Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fairytales and their impact on human development
Fairytales and their impact on human development
The morals of fairy tales
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fairytales and their impact on human development
Death. One thousand and ninety-five women, dead. When over one thousand women die at the hands of a scorned king, Scheherazade, a woman, is placed before him. Unlike the other women, she was not sent to him against her will, she volunteered (1001 Arabian Nights 19). Any sane person would say she had a death wish. How could a young girl willingly lie with King Shahryar, knowing he lies with a new woman every night...only to kill her in the morning? The answer is simple: fairy tales. Fairy tales, stories, myths, folklore, fables, etc. motivate Scheherazade to volunteer herself. To understand the power behind fairy tales, an understanding of the story of King Shahryar and Scheherazade is necessary. Not only is the importance of fairy tales evident …show more content…
in the tale of The Arabian Nights, but the double standards between men and women at that time, and the sexism against women is evident. The story starts off with two king brothers, King Shahryar, the elder, and King Shah Zaman, the younger. King Shahryar was king of “the islands of India and China” ( 1001 Arabian Nights 1). King Shah Zaman was the king of Samarcand (City in Uzbekistan) in Barbarian land (1001 Arabian Nights 1). One day, King Shahryar decided he missed his little brother too much, and had his Wazir, high official, deliver a message to King Shah Zaman. The message was loving, and invited the young brother over to King Shahryar’s court to visit. King Shah Zaman accepted the invitation happily, and prepared to visit his brother (1001 Arabian Nights 2-3). Upon leaving for his brother’s court King Shah Zaman realized he had forgotten a gift for his brother in his bedroom. Shah Zaman returned back to his room in order to retrieve the gift, when he found his wife, The Queen, in the arms of a black cook (1001 Arabian Nights3). The King’s drastic reaction shows the double standards between men and women. The adulteress was sleeping on King Shah Zaman’s bed with the cook, when Zaman sliced the couple into four pieces where they slept (1001 Arabian Nights 3). King Shah Zaman angrily said, “If such case happen while I am yet within sight of the city what will be the doings of this damned whore during my long absence at my brother’s court?” (1001 Arabian Nights 3). King Shah Zaman is clearly angry with his wife, considering he kills her, and his use of the word “whore.” According to Merriam Webster Dictionary, a whore is the following: “a woman who engages in sexual acts for money.” This word choice is harsh for King Shah Zaman to use, because his wife was not a whore. While King Zaman can take as many concubines as he pleases, but his wife is only allowed to be with him.Therefore, calling his wife a whore for cheating on him is hypocritical, and shows the double standards regarding men and women at that time. Concubines did not originally start in Islamic culture, but thanks to Muslim society, concubines were granted certain rights. “Concubinage” is a form of the word “marriage,” and in Islam, both are similar. According to “Faith in Allah,” concubines were treated similarly to wives, but of a lower status. Concubines were given outlets for freedom as well (Elias np). If King Shah Zaman (and his brother) were moral, why not set all of their concubines free? If a man has many concubines, they are not all getting individual attention from the man, therefore they are likely to seek attention elsewhere (Fellizar np). If a concubine cheats on their “master,” they are scolded and judged and in King Shahryar’s case, murdered. If the king brothers did not have enough attention to give to their plethora of concubines, they should have set said concubines free, instead of hiking up the rate of death in concubines! King Shah Zaman leaves the dead couple in his bed, and continues the journey to visit King Shahryar. At his brother’s castle, King Shah Zaman refuses to participate in any activities with his brother, and shuts himself in a room.He appears sickly, and only mulls over his dead wife’s betrayal night after day.
The king’s ability to obsess over his wife also shows double standards between men and women, because a concubine could not shut herself inside and obsess over her “master’s” sexual encounters, so why should Shah Zaman get to do so? One day, in the midst of mulling, King Shah Zaman looks out a window onto his brother’s pleasure grounds (1001 Arabian Nights 5). There, King Zaman witnesses his brother’s wife have sex with a “blackamoor” (1001 Arabian Nights 5). The concubines cheat on the king as well. Upon seeing this act of infamy, King Shah Zaman realizes that his brother being betrayed is worse than his own personal betrayal, for his brother is a greater king than himself. This realization heals King Zaman from his sickly state, so that when his brother returns home from hunting, King Shahryar questions his brother’s healthy glow (1001 Arabian Nights 6). In Islam, polygamy is allowed, but polyandry is not (Understanding Islam np). This double standard makes it acceptable for men to have wives as they please, and women to be stuck to the same man, who is out and about with whomever/whenever.This Islamic law gives men more agency, and creates a sort of domestic sphere for women. Psychologically, this may cause women to want to cheat on their husbands, because it gives …show more content…
them agency/power. The following morning, King Shahryar witnesses The Queen and the blackamoor together (1001 Arabian Nights 7-8). Betrayed, King Shahryar decides to leave with his brother to find other men that have been cheated on by their wives, to see if all women are truly vile. On their journey to find adulteresses they come across a jinni. The jinni then reveals a woman, who he stole the day she was going to get married. He stole the woman so he could be the only one to “hath loved or hath enjoyed” her (1001 Arabian Nights 9). The jinni rests his head on the woman’s thighs and falls asleep. As the jinni slept, the woman commands the two kings to have sex with her. The kings do not want to, for they fear the jinni will kill them. Despite this, the woman tells the kings that if they do not do as she says, she will awaken the jinni to kill them. So the two kings unwillingly have sex with the woman (1001 Arabian Nights 9). Once the act was completed, the jinni’s maiden produced a “knotted string, whereon were strung five hundred and seventy seal rings” (1001 Arabian Nights 10). The rings were all from men the jinni’s maiden had made love to, unbeknownst to the jinni. Both Kings realize that the jinni’s betrayal is much worse than their own, considering the jinni is far more powerful. The king brothers come to a conclusion that all women are evil, and King Shahryar has his wife, and twenty concubines killed (1001 Arabian Nights 11). Looking at all the events that just unfolded, the double standards for men and women become clear yet again. Both kings could marry and keep as many concubines as they pleased. Yet when either of their wives cheated on them with ONE man, the woman was killed (along with twenty concubines). The kings would not be killed for sleeping with a woman other than their wife, so why should their wife be killed? In the jinni’s case, he abducted the woman the day she was supposed to be married, and he raped her, and continued to rape her whenever he felt like it. This caused the woman to cheat on the jinni with five hundred and seventy two men! Though the woman was not killed by the jinni (for she was never caught), she was seen as a whore by the kings. While they do not directly call her a whore, she is the deciding factor that causes them to deem all women evil. They view her as the cheater for going out to sleep with men behind the jinni, even though the jinni abducted and raped her. These sexisms and double standards are evident throughout the events listed above in The Arabian Nights. After deeming all women evil, the kings go separate ways.
King Shahryar decides to lie with a new woman every night, only to take her virginity and kill her the next morning (1001 Arabian Nights 11). For three years, King Shahryar stays on track, killing one thousand and ninety five women. After those three years, the king’s wazir was having trouble finding new women for the king to lie with, for they were all running in the opposite direction (1001 Arabian Nights 12). That is when the Wazir’s own daughter, Scheherazade, made a courageous move. Scheherazade had read one thousand histories, stories, fables, fairy tales etc. whatever one chooses to call them, Scheherazade was very well versed in story-telling. Through these tales, Scheherazade had the courage to offer herself up to lie with the king, well knowing that she would be dead the next morning (1001 Arabian Nights 12-3). Scheherazade had a plan to save herself, however, and it involved her younger sister, Dunyazad. Scheherazade was brought to the king by her father, the wazir (who only agreed to offer up his daughter because Scheherazad blackmailed him). Scheherazade’s courage from the fairytales empowers her, and it causes her to become incharge/a woman of action, which is not common in Islamic culture. Scheherazade defies the double standards/sexisms in 1001 Arabian Nights, and is refreshing to the book’s constant sexisms/standards. Scheherazade made love to the king, but started crying during their love-making.
King Shahryar asked Scheherazade what was wrong, when she admitted she missed her younger sister, Dunyazad, and could not fall asleep without her. The king called for Dunyazad to sleep in his chambers with them. The plan was for Dunyazad to beg her older sister to tell a story, which she did. The story was so exciting that Scheherazade had the king enthralled. At the end of the story, Scheherazade would say that the previous story was not as interesting as the next story she could tell, and that would convince King Shahryar to spare her life another night (1001 Arabian Nights 20). Every night, Scheherazade would tell a more interesting story, and say, “yet this tale is not more wondrous than…” (1001 Arabian Nights 33). The king, Scheherazade, and Dunyazad would fall asleep with one tale, and the king would let Scheherazade live another day so he could hear the next. The power behind these fairy tales is what spared Scheherazade’s life (and the thousands of other women that would be in Scheherazade’s place, had it not been for her storytelling). While the tales empowered and saved Scheherazade, they also gave Scheherazade a superiority over the king. Scheherazade, made smarter through fairy tales, was more educated/superior to the king, which again, is refreshing, and breaks the sexism throughout the book. For one thousand and one nights, Scheherazade had told King Shahryar a new story. Throughout her storytelling, she had given birth to three sons with the king. When Scheherazade ran out of stories to tell the king, she begged him to spare her life, for she was the only one that could take care of her sons, for no one would love them as she does. The king wept, and said that of course he would spare her life, for during those one thousand and one nights, Scheherazade and King Shahryar had fallen in love (1001 Arabian Nights 727-8). King Shahryar fell in love with Shahryar through the fairy tales, again, showing the power behind them. The king marries Scheherazade, and calls his brother to his court. King Shah Zaman had been living as his brother had, killing a new woman everyday. Upon seeing that his older brother found a woman that was not evil, King Zaman decides to marry Scheherazade’s younger sister, Dunyazad (1001 Arabian Nights 729). Both of the king’s marriages end the slaughter of many women, and can all be attributed to the wondrous tales Scheherazade told. If it had not been for the fairy tales, Scheherazade would not have been spared and double standards/sexisms would not have been put to an end in the book! In conclusion, the tale of The Arabian Nights was plagued with sexism and double standards, but also showed the power behind fairy tales. Not only can fairy tales help little children fall asleep, but fairy tales can save countless lives.
In fact, the main character is even aware of her change of character when it comes to being a writer. When recalling how her writer side would have attempted to understand the contradictory opinion of her editor Jonathan, Sharon states that “sometimes [she] think[s] the novelist is [her] better self, interested, understanding, wanting to know more” (277). (add explanation) Also, a comparison between Sharon and Scheherazade as storytellers can be made, demonstrating the importance of storytelling for both women. In the final part of Serial Monogamy, Hope expresses to the two daughters Sharon’s heritage: “if people ask where you came from, tell them your father was a prince of Persia and your mother a storyteller from Samarkand. And no one could ever really say which one seduced the other” (341). The fact that Hope was able to see Sharon as her best self shows how the storytelling characterized the writer so much that she became one with the Scheherazade from Arabian nights. Just like the famous storyteller, Sharon was able to grow with storytelling and made it part of her heritage. Through the telling of her own story, Sharon is able to accept her situation enough so that she can share her texts with her daughters without any bad intentions. At the very beginning of the book, Sharon emotionally expresses her final feelings toward Al and Hope for her daughters to read: “Please don’t think I wrote
Literature is the key to our world or language. Many writers have emerged from this subject such as Homer who wrote The Odyssey and Euripidies who wrote about the evil Medea. Also mentioned in this paper are the Thousand and One Arabian Nights which is a collection of folktales and stories that are compiled into one. Each of these works of literature has a woman character that has many similarities in solving their problems. In The Odyssey the woman character that will be in comparison is Penelope which is Odysseus’s wife. In the story of Medea, Medea is of course the character we will be discussing and Shaharazad is the woman character from the Thousand and One Arabian Nights that will also be in comparison. Each of these women find themselves in a particularly “sticky situation.” However, Penelope, Medea, and Shahrazad are three strong women whose perseverance and cleverness help them to attain their goals.
In the Middle East it was male-dominant, male’s had all the control in the family. Women’s rule in life was to give birth too many children to continue the family blood line and take care of them, while the men go to work and come home find something for them prepared to eat. Men were the head of the house, whatever they said, had to be obeyed. Women were limited in their rights, even in marriage they weren’t asked for their opinion, “Would you like to marry this guy?” But rather they were forced by their family members to participate in arranged marriages. In this story we see that the slave woman had no rights, this woman obeyed them without saying a word. In addition, to this she was a slave, and slaves had no rights when it came to their master’s commands. She didn’t have a choice but rather obeyed what the master said even if she didn’t agree. Women were mistreated sometimes by men. "Bring the mule’s nose-bag along with you," he added to the groom; "she has not finished her feed, I think; when we get to the palace, put the bag on her again—she can eat the rest of her fodder while I am with the caliph. “Hear and obey," said the groom "(Portland, Maine: Wheelwright, 1955, p 310-313). One can see in this quote that they placed a bag over the girl and limited to when should she eat. The woman was treated as if she was a toy, played with for a while and then placed to the side when they were
One of the main psychological consequences of having the system of many wives and concubines is that not only the husband, but also wives have complete power over each other as in a hierarchical system. As in the film, the secon...
Since women technically had no power without the help of a man, she had to be sly and crafty to get what she wanted. The perfect example of this is the teller of all these stories. Shahrazad the Vizier’s eldest daughter, willingly chooses to become the King’s next bride to be. “‘Give me in marriage to this King: either I shall die and be a ransom for the daughters of Moslems, or live and be the cause of their deliverance.’”. (pg19) Shahrazad tricked the King into keeping her alive by telling him stories and stopping in the middle of it to survive another night. Her plan works and not only is she spared but thanks to her, the king realizes that women are eloquent, and that they can be trusted. She also saved the lives of other girls since the king no longer needs a new woman every night. In The Tale of Al- Haddar, the barber’s second brother is tricked into shaving his beard and dye his eyebrows by a beautiful woman. This demonstrates that one should not to conclusions, even if it is a pretty
However, women are usually considered the ones who needs saving or are weak. Yet, in these tales Antigone and Shahrazad have bravery that many men in the stories lack when being faced against the ruler of their domain. No one dares to speak back to the king or ruler in fear of the harsh retribution or punishment that would be sure to strike them. If men could not even stand up against a ruler, then what option would be left for women, who were to be subservient and docile to everyone of higher authority—which included every man they came in contact with. Shahrazad and Antigone were supposed to be in the background, being dutiful to their superiors. However, with bravery, they managed to stand up for a cause that they believed needed to be changed. The Thousand and One Nights is an Arabic literary work and in general it has been found in Arabian societies “that women were virtually the property first of their fathers or older brothers and then of their husbands … were not able to manage or control any of they own property and … denied their inheritance” (Hambly 3). Yet, even though Shahrazad lived in a society where she was labeled as property, she used her bravery to do the impossible and stand up against the most powerful man in her city—King Shahrayar. Even he father who was a royal vizier and held a high place in the kingdom dared not to interfere with the tyrannous acts of Shahrayar and told his daughter Shahrazad, “If I give you to him, he will sleep with you for one night and will ask me to put you to death the next morning, and I shall have to do it, since I cannot disobey him” (“Thousand and One Nights” 414). Even Shahrazad’s own father refused to save her because he lived in fear of the punishments he may receive from Shahrayar. But, even though she was warned and had the choice to not be given to the king,
In conclusion, the development of the folktales leads to the obtaining of ideas about gender. In many ways our society supports the idea that women seem underestimated as well as physically and mentally weak in comparison with the men who is portrayed as intelligent and superior. This can be shown in many ways in the different versions of this folktale through the concepts of symbolic characters, plot and narrative perspective.
In the novel She and in the stories of The Arabian Nights, both Haggard and Haddawy explore the expanding gender roles of women within the nineteenth century. At a time that focused on the New Woman Question, traditional gender roles were shifted to produce greater rights and responsibilities for women. Both Ayesha, from Haggard’s novel She, and Shahrazad, from Haddawy’s translation of The Arabian Nights, transgress the traditional roles of women as they are being portrayed as strong and educated females, unwilling to yield to men’s commands. While She (Ayesha) takes her power to the extreme (i.e. embodying the femme fatale), Shahrazad offers a counterpart to She (i.e. she is strong yet selfless and concerned with the welfare of others). Thus, from the two characters emerge the idea of a woman who does not abide by the constraints of nineteenth century gender roles and, instead, symbolizes the New Woman.
Thinking back to our childhood, we all remember hearing many kinds of fairy tales. Some of them inspired us others confused us, and most of them taught us valuable lessons. Through out centuries tales and stories have been used as a valuable tool to pass on our culture to new generations. There is a strong belief that these fairy tales mirror and influence society. All cultures interpret tales in their own unique way. They add and subtract various aspects of the tale to fit the needs of their particular society. The same tale in the United States is different from the tale told in Asia. A good example of tale evolution can be seen in one of the most famous tales ever told which is “Cinderella”. As a professor of women’s history Karol Kelley points out in her essay Pretty Woman: A Modern Cinderella “There are some 700 versions of Cinderella”.This fairy tale as many others has been changing for many years, and in recent years Cinderella has come under some criticism for its depiction of women’s roles in society.
Stories like Sindbad, Aladdin and the Magic Lamp and other popular stories are very common today in the western culture. Animated movies were also made for the entertainment of kids on these popular stories. One might wonder that where these stories originated and how it came down and made place in the western culture. Although these stories are very popular in both the western culture and the eastern culture but the original literary work is not so popular in common people. Theses stories are some of the stories from the Arabic work "The Thousand and One Nights." The work of "The Thousand and One Nights" represents basically a female that is a strong and clever idol and continuously imaginative and creative. It is an anonymous work which is widely known in the Arab world. It is an Arabic collection of a thousand tales, which is derived from the Persian version, telling of a King who was in the habit of killing his wives after the first night, and who was led to abandon this practise by the cleverness of the Wezir's daughter, who nightly told him a tale which she left unfinished at dawn, so that his curiosity led him to spare her till the tale should be completed. Many people have written about these stories, that where they originated, what time period was it originated, how they have been changed, and also literary criticism of the work.
The fairy tales that we have become so familiar with are embedded with love, imagination and enchantment. In truth, these are just common archetypes; originally fairy tales had a much darker backdrop. They were once symbols of sexualisation and brutality as not everything ended happily ever after. Deriving from promiscuous and overlooked on goings from the 19th century (such as molestation), these ideas were later suppressed when they became children’s tales. John Updike described traditional fairy tales as ‘The pornography of their day’, hence they contained elements of wish-fulfilment and gratification such as rape, pleasure and attainment. This is true to a certain extent but they also consisted of violence, mutiny and injustice. An exploration
In the novel This Earth Of Mankind by Pramoedya Ananta Toer, discrimination against social structure, race, and gender is apparent. The setting is in the Indies, or now called Indonesia. At that time, there are terms for different races in the book, which are “Native” indicating someone who is pure Indonesian, “Indo” a half European and half Indonesian, and “Pure Blood” or “European” when someone is pure European. An Indo and a Pure Blood receives more respect in society than a Native. Furthermore, European or Pure Blood is at the top of this social hierarchy, people who are European or Pure Blood receives the utmost respect in society. Differences in gender is prevalent in this novel, where most women in this book have power in their own homes, but in society is looked down upon. Female characters experiencing these are Annelies, the main character’s love interest, Nyai Ontosoroh, Annelies’ mother who is a concubine, and Magda Peters, the main character’s European teacher. Women in this novel are portrayed differently according to what race, social structure, and gender they are born in, which can be seen through Nyai Ontosoroh, Annelies, and Magda Peters.
For centuries, fairytales have been used for instruction; to teach children what is expected of them as they age and what terrors behold them if they do not comply with the guidelines laid out for them by their culture/society. Many of the tales were purposely frightful in order to scare children away from strangers, dark corners, and traveling off the beaten path into the dark thicket. Charles Perrault first began writing fairy tales in the late 17th century to educate his children. The morals of those tales often center on what is expected of young women; that they should remain ‘pure’ and ‘docile’. He wrote the tales in a time period when fairytales or ‘jack’ tales were looked at as instructional lessons. They were also widely told around the fire, as entertainment, for adults. Angela Carter adapted Perrault’s classic tales in the 1970’s; changing the victim...
Many fairy tales are filled with things such as knights and princesses. They are written to make children feel safe and happy. Little known to many people fairy tales take on a deeper and darker meaning. Many fairy tales are just watered-down versions of tragic things that have happened in history. Many fairy tales have scary origins. Some may talk about rape, cannibalism, incest, and torture. Some may think that children cannot handle the truth of these events. Therefore they write fairy tales to numb the pain that may have had to deal
Fairy tales have been a part of our lives for as long we can remember and they have long lasting repercussions. These stories go as far back as the early 1600's when the stories of sleeping beauty began to surface ("Sleeping Beauty") As always the dominate theme in these tall tales is love. Nothing could make a story more interesting than a love affair between a knight and a fair maiden. Through the centuries, the art of telling stories has captivated listeners and readers as they developed and grew. The more you heard the more intrigued you became and by the end the story tell would have you sitting on the edge of your seat ready to jump up and scream at the exciting finale to come. Whether these legends ever actually happened or not doesn't even matter if it entertains you. Telling stories is a purely recreational act but it might have heavier consequences on our relationships in life that we never expected.