Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A study of prisoners and guards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A study of prisoners and guards
“A beating is almost irresistible as an argument (Shalamov Kolyma).” Varlam Shalamov spent seventeen years in the Gulag (TEEB). Of all the lessons Shalamov recorded of his time in there, one theme stands out: The necessity of total subordination. The cruelty in the hands of the guards and even prisoners reflects the controlling expectations that their superiors have of them. //The drive for control was an elixir combating the desperation of camp life.// Shalamov’s short stories reflect a lust for control in the lives of those who feel they have none for themselves. The guards grasp for extra authority in order to elevate themselves in the eyes of the prisoners. Shalamov states that in the camp you are defined by the power you exert over others, …show more content…
The guards may have had perks, such as building a fire for warmth (Shalamov Berries), but their lives were a lockstep of patrols, cold marches, and orders from above dictating what was and was not permitted (ibid). In short, the guards are little more than prisoners themselves. Shalamov could sense this when he fell in the snow under the weight of firewood. He felt irritation from both the prisoners and the guards - both groups were cold, hungry and tired (ibid): same rights, different roles. Shalamov likewise spoke to the similarity in the obedience of Seroshapka in Berries: Seroshapka wanted to kill Shalamov but could not unless he crossed the line (ibid). Fear of consequence or a perverted sense of restraint had stopped Seroshapka from breaking his orders, not unlike the actions of the prisoners under authority. For example, after Rybakov is shot, Shalamov freezes in place at Seroshapka’s order (ibid). Consequences for disobedience among prisoners were instant, and Shalamov knew better than to test them. In Soviet Russia, every man had a superior, and the shared conditions and pressures of the prisoners and guards show that both parties had little control over themselves; both were conditioned to be
Conover begins his investigative journey as he goes through the training required to become a prison guard. The process that each potential guard has to graduate from highly resembles that of which the military uses. Perfectly made beds, matching uniforms, roll calls, shooting practice, and psychological tests are all engrained into the schedules of potential guards. When this realizations strikes the author he says, “It dawned on me that I had reported to boot camp.” The emphasis on uniformity and discipline clearly showed the correlation those who controlled prisons saw between the prisons and warzones. The rhetoric is nearly identical as well, as evidenced by the “sergeant” who states,” The gray uniforms are the god guys, and the green uniforms are ...
"Gulag: Soviet Forced Labor Camps and the Struggle for Freedom." Gulag: Soviet Forced Labor Camps and the Struggle for Freedom. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Mar. 2014. .
This demonstrates that the prisoners are part of a system where the needs of the collective are far more important than the needs of the individual (in both communism and in the prison.) It also reveals the corruption of the Soviet Union because it while it claims that everyone should be equal, the life of the prisoners in the camp are not valued at all. This could be due to the fact that prisoners in the camps aren’t viewed as people, but rather as animals that are being worked to their death.
Resistance took a violent appearance in the camp Treblinka when the inmates rose against their oppressors and set fire to Treblinka; however, only abou...
...se are not the only occurrences of violent attacks that the prisoners make on one another. Idek beats and whips Wiesel; a boy kills his father; Wiesel’s sick father is violently bullied by others in their block. The list goes on, and they can all be traced back to dehumanization as the abusers have no consideration for the victims as people.
Bardach, Janusz, and Kathleen Gleeson. Man Is Wolf to Man: Surviving the Gulag. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1998. Print.
Subjects became so entranced in these roles that the guards started to behave as if they really were the guards of a true prison. Zimbardo had told them to think of themselves in this way and it led to the guards mentally abusing the prisoners with their cruel and degrading ro...
Solzhenitsyn believed that it was nearly impossible to have truly free thoughts under the prison camp conditions described in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, or in any situation where there is an authoritarian ruler. In a pris...
A crucial concept developed throughout Survival in Auschwitz and The Drowned and the Saved is the process of “the demolition of a man” through useless acts of violence. In order for the Nazis to control and murder without regard or guilt, they had to diminish men into subhumans. Those who entered the camps were stripped of their dignity and humanity, devoid of any personal identity. Men and women were reduced to numbers in a system that required absolute submission, which placed them in an environment where they had to struggle to survive and were pitted against their fellow prisoners. The purpose of the camps were not merely a place for physical extermination, but a mental one as well. Primo Levi exposes these small and large acts of deprivation and destruction within his two texts in order for readers to become aware of the affects such a system has on human beings, as well as the danger unleashed by a totalitarian system.
Subjects became so entranced in these roles that the guards started to behave as if they really were the guards of a true prison. Zimbardo had told them to think of themselves in this way and it led to the guards mentally abusing the prisoners with their cruel and degrading routines. In Romesh Ra...
We see that the author’s purpose is to allow the readers to understand that the prisoners were not treated humanly, and allows us to see the negative attitudes the authority had towards the prisoners.
The novel focuses on one man, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov, as he tries to survive another day in the Soviet Union with dignity and compassion. The action takes place at a prison camp in Russia in the northeastern region called Ekibastuz. The location is pounded by snow, ice and winds of appalling and shocking force during winter and lasted for many weeks. The camp is very isolated as it consists double rows of barbed wire fencing around the entire area, making sure it is fully concealed and private, so that no prisoners can escape. The conditions of the camp are very harsh. It is a union where camp prisoners have to earn their food by working hard in their inadequate clothing during the extremely cold weather. Living conditions are almost unbearable; heavy mattresses do not include sheets, as an alternative it is stuffed with sawdust, prisoners only eat two hundred grams of bread per meal and guards would force prisoners to remove their clothing for body searches at temperatures of forty below zero. The building walls are covered in dull and monotonous white paint and it was untidy and unpleasant. “It’s constant chaos, constant crowds and constant confusion” shows that ceilings are most likely coated with frost and men at the tables are packed as tight and it was always crowded. Rats would diddle around the food store, because of the incredibly unhygienic and filthy environment the camp is and it was so insanitary that some men would die from horrible diseases. “Men trying to barge their way through with full trays” suggests that the living conditions are very harsh indeed and mealtimes would be chaotic, as every famished men would be rushing to receive food. However, not only did the place cause the prisoners to suffer and lose their...
“Men forced to undress and becomes in a rank. Some former prisoners report that beat them on genitals and a groin, forced to have oral sex and to suck off, beat the stun gun in erogenous places, stubs from cigarettes thrust into anuses. To detainees repeatedly threatened that they will be raped in the face of relatives, wives and daughters, and also their families threatened that, including and children too will be raped. Some men declared that proctal forced them bludgeons, and that they saw as governmental armies forced also children. One person declared that he saw rape of the boy in the face of the father. 40-year-old man saw as three officers of security service force the child.” [6]
Research based on studies by Phillip Zimbardo and Stanley Milgram on obedience and conformity are highly vital towards interpreting evidence of vulnerable individuals in the face of authority and social systems. Investigation into this area could then prove that obedience is a necessity in society for it to function appropriately by applying predetermined rubrics, and “conformity can be described as yielding to group pressures, something which nearly all of us do some of the time…” (Eysenck, 2004). Zimbardo is one of many psychologists to put research forward into obedience and conformity by conducting his study ‘The Stanford Prison Experiment’, in 1971 where the initial aim was to test which individuals would conform to either the role of a prisoner or a prison guard.
This experiment gathered twenty-one young men and assigned half of them to be “prisoners” and the other half to be “guards”. Simply put, the point of the experiment was to simulate a prison and observe how the setting and the given roles affected the behavior of the young men. The men who were given the roles of guard were given a position of authority and acted accordingly. This alone strongly influenced the behavior of both the guards and the prisoners. The guards had a sense of entitlement, control, and power, while the prisoners had a feeling of resentment and rebellion. Social pressure also played a crucial role in the experiment. Many of the guards began to exploit their power by abusing, brutalizing, and dehumanizing the prisoners. Some of the other guards felt wrong about this abuse, but did nothing to put an end to it. Finally, the situation and setting of the experiment immensely altered the conduct of both the prisoners and guards. The setting of being in a prison caused many of the volunteers to act in ways that they may have normally not. Even though the setting of being in a prison was essentially pretend, the volunteers accepted the roles they were given and acted as if it was all a reality. The prisoners genuinely behaved as if they were indeed real prisoners, and the guards treated them likewise. The situation these volunteers