Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on joseph rudyard kipling
Rudyard kipling + biography
Rudyard kipling + biography
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The story “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi”, written by Rudyard Kipling, tells the tale about Rikki Tikki’s war-like situation with the beastly cobras. A bungalow in India is protected by one ferocious mongoose. Only Rikki-Tikki’s protectiveness, tenacity and intelligence will allow him to overcome the garden’s most feared creatures. First, Rikki shows us how protective he was when he challenged Nagaina to her final battle. “Son of a big man who killed Nag,” she hissed, “I am not ready yet. Keep very still! If you move, I strike. If you don’t move, I still strike. Oh, you foolish people who killed my Nag…” Then Rikki-Tikki came up and cried, “Turn around Nagaina, turn around and fight!”(p.g 24) Nagaina had been threatening to kill the boy with her venomous fangs. Since the family was overtaken by fear for their young son, they were powerless at that moment. Rikki finally arrived, feeling angered and protective of the people who cared for him, and challenged Nagaina to a battle she would not slither out of alive. …show more content…
Next, Rikki-Tikki displays his tenacity by never giving up.
“Rikki-Tikki knew that he must catch her (Nagaina) or all of the trouble would begin again.” (p.g 26) After stealing the last egg from Nagaina, he tried to negotiate a deal with her. Rikki Tikki wanted Nagaina to leave the garden and never return, but the cycle would just repeat itself. If Rikki let Nagaina go, the egg would hatch and a new cobra would emerge and continue to terrorize the garden’s animals. Nagaina tried to escape Rikki-Tikki, but she knew he would never stop until she was gone. Rikki could have let her go, but his tenacity did not allow him to be
defeated. Lastly, Rikki-Tikki Tavi had such intelligence, that he managed to outwit Nagaina. “Rikki-Tikki put his paws on either side of the egg and his eyes were blood-red. What price for a snake’s eggs? For a young cobra? For the last-the very last of the brood?” Rikki-Tikki knew Nagaina would harm the family in revenge for her husband’s(Nag) death. Therefore, he had to act fast and defend his family with every single snake’s weakness: her eggs. Rikki-Tikki had to swiftly conjure a solution. Nagaina, fearful for her last egg, surrendered, snatched the egg from Rikki and fled. Rikki-Tikki- Tavi only had his protectiveness, tenacity and intelligence to win the battle against two cobras who ruled with terror. Rikki protected the family from Nagaina’s wrath. His tenacity proved worthy. He never gave up, even when the seemingly inevitable occurred. Rikki’s intelligence was enough to defeat the ruthless Nagaina. Rikki-Tikki- Tavi was a hero to so many people. Now the little bungalow in India could be a safe and happy place.
Our journey starts in the year 1853 with four Scandinavian indentured servants who are very much slaves at the cold and gloomy headquarters of the Russian-American fur-trading company in Sitka, Alaska. The story follows these characters on their tortuous journey to attempt to make it to the cost of Astoria, Oregon. Our list of characters consists of Melander, who is very much the brains of the operation as he plans the daring escape from the Russians. Next to join the team was Karlson, who was chosen by Melander because he is a skilled canoeman and knows how to survive in the unforgiving landscape of the Pacific Northwest. Third was Braaf, he was chosen because of his ability to steal and hide things, which made him a very valuable asset to the teams escape. Last to join our team is Wennberg who we know is a skilled blacksmith who happens to hear about their plan and forces himself into the equation.
Rikki tikki tavi I cannot get that song of the brave Rikki Tikki Tavi the mongoose out of my head. A mongoose is a furry creature from India who kills cobras or other types of snakes and if its eyes get red, the mongoose is mad. Also the mongoose is a curious creature It is strange how similar the book is in the movie. Some of these similarities are the conflicts, the resolution and the rising action.
Rikki-tikki is proud of himself because he helps the animals and the humans by killing the snakes or dangerous animals. The humans first find him after the flood washes him out of his berrow. Teddy wants to give him a funeral but his mom seas that maybe he isn't dead. He helps a bird and he helps the humans. On Page 16 “Teddy shouted to the house: “Oh look here! Our mongoose is killing a snake.“ On Page 18 and 19 Rikki-tikki killed Nag, “The big man picked up Rikki-tikki and he had said it's the mongoose again, Alice: the little chap has saved our lives now.” Teddy's father, the big man beats the snakes after Rikki bites the snakes to make sure the snakes are dead. Rikki kills the eggs in the melon bead so that there aren't little Cobras around
“The Rattler” explores the conflicts between man and nature that seem inescapable. The narrator is taking a walk through the desert when he comes across a rattlesnake. After some thought, he decides to kill it and proceeds to violently slaughter it with a hoe. The snake fights back when provoked, but fails. The author makes the reader feel sympathy towards the snake and empathy towards the man through the personality of the snake, the point of view of the man, and the language and details regarding the setting.
Over centuries, humankind has searched for the line where positive and negative influence over nature intersect. “The Rattler”, a tale of a man and a rattlesnake who cross paths in the desert, deals with this very question. The individual is at first cautious of the snake, thinking it best to leave the dangerous creature alone. But at the thought of the nearby neighbors, he takes it upon himself to kill it, and then continues on into the night. The author uses comparison, diction and personification in “The Rattler” to promote sympathy for both characters: the snake and the man.
At the beginnings of the 1900s, some leading magazines in the U.S have already started to exhibit choking reports about unjust monopolistic practices, rampant political corruption, and many other offenses; which helped their sales to soar. In this context, in 1904, The Appeal to Reason, a leading socialist weekly, offered Sinclair $500 to prepare an exposé on the meatpacking industry (Cherny). To accomplish his mission, Sinclair headed to Chicago, the center of the meatpacking industry, and started an investigation as he declared“ I spent seven weeks in Packingtown studying conditions there, and I verified every smallest detail, so that as a picture of social conditions the book is as exact as a government report” (Sinclair, The Industrial Republic 115-16). To get a direct knowledge of the work, he sneaked into the packing plants as a pretended worker. He toured the streets of Packingtown, the area near the stockyards where the workers live. He approached people, from different walks of life, who could provide useful information about conditions in Packingtown. At the end of seven weeks, he returned home to New Jersey, shut himself up in a small cabin, wrote for nine months, and produced The Jungle (Cherny).
Spunk is a short story written by Zora Neale Hurston. It tells of a supernatural story of African-American folk life. It is a story about a difference between two men over a woman. The woman in question was married to Joe Kanty but was adulterating with the town bully known as Spunk. Spink was feared by the people including Joe but he got the courage of confronting him despite his bully character. Spunk killed him in the confrontation but later on in the story, Joe comes back to haunt Spunk which resulted to his death. The story is about a conflict between Joe Kanty and Spunk Banks over Lena who was Joe’s wife. The story progresses into a revenge whereby Spunk is killed by an evil spirit which he belies to be Joe. However, superstition plays a very important role in Hurston’s tale as Spunk claim that he is haunted by Joe Kanty’s ghost.
In the resolution, Rikki- Tikki kills Nag in the bathroom during the night, and prepares himself for the now enraged Nagaina. With the thought in his mind that Nagaina would be guarding her eggs behind the melon bed, Darzee’s wife creates a diversion, and Rikki smashes all but one egg. “Rikki had found the cobra’s nest and had crushed, all but one, of the deadly eggs” (Ross 19:04). Kipling states that, “Teddy and his mother and father were there at early breakfast, but Rikki-tikki saw that they were not eating anything. They sat stone still, and their faces were white. Nagaina was coiled up on the matting by Teddy's chair, within easy striking distance of Teddy's bare leg, and she was swaying to and fro, singing a song of triumph.” and continues with, ‘"Son of the big man that killed Nag," she hissed, "stay still. I am not ready yet. Wait a little. Keep very still, all you three! If you move, I strike, and if you do not move, I strike. Oh, foolish people, who killed my Nag!"’ (Kipling 154). Although, be that as it may, the song of triumph that the movie says is “Son of the man that killed Nag, if you move, I strike, and if you do not move, I strike! Oh, foolish people!” (Ross 19:30). So, to wrap up, both of the mediums claim that Rikki- Tikki- Tavi smashed all of the eggs except one, and that Nagaina is at the veranda, wound up and ready to kill. The song of triumph that the wicked snake sings however, is not a
Zora Neale Hurston’s “Sweat” is a distressing tale of human struggle as it relates to women. The story commences with a hardworking black washwoman named Delia contently and peacefully folds laundry in her quiet home. Her placidity doesn’t last long when her abusive husband, Sykes, emerges just in time to put her back in her ill-treated place. Delia has been taken by this abuse for some fifteen years. She has lived with relentless beatings, adultery, even six-foot long venomous snakes put in places she requires to get to. Her husband’s vindictive acts of torment and the way he has selfishly utilized her can only be defined as malignant. In the end of this leaves the hardworking woman no choice but to make the most arduous decision of her life. That is, to either stand up for herself and let her husband expire or to continue to serve as a victim. "Sweat,” reflects the plight of women during the 1920s through 30s, as the African American culture was undergoing a shift in domestic dynamics. In times of slavery, women generally led African American families and assumed the role as the adherent of the family, taking up domestic responsibilities. On the other hand, the males, slaves at the time, were emasculated by their obligations and treatment by white masters. Emancipation and Reconstruction brought change to these dynamics as African American men commenced working at paying jobs and women were abandoned at home. African American women were assimilated only on the most superficial of calibers into a subcategory of human existence defined by gender-predicated discrimination. (Chambliss) In accordance to this story, Delia was the bread victor fortifying herself and Sykes. Zora Neale Hurston’s 1926 “Sweat” demonstrates the vigor as wel...
‘Hills Like White Elephants’ is a short story authored by Ernest Hemingway about an American and a girl named Jig. In the story, the two are sitting in a train station waiting for the train to Madrid. While they wait, they have an intense ongoing debate on whether or not to abort Jig. At the end of the story, the train is about to arrive and the man carries luggage on the tracks as they prepare to leave. The end of the story does not clearly define the outcome of its decision. She said I feel good at the end of the story - happiness is a central theme of the story, but we wonder if she went through with the operation. The paper discusses the manner in which symbolism has been employed in the story to communicate about an abortion, the couple is considering to go through.
“The Jungle,” written by Upton Sinclair in 1906, describes how the life and challenges of immigrants in the United States affected their emotional and physical state, as well as relationships with others. The working class was contrasted to wealthy and powerful individuals who controlled numerous industries and activities in the community. The world was always divided into these two categories of people, those controlling the world and holding the majority of the power, and those being subjected to them. Sinclair succeeded to show this social gap by using the example of the meatpacking industry. He explained the terrible and unsafe working conditions workers in the US were subjected to and the increasing rate of corruption, which created the feeling of hopelessness among the working class.
First, Nagaina shows great stealth when she tries to kill Rikki at the beginning of the short story, “...just under him whizzed by the head of Nagaina, Nag’s wicked wife” (19). Darzee, the foolish bird, warned Rikki Tikki just in time to jump. If he hadn’t, Nagaina probably would’ve had success with her stealthy plan. Rikki could’ve bitten her back but, “He came down almost across her back, and if he had been an old mongoose, he would have known that then was the time to break her back with one bite; but he was afraid of the terrible lashing return stroke of the cobra...” (19). After that, Nagaina and Nag slither off steaming knowing that they could have gotten rid of Rikki Tikki if it weren’t for the crazed bird.
Rikki is good because he is very protective, courageous, and loyal. The narrative shows he is protective because Rikki saved the family’s lives. Proof of this is when the dad says, ”It’s the mongoose again, Alice; the little chap has saved our lives now.” This shows me Rikki is protective. In the text Rikki says,”The boy is safe and it was I-I-I that caught Nag by the hood last night in the bathroom.” Rikki says this to Nagaina so that she knows that he was the one to kill Nag. In this way, he protects the entire family because he brings Nagaina’s egg into the room where she was holding the family hostage and turns her attention toward himself. The story
This part of the story moves towards the resolution and shows that the protagonist, Rikki-tikki, really has to be brave, courageous, and face his fears by saying, “and very few mongoose, however wise and old they may be, care to follow a cobra into its hole. It was dark in the hole; and Rikki-tikki never knew when it might open out and give Nagaina room to turn and strike at him.” Rikki-tikki is as brave as a lion. On the other hand, Nagaina is not very brave or courageous because she sends other people to do her work for her. She says to Nag, “Go in quietly, and remember that the big man who killed Karait is the first one to bite. Then come out and tell me, and we will hunt for Rikki-tikki together.” She does not attempt to face any of her fears like Rikki-tikki. She makes other people do things that she is too terrified to do, which is part of the reason why she never
It gave him confidence in himself(page 9). This is an example because Rikki-Tikki an animal, thinks he can be confidence in himself just like a human. This personification proves the theme by him being confidence in himself even if he’s small. Another example is the author writes Rikki-tikki had a right to be proud of himself, but he did not grow too proud, and he kept that garden as a mongoose should keep it, with tooth and jump and spring and bite, till never a cobra dared show its head inside the walls(page 21). This is an example because Rikki-Tikki is relating to a human being proud of himself. This personification proves the theme by the author saying Rikki-Tikki was proud of himself because he overcame his fears. To sum up author Rudyard Kipling uses personification to help prove that anyone can be confidence and overcome their fears no matter what size, just believe in