Team Analysis Paper

1102 Words3 Pages

Communication
The first criteria I am using to analyze my team is communication. What I mean by communication is how the team exchanged, received, and connected on a regular basis when there was a goal to accomplish. I choose communication as a criteria because communication is the most important quality a team needs to succeed. Communication alone isn't enough it is beyond that in terms of communicating it effectively with quantity and quality. Understanding roles and communicating work is the key to a valid team collaboration. Within our group we did a good job at communicating goals and reporting back to team members. Our team used a group chat on our cell phones to stay updated with each other with tasks and the project progress. We also …show more content…

What I mean by performance is how the group collaborated together and functioned to work efficiently towards a common goal. I choose performance to analyze because the principle of working together underpins how a team operates. Different skills and views are never underestimated and they could only enhance a product or project if communicated correctly. One positive quality within performance is that each of my teammate had a distinctive skill and were creative and innovative in their own way. For example, one team member was really good with software, another at marketing, and another at writing. All these different talents and expertise brought easiness and lots of creativity in our project. It was also an opportunity for each member to learn from each other expatriates, ad I personally did learn. One quality that affected our performance was procrastination. Many of the team members procrastinated until the last minute to postpone work and left it until a week or so before something was due. This left some team members frustrated as some were very organized and did not appreciate last minute, inconsistent, and sloppy work and wanted to read writing multiple times before it is turned in. This caused some unnecessary tension between members and wasted time and energy that could have been used in the project …show more content…

What I mean by time management is meeting deadlines, planning, scheduling, arranging when a deliverable or a project was due. Time management is very important and is needed for a good project outcome. I choose time management as a criteria to analyze because a lack of time management could lead to all the things that went wrong that I mentioned in this analysis like procrastination and lack of communication. Good time management helps accomplish goals in a shorter time and allows for opportunities that could be an advantage to a teams product. Within our group one positive attribute within this criteria was that as a group we were able to always complete tasks on time and before hand to review things and put together for the final product. We were all alway able to complete tasks before hand like the interviews needed for deliverable 1 and

Open Document