What will it take for Americans to realize that our education system is broken? I am reminded of a song, the answer to this question is simply blowing in the wind. It is obvious that an educational reform is in need. Neil Postman would agree that the times, they are a chagin’. With new technology comes new learning methods. In his essay “Television as Teacher,” Postman focusses on technologic advancements and their place in the classroom. We as Americans strive to be the best we can possibly be. This means that we need to provide our cities with the best education possible. This means conforming with technological advancements.
Neil Postman’s essay, “Television as Teacher” discusses the effect television has on education. Sesame Street
…show more content…
is a hot subject in this essay. He also discusses some of the major crises of Western education. Postman also discusses how education has great influence and control over education. Even though Postman does an average job touching on different factors in this educational reform, he fails to consider all of his points. In his point about etiquette, Postman falsely claims that watching television requires no decorum. However, anyone that’s every watched television with another person knows that this is not true. I have to applaud Postman for including studies in his essay that go against his main points.
Studies proved that dramatic settings do not increase a students’ ability to learn material. However, studies that support his thesis would have been nice.
Although the assignment instructions instruct us not to ‘rant’ on a small issue, I am going to take this opportunity to say that I plan on ‘ranting.’ I feel that it very important that I make my point clear. While this essay is for the most part well constructed, I found just a few crucial mistakes. While this was supposed to be a ‘professional’ essay, as soon as I read the mistakes, I immediately discredited this essay. It is important that a writer takes the time to double think about what they are saying if they plan on using their works for ‘professional’ purposes.
Postman does a good job including many details. However, he either used a poor choice of words, or was completely wrong about a few things. His first mistake was stating that watching television requires no decorum. Now, I do not know about you, but when I am watching television with other people, I would expect them to behave in a certain manner. I would not want them to sit in front of the television set. Nor would I want them making loud noises during the show. I would not want them changing the channel during a show you were intrigued in. So Neil Postman was certainly incorrect about this. There is most certainly television watching decorum. So that was Postman’s
first ‘strike.’ Postman’s second ‘strike’ if you well, was when he stated that the third major crisis of Western education was the result of electronic revolution. Technological advancements do not seem like an educational crisis. Technological advancements seem to be the cumulation of years and years of research and development. So to discredit all of this work is absurd and outrageous. To add insult to injury, he claims that this in particular television. This is down right absurd. I, as a reader immediately discredited this essay as a whole because of his outrageous claims. In conclusion, this essay is well written. However, due to a simple few mistakes, this piece of work has lost all of its’ meaning and value to me. This reiterates the point that as a writer writing for professional purposes, you must, and I cannot stress this enough, must double check everything you are claiming. Postman does an alright job providing details and studies. This essay could be very good if only a little more time and effort was spent.
Not only educational shows accomplish these goals, but fictional television programs can often incorporate information that requires viewers to grapple with a topic using logical reasoning and a global consciousness. In addition, not to diminish the importance of reading, television reaches those who may never pick up a book or who might struggle with reading problems, enabling a broader spectrum of people to interact with cognitive topics. Veith has committed the error of making generalizations about two forms of media when, in truth, the situation varies depending on quality and content. However, what follows these statements is not just fallacious, but
In Rereading America Michael Moore entitled “Idiot Nation” focuses on the failing educational system in the United States of America. The American nation has decreased in their studies and have lowered their standards, yet America still claims they have their priorities in order, which is education. Moore attempts to persuade his readers that the people who are to blame are lack of education in politics and the budget cuts they are making, however, politics blame teachers for making America decrease in their schooling test scores. Americas have many opportunities and useful tools to be successful; however,
This assignment is a testament of growth and contributed to my outlook on strategies towards improving my writing through the importance of understanding how crucial, each component of the writing process is and how in depth you should take each process. Lastly, this reflection advocated how editing is the principal task of every good writer. “To write is human, to edit is divine,” Stephen
If it was not apparent enough that America’s education system is failing, Michael Moore’s “Idiot Nation” openly explains to us about the truth. America, for being the richest country, is behind in the educational standpoint. America needs to rethink their standards when it comes to education. America is more focused on corporate earning than educating our youth. The author of “Idiot Nation” makes the reader think about how America is viewed in the world. The purpose of Michael Moore’s essay is to point out what is wrong with this nation and also give the reader the motivation to actually do something about the situation at hand. Moore is trying to make readers aware of where we send our children. The author is trying to shock readers with the facts to do something to improve the American education system.
America has not changed it’s educational system in over two hundred years. For this reason, our students and population are falling further and further behind. Our society has done nothing but move forward, so why hasn’t our learning? Everybody has a story, opinion, or response to education. We need to invest in refining our tools to succeed, to create a better sense of self, and a stronger, more well-rounded nation. The American educational system is hurting students by passing them without merit and relying on standardized tests; however, many are now running back to these hollowed halls to ensure better futures.
Neil Postman’s thoughts toward television and education would sadly not change after thirty years, but more technologies such as laptops, tablets, cell phones, and even social media would be added to the curriculum. Neil Postman would most likely be appalled at the amount of information I learn through the internet, and the formats that I learn the information in. For example, BuzzFeed News is an application on my cellphone that give information through videos, music, and images. All the formats that television used, but quicker.
The American school system is no stranger to criticism, but everybody seems to have a distinct idea of what should be done to improve it. It was not too long ago that we had no public schooling system at all. A man would change that forever, immortalizing himself as the “father” of American education. It was surprising to me that I had never heard of this man, especially considering I had finished my journey through free and compulsory education two years ago. The man who went on to change American education, was Horace Mann, the first Secretary of the Board of Education in Massachusetts.
In his novel, Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman describes to the reader, in detail, the immediate and future dangers of television. The argument starts out in a logical manner, explaining first the differences between today's media-driven society, and yesterday's "typographic America". Postman goes on to discuss in the second half of his book the effects of today's media, politics on television, religion on television, and finally televised educational programs. He explains that the media consists of "fragments of news" (Postman, 1985, p.97), and politics are merely a fashion show. Although Postman's arguments regarding the brevity of the American attention span and the importance of today's mass media are logical, I do not agree with his opinion of television's inability to educate.
In our society entertainment has become an immense part of our daily lives. We spend extensive periods of time watching TV, which in general has become a habit for many individuals, and a necessity for others. In the article Television as teacher by Neil Postman he argues that television does not help us learn what is necessary for further education, and that it shouldn’t be utilized as a main learning tool because it undermines the techniques applied in teaching centers. Some of these technics are obtaining a previous education before practicing the advanced learning, paying attention to the material being provided, and retaining the information given for future references. Nonetheless I agree with Postman’s point of view that Television is
The second idea that Postman gives, he does admit that it is desperate, is to address the problem that exists throughout schools. Postman does acknowledge that all of this exposes a type of typical American faith in the possibilities of the American education system. He writes that we have not yet investigated the way printed text affects the way our minds work. Postman stays somewhat optimistic, that teachers are actually becoming more “media conscious” in a world that demands a person to know about new forms of technology (162).
In “Idiot Nation,” Michael Moore discourses on the collapse of American education system and the three main reasons behind it: politicians’ ignorance, shortage of teachers, and the rise of Corporate America. Moore first points out how ignorant the President and politicians are by stating that the President cannot simply identify whether Africa is a nation or a continent. Next, Moore attributes the lack of funding in education to the fact that politicians prefer to build bomber than to improve our education system; this leads to shortage of resources, overpopulated classrooms, and decrease of books available for students. He then notes that the low salaries of teachers, which are caused by the insufficient funding of education, result in shortage of qualified teachers, leading to the failure of the education system. In addition, Moore discusses about the rise of Corporate America, which is another factor corrupting the education system. To get funding from Corporate America, schools diminish the time students have in class, by making students watch advertisements from businesses and help businesses conduct research during class time. Throughout his excerpt, Moore uses exemplification, surprising statistics, rhetorical questions, and simple but clear reasoning to effectively express his ideas and convince readers of his arguments.
Over time there has been a major debate over television and children. Some think that kids shouldn’t watch it, some say that it is okay in moderation, and others say it doesn’t have any effects. The real debate starts when one starts to talk about the content of the shows. Sesame Street is a show that most would say is for all ages, but is it truly educational? Can kids really learn from it?
As I read Television as a teacher written by Neil postman, His main argument throughout the article is that television isn’t a good or effective way to use education, and he describes how it’s actually worst for us and were not learning the full purpose of education and learning by watching tv. His main example was Sesame Street, and how children sit in front of a television for hours watching what they call education television and claiming they get knowledge from it but they're getting no social interaction by watching it. Also, Neil postman makes excellent points by comparing education television to a real classroom, saying how a classroom has social interaction, the ability to ask a teacher question, development of language, and it’s a
Lyle. L, Parker. B. E, Schramm. W. (1961) Television in the lives of our Children. 61.6533
This book, Dare The School Build a New Social Order by George Counts, is an examination of teachers, the Progressive Education Movement, democracy and his idea on how to reform the American economy. The book is divided into 5 different sections. The first section is all about the Progressive Education Movement. Through this, George Counts points out many downsides and weaknesses of this ideal. He also talks about how he wants teachers to lead society instead of following it. In the second section, he examines 10 widespread fallacies. These fallacies were that man is born free, that children are born free, they live in a separate world of their own, education remains unchanged, education should have no bias, the object of education is to produce professors, school is an all-powerful educational agency, ignorance rather than knowledge is the way of wisdom, and education is made to prepare an individual for social change.