Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Definition of Self-Authorship Baxter Magolda’s defines her theory of self-authorship as “the capacity to internally define a coherent belief system and identity that coordinates engagement in mutual relations with the larger world (2004, p.xxii). However, my ideal definition of self-authorship is a lifelong process in which you discover your individuality in order to create an understanding of yourself and the relationship you have with others. It is the process in which we evaluate how to define ourselves through our values, beliefs, and views of the world. It is the breakthrough point in our lives where we utilize the information we have absorbed from our childhood to creating our own understanding to reevaluate our perspective of reality. …show more content…
The first phase is to follow external formulas. Within this phase, you conform to authorities and rules. You will develop an understanding of what others expect of you and develop knowledge on the different perspectives others have. The second phase to achieve self-authorship is crossroads. At this phase, people may begin to take stands that differ from what they have absorbed throughout their life. They become mindful of constructing their own perspective rather than following through others. The third phase is becoming the author of your own life. At this time, you begin to decide your beliefs and to live by them. You set out your priorities that guide your decisions and the relationships in your life. The final phase is to develop an internal foundation. At this point you have reached a point of self-authorship, you have developed concrete grounds to your beliefs and values and follow them. As a first-year college student, I feel as if I am at the first phase of self-authorship. I am expected to go to college, get involved with school, get good grades, and to withhold great maturity in everything I do. I seek the acceptance from those around me and do nothing more than what is …show more content…
The epistemological concept questions “how do I know?” The epistemological dimension is how we view the assumptions of knowledge to decide what to believe (Marcia, 2008, p2). The way in which information is delivered affects how it perceived by those who receive the information. Intrapersonal dimension is how we chose and adopt the values and beliefs that we decide to live by (Marcia, 2008, p8). For example, as a student in the first phase of self-authorship, I seek my values and beliefs according to seeking acceptance from those around me, while others who may be further down the process chose their values and beliefs according to who they are. Interpersonal dimensions is the connection between yourself and with others (Marcia, 2008, p9). It is the understanding of others views and developing a mature and respectful way to interact with everyone. “Complex epistemological, intrapersonal, and interpersonal development is necessary for adults to build complex belief systems, to form a coherent sense of identity, and to develop authentic, mature relations with diverse others (Baxter Magolda, 2001).” Within this course, I believe that we have learned a bit of all of three dimensions. Reading the
Myers, D. G., (2009). Self-Concept: Who Am I?. In M. Ryan(Ed.), Exploring social psychology (pp. 23-33). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
What is the self? According to Charles Horton Cooley, explain the ‘looking glass self’ (discuss the three phases). George Herbert Mad also discusses the stages of the self: identify differences between I and Me. What is meant by significant others? How are significant others related to the self? Identify Mead’s three-stage process of self-development.
Epistemology is he study of our right to the beliefs we have. In a broader sense, we start from what we call our cognitive stances, and ask whether we are justified to have these stances. When discussing cognitive stances, we must include both our beliefs as well as what we take to be our knowing. At an even deeper level we examine our attitudes towards the various strategies and methods we use to get new beliefs and filter out old ones. Epistemology is concerned then with whether we have acted responsibly or irresponsibly in forming the beliefs we have. Based on this process, we ultimately want to find true knowledge or justified belief. Traditionally, there are four sources of knowledge; sensation, memory, introspection, and reason.
Epistemology is the nature of knowledge. Knowledge is important when considering what is reality and what is deception. The movie “The Matrix” displays a social deception in which Neo, the main character, is caught between what he thought was once reality and a whole new world that controls everything he thought was real. If I were Neo, I would not truly be able to know that I was in the matrix. However, it is rational to believe that I am in the matrix and will eventually enter back into my reality later. The proof that that I can know that I am in the matrix and that I will return to reality comes from the responses of foundationalism, idealism, and pallibalism.
Most people find that there is no one that knows you better than you know yourself. We know our hopes, wishes and dreams better than anyone else, even our own parents, and we know what we are willing to do to get them. I chose to write about myself for this very reason. I believe that I know myself well enough to be able to analyze myself and understand why I am the way that I am.
Epistemic knowledge is a knowledge of building knowledge itself, the crucial components of involved in the process of building knowledge and the capacity of justifying the knowledge produced by science such as a hypothesis, a theory or an observational claims(diSessa, 1993; Duschl, 2007). Epistemic knowledge plays a paramount role on how we know what we know. Such knowledge enables to understand the nature of science(diSessa, 1993). Understanding nature of science demands to identify scientific theory from hypothesis as well as scientific facts from observations (Hammer, 1994; Laudato, 2010).
“There is only one corner of the universe you can be certain of improving, and that’s your own self”. This quote by Aldous Huxley can be related to the learning style of Self-Authorship in many ways. Self Authorship can be described as a way that individuals grow and change, specifically in the context of a higher education (“Long Strides”). This can be connected to the quote by Huxley in the aspect that students receiving a higher education are doing it to improve themselves and are taking the initiative to do so in the hopes of creating a successful life. To better understand Self-Authorship, one can work to understand the theory, connect it to what is seen practiced around them, and have knowledge on the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
The characteristics of writers are success involves a lot of respect, personal growth , and other internal measure of value , religious , cultural values and other various external factors. All of these things are integrated in a writer who play a role, the most important thing is something spiritual ecology , especially writers emotional experience . Some people did not go through advanced , standardized training , but it has also become a good writer . However, In fact, we should understand that for writers , for their spiritual ecosystem Writers cause is very important. Writers this business with other line of business there are many differences, a scientist may be very pale spiritual ecosystem , and may even be very naive. From the beginning of creation point of view, any phenomenon of life , only to turn into a person's psychological phenomenon later , in order to ultimately translate into literary phenomenon . Spiritual and emotional feeling and perception of this phenomenon is the only way that only certain feeling accumulation.
Alexandra Kaye 5/3/14 LAQ 2 IB Psychology SL. Q: Discuss two errors in attribution. Within the social-cultural level of analysis, researchers study the social context in which behavior occurs. Humans have the natural need to understand why things happen. In order to explain why things happen, humans use attribution.
It’s really fascinating to me how I tend to evaluate where I started and where I am now. As a writer, I would say that I know my strengths and weaknesses clearly. Every writer wants to be impeccable, distinguished, extraordinary, but I had to come to realization that a writer can never reach perfection. Professor O’Neill pointed out that as a writer you will never stop improving, because you never stop learning. As a writer we all tend to have our flaws, but the day our writings don’t have faults, is the day where writing gets boring.
At the end of sophomore year I was stuck between honors English and AP. I knew that I would be able to keep an A all year in honors but I wanted a little bit more of a challenge, so I chose AP. I heard from many people while signing up for classes that junior year was going to knock us on our butts. I never for a second thought that junior year and the classes would be any different than the rest. At the end of yet another year, I have realize that junior year was a constant struggle of turning assignments in on time and creating time for other things, but it was a year that has helped mature me for college.
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the theory of knowledge. Epistemology studies the nature of knowledge, justification, and the rationality of belief. Much of the debate in epistemology centers on four areas: the philosophical analysis of the nature of knowledge and how it relates to such concepts as truth, belief, and justification, various problems of skepticism, the sources and scope of knowledge and justified belief, and the criteria for knowledge and justification. Epistemology addresses such questions as "What makes justified beliefs justified?", "What does it mean to say that we know something?" and fundamentally "How do we know that we know?"
I am excited my first principal essay is over, but I’m reluctant to write another. I enjoyed the subject we were assigned to write about, and felt I analyzed it well. Although, as I got deeper into my writing I realized it wasn’t as simple as I wished it would of been. My ideas and topics clumped together,and weren’t as clear as they should of been. I needed to write more toward my claim, than ideas I thought were interesting to me.
John Hartley theorizes three sub-categories for authorship: God is an Author, No-One is an Author, and Everyone is an Author; each of these concepts furthered by anecdotal emphasis and overall illustrating the vastness of the term author. God is an Author
What does it mean to know something? Are there conditions which must be met in order to claim that you know something? Finally, are there limits to what can be known about a particular subject or thing? These, generally speaking, are the questions that epistemology is concerned with. Broadly defined epistemology, is the study of what it means “to know.” Epistemologists reflect on both the nature of knowledge and the limitations of the human ability to comprehend things in the world.