Spanking has probably crossed the minds of many parents at some point. Maybe the child was being disobedient or disrespectful. Time-outs aren't effective, and neither is any other discipline techniques tried. Suddenly, one began to wonder, "Is a swat on the bottom so bad?” The decision is determined by the individual asked. Some say finding spanking supporters are hard, but statistics say other wise. Of the 1,000 readers polled on parents.com, 81 percent said they had spanked their child at least once, and 22 percent do so once a week or more. That figure is consistent with a 2007 study published in the journal Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, which found that nearly 80 percent of kids are spanked at least once by fifth grade (Moninger). …show more content…
Although Dr. Phil is against spanking, he believes individuals should look at results of many years worth of research and decide for themselves. Each parent must decide which form of discipline would be most effective for their child. In his article, “Spanking Research,” Dr. Phil presents many reasons why children should get spankings. Discipline plays a big role in children’s lives. According to Dr.Phil, “In a study, moms who consolidated dissuading negative outcomes, (for example, spanking) had the most achievement in changing negative behaviors.” In other words, children with negative behavior can be greatly affected by negative consequence, such as spanking. Spankings can be compelling on a temporary basis in getting youngsters to change any negative practices that incited the spanking. Spankings do not cause negative effects, argues Dr.Phil. Moreover, parents have power to spank their youngsters to revise their wrongdoing. Parents who discipline effectively spank on a basis of clearly defined rules, not on their feelings at that particular moment. Opponents of spanking say that it has long-term negative consequences such as increased anti-social behavior. But it’s found that those same consequences can be associated with nearly every other kind of nonphysical punishment. Spanking isnt any better or worse than grounding children, sending them to their room or even getting them …show more content…
Spanking a child is a type of punishment that can be regulated by various factors including how the parent delivers the punishment and how it impact to the child's perception, reaction and emotion Spanking is like milk: it does the body good — or at least the mind. Spanking is not child abuse and parents should not be afraid to discipline their children with an occasional spank. Unlike Dr. Markham, who stated spanking a child is child abuse when he/she has done wrong, Dr. Phil argued occasionally spanking a child who is acting unsafely or terribly does not make parents child abusers or people with anger problem; it makes them parents who care about their child’s future. In disciplining children, parents should do everything as kindly and gently as they can first. They should try to understand a child, make sure the child understands what is expected of them, use reasoning and find an adequate nonphysical consequence, like a “timeout” or taking away privileges, in which Dr.Markham believe in. But if the child won’t cooperate, some kids need something more forceful to back it up.This is where backup spanking comes in. It involves two swats of an open hand to the rear end. However, the two doctors
Spanking is permitted in many U.S. States but it does very by state. I would inform the parents that in the state of South Carolina, it is legal to spank your child for punishment if for sole purpose of restraining or correcting, and the force has is reasonable in manner and moderate in degree. (Kidjacked Spanking Laws, 2014) I have always felt that spanking doesn't work. It can temporarily stop the unwanted behavior, but the most effective forms of discipline are those that teach children how to control their behavior. Spanking could teach your child to be afraid of you when they have done something wrong, but it does not teach the child the real consequences of their behavior.
There are detrimental risks and disadvantages to using spanking children as a form of punishment. Children will never actually learn the reasoning for why they are being spanked. This will not produce benefits for the child later in life; it will actually hurt them because they aren’t learning important lessons as a child. A giant risk a parent takes when choosing to spank their child is that it may lead to increased aggression by age 5. Also the more a parent spanks, the less effective it becomes. Spanking has no benefits and is harmful to children.
Spanking, a fictitious form of child abuse, is an appropriate action toward unruly children. It is a popular practice used to instill discipline and values in children, and is more effective than talking to or yelling at the child or placing the child in “time out” sessions. In the long run, spanking causes no damage to the child’s mental or physical health. Instead, it creates a basis for good behavior.
Spanking a child is not against the law in most places. However, parents who use it in their homes are being accused of child abuse. The Chicago Tribune published an article that urged readers to report child abuse when they become aware of it. In the article “Child abuse in plain View” the author describes spanking as a type of abuse that happens behind closed doors (“Child abuse in plain View”). Like most critics of corporal punishment, the author is trying to link spanking to abuse. The author`s concern about abuse is a valid one. Abuse should be reported immediately. However, any attempt to define spanking as abuse is wrong. Spanking a child is not abuse. It is an effective way of discipline that helps guide the child into becoming a respectful and responsible person.
[to] strike with an open hand. Spanking does not infer a sustained whipping from Dads belt, but a mild form of corporal punishment that does not cause injury. Spanking is alive and well today, despite the antispanking prohibition. In a poll sponsored by Working Mother and the Epcot Center at Walt Disney World in Florida, 7,225 adults and 2,599 kids were surveyed (Hickey 48). When asked?When should parents spank their children?
First of all, spanking does not lead to violence. Our surrounding world and media do. "The average sixteen-year- old has watched 18,000 murders during his formative years, including a daily bombardment of stabbings, shootings, hangings, decapitations, and general dismemberment" (Meier 34). It seems unjust to blame parents who are trying to raise their children properly for today's violence. If a child touches a hot stove he does not become a more violent person because of it, he just learns not to do it again because he learned a valuable lesson from the pain (Meier 34).
Spanking is commonly associated with parents attempting to correct behavior in a child; ultimately often out of frustration and/or anger with the child’s behavior. In the heat of the moment, most parents do not associate the long term psychosocial or behavioral effects the act of spanking can have on a child. The dangers of these effects derived from how children think and behave show us that spanking is not an effective form of discipline.
The issue of spanking is whether it is justifiable or an act of child abuse. Some child specialists, such as Christine Walsh and Michael Boyle, argue that if a parent must administer a spanking, it should not be through anger and only as a last option when other forms of discipline have been deemed unsuccessful. They say that for a spanking to be instructive it must be...
Many people believe that physical punishment of a child is not right and in a public institution, they have a right to get involved and try to stop what they see as violence against children. In fact, one Texas judge sentenced a mother to five years of probation after spanking her child, even though there is no law that strictly prohibits spanking. Despite the increasing mindset that spanking is abuse, sometimes a handprint on the backside is more effective than a firm warning. In a study done by the Pediatrics, it was found that a small two percent of children observed showed any negative effects from spanking and even that could have been the result of something else. So if spanking does not really harm a child mentally, then there is nothing to worry about.
Many people argue that spanking creates more problems for both the parents and the child. Two thirds of child abuse cases were found
Now it has been becoming the method that is being used by most doctors and many parents. The type of discipline parent’s use is entirely up to them. However, this points is not important because spanking might actually more harm than good. Meaning spanking will not correct the problem that the child has, but only make them worse. In some countries around the globe is illegal to spank their child.
I personally do not advocate spanking. I could not imagine losing my temper to a point where I thought I needed to spank my child. While I do anticipate that having children will be a real test of patience, I do not expect that I will lose my patience so much that I will spank my children. I find spanking to be a real contradiction to what most parents tell their children. Most parents do not allow their children to hit, whether they are angry or not. Even when kids think another kid did something wrong, or bad, they are still not allowed to hit. If a parent tells a kid this, and then turns around and spanks the kid when they do something wrong, how will the kid ever learn that hitting is wrong? In my opinion, there has to be a better way to discipline children. I think that sending a child to a room where they cannot interact with anyone else, and then taking away a privilege would be a better way of handling discipline. Also, when I was a child, I can remember that when I was angry, my dad would come in to my room after I had time to cool down and talk to me about why I was angry. I can remember these as really fond times with my dad. It helped me identify why I was so angry, and most of the time it was at my mom for not letting me have my way. When I could identify why I was angry, my dad and I could come up with a solution to solve the problem. I think that rather than spanking, this is a good way to discipline children.
Very few see a grey area concerning this matter. On one hand, many people think spanking is nothing more than a legal form of abuse. On the other hand, many people stating that it is a necessary tool to raise well behaved children. Although, many people feel that spanking is an appropriate act of discipline, spanking has many negative effects on developing children. First, it teaches the child to fear adults rather than respect them.
Spanking is a disciplinary act that has been used by parents for years now. It does not seem like a big deal at the time, but spanking does have long term effects that can affect the child even when he or she is a adult. Spanking whether it is appropriate for parents or any guardian of a child should be allowed to spank their child or not. There is a lot of controversy because parents say kids need to be disciplined when they are behaving badly. Others say parents shouldn 't spank their child because they long-term outcome is worse and they are not teaching the child a lesson. Some parents agree with these specialist and don 't spank their child but use other ways of discipline that doesn 't involve hurting
Parents need to use physical punishment as a disciplinary tactics. Parents who are trying to raise their undisciplined children should use the spanking technique to help their children to become respectful and well minded young adults. The research, by Calvin College psychology professor Marjorie Gunnoe, found that kids smacked before age 6 grew up to be more successful. On the other hand, researchers’ find that hitting your child leads to fear and ideas of running away. Spanking a child may save his or her life in the future. Kyle Schnitzer of The New York Post writes “researcher’s looked at four nationals studies using 23 years of data, where in 1988, 46% of mothers in middle-class families used spanking. Whereas in 2011 the use of spanking dropped drastically to 18%. “It’s not abuse it’s a learning experience to the child body (Lauren).” Therefore spanking a child is not lazy parenting