Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths of psychodynamic perspective
My understanding of the psychodynamic approach
Personality development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths of psychodynamic perspective
An individual’s personality is what makes them unique from others. In psychology, there is no one consistent meaning for the term personality. Instead, there are multiple different approaches that psychologists have developed in order to understand personality more accurately (Whitbourne & Whitbourne, 2011, p. 166). The cognitive perspective and the psychodynamic perspective are two approaches that attempt to connect personality and development. In Terkel (2013), two oral histories that can be linked to the personality approaches can be found in chapter thirteen pages 265-273 and chapter eight pages 161-167. Through the oral histories of Quentin Young, M.D. and Uta Hegan, the cognitive perspective and the psychodynamic perspective, respectively, …show more content…
180). Quentin Young, M.D., describes himself as youthful and enthusiastic when he first began practicing. Not only did he delight in his role as a doctor, but he found himself excited to educate his patients with the knowledge that he had obtained throughout his many years of school (Terkel, 2013, p. 271). As a young doctor, Dr. Young’s view of himself was extremely hopeful and positive and reflected his desire to become an outstanding caregiver. This relates to the positive selves theory because his motivation to achieve a hoped-for self, i.e., a great doctor, shaped his development throughout his adult life. For example, when at a crossroads to choose whether to specialize in medicine or to stay in general medicine, Dr. Young chose to stay a general doctor, even though it was becoming extremely popular to specialize (Terkel, 2013, p. 268). This example illustrates one of the decisions Dr. Young was forced to make in order to reach his hoped-for self. At the time of publication, Dr. Young was 70 years old. He indicates that although he has had many rewarding experiences in life, not one of them compares to caring for patients (Terkel, 2013, p. 265). This statement confirms that Dr. Young achieved his hoped-for self, setting his expectations high and achieving …show more content…
The main idea behind this approach is to understand how the ego can adapt to exterior influences while maintaining interior desires (Whitbourne & Whitbourne, 2011, p. 168). Actress Uta Hegan grew up in the arts and has always had a passion for theatre (Terkel, 2013, p. 161). Uta’s ego has played a central role in directing her behavior. Through her work in theatre, she has maintained a positive self-esteem and sense of self-worth despite being told that acting for a living is not considered working (Terkel, 2013, p. 163). She was able to adapt to exterior influences by maintaining an enthusiastic attitude, while managing her interior desires of succeeding as an actress. In addition, Uta has continued to experience personality development throughout her adult life. One example she refers to is that over a five-year period, she changed her attitude about those younger than her. She originally thought of the younger generation as lazy and slob-like, however, teaching them in a classroom setting helped to change her mind (Terkel, 2013, p. 167). Being 75 years old at the time of publication, Uta is ideal example of an individual who has continued to develop throughout her adult life, while maintaining a solid sense of
This essay will explore one of the possible combinations of theories on personality and explain how it can be applied in practical therapy.
A Comparison of Psychodynamic and Social Learning in Regards to the Development of Personality "No Works Cited" “Psychologists define personality in many ways, but common to all of the ways are two basic concepts, uniqueness and characteristic patterns of behaviour. We will define personality as the complex set of unique psychological qualities that influence an individuals characteristic patterns of behaviour across different situations and over time.” (Psychology In Life, Phillip .G. Zimbardo, page 509)
Every single individual has a personality; it is the very quintessence of human existence. Personality drives our interactions with others, our desires – conscious and unconscious, our perceived needs, and to a certain extent, even our actions. Psychodynamic approaches to personality are focused on the belief that we have virtually no control over our own personality, that it is primarily controlled by unconscious powers. Social cognitive approaches to personality centers around the belief that we still have little to no control over our own personality, and that the cognitive influence, that is to say thoughts, feelings, expectations and values – along with the observation of others behavior is the primary influence on personality. These two approaches to personality are so radically different, and yet both have their own merits – they are two of many, and nobody is quite sure what the truth is.
Personality is patterns of thinking, behavior and emotional responses that make up individuality over time. Psychologist attempt to understand how personality develops and its impact on how we behave. Several theories attempt to explain personality, using different approaches. The social-cognitive and humanistic approaches are two of many theories that attempt to explain personality. This essay will identify the main concepts of social-cognitive and humanistic approach, identify perspective differences and discuss approach limitations.
Psychodynamic and behavioural approaches are the two major approaches to personality, however, they view personality from different perspectives. Psychodynamic approach makes the argument that personality is caused by forces in the unconscious that are not learned. The individual has little control over their behaviour as it is predetermined, and early childhood plays a crucial part in shaping a person’s personality. Behavioural approach, on the other hand, recognises personality as learned and focuses only on present behavioural matters. Because of
There are many people in this world; no two people are the same. When considering personality theories it is important to note that not all theories apply to all situations or all people. Different theories have different approaches. It is important to know the person before making assumptions about the proper theory to apply to the person or in any given situation. The purpose of this paper is to analysis how different personality theorists could interoperate different individual circumstances and behaviors based on case examples provided by the instructor.
Schultz, D.P. & Schultz, S.E. (2009). Theories of Personality, Ninth Edition. US: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
I believe our personalities make up who we are and how others perceive us at times. Personalities are our own unique qualities, that we possess as individuals. In writing this short paper, I have found that psychologists use assessments to define an individual’s personality to determine their qualities and what makes them different from other individuals. Through the Big Five Personality test, I found it difficult to define and understand an individual personality
A Comparison of the Main Approaches to Personality Psychology Psychology of personality is a difficult concept to define and quantify, therefore most personality theories, however different they may be in other respects, share the basic assumption, that personality is a particular pattern of behaviour and thinking, that prevails across time and situations and differentiates one person from another. Most theories attempting to explain personality represent part of the classic psychological Nature verse Nurture debate. In other words, is personality “inherited”, or developed through our interactions with the environment. In addition, we shall compare and contrast two of the main approaches to personality psychology by concentrating on Psychoanalytical Theory (Freud) and Social Learning Theory (Bandura). By looking at the Psychodynamic approach, developed by Freud, we can argue that it emphasizes the interplay of unconscious psychological processes in determining human thought, feelings, and behaviours.
area of the understanding the unconscious, an aspect of the mind to which, he claimed, we
Sollod, R., Wilson J., & Monte C. (2009.). Beneath the mask: An introduction to theories of personality (8th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Personality is the study of an individual’s unique and relatively stable patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving over time and across situations and it is what distinguishes one individual from another. In the past changes in personality were thought to have only occurred in the developmental stages of childhood and solidifies in adolescence. After the teenage years it was thought to be set like plaster or the change seen to be inconsequential or absent( Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, 2003). However, recent studies have suggested that changes in personality traits continue to occur throughout an individual’s lifespan due to multiple reasons.
The period of development from adolescence to adulthood offers an abundance of opportunities and confronts (Kroger, 2007). Many theorists argue that an individual’s personality has an increased
Personality involves a blend of characteristics that make one unique. In reviewing personality, we consider the influence of the interactions that one is engaged in, the nature or the environment of one's upbringing and genetics. The characteristic traits may change over time while some of them becoming a lasting part of a person’s personality. In this essay will analyze the theories that relate to the character and the various stages that children undergo during development. We will use the same theories and developmental stages in analysis my progress from childhood up to date.
Personality is the expression of a person’s traits according to ones feelings, mentality and behavior. It involves understanding individuals’ traits such as withdrawal and willpower and how various parts of an individual link together to form personality. Personality expresses itself from within an individual and is comparatively regular throughout in an individual’s life. Different people have different personalities dependent on factors such as environment and genetic composition. Our personality is dependent on the success or failure of our development in the eight stages of life. This is proposed by Erik Erikson. Success in the development stages lead to virtues while the failure leads to malignancies.