Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of leadership in the society
Importance of leadership in the society
Building effective teams and teamwork
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of leadership in the society
Leadership is necessary for a group to accomplish goals. Leadership according to Lamberton and Minor (2014), is the ability to impact people to attain a goal. A leader according to Gaiter (2013), sets direction and influences others to accomplish goals and directs cohesiveness. A leaders’ goal is not just the success of the team but, also the success of individuals on the team, a leader must motivate, inspire and empower others for success (Gaiter, 2013). To accomplish these goals a leader will utilize a leadership style.
There are four styles of leadership, the first is the autocratic leader. This leader makes all the decisions and the followers have no freedom to disagree. For example, musicians in an orchestra. Another leadership
…show more content…
These requirements are intended to lead the organization to its fullest potential. The autocratic leader that make all the decisions is necessary for an organization such as an orchestra. Think of how an orchestra would sound if they utilized another form of leadership. Each instrument would fail to be precisely orchestrated with the others, the resulting music would be very difficult to listen to. The most important aspect of the autocratic leader is that this leader must always be leading and their followers must be willing to abide to the leaders authority. The consultative leader is willing to hear the perspective of others. After seeking the opinions of the followers the consultative leader then makes a decision. This type of leadership gives the followers a chance to be heard. Most importantly it gives the leader a chance to get to know the followers and to hear their opinions on how the organization should carry on their business. The final decision remains with leader. The participative leader is utilized for teams, the decision making power is a team effort. The leader will make decisions if team is unable to come to a consensus. The importance of this type of leadership is, that it gives each member of the team “ownership”, this can improve the morale. The free-rein leader gives the guidelines and the followers are free to choose how to accomplish the end goal. The most important aspect of this …show more content…
Currently I do not hold a position of assigned leadership, but I have in the past. My leadership style is the consultative leader. My goal is to know how the members of my team perceive the necessary changes and how they would like to see the changes accomplished. Receiving input from the team gives them the confidence that their leader considers them an integral part of the team. Listening to the team members also gives them a sense of ownership if their opinions become a part of the solution. This can also have a down side, if you have a member of the team consistently give their input and the leader does not utilize their
On the other hand, a leader is a person who influences a group of people in order to achieve certain goal. According to Oliver, (2006), leader is an individual who has an ability to demonstrate a specific set of role of behaviours in order to influence the others behaviours and attitudes. There three factor or keys that necessary to obtain a goal, which are the person, people, and purpose. Figure 1 below shows the relationship between the three factors needed to achieve the goal.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
The first leadership style to discuss is the autocratic leader. This leader will make all the decisions for the group and they make it very clear they are in charge. The power they hold as the leader is important to them. Unlike the other three styles, employees do not have a voice and are unable to disagree. The second leadership style is the consultative leader. This leader will consult with employees to gain input into decision making to reach the goals of the organization. However, once they have come to a decision this leader will take responsibility for it. This type of leader is more team oriented, and is willing to delegate authority to other team members. The third leadership style is the participative leader. This leader is similar to
"Quiz - What's Your Leadership Style?" Quiz - What's Your Leadership Style?About.com, n.d. Web. 12 June 2014. .
In autocratic leadership style, the leaders take direction ship and make decision in own. They do not transfer any domination to the others.
Goal attainment: Leadership involves goal attainment. It includes attention to goals and directs a group of individuals towards accomplishing a defined task or goal.
Another leadership style is the transformational leaders, the employees feel trust, admiration, loyalty and respect concerning their leaders, and they are motivated to do more than they normally would do for another style of leader. The leader transforms and motivates employees by first, making them understand the importance of task outcomes, secondly, allowing them to focus their own self-interest for the sake of the organization. In the end everyone wins.
Leadership can take many different forms, depending on the person and the situation in which it is needed. Collaborative leadership is a leadership style in which a leader brings together a large group of people, with a variety of backgrounds, to make a productive decision and act upon it. According to Chrislip and Larson (1994):
A leader, meaning more than merely a manager, is someone who is responsible to guide and direct his or her group. While the manager administers; the leader innovates and focuses on not only systems and structure but also on people. The leader has a long-range perspective.The manager does things right; whereas, the leader does the right things (Murray, 2010). There are different leadership theories supporting different points of view. The Great Man theory believes that great leaders haveinherited crucial characteristics that make them a natural-born leader. Behavioral theory of leadership believes that people can learn to become leaders through teaching and observation(Schyns, Kiefer, & Tymon, 2011). Whereas, the Participative leadership theories suggest that the ideal leadership style is one that takes the input of others into account the transactional theoryfocuses on supervising, organizing and performing as a group(Avolio, Walumbwa, & Weber, 2009). According to Darling &Leffel, there are four types of leadership that include Analyzer (gathering facts and analyze data to reach conclusions), Creator (likes to take an opportunity and innovate), Connector (create a friendly working environment and Director (pragmatic and focuses on tasks and results)(Darling & Leffel, 2010). According to situational theory, different styles of lead...
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
Leadership is defined as a process by which an individual influences others to obtain goals. There are three aspects that should be addressed when explaining leadership. One aspect is that leadership is a social influence process; leadership could not exist without a leader and one or more followers. Another leadership aspect is compliance; all of the leader’s directions must be complied with voluntarily. Compliance is what separates leadership from other influence-based formal authority. Finally, leadership results in the followers’ behavior, that is purposeful and goal-directed which must be in some organized setting (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009).
There are three different types of leadership styles one can be considered. You have Autocratic leadership, where an individual makes all the decision making alone and does not consider what input others have (Hill, Howlett,255). This type of leadership is where the leader of the organization has a main focus on the task only and not everyone that in involved (Hill, Howlett,255). Then there is Democratic leadership, where everyone is able to have an input in the decision making process (Hill, Howlett,255). Finally, Laisse-Faire style is the last type of leadership, where the task is not a concern, the employees are the only concern in this type of leadership (Hill, Howlett,255).
Throughout my life, I have been fortunate to have many opportunities to take on leadership roles, and to use these roles to influence others in very positive ways. After taking the leadership quizzes or survey, I was able to determine that my personal leadership style is Participative. Participative style is the leadership style where a leader gives team the opportunity to wholly take part in
Leaderis a person who has strong ability to control and direct people in the right ways. There are 10 types of leadership, also there are many differences in skills between leaders and many different ways that each leader uses to treat others. Also Leadership has been described as "a process of social influence in which a person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task". For example, some understand a leader simply as somebody whom people follow, or as somebody who guides or directs others, while others define leadership as "motivating and organizing a group of people to achieve a common goal".
Leadership is essentially the ability to motivate. An effective leader can motivate others toward reaching a common goal. Leaders are different than managers in that leaders inspire others to do the work needed while managers generally tend to manage the tasks associated with completing the goal.