apply the same scenario to Kansas City DJ’s Max Floyd and Tanna Guthrie from 99.7 KY. The main reason why Stossel and his co-writer had decided to brusquely end the first paragraph of the article, it is not to embarrass Bruce Marrow or Max Floyd or Tanna Guthrie, but instead, to identify whether it is fair for people to get fired, even after they help build a company, just because they are getting old. The writer’s thesis starts off effective, but the bitter, harsh tone undoes its effectiveness.
Stossel and Mastropolo’s thesis did not come until at the middle of the article when they talked about how Murray Schwartz is convinced “that older people can do the job just as well as younger people and believes that employment age discrimination laws are a crucial protection for older workers” (paragraph 11). With this issue, there are two sides of argument in this article: one is from the corporate as to why it is a necessity to fire people when they come of age, and the second one is from the workers being affected at this age discrimination. There are several people applying for jobs these days and a company attempts to fill that job with the best qualified person. If a per...
... middle of paper ...
...all areas of life for good reasons and a company can do whatever it wants to ensure profitability. His highly biased piece on age discrimination, however, will leave people dismayed and irate for not presenting a more balanced view of this issue.
With all discrimination aside, what’s important is to show some honest respect, ethics, value, and loyalty to every employee.
Works Cited
Stossel, John and Frank Manstropolo. “Fired For Being Too Old: Unfair or Good Business?”
ABC News. 25 July 2008. 05 February 2012.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Stossel/story?id=5444494&page=1#.TzhSHoH4La9
“Equal Employment Opportunity.” United States Department of Labor. 05 February 2012.
http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/discrimination/agedisc.htm
“John Stossel.” FOX News Network, LLC. 05 February 2012.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/watch/anchors-reporters/john-stossel-bio/
Upon reading this piece, I could not escape the striking similarities between how Sammy passed the time at the A & P grocery store, and the monotonous routine of when I was employed at a local grocery store. "In walks these three girls in nothing but bathing suits." From Personal experience, I can tell you that "checking out" women is a favorite past-time of bored adolescent male employees of grocery stores such as Sammy. Even Old McMahon, the meat guy, was "patting his mouth... and sizing up their joints." Furthermore, I was not surprised to learn this cherished activity dates back nearly a half century ago to Sammy's days of working in a grocery store. Another detail of the grocery store that sticks out in my mind is how supervisors demanded rigid adherence to policy and rules. Updike did not fail to illustrate this aspect of this job. "I don't want to argue with you. After this come in here with your shoulders covered. It's our policy." Updike also illustrates the point of how employees detest their supervisors' policy. "Policy is what the kingpins want, what the others want is juvenile delinquency." From once being a victim of policy myself, I interpreted Sammy's quitting as breaking free from the A & P's constraints; similarly, this was the reason I finally quit my job at the grocery store. The inclusion of the details of grocery work make it clear John Updike spent time working in the grocery business.
Elderly folks are eminently mature and have the finest instinct about what is right and wrong though It’s challenging to change someone’s point of view in a matter like this. When such injustice takes place, it de-motivates senior workers from their work. In an article over Ageists by Vincent J Roscigno, he states facts about different views on older Americans in general and in workplaces such as, “most of the population consists of biases and preconceptions, and the accused are unashamed in their views of older Americans. Those who believe that younger employees have much more value than senior employees are inserting a strong assumption based on their age. “Ageist attitudes and discrimination is what results in lower levels of overall organizational commitment to older workers, and a “push” out of a particular workplace.” Just because of an older employee’s depiction, such unfairness circulates in workplaces which cause false impressions of older
Age discrimination is a growing concern in our society, having significant consequences in denying an increasing proportion of the population the right to work. The percentage of older adults (65 and over) in Canada has risen from 8% in 1971 to a rate of 14% in 2011. This number is expected to steadily rise to a rate of 24.7% (roughly 1 in 4) by the year 2051 (Canada, 2014). Not only is this high rate concerning when considering the availability of future job positions, but this is especially concerning when, as the Ontario Human Rights Commission has determined that “age discrimination is often not taken as seriously as other forms of discrimination” (OHRC, 2014).
In addition, Walsh states that “the crux of a disparate treatment case is an allegation that an employment decision was intentionally discriminatory in the sense of being based on protected class (Walsh, 2013)”. When Ms. Baker refused to fire employees simply because they were older, she was placed on probation, and ultimately released from her position. Furthermore, the reasons given to Ms. Baker at the time of her termination differed from the reasons given to the court.
1. As per the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, business victimization anybody no less than 40 years old in the US is refused. The pertinent code segment is 29 U.S.C. § 631(a). The law does not permit age separation in matters of employing or advancements. This is a sweeping boycott against age segregation. Mr. Zimpfer was a casualty of illicit age segregation as indicated by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and case law. Per the content, ADEA was intended to disallow age separation in business choices, for example, procuring, work maintenance, pay and different terms and conditions. There are sure prerequisites for setting up a by all appearances instance of age segregation. Mr. Zimpfer is a casualty as every one of the prerequisites that were damaged by
Age discrimination is nothing new, but nowadays elderly care is a serious problem. Discrimination against the elderly in poor treatment at the lack of adequate support seniors living in long-term treatment options or health care facilities are set to contribute to a lack of self-worth and depression in the elderly. Parents and guardians of all types of families, it is necessary to encourage a positive attitude towards aging, their children at home. Discrimination against the elderly attitude and attitude can change your training, familiarity and understanding.
In today’s modern business environment, human resources (HR) plays a critical role in keeping executives informed of key legislation and minimizing the organization’s risk exposure. Expectations are high and HR responsibilities are broad, including recruitment, retention, performance management, risk management, training and education, and employee safety, wellness, and benefits. When it comes to employment regulations and ever-changing legislation, executives rely heavily on HR professionals to be subject matter experts. Age discrimination suits are on the rise and post-termination lawsuits can be a real threat to an organization. The Supreme Court’s (SC) ruling on McKennon versus Nashville Banner Publishing Company (NBPC) increased an
With Australian population growing old faster than ever, the number of reported age discrimination cases against elderly have increased significantly. According to trends studied by AMP.NATSEM (2015), it is expected that by 2035 65.1% of men and 72.1% of women are likely to be unemployed. Age discrimination is a barrier to psychological and financial well-being of elderly. The survey by National prevalence survey of age discrimination in the workplace (2015) showed that one in four of Australian aged more than 50 years have faced discriminatory behavior at their workplace occasionally with over 80% individual suffering negative impact on their life. It is hard to ignore that discrimination prevails in every industry actively from recruitment
Older adults face ageism in work place also. The employer consider older adults as inflexible, unwilling to adapt to technology, resistant to new ways, having some physical limitations, costing more for health insurance and so on. Many researches also show that the older worker was less favored for continued career development and training and unlikely to be promoted. Similarly, the older workers also have the disadvantage shorter interviews, fewer commissions, fewer job offers and are less likely to be hired (Dennis & Thomas,
Older works may encounter a lot of stereotypes in the work place both positive and negative. Older workers are often viewed as being inflexible when it comes to technology use and unwilling to adapt. They are also commonly look at as if they have less energy and drive to work. Older workers are often viewed as having less physical prowess in the work place. Even with legislation passed about discriminated against older works in the hiring process studies still show that two workers with the same credentials, one being older and one younger, the younger candidate is more likely to get the job. Older people are still viewed as a less valuable worker even if they have all of the same experiences as someone else. Another form of ageism that workers
I consider Ageism discrimination based on one’s age. Many times you hear people say you are too young or you are too old to do certain job/task is consider ageism. I have been subjected to ageism for years at my work place. It is very frustrating when you are in charge of a group of people who think you are their child and so you cannot delegate task to them to complete. I have experienced with so much hostility from my older co-workers and occasionally younger co-workers that I prefer to just do the task that I am asking them to do. It took some time to realize that I was not doing myself any justice by doing their jobs. I have learned along the years that no matter where I go and whom I come in contact that I am going to be subject to ageism.
Age discrimination laws prevent discrimination based on race, sex, religion, national origin, physical disability, and age by employers (Employment discrimination. (2016). However, there is an emerging generation into today’s workforce who
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act, signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1967, forbids workplace discrimination against those who are forty or older. The act applies to employers, but also covers membership within labor organizations and employment agencies. With the passage of this legislation, it became illegal for the groups above to refuse employment, discharge employees, or limit compensation and terms and conditions due to an individual’s age. Additionally, employers are forbidden from classifying employees in a way which deprives them from employment opportunities by age. Overall, the act was created to protect the aging American workforce.
One employment law that will impact human resources within the next five to ten years is the age discrimination in employment act (ADEA). This act prohibits employers with more than twenty employees from discriminating against any worker with respect to compensation, terms and conditions, or privileges of an individual age forty or older (Phillips et al., 2015). For example, under ADEA, employers can not mention age in a job description, set age limits for training, or force an individual to retire. Another interesting fact about ADEA is an individual cannot be denied the opportunity to participate in employer sponsored benefits plans based on age (AARP).
Age discrimination continues to be a problem for both men and women that are over the age of 40 in the workforce. In year 1967, the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act ADEA was passed to prohibit discrimination against workers over age 40 and older. Another law in the year 1964, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, or national origin. However there are still age discrimination and it seems to be more especially for older women more than older men. The Federal and the state should implement more regulations to protect workers' rights in all age groups, both in the younger and older generation including their race and gender.