Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal cloning cons
Ethical and moral issues of cloning
Ethical and moral issues of cloning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Animal cloning cons
Imagine having a favorite hunting dog die with that dog having the best personality, then you want a clone of your dog so you go through with it and get your dog and you find out it is really aggressive and it bites you. Dog cloning is possible, however you can only get your dog cloned in South Korea. Cloning is a terrible idea.
Firstly, the expense of dog cloning is a shocking. According to Kristin Lewis, the basic price for dog cloning is 155,000 thousand dollars (23). Although IN RNL the lowest price they have ever cloned an animal is 30,000 thousand dollars. And Bio Arts has the base price of the basic 155,000 thousand dollars (Davis). Despite all that and if your clone dies, you will not get your money back for the clone you purchased.
Your dog’s personality may not be the same as you last dog. There was once a bull named Chance that was a gentle giant, When he died, his owner wanted a clone of him so he could have another bull like Chance. When he got the bull back
…show more content…
Kristan Lewis, says there was once a sheep that was a clone that had a huge muscle that surrounded its lungs as a result the sheep died of suffocation (22). Furthermore the lifespan of those clones could rapidly decrease from 16 years of age to 6 years of age. There was also a dog that was a clone that could not produce enough food for her puppies so they had to make the dog stop having puppies (Davis). Except on the other side people may want to bring back some extinct animals like the woolly mammoth, however, where would we keep the behemoth of an animal, besides even if there was a place to keep the animal would be ethical to keep the mammoth in a zoo.
So if you’re looking to clone a dog it is a good way to waste money. Also a good way to make a dog suffer with health problems. Furthermore, your dog may not have the same personality as your original. But if you go back to the hunting dog, that isn't a good way to honor that
Humans have driven many animals extinct, but should we bring them back is the question. Geneticists, biologists, conservationists and ethicists gathered to discuss the controversies. Some people say in doing this we are playing God, while others say we did by killing them. Other scientist say that it may be beneficial because it will add biodiversity, and medicinal properties back to the ecosystem. It is only possible to bring species back from around 10 thousand years ago. Recently scientists have vastly improved the cloning process. We can now coax adult animal cells into any type of cell, including eggs and sperm, then manipulating them into full-fledged embryos, which has led to the ideas and developments of reviving many other species including mammoths, frogs and
In the chapter we are also introduced to Second Chance, a cloned bull, which was intended to resemble his donor but ended up being nearly the exact opposite. Second Chance was very forceful and violent in comparison to his donor, who was more careful with his owner, Ralph Fisher. Fisher took advantage of the opportunity to have a replica of his admired bull but there was no real success because he instead got a bull he never anticipated to receive. (Anthes 68) Second Chance exemplifies how the outcomes are unknown and really unpredictable since the donor and the clone had two very distinguishable personality types. A clone is simply an organism that has been asexually reproduced to closely resemble its donor, which means that pet cloning is not exact when it comes to appearance or personality of the
What cost would there be to make a clone of a human being? One cost can be explored from a monetary standpoint. It is estimated by the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs that it would cost roughly 250 million dollars to produce a human clone (Lackey 1). This would prove to be a truly monumental milestone in human evolution yet, at what cost? Every year in the continent of Africa alone 33 million people perish for sheer lack of food (Lackey 1). These people die because they cannot receive the basic staples of consump...
Many people say that everyone in the world has a twin. Today, science and technology has the ability to make this myth reality through the process of cloning. I am strongly against cloning for many reasons. People should not utilize cloning because it would destroy individuality and uniqueness, cause overpopulation, animal cruelty, it is against morals and ethics, and it violates many religious beliefs.
Cloning is a genetic copy or clone of someone .Cloning can help in Health, Heart Attack, Brain damage, spinal cord, and Heart Disease. And I Think scientist should keep cloning to help people and Animal cloning is becoming a useful technique for producing farm animals and is likely to be used to produce clones from valuable adults. Other applications will also undoubtedly be discovered in the near future, such as for preserving endangered breeds and species. Although cloning promises great advantages for commerce and research alike, its outcome is not always certain due to high pregnancy loss and high morbidity and mortality during the neonatal period. Research into the mechanisms involved in the reprogramming of the nucleus is being conducted throughout the world in an attempt to better understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in correcting these problems. Although the cause of these anomalies remains mostly unknown, similar Phenotypes have been observed in calves derived through in vitro fertilization, suggesting that culture conditions are involved in these phenom...
Oftentimes, though, the clones die upon birth. In 2003, the first de-extinct animal was born- a type of ibex that went extinct in 2000 (BBC). The baby died minutes after birth due to an abnormality in the lungs, but the scientists weren’t concerned; after dissecting the baby to see what went wrong, they decided to start all over again.
The first cloned mammal was created in 1997 by by Scottish scientists, the clone was a sheep named Dolly, after this happened cloning was first seriously discussed if it should be allowed, I think it should and here is why. One type of cloning is Therapeutic cloning which is used to create stem cells rather than a living clone. According to the author “When introduced into a damaged heart, they become healthy heart cells,” (Farrell). Now with this said this type of cloning can help more than harm because it can create stem cells which can become any type of cell needed. For example if you had damaged lung cells the stem cells from this cloning could replace the damaged ones make you more healthy. But this is not the only type of cloning out
A disadvantage of animal cloning is that there is a high chance of mutations occurring as in animal cloning somatic cells play an important role and when these cells contain mutations, the animal that has been cloned may be weak or could have lethal effects throughout its body later on. Another disadvantage of animal cloning is that death can occur when the donor eggs mitochondria doesn’t exactly match with the body cells (somatic) mitochondria. Furthermore, another disadvantage of animal cloning is that it is extremely expensive. This is because a large number of eggs are required for a single living clone, and this may not be worthwhile pursuing as it much easier to reproduce animals normally. Another disadvantage of animal cloning is the high failure rates. Currently, somatic cell nuclear transfer technique only has an approximate success rate of 0.1 percent-2. What this means is that out of 1000 cloning attempts, between 1-20 cloned would be successfully produced. Nevertheless there are advantages in animal cloning. Firstly, animal cloning can be used to preserve endangered species. Currently, thousands of animal species across the world are in danger of becoming extinct. However, with animal cloning, this would provide a tiny bit of hope for these certain animals surviving as the population could be highly increased in a short space of time, therefore the extinction rate would decrease and the population will increase for that specific species. However, this could very well be an advantage, but reintroducing extinct animals back to earth could lead up to one huge problem. The genes for these extinct animals are blind to us and scientists, therefore if we do reintroduce extinct animals then we could also bring back ancient viruses or bacteria that roamed the earth thousands of years
There are many different breeds of dogs in this world, therefore I’m going to compare the similarities and contrast the differences between only three unique, resourceful, yet loyal dogs. These dogs are the Beagle, German Shepard, and Rough Collie. The similarities between the Beagle, German Shepard, and Rough Collie are that they’re very popular towards many dog owners. They remain loyal to dog owners, and because of these particular traits that the dogs show they
...n animal that is very similar to the deceased pet. There are always animals at the pet shelters that need a home. Instead of creating clones of pets that are bound to suffer, adopt a new pet at a pet shelter.
First of all, “Australia’s first cloned sheep appeared to be healthy and energetic the day she died, during the autopsy they could not find the cause (Castro, 2005).” There are many risks to cloning and you are seldom able to identify the cause of their death. “More than 90% of cloning attempts fail (Human Genome Program, 2006).” Most cloned animals died mysteriously even before they were born or when they were very young, so there is hardly any information on how clones age. Clones may be born with a normal looking body but may have internal functioning problems. “Cloned animals tend to have more compromised immune function and higher rates of infection, tumor growth, and other disorders (Human Genome Program, 2006).” There are many risks of cloning and a major factor is genetic differences.
Human cloning is ridiculous. There are several definitions of cloning. Cloning is a breed specimens as a clone. Cloning is also to create an identical copy of something, or is a replicate. There are several reasons that cloning should not exist.
Cloning your deceased pet either a cat or dog is now available to anybody who can properly preserve the DNA. Cloning animals have been around for many years according to the article, “Should You Clone Your Pet?”, but recently people have come accustomed to the idea of buying an identical twin of their closest pets. In a brief explanation of the process of cloning scientists simply extract the genetic material from the pet and make it into “cluster cells,” (Clone 28). Which is then placed into the womb of the female animal to take on a regular pregnancy. Something to consider would be the possibility of the clone not having the same personality because of how its determined by life experiences rather than genetic modifications. For the low cost of about $25,000 - $50,000 USD a distressed citizen can pay for the exact recreation of their beloved pet dog or cat that recently passed away. With the information provided at the website, “Viagen Pets,” anybody can visit and learn as much as they need to make a decision on cloning a pet. The process is explained in a socially readable way for people of all ages and have tabs for client stores as well as blogs and frequently asked questions. Some of the groups that do not support the programs of cloning would be those who worry about the huge populations of stray animals stuffed in humane organizations, animal pounds,
Finally, human cloning for reproductive purposes is too expensive. The cost to clone one human could be more than $100,000 (Herper). That is extremely high considering the cost of in vitro fertilization. In vitro fertilization costs between $3,500 and $25,000 depending on the procedure (Advanced Fertility Services). If someone could not become pregnant it is much more likely that they would chose to use fertilization and be guaranteed a healthy, normal child rather than spend the money to clone a child that could have defects. With fertilization costing only one fourth of cloning, why would someone choose to clone?
The main argument for cloning is that it helps people who've lost a pet get through that loss. The people for cloning are often acting out of grief or loss. When people lose their pets they become emotionally unstable. This puts an end to all logical processes. For these people, cloning is a way to soothe their agony. Cloning can end their pain and allow their relationship to continue with an old friend. Why be sad when you can have a new Scruffy? The main