Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing and contrasting the effects of television on children
Influence of tv on children essay
The effect of tv on children essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Television Can Accomplish Education Through TV
Problems with kids and television have existed since the invention of this media instrument. For example, parents are concerned
with the number of hours children spend in front of the television, as well as the amount of violence represented in different
programs. Most important, parents are speculating as to what educational value TV actually has.
People have always wondered about effects television could have on individuals. By the late 1980 s, an increasingly deregulated
broadcasting industry had achieved some powerful victories over education. Shows with a greater amount of controversial subject
matter started to air. Censorship was decreased a great deal. On average, children between the ages of six and twelve are
watching 20 to 28 hours of television a week, which almost equals the 35-40 hours kids spend in school. Some claim, however, that
TV has begun to dominate more than just time.
Television projects the characteristics of the cultural environment surrounding it. People like David Marc believe television "leaves
behind a body of dreams that is, to a large extent, the culture we live in," and he concludes that television, not education, is the
"most effective purveyor of language, image, and narrative in American culture." (1)
However, others continue to stress the "ultimate effect" television has on education. It is recognized by Leon Botstein that "the
simplification and standardization of language" controls the extent of expression and thought. Because of this, "eloquence and even
originality, from the perspective of the classroom" have become insignificant. (3)
It is the opinion of the Center for Educational Priorities that by the 1990 s, televis...
... middle of paper ...
...r not, TV has become an important device in the
United States, as well as in the rest of the world. Children should not be kept away from this form of media. Instead, children
should be taught interesting, quality subject matter with television as an aid. Images in a child s mind can become so much more
vivid when he or she can compare them to images they behold on television. The argument that television lacks originality and
promotes stupidity suffers because television can offer insight and a sense of wonder through intelligent and imaginative
programming. Since there are people of this generation who do not enjoy Hamlet, it is safe to say that not every citizen living
during the late 1500 s to early 1600 s was an avid fan. If Shakespeare is said to be revered now, who is to say whether Seinfeld
will be revered at the level of Shakespeare in years to come?
Not only educational shows accomplish these goals, but fictional television programs can often incorporate information that requires viewers to grapple with a topic using logical reasoning and a global consciousness. In addition, not to diminish the importance of reading, television reaches those who may never pick up a book or who might struggle with reading problems, enabling a broader spectrum of people to interact with cognitive topics. Veith has committed the error of making generalizations about two forms of media when, in truth, the situation varies depending on quality and content. However, what follows these statements is not just fallacious, but
In “Television Harms Children”, Ann Vorisek White claims that the intellectual and cognitive development of children who frequently watch television is threatened. To support this claim, she points to the findings that “the more television children watch, the weaker their language skills and imaginations” (White, 2006). Before the brain fully matures around age 12, it is in the stage of rapid development. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) “recommends that children under the age of two not watch TV or videos, and that older children watch only one to two hours per day of nonviolent, educational TV” (White, 2006). A study from the AAP (as cited in White, 2006) found that the average American child watches four hours of television every day. Considering "expression and reasoning are not automatic" abilities, young children who routinely watch television eventually become "passive and nonverbal" to stimuli in their environment (White, 2006). Since the normality of curiosity and imaginations of young children are the foundation of how they learn, remaining passive for extended periods of time affects their intellectual and moral development.
In "thinking outside the idiot box", Dana Stevens responds to Steven Johnson's New York Times article in which Johnson believes that watching television makes you smarter. Indeed, Steven Johnson claimed that television shows have become more and more complex over the years in order to follow the viewers need for an interesting plot instead of an easy, linear story. However, Dana Stevens is opposed to this viewpoint. Stevens is not against television, he does not think it makes you smarter nor that it is poisenous for the brain, he simply states that the viewer should watch television intelligently. That is to say that, viewers should know how much television they should watch and what to watch as well.
In 1985, television was a platform to use for educational purposes and entertainment. It did teach our youth that teaching and learning could be both fun and educational. With new developing technologies, it is only natural for our culture of education to develop. Although the format of education changes, change is not a bad thing. I see images, video, music, and all media as tools for our youth to learn. Making viewers and users aware of the impacts is necessary to inform the generation to
Television has become a big part in children’s day-to-day lives especially in the 20th century. Children in this century rely on television to keep them entertained and educated instead of entertaining and educating themselves by participating in activities, which will teach them a lot more in life then the actual television. There is no doubt that children are most easily influenced by television because of the different content that they watch as well as the amount of time consumed watching TV. The television does have an emotional and intellectual development on children but this all depends on the content that they’re watching and the way that they absorb the information that the show is trying to send out. Different programs will portray
One of the mediums by which this cultural shift has continually happened is through television. Not only does culture affect choices made by those in the television industry, but popular series and talk shows, whether intentionally or not, name what culturally acceptable regarding many social issues. Television, TV for short, is referring to the telecommunication medium by which ideas are transmitted into moving pictures. The Television industry will be defined as the group of brains behind the creating process of a television show of any genre. Genres each have their own purpose and effect on the audience; talk shows mean to engage, while sitcoms, drams, mini-series, and television comedies are meant to entertain. Regardless of its intentions, each genre of TV has an affect on the people who internalize what they are watching.
...ing our views, but as for children, TV is one of the key things that shape their minds.
In a Class Dismissed when the narrator says,” because we have seen television as just entertainment, we readily disregard its impact on our thinking”. When I heard that statement, I thought to myself that our perceptions of things are based upon what we see on TV, although I do view TV as entertainment as well. However, I never paid attention to how TV impacted my thoughts until viewing and reading in the material in this class. Because of some of the things that we studied and the familiar shows that we talked about I understand and noticed small things in TV shows and ad
As I read Television as a teacher written by Neil postman, His main argument throughout the article is that television isn’t a good or effective way to use education, and he describes how it’s actually worst for us and were not learning the full purpose of education and learning by watching tv. His main example was Sesame Street, and how children sit in front of a television for hours watching what they call education television and claiming they get knowledge from it but they're getting no social interaction by watching it. Also, Neil postman makes excellent points by comparing education television to a real classroom, saying how a classroom has social interaction, the ability to ask a teacher question, development of language, and it’s a
While reading the book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, written by Neil Postman, it instantly brought to my attention the serious effect of the idea that television no longer serves as neither an educational nor political purpose, and it doesn’t give thorough information. Throughout his book, Postman dives into the effects that our country's shift from print based culture to a televised and video based culture has had on education, politics, and national news. What was once an age of reading and print based learning, has now been transformed into teaching from a television screen, using Sesame Street as a prime example. Parents loved this source because it “assuaged their guilt over the fact that they could not or would not restrict their children’s
Neil Postman’s essay, “Television as Teacher” discusses the effect television has on education. Sesame Street
Children between two and eleven years of age watch an average of 25 hours of television a week.(Children's Television) Which means that children spend more time watching television than in school. With that statistic it is no wonder why this is such a huge problem that this nation has to deal with.
It has been a common discussion for us to dismiss television as a result of the negative things that most of the young viewers tend to copy and practice later on after watching. Johnson is mistaken when he says watching television makes you smarter and because he overlooks the fact that reality television does not teach us what is really going on in our society. For example, shows like “fear factor” (Johnson, 293) where people are being asked and deceived to do crazy things like overcoming their fear and would stoop down so low for the money. Johnson claims that “we need a change in the criteria we use to determine what really cognit...
Firstly, we can get a lot of new knowledge through learning. Television can be a powerful teacher. By watching we can learn valuable lessons about racial harmony, cooperation, kindness, simple arithmetic and the alphabet through an educational television format. Some public television programs stimulate visits to the zoo, libraries, bookstores, museums and other active recreational settings, and educational videos can certainly serve as powerful pro social teaching devices. The educational value has been shown to improve the reading and learning skills of its viewers. Reference from Wright JC, Huston; Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas stated some disadvantaged settings, healthy television habits may actually be a beneficial teaching tool. Objectively, it helps to improve the writing, reading and listening skills for young generation and makes interest too. In addition, it may be comes a motivation for youth to overcome their communication probl...
Today there is much controversy over whether there should or shouldn’t be censorship of the media. Censorship should not be imposed on citizens by the government or other agencies; adults have a right to view or listen to what they choose. Additionally, if children’s media is censored, parents are the ones who should monitor and regulate it. Parents should be the ones to monitor children’s viewing of television and also what they hear on the radio, CD’s, and tapes.