Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research paper on effects of spanking a child
Demerits of using corporal punishment
Research paper on effects of spanking a child
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research paper on effects of spanking a child
Corporal punishment, or “spanking”, has been used by many cultures around the world throughout history. It is an immediate remedy to bad behavior in children and has been heralded for its effectiveness by its proponents. However, there is no scientific evidence to support the claim that spanking is more effective than other forms of discipline. There are multiple studies and experiments which demonstrate that corporal punishment can cause long term physical, emotional and mental injury to children. Because of this evidence, and the fact that the line between corporal punishment and abuse varies so much from person to person, spanking should not be used by parents to discipline their children. Spanking advocates give many reasons why spanking should be used in the home, many of which are …show more content…
Effective methods of behavior modification focus primarily on positive reinforcement, logical consequences, and healthy interactions between parents and children. Disciplinary methods should, if used properly, engender trust within the relationship. Children learn to trust that their parents will be consistent and fair, and use that knowledge to develop a better framework for understanding the world around them. By acting out of love, with the best interest of the child in mind, parents are able to gently guide their children away from potential danger, towards a happier and healthier lifestyle. Parents should never scold, lecture or yell at children, especially out of anger.
Logical consequences are usually the most effective method of discipline, because they establish a direct relationship between a child’s actions and outcomes. If a child rides their bike in the street, they may lose their privilege to ride the bike. This example clearly demonstrates to the child the result of the bad behavior, while reducing the likelihood that the behavior will be
Spanking is the most effective form of discipline when a child knows doing something is wrong, but the child does it anyway. A child who is properly disciplined through spanking is being taught how to control her or his impulses and how to deal with all types of authorities in future environments. Parents can control their child’s future
The use of spanking is one of the most controversial parenting practices and also one of the oldest, spanning throughout many generations. Spanking is a discipline method in which a supervising adult deliberately inflicts pain upon a child in response to a child’s unacceptable behaviour. Although spanking exists in nearly every country and family, its expression is heterogeneous. First of all the act of administering a spanking varies between families and cultures. As Gershoff (2002) pointed out, some parents plan when a spanking would be the most effective discipline whereas some parents spank impulsively (Holden, 2002). Parents also differ in their moods when delivering this controversial punishment, some parents are livid and others try and be loving and reason with the child. Another source of variation is the fact that spanking is often paired with other parenting behaviours such as, scolding, yelling, or perhaps raging and subsequently reasoning. A third source of variation concerns parental characteristics. Darling and Steinberg (1993) distinguished between the content of parental acts and the style in which it was administered (Holden, 2002). With all this variation researchers cannot definitively isolate the singular effects of spanking.
Alan Kadzin, Yale University’s Professor of Child Psychiatry and Director of Yale Parenting Center, as cited in A Surprising Number of Americans Still Spank Their Kids written by Time Magazine’s Denise Foley, believes that “spanking can be destructive long before it becomes a clear cut case of child abuse.” He supports this with his research that indicates that spanking can “predict” future mental and physical health problems. Additionally, individuals who were spanked died at a younger age of “cancer, heart disease, and respiratory illnesses.” Dr. Murray Strauss, a University of New Hampshire in Durnam professor of sociology and co-director of the Family Research Laboratory, also describes in the article Pros/Cons: Spanking by Jessica Pauline Ogilvie, how this induces the child to be at a higher risk for “committing juvenile crime, assaulting other kids …and hitting their dating or [domestic] partner[s].”
The issue of spanking is whether it is justifiable or an act of child abuse. Some child specialists, such as Christine Walsh and Michael Boyle, argue that if a parent must administer a spanking, it should not be through anger and only as a last option when other forms of discipline have been deemed unsuccessful. They say that for a spanking to be instructive it must be...
Swat! The entire store tries not to stare at the overwhelmed mother spanking her three-year-old whaling son. As if the screaming tantrum wasn't enough of a side show at the supermarket. This method, or technique perhaps, has been around for decades, even centuries. Generations have sat on grandpa’s lap and listened to the stories of picking their own switch or getting the belt after pulling off a devilish trick. So why then has it become a major controversy in the past few decades? The newest claim is that spanking and other forms of physical punishment can lead to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury and mental health problems for children. Brendan L. Smith uses many case studies and psychologists findings in his article “The Case Against Spanking” to suggest that parents refrain from physically punishing their children due to lasting harmful effects.
Books such as Children: The Challenge and Parenting with Love and Logic cover the concepts in depth. What makes How to Discipline without Damage special is the way that Wright presents the information so clearly and so quickly. Busy parents usually do not have the time or inclination to read a 300-page book to help resolve their discipline issues. The brevity of this book, a mere 98 pages, is a great way to introduce to these concepts and provide practical, positive examples to emulate. Wright empowers parents to begin implementing small, positive changes in their discipline from the very start of this book with her practical suggestions.
Consistency is important in how you emotionally react when your child does something which you don't like and also what reaction or consequence you use to teach that the behavior is the undesirable. Consequences should fit the behavior, and your tone and demeanor should match the severity of the behavior. If a child is acting out the behavior needs to be addressed with a logical and related consequence.
Spanking a child is a type of punishment that can be regulated by various factors including how the parent delivers the punishment and how it impact to the child's perception, reaction and emotion Spanking is like milk: it does the body good — or at least the mind. Spanking is not child abuse and parents should not be afraid to discipline their children with an occasional spank. Unlike Dr. Markham, who stated spanking a child is child abuse when he/ she has done wrong, Dr. Phil argued occasionally spanking a child who is acting unsafely or terribly does not make parents child abusers or people with anger problem; it makes them parents who care about their child’s future. In disciplining children, parents should do everything as kindly and gently as they can first.
There is only one question about parenting that sends parents to opposite corners.” Should I or should I not spank my child”. Not even the controversies over breast or bottle, working or stay at home comes close to the arguments over spanking. A lot of whether you spank as a parent or not depends on how you were disinclined as a child. Most parents whom were spanked as a child tend not to spank their children.
I personally do not advocate spanking. I could not imagine losing my temper to a point where I thought I needed to spank my child. While I do anticipate that having children will be a real test of patience, I do not expect that I will lose my patience so much that I will spank my children. I find spanking to be a real contradiction to what most parents tell their children. Most parents do not allow their children to hit, whether they are angry or not. Even when kids think another kid did something wrong, or bad, they are still not allowed to hit. If a parent tells a kid this, and then turns around and spanks the kid when they do something wrong, how will the kid ever learn that hitting is wrong? In my opinion, there has to be a better way to discipline children. I think that sending a child to a room where they cannot interact with anyone else, and then taking away a privilege would be a better way of handling discipline. Also, when I was a child, I can remember that when I was angry, my dad would come in to my room after I had time to cool down and talk to me about why I was angry. I can remember these as really fond times with my dad. It helped me identify why I was so angry, and most of the time it was at my mom for not letting me have my way. When I could identify why I was angry, my dad and I could come up with a solution to solve the problem. I think that rather than spanking, this is a good way to discipline children.
The work of Elizabeth Gershoff, recognized as the leading researcher on spanking in the United States, shows that “... using this type of discipline method bring the child to understand what he has done wrong and it increase his self-esteem. ˮ On the other hand, parents can reward the good behaviour of their children. This method will give kids a motivation to behave properly because they like to be rewarded. For instance, if a child normally makes a mess at the table, compliment him when he doesn't make one.
...orce the good behaviour with rewards and decrease the likelihood of negative behaviour being repeated. The structured discipline of both parents and teachers help the child to appreciate that good behaviour is much more beneficial than bad behaviour but without this structure in one or both of these settings, could lead to the child not understanding, leading to it being much more difficult to correct behaviour that isn't wanted without resorting to drastic measures of physical or psychological punishment that would do more harm than good. Further research into helping the children in these sort of circumstances would be much more beneficial to the topic of child behaviour and punishment.
Mather and Goldstein (2015) stated that behaviors can retained or changed with appropriate outcome. Teachers can use the procedure defined by them to accomplish students’ behvaiour using the following outcomes. The very first step is to describe the problem. The second step is to adjust the behavior by emerging a behavior management strategy. The third step is to recognize an effective reinforce and the latest step is to use the reinforce on a regualr basis in order to change the
In conclusion, by eliminating punishment, using the kind and firm technique and by having a relationship based on mutual respect, parents can properly discipline their children without being abusive. Although, positive discipline may not provide immediate results, it will actively stop misbehavior instead of redirecting
Therefore, the six basic principles of effective punishment in which are most relevant for consideration when using procedures that may function as punishment to change any child's given behavior where explained how the factors influenced the given contingency to function as a punisher. Eliminating bad behavior should begin at an early age for a child by implementing the correct punishment and keeping consistent with the behavioral intervention. If the behavior has not improved as time passes then the behavioral planned was not effective because of inconsistency, targeting the right reinforcer, etc.