Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justice and our society
Justice and our society
Euthyphro 5 definition of piety
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justice and our society
Euthyphro: Hello, my dear Socrates. I’m glad to meet you here. I spent the whole evening thinking about our conversation from yesterday, and I think I have a better and more accurate definition of piety. Socrates: That is very good, my dear Euthyphro, please tell me about your new definition of piety. E: I believe what it is for an act to be pious is for the act to obey god’s will, and do what is good for the society. S: To obey god’s will, to do what is meaningful to the society is to be pious, is that right? E: It is indeed. S: Then tell me, Euthyphro, how do you define society? Is it one other person, or is it the society as a whole? E: I would say this society is the society as a whole. Moreover, the society is made up of a group of people …show more content…
However, a single person cannot be the society, and the society is made up of many individuals. S: So if someone hurts a member of the society, will he be doing something which is harmful to the society? E: Quite so. Hurting a member of the society will do harm to the society. S: Are there people in the society who are being harmful to the society? E: I think there are. S: If a member of the society has done something which is harmful to the society, what should we do about it? E: That person must be sanctioned, Socrates. S: But we just said before, that a person, as a member of the society, which hurting that person is just as same as hurting the society. E: That is not the same, Socrates. This person has harmed the benefit of the whole society, and he has lost his qualification to be a member of the society. S: So, do you mean that the society is made up of people who do not harm the society? E: Well, Socrates, I have to admit that there are people in the society who do good things to the society, but there are also people in the society who do harm to the society. Therefore, what is good for the society is to benefit the society as a whole. That is to say, we need to ensure the benefit for the majority of the whole society, which it is necessary to sanction those who do harm to the whole …show more content…
E: Of course. S: Should we sanction the thief? E: Certainly, we must sanction the thief. It will protect the benefit of the society as a whole. S: Tell me then, if one kills the thief, does his action maintain the benefit of the whole society? Is this an action of pious? E: No, Socrates, absolutely no. Although the thief has harmed the society and committed a crime, it would still be wrong for a person to kill the thief. The thief should be handed over to the court and let the court judge him. S: Why should the thief be handed over to the court and let the court judge him? Is it not the thief doing harm to the society? Is it not a pious thing to kill the thief and preserve the benefit of the society? E: No, Socrates. Even though he thief did harm the benefit of the society, to hand him over to the court should still be the pious thing to do. The thief should have the right to a fair and impartial trial, thus this is the right way to protect the benefit of the society. Conversely, to kill the thief would be an act of impious, which would be against the benefit of the
It could be said that the proper society is merely a backdrop for a heroic individual to stand out. Z assumes the role of an individual who breaks away from the constraints placed on him by society. He refuses to let his place or class restrict his movements as an individual. However, to what point does an individual need a society? If an entire society became individuals would the society still function successfully? It could be said that some of the rules and regulations
When speaking to Crito about if we are mutilated by wrong actions and benefited by right ones, Socrates says, “What we ought to consider is not so much what people in general will say about us but how we stand with the expert in right and wrong, the one authority, who represents the actual truth.” (267, 68-71). Socrates believes we shouldn’t care about what people’s opinions are about our beliefs. We should focus on standing up to the authorities if they are going against our morals . I agree with Socrates that a person should stand up for justice because everyone is created with equal rights, and if authority abuses one’s right we should speak up. His statement will have a significant application when an authority imposes an immoral law or rule because in that moment one will have to stand up against the unjust action . Socrates thinks if authority treats an individual or group unequally, it is immoral because he thinks that people aren’t equal, however, he thinks people should be treated equally. In this case standing up to immorality is the right thing to do if the person thinks the higher power is wrong. Similarly, Antigone agrees with Socrates’s claim of people being treated equally because of her experience with one of her brothers, Polyneices, not having a burial while the other brother, Eteocles, did have a
Euthyphro’s second definition of piety is “the pious is what the gods love”. Socrates takes this idea and
There really is no logical stance for opposition. It makes sense; it clicks. Piety, holiness, is undoubtedly related to a mans service to god and his social implications because of it. It is a universal truth that cannot be disputed. Holiness is not only the general acceptance of a higher being- it is the acknowledgement of god in such a way that it exceeds the shallow affirmations of the common man, usually by acts which displace one from indulgences of society. Religious officials strive to achieve this true definition of holiness, which is made evident in their lifestyles.
question of the nature of society. As to this question, Golding asserts that society is an
The second argument that supports Socrates decision to stay in prison is that of the repercussions to the city of Athens. If Socrates escaped, the Athens city together with its fabric, laws, would be annihilated. By the extension, destruction of the Athens’ city equally destroyed the lives of people of Athens. Socrates argues that harming others is similar to harming ones soul because such an act constituted an unjust act. Therefore, it was a wiser decision to meet death rather than escape.
Defining social harm is not an easy task, the question of culpability and methodologies for studying harm are diverse. The perception of social harm incipiently was to expand the notion of harm to cover harms fulfilled by organizations and nations states that are not held as crime since they do not fit the description ('an act that is capable of being
Euthyphro was arguing that by doing what the gods believe is holy and pious you are making them better, in other words you are taking care of them and it is like a kind of service that you are doing towards the gods. Euthyphro said, “The kind of care, Socrates, that slaves take of their masters” which meant that you are taking care of them in the sense that you are making them better and not actually caring for them (17, 13d). In other words, you are helping improve them and this is a service that the gods appreciate and want you to do. He believed that this service is improving the gods and that they like this service. The gods believe that being holy is a service towards them, therefore there should be a reason on why the gods use us and want to reward our holiness. He believes that the gods choose what is holy for a reason and should be approved by
Out of the confrontation with Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, Socrates emerges as a reflective individual searching for the rational foundation of morality and human excellence. The views presented by the three men are invalid and limited as they present a biased understanding of justice and require a re-examination of the terminology. The nature in which the faulty arguments are presented, leave the reader longing to search for the rational foundations of morality and human virtue.
...ements. Yet, everyone in our society will result in developing their own perspectives on deviance and social control.
Before taking this class, my understanding between each individual and the whole society is that every individuals as the gear are connected together to become a society like a machine. That is, human beings build the society. However, the class gave me bigger view of the relationship between the people and the society. Discussing about the relationship between me and the broader social world is based on how all human beings and the broader social world effect together. Thus, I am going to show my understanding from the class and reading about the interaction between each individual and the whole society.
their value or lessening it), and that the violence that often occurs from doing so is senseless and
People are often blinded by the situation in which they are in, and by their personal motives which drive them to act. Humans, by nature, have faults and vices that are potentially harmful. It is the responsibility of society to anticipate harm, whether to oneself or to others. Once dangerous patterns and habits are recognized, it is imperative to anticipate and prevent injury from reoccurring. To allow any individual to be inflicted harm forces citizens to lose trust in the government, thus unraveling the fabric of society.... ...
Looking at it from a societal perspective, society shapes humans from within an individual; it affects their role in a family; plays a part in a person’s class; extends out to influence one’s culture; and even shapes a generation. At the individual level one must concede that we need society – we are interdependent creatures. Adam Smith mentioned, “In civilized society [a person] stands… in need of cooperation and assistance of great multitudes” – in today’s context, we ar...
The society that we live in today has been around since we were born. Over the years it has gone through changes, but it has always been in our lives. For this reason it is hard to understand how a society can develop. Because society is the largest of the human systems a lot has to happen in order for it to become dysfunctional and also for it to be healed. After a short discussion our class came up with many different questions regarding society. For example how can an individual or small group of individuals have an impact on society that consists of so many people? What is our role in a global society? How can societies in other countries affect our society here in the U.S.? In this paper I will attempt to answer these questions as well as cover the structure of society in greater detail.